This work reports experimental evidence of indefinite causal order in a quantum process characterized by a 6×6 process matrix. The model was constructed step-by-step from an empirical basis of four distinct types of quantum experiments (Bell tests, Leggett-Garg inequalities, weak measurements, and delayed-choice experiments), naturally leading to an atypical quantum model that defies conventional interpretations. The emergent structure occupies an intermediate (Madhyamika) position between realism and QBism, exhibiting features that challenge both local and non-local descriptions in spatial and temporal domains. The model's characteristics align most closely with Carlo Rovelli's Relational Interpretation, where quantum properties are not absolute but exist in relation to specific physical interactions. Has similarities with TSVF and Costa de Beauregard's models, but also some significative differences. Using methods of causal projection and witness optimization, the study identifies signatures of causal indefiniteness, quantified by a causal error of 0.1488±0.0001. The process exhibits a 75% ICO score indicating moderate evidence of indefinite causal order, with CHSH value 2.753 achieving 90.95% of the standard quantum bound. The analysis includes comprehensive statistical validation via bootstrap methods and comparison with synthetic causal and non-causal processes. The causal incompatibility persists under bootstrap resampling with injected noise up to σ=0.01, demonstrating robustness of the effect. The experimental process shows 3.2× greater causal error than reference ICO benchmarks. So the model would be falsifiable through various types of experiments not difficult to design. Key quantum characteristics include entanglement negativity of 0.474 and total coherence of 0.315, supporting genuine quantum signatures beyond classical causal models. The complete Python code for the analysis, including process matrix optimization, causal projection, witness optimization, and statistical validation, is provided. The work not only contributes to understanding fundamental limits of quantum causality but also provides an empirically grounded framework that bridges multiple quantum phenomena within a unified relational context, potentially facilitating new approaches to quantum information processing beyond conventional causal structures.
This work reports experimental evidence of indefinite causal order in a quantum process characterized by a 6×6 process matrix. The model was constructed step-by-step from an empirical basis of four distinct types of quantum experiments (Bell tests, Leggett-Garg inequalities, weak measurements, and delayed-choice experiments), naturally leading to an atypical quantum model that defies conventional interpretations. The emergent structure occupies an intermediate (Madhyamika) position between realism and QBism, exhibiting features that challenge both local and non-local descriptions in spatial and temporal domains. The model's characteristics align most closely with Carlo Rovelli's Relational Interpretation, where quantum properties are not absolute but exist in relation to specific physical interactions. Has similarities with TSVF and Costa de Beauregard's models, but also some significative differences. Using methods of causal projection and witness optimization, the study identifies signatures of causal indefiniteness, quantified by a causal error of 0.1488±0.0001. The process exhibits a 75% ICO score indicating moderate evidence of indefinite causal order, with CHSH value 2.753 achieving 90.95% of the standard quantum bound. The analysis includes comprehensive statistical validation via bootstrap methods and comparison with synthetic causal and non-causal processes. The causal incompatibility persists under bootstrap resampling with injected noise up to σ=0.01, demonstrating robustness of the effect. The experimental process shows 3.2× greater causal error than reference ICO benchmarks. So the model would be falsifiable through various types of experiments not difficult to design. Key quantum characteristics include entanglement negativity of 0.474 and total coherence of 0.315, supporting genuine quantum signatures beyond classical causal models. The complete Python code for the analysis, including process matrix optimization, causal projection, witness optimization, and statistical validation, is provided. The work not only contributes to understanding fundamental limits of quantum causality but also provides an empirically grounded framework that bridges multiple quantum phenomena within a unified relational context, potentially facilitating new approaches to quantum information processing beyond conventional causal structures.
In classical physics, events follow a definite causal order: the past influences the future, but not the reverse. Quantum theory, however, permits superpositions of causal orders—the so-called indefinite causal orders (ICOs)—which can provide operational advantages over classical scenarios. Verifying such phenomena has sparked significant interest, much like earlier efforts devoted to refuting local realism and confirming quantum entanglement. To date, demonstrations of ICO have all been based a process called the quantum switch and have relied on device-dependent or semi-device-independent protocols. Achieving a device-independent verification of ICO would imply that nature allows for correlations that do not respect causality, independent of any experimental assumptions or underlying theoretical description of the experiment. To this end, a recent theoretical development introduced a Bell-like inequality that allows for fully device-independent verification of ICO in a quantum switch. Here we implement this verification by experimentally violating this inequality. In particular, we measure a value of 1.8328 ± 0.0045 , which is 18 standard deviations above the definite causal order bound of 1.75 . Our work presents the first implementation of a device-independent protocol to verify ICO, albeit in the presence of experimental loopholes. This represents an important step toward the device-independent verification of an ICO and provides a context in which to identify loopholes specifically related to the verification of ICO.
The study of causal relations has recently been applied to the quantum realm, leading to the discovery that not all physical processes have a definite causal structure. While indefinite causal processes have previously been experimentally shown, these proofs relied on the quantum description of the experiments. Yet, the same experimental data could also be compatible with definite causal structures within different descriptions. Here, we present the first demonstration of indefinite temporal order outside of quantum formalism. We show that our experimental outcomes are incompatible with a class of generalised probabilistic theories satisfying the assumptions of locality and definite temporal order. To this end, we derive physical constraints (in the form of a Bell-like inequality) on experimental outcomes within such a class of theories. We then experimentally invalidate these theories by violating the inequality using entangled temporal order. This provides experimental evidence that there exist correlations in nature which are incompatible with the assumptions of locality and definite temporal order.
This paper is the thirty-fourth in a sequence developing an interpretive framework that redescribes physical reality as a causally consistent history of information updates rather than as a collection of independently existing objects. It is the capstone (third panel) of the ninth grouping — the quantum-mechanics–gravity interface trilogy (32 Quantum Geometry → 33 Records Backreacting on Geometry → 34 Causal Structure Without a Global Order) — and closes that trilogy. Its core physics is the process-matrix framework (Oreshkov, Costa, & Brukner, 2012), with the quantum switch (Chiribella et al., 2013) as the worked instance and causal (non)separability as the central classification. When the order of operations is quantum-controlled — and, at the interface, when geometry is superposed so different branches carry different causal graphs — the temptation is to posit a hidden definite global total order behind the indefiniteness. The thesis is that there is no Global Causal Sequencer; P1 is a declared architectural commitment, not a theorem, and a rival that posits a deeper definite order underwriting the indefiniteness is acknowledged but declined architecturally. R-A: indefinite operational order is not causal inconsistency or a closed loop — a coherent superposition of order components is causally nonseparable (witness-certifiable; note that witness-based nonseparability and causal-inequality violation are not equivalent, and the quantum switch need not violate a causal inequality) yet a valid, consistent process. R-B (restricted to controlled-order processes such as the quantum switch, or any process with a declared physically recorded order-control observable): recording the order-control does not by itself produce a determinate order — one must distinguish the coherent control, the decohered-but-unconditioned causally separable mixture, and the conditioned record-relative effective order — only the last is determinate, and only relative to a recorded value and the declared parameter chi, whose order-control basis is an admissible decoherence-stable pointer basis/algebra (not an arbitrary rotation). R-C: causal structure is profile-valued, CausalProf = (d_order, d_interv, d_record, d_valid, d_family, d_arrow), with a process-validity (not graph-acyclicity) component and an independent record-arrow component from Paper 9's arrow package. R-D (the novelty witness): effective order is provenance-gradable — a matched pair of histories with identical audited world-side order records but different provenance yields different warranted standing (OrderStandProf). R-E: a conservative-before-radical discipline works indefinite operational order first, then a minimal superposed-causal-graph bridge on Paper 32's identity fibers, separating an identity disposition from an order disposition; full quantization of the causal relation is flagged, not claimed. This retires the Global Causal Sequencer and closes the interface trilogy; no causal loops, no retrocausal signaling, no revived global order, no quantum-gravity completion. Presents no new physics; results are interpretive (L2) on imported physics (L1).
Quantum processes can exhibit indefinite causal order, allowing coherent superpositions of distinct orderings of events. Whether such processes generate genuinely noncausal statistics, however, depends not only on their global causal structure but also on the local operations available to the parties. Here, we restrict communication to the classical outcomes of local operations, yielding a causal polytope with new causal inequalities that can be violated using measure-and-reprepare, entanglement-breaking instruments requiring no coherent transmission through the laboratories. Using a semidefinite-programming framework, we bound the achievable violations and reveal noncausal correlations that satisfy all conventional input-signalling inequalities, demonstrating that restricting the information available for communication can uncover forms of indefinite causal order inaccessible under less restrictive operational assumptions.
The fundamental nature of causality has been challenged by quantum theory. In particular, recent developments have shown that by relaxing the standard assumption that quantum events are embedded in a fixed background causal structure, a new kind of causal relations, indefinite, can emerge. These indefinite causal structures have been interpreted as causal loops allowing for the violation of a form of causality without paradoxes. On the other hand, quantum contextuality shows that any attempt to extend quantum theory such that classical logic holds in the extended domain fails due to the rise of inconsistent logical loops. There has been increasing evidence that it is a key feature in the understanding quantum paradoxes. This thesis aims at improving our understanding of indefinite causal orders and quantum paradoxes in order to address the question: “Could the non-fundamental nature of causality be related to a form of contextuality ?”The process matrix formalism is a mathematical framework which, in analogy withentanglement and the violation of Bell inequalities (nonlocality), offers new tools - witnesses of causal nonseparability and the violation of causal inequalities with noncausalcorrelations - to study and identify indefinite causal orders. In a bottom-up approach, wehave identified a large class of physically implementable processes, the quantum circuitswith quantum control of causal order (QC-QCs), that includes causally nonseparable processes such as the celebrated “quantum switch”. However these circuits cannot be used to violate causal inequalities. Nevertheless, in another work, I have proposed a significant relaxation of assumptions to certify the causal nonseparability of many processes, showing that it can be done in a semi-device-independent scenario with untrusted local operations and trusted quantum inputs. In particular, I have shown that the quantum switch can generate noncausal correlations in this kind of scenario.In order to refine my understanding of quantum contextuality, I have investigated theorigins of the Kochen-Specker theorem and I have analysed how the Hardy paradox entails a form of logical contextuality. I have identified that the two possible intermediatemeasurements involved in a pre-post-selection version of the paradox differ causally fromeach other. This analysis might be useful to study of the Frauchiger-Renner paradox, a“meta-version” of the Hardy paradox. On a more metaphysical aspect, I have argued fora “Gödelian hunch” from quantum theory, the idea that quantum paradoxes emerge froma lack of distinction between theoretical and metatheoretical objects.Finally, in order to establish a link between indefinite causal orders and contextuality,I have proposed a new causal game, in which the grandfather paradox is formalized interms of a logical inequality. Some process matrices can violate the causal inequalitywithout violating the logical one. I suggest that the emergence of logical inconsistenciesfrom the violation of a logical inequality might be interpreted as a form of contextuality.
This work develops a graph-theoretic and process-based foundation for indefinite causal order in quantum theory, demonstrating that causal indefiniteness is not an ad hoc or exotic phenomenon but an emergent structural property of quantum dynamics when the primitive unit of evolution is taken to be the П-такт (P-Tact) — a discrete quantum process composed of local unitary superposition and entangling unitary interaction. Building upon a sequence of previously published foundational works, this paper formulates indefinite causal order as a superposition of quantum process graphs, where each graph encodes a definite causal structure, and the quantum state corresponds to a coherent superposition over such graphs. Within this framework, causal order is not fundamental but arises only in coarse-grained or classical limits. We show that: Indefinite causal order naturally emerges from the superposition of process graphs, without invoking external control systems or higher-order operations. The quantum switch is reinterpreted as a special finite realization of a more general graph-superposition principle. Time and causality emerge as effective parameters in the infinite-graph (continuum) limit of discrete П-такт dynamics. The graph-theoretic formulation is fully compatible with — and structurally supports — the Everettian (Many-Worlds) interpretation, where branching corresponds to graph bifurcations rather than wavefunction collapse. Classical spacetime causality appears as a macroscopic ordering imposed on an underlying non-causal quantum substrate. This approach unifies quantum information, indefinite causal order, emergent temporality, and Everettian branching within a single formal framework based on discrete process units and their graph composition. The results close several open conceptual gaps in the interpretation of quantum switches, process matrices, and non-classical causal structures, offering a consistent ontology grounded in quantum dynamics itself. This paper directly builds upon and extends the following foundational works: Pavlov, M. (2026). Quantum Switch as an Emergent Process Structure from Discrete Process Tacts (П-такт). Zenodo.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18498181 Pavlov, M. (2026). Quantum Switch and Teleportation. Zenodo.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18509173 Pavlov, M. (2026). Emergence of Causality, Gravity, Time, and Three-Dimensional Space from Discrete P-Tact (П-такт) Dynamics. Zenodo.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18504244 Pavlov, M. (2026). P-Tact (П-такт) as the Primitive Unit of Quantum Theory. Zenodo.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18516711 Together, these works establish a coherent program aimed at demonstrating the universality of quantum mechanics, the absence of fundamental collapse, and the emergence of spacetime and causality from discrete quantum process dynamics.