Quantum processes can exhibit indefinite causal order, allowing coherent superpositions of distinct orderings of events. Whether such processes generate genuinely noncausal statistics, however, depends not only on their global causal structure but also on the local operations available to the parties. Here, we restrict communication to the classical outcomes of local operations, yielding a causal polytope with new causal inequalities that can be violated using measure-and-reprepare, entanglement-breaking instruments requiring no coherent transmission through the laboratories. Using a semidefinite-programming framework, we bound the achievable violations and reveal noncausal correlations that satisfy all conventional input-signalling inequalities, demonstrating that restricting the information available for communication can uncover forms of indefinite causal order inaccessible under less restrictive operational assumptions.
Quantum processes can exhibit indefinite causal order, allowing coherent superpositions of distinct orderings of events. Whether such processes generate genuinely noncausal statistics, however, depends not only on their global causal structure but also on the local operations available to the parties. Here, we restrict communication to the classical outcomes of local operations, yielding a causal polytope with new causal inequalities that can be violated using measure-and-reprepare, entanglement-breaking instruments requiring no coherent transmission through the laboratories. Using a semidefinite-programming framework, we bound the achievable violations and reveal noncausal correlations that satisfy all conventional input-signalling inequalities, demonstrating that restricting the information available for communication can uncover forms of indefinite causal order inaccessible under less restrictive operational assumptions.
Quantum theory is in principle compatible with scenarios where physical processes occur in an indefinite order, potentially yielding advantages in a broad range of information processing tasks. However, advantages in communication, the most basic form of information processing, have so far remained controversial and hard to prove. Here we provide a framework for assessing the role of causal order in communication, by comparing different causal structures under the constraint that the allowed operations must not generate signaling from signaling-incapable devices. Using this framework, we establish a clear-cut advantage of indefinite causal order, and, at the same time, we identify a series of fundamental limits to the communication power of causal structures in quantum mechanics. Notably, we find that a special form of indefinite causal order, obtained by coherently controlling the order of two processes, enhances the transmission of classical messages in a one-shot scenario, but no quantum operation with indefinite order can offer advantages over shared entanglement when asymptotically many uses of the same communication device are employed. Overall, our results unveil non-trivial relations between communication, causal order, entanglement, and no-signaling quantum processes.
Quantum processes with indefinite causal order challenge the classical assumption that operations must occur in a single fixed temporal sequence. The quantum switch provides a concrete setting in which two operation orders, A≺B and B≺A, are coherently controlled by a quantum system. In the strict process matrix formulation of the lazy guess your neighbour’s input (LGYNI) game, however, quantum theory, including the quantum switch, does not violate the standard causal inequality when probabilities are computed solely from local instruments. In this work, we study an extended control-assisted operational protocol in which the control system of the quantum switch is measured and used to define the task output. We compare increasingly expressive strategy classes, including single-qubit SU(2) operations, product target-ancilla operations, and entangling Cartan-decomposed two-qubit operations with generalized POVMs. Restricted models saturate or remain below the 3/4 fixed-order benchmark, whereas the optimized Cartan + ancilla + POVM strategy reaches Psuccext≈0.83596, demonstrating enhanced task performance within the extended protocol. The optimized strategy remains operationally no-signaling to numerical precision and retains its extended protocol advantage under more than 25% white noise admixture. These results identify the operational resources required for control-assisted quantum switch enhancement and support the view that indefinite temporal order can be used as a quantum informational resource without implying a breakdown of operational causality.
Logical consistency with free local operations is compatible with nontrivial classical communications, where all parties can be both in each other’s past and future—a phenomenon known as noncausality. Noncausal processes, such as the “Lugano process,” violate causal inequalities, yet their physical realizability remains an open question. In contrast, the quantum switch—a physically realizable process with indefinite causal order—can only generate causal correlations. Building on a recently established correspondence [Kunjwal and Baumeler, ] between the SHIFT measurement, which exhibits nonlocality without entanglement, and the Lugano process, we demonstrate that the SHIFT measurement can be implemented using a quantum switch of classical communications in a scenario with quantum inputs. This shows that the structure of the Lugano process can be simulated by a quantum switch and that successful SHIFT discrimination witnesses causal nonseparability rather than noncausality. Finally, we identify a broad class of “superposition of classical communications” derived from classical processes without global past capable of realizing similar causally indefinite measurements. We examine these results in relation to the ongoing debate on implementations of indefinite causal orders.
Quantum theory is in principle compatible with processes that violate causal inequalities, an analogue of Bell inequalities that constrain the correlations observed by sets of parties operating in a definite causal order. Since the introduction of causal inequalities, determining their maximum quantum violation, analogue to Tsirelson's bound for Bell inequalities, has remained an open problem. Here we provide a general method for bounding the violation of arbitrary causal inequalities, establishing limits to the correlations achievable by arbitrary local experiments and by arbitrary quantum processes with indefinite causal order. We prove that the maximum violation is generally smaller than the algebraic maximum of the corresponding correlation, and determine Tsirelson-like bounds for a class of causal inequalities including some of the most paradigmatic examples. Our results motivate a search for physical principles characterizing the boundary of the set of quantum correlations with indefinite causal order.
Recent frameworks describing quantum mechanics in the absence of a global causal order admit the existence of causally indefinite processes, where it is impossible to ascribe causal order for events A and B. These frameworks even allow for processes that violate so-called causal inequalities, which are analogous to Bell's inequalities.However, the physicality of these exotic processes is, in the general case, still under debate, bringing into question their foundational relevance.While it is known that causally indefinite processes can be probabilistically realized by means of a quantum circuit, along with an additional conditioning event C, concrete insights into the ontological meaning of such implementation schemes have heretofore been limited.Here, we show that causally indefinite processes can be realized with schemes where C serves only as a classical flag heralding which causally indefinite process was realized.We then show that there are processes where any pure conditioning measurement of C leads to a causally indefinite process for A and B, thus establishing causal indefiniteness as a basis-independent quantity.Finally, we demonstrate that quantum mechanics allows for phenomena where C can deterministically decide whether A comes before B or vice versa, without signaling to either.This is akin to Wheeler's famous delayedchoice experiment establishing definite causal order in quantum mechanics as an instrument-dependent property.
Quantum theory is in principle compatible with processes that violate causal inequalities, an analogue of Bell inequalities that constrain the correlations observed by sets of parties operating in a definite causal order. Since the introduction of causal inequalities, determining their maximum quantum violation, analogue to Tsirelson’s bound for Bell inequalities, has remained an open problem. Here we provide a general method for bounding the violation of arbitrary causal inequalities, establishing limits to the correlations achievable by arbitrary local experiments and by arbitrary quantum processes with indefinite causal order. We prove that the maximum violation is generally smaller than the algebraic maximum of the corresponding correlation, and determine Tsirelson-like bounds for a class of causal inequalities including some of the most paradigmatic examples. Our results motivate a search for physical principles characterizing the boundary of the set of quantum correlations with indefinite causal order. Quantum theory has been shown to be compatible with processes violating a definite causal order, but no detailed analysis of the maximum allowed degree of violation has been carried out so far. Here, the authors fill this gap by providing the analogue of Tsirelson’s bound for the violation of causal inequalities.