Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Lattice Theory: The Jauch and Piron Proof

Jeffrey Bub

Published Jan 1, 1974• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-010-2229-3_4

Related papers

A note on Jauch-Piron states

Pavel Pták

Reports on Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 1986•2 citations

Countable Jauch-Piron logics

Peter G. Ovchinnikov

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jun 1, 1993•3 citations

Piron's foundation of quantum mechanics (Comment on his paper)

W. Balzer

Erkenntnis•Nov 1, 1981•3 citations

A Refutation of the Proof by Jauch and Piron that Hidden Variables Can be Excluded in Quantum Mechanics

David Böhm, Jeffrey Bub

In this paper, we examine an argument of Jauch and Piron, which aims to prove the impossibility of hidden variables underlying the quantum theory, on the basis of certain assumptions that are weaker than those used by von Neumann for the same purpose. We show that, while the assumptions of Jauch and Piron are in fact weaker than those of von Neumann, the net result is that they actually prove nothing new at all. The conclusions of Jauch and Piron concerning the nonexistence of hidden variables are indeed seen to follow from a false assumption; i.e., that the impossibility of propositions that describe simultaneously the results of measurements of two noncommuting observables is an "empirical fact." Actually, it is shown that this assumption follows if and only if one first assumes what the authors set out to prove; i.e., that the current linguistic structure of quantum mechanics is the only one that can be used correctly to describe the empirical facts underlying the theory.

Reviews of Modern Physics•Jul 1, 1966•89 citations

Equations and Hilbert lattices

René Mayet

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2007•5 citations

Jauch–Piron states in W*-algebraic quantum mechanics

Anton Amann

A state φ on a W*-algebra ℳ is said to fulfill the Jauch–Piron condition if φ(p)=φ(q)=1 for projections p,q∈ℳ implies φ(p∧q)=1. Here p∧q denotes the infimum of p and q in the projection lattice of ℳ. The Jauch–Piron condition is a compatibility condition between the algebraic and the lattice-theoretic approach for the description of physical systems. Normal (i.e., σ-weakly continuous) states always fulfill the Jauch–Piron condition. It is argued that states not fulfilling this condition should be regarded as unphysical. It is shown that a state φ on a σ-finite factor ℳ is singular if and only if projections e, f∈ ℳ exist such that φ(e)=φ( f )=1 and e∧f=0. In particular, any pure state φ on ℳ fulfilling the Jauch–Piron condition is normal, which implies that the underlying factor ℳ is of type I. Furthermore, the following result is proved: Let φ be a pure Jauch–Piron state on W*-algebra ℳ with separable predual and without any commutative summand. Then φ is normal and a central projection z0∈ ℳ exists such that φ(z0)=1 and z0 ℳz0 is a factor of type I. Thus, cum grano salis, pure Jauch–Piron states exist only on commutative W*-algebras and type I factors. The former case corresponds to classical theories, the latter to Hilbert-space quantum mechanics. The implications of these results on the interpretation of quantum mechanics are discussed.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1987•20 citations
In this paper, we examine an argument of Jauch and Piron, which aims to prove the impossibility of hidden variables underlying the quantum theory, on the basis of certain assumptions that are weaker than those used by von Neumann for the same purpose. We show that, while the assumptions of Jauch and Piron are in fact weaker than those of von Neumann, the net result is that they actually prove nothing new at all. The conclusions of Jauch and Piron concerning the nonexistence of hidden variables are indeed seen to follow from a false assumption; i.e., that the impossibility of propositions that describe simultaneously the results of measurements of two noncommuting observables is an "empirical fact." Actually, it is shown that this assumption follows if and only if one first assumes what the authors set out to prove; i.e., that the current linguistic structure of quantum mechanics is the only one that can be used correctly to describe the empirical facts underlying the theory.
A state φ on a W*-algebra ℳ is said to fulfill the Jauch–Piron condition if φ(p)=φ(q)=1 for projections p,q∈ℳ implies φ(p∧q)=1. Here p∧q denotes the infimum of p and q in the projection lattice of ℳ. The Jauch–Piron condition is a compatibility condition between the algebraic and the lattice-theoretic approach for the description of physical systems. Normal (i.e., σ-weakly continuous) states always fulfill the Jauch–Piron condition. It is argued that states not fulfilling this condition should be regarded as unphysical. It is shown that a state φ on a σ-finite factor ℳ is singular if and only if projections e, f∈ ℳ exist such that φ(e)=φ( f )=1 and e∧f=0. In particular, any pure state φ on ℳ fulfilling the Jauch–Piron condition is normal, which implies that the underlying factor ℳ is of type I. Furthermore, the following result is proved: Let φ be a pure Jauch–Piron state on W*-algebra ℳ with separable predual and without any commutative summand. Then φ is normal and a central projection z0∈ ℳ exists such that φ(z0)=1 and z0 ℳz0 is a factor of type I. Thus, cum grano salis, pure Jauch–Piron states exist only on commutative W*-algebras and type I factors. The former case corresponds to classical theories, the latter to Hilbert-space quantum mechanics. The implications of these results on the interpretation of quantum mechanics are discussed.