Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

PERTURBATION THEORY OF MANY PARTICLE SYSTEMS. PART I

P. G. Khubchandani, C. Manohar

Published Jan 1, 1963• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Studies are being nnade to examine the effects of phononphonon interactions on neutron scattering in crystals. This involves the use of the resolvent operator and the diagram techniques. ln order to become familiar with the resolvent operator, a general perturbation theory was developed from which the familiar forms of it could be derived as special cases. The Brillouin-- Wigner and Raleigh--Schrodinger perturbation theories were derived. (M.C.G.)

Related papers

Studies in Perturbation Theory. IX. Connection Between Various Approaches in the Recent Development—Evaluation of Upper Bounds to Energy Eigenvalues in Schrödinger's Perturbation Theory

Per‐Olov Löwdin

The treatment of Schrödinger's perturbation theory based on the use of a series of inhomogeneous differential equations of iterative character is briefly surveyed. As an illustration, the method is used to derive the general expression for the expectation value of the Hamiltonian to any order which provides an upper bound for the ground-state energy. It is indicated how the well-known theory for inhomogeneous equations may be utilized also in this special case. The solution of the Schrödinger equation by means of the partitioning technique and the concept of reduced resolvents is then treated. It is shown that the expressions obtained are most conveniently interpreted in terms of inhomogeneous differential equations. A study of the connection with the first approach reveals that the two methods are essentially equivalent, but also that the use of reduced resolvents and inverse operators may give an alternative insight in the mathematical structure of perturbation theory, particularly with respect to the ``bracketing theorem'' and the use of power series expansions with a remainder. In conclusion, it is emphasized that the combined use of the two methods provides a simpler and more powerful tool than any one of them taken separately.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 1965•178 citations

A simple derivation of the series in perturbation theory

Luis Laín, Alicia Torre

A simple algorithm to derive the Brillouin-Wigner and the Rayleigh-Schrodinger series in time-independent perturbation theory is presented. The method provides a better understanding of the normalisation treatment of the perturbed wavefunctions and it establishes a clear relationship between the Brillouin-Wigner and Rayleigh-Schrodinger series.

European Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1987•3 citations

Formal perturbation theory

Isaiah Shavitt, Rodney J. Bartlett

Background There are two stages in the study of perturbation theory and related techniques (although they are mixed intimately in most derivations in the literature). The first is the formal development , carried out in terms of the total Hamiltonian and total wave function (and total zero-order wave function), without attempt to express anything in terms of one- and two-body quantities (components of Ĥ, orbitals, integrals over orbitals etc.). We can make a considerable amount of progress in this way before considering the detailed form of Ĥ. The second is the many-body development , where all expressions are obtained in terms of orbitals (one-electron states) and oneand two-electron integrals. We shall try to keep these separate for a while and begin with a consideration of formal perturbation theory. Another aspect of the study of many-body techniques is the large variety of approaches, notations and derivations that have been used. Each different approach has contributed to the lore and the language of many-body theory, and each tends to illuminate some aspects better than the other approaches. If we want to be able to read the literature in this field, we should be familiar with several alternative formulations. Therefore, we shall occasionally derive some results in more than one way and, in particular, we shall derive the basic perturbation-theory equations and their many-body representations in several complementary ways. Classical derivation of Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory The perturbation Ansatz We begin with a classical textbook derivation of formal Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory (RSPT).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 6, 2009•0 citations

Convergent Schrödinger Perturbation Theory

Gerald Speisman

A formulation of Schr\"odinger perturbation theory is developed that gives a unified treatment of non-degenerate and degenerate cases, is unique, and has a nonzero radius of convergence under very general conditions. Two alternative procedures are given for finding perturbed eigenvectors, one of which is simpler for the nondegenerate case or for small finite degeneracy, the other simpler for infinite or large finite degeneracy. The low-order terms in the perturbation expansions of quantities used in applications are given. The perturbation theory formulated in this paper has the following advantages over the conventional Schr\"odinger and Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theories: (i) When the convergence criterion is satisfied, bounds on the error made in replacing an appropriate infinite perturbation series by its first $n$ terms can be obtained. (ii) For the case of degeneracy, the conventional Schr\"odinger perturbation theory can break down under conditions to which the convergence of the perturbation theory developed in this paper are insensitive. (iii) There is no implicit dependence on the eigenvalue, such as appears in the Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory. (iv) For the case of degeneracy, statistical information about the distribution of certain eigenvalues can be obtained without finding the individual eigenvalues. (v) The theory is applicable to a wider class of problems than the conventional Schr\"odinger and Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theories.

Physical Review•Aug 15, 1957•28 citations

Resolvent Operator Formulation of Stationary State Perturbation Theory

Robert Yaris

By starting with an exact operator equation and using different methods of expanding the resolvent operator, the Schrödinger, Wigner—Brilloin, similarity transformation, gauge transformation, and first-order perturbation iteration method, perturbation expansions are generated in a rigorous and straightforward manner. It is also shown how additional perturbation and perturbation iteration methods can be generated.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Apr 1, 1964•9 citations

ON PERTURBATION THEORY FOR LARGE QUANTUM SYSTEMS

Yu.L. Mentkovskii

A new form of the Van Hove--Hugenholtz perturbation theory expansion is proposed. The series obtained differ from the more familiar ones by the simplicity of the energy-denominators, a fact which may be useful, for example, in calculating the excited states. The deduction of the indicated expansions is quite simple. (auth)

Zhur. Eksptl'. i Teoret. Fiz.•Aug 1, 1960•0 citations
Studies are being nnade to examine the effects of phononphonon interactions on neutron scattering in crystals. This involves the use of the resolvent operator and the diagram techniques. ln order to become familiar with the resolvent operator, a general perturbation theory was developed from which the familiar forms of it could be derived as special cases. The Brillouin-- Wigner and Raleigh--Schrodinger perturbation theories were derived. (M.C.G.)
The treatment of Schrödinger's perturbation theory based on the use of a series of inhomogeneous differential equations of iterative character is briefly surveyed. As an illustration, the method is used to derive the general expression for the expectation value of the Hamiltonian to any order which provides an upper bound for the ground-state energy. It is indicated how the well-known theory for inhomogeneous equations may be utilized also in this special case. The solution of the Schrödinger equation by means of the partitioning technique and the concept of reduced resolvents is then treated. It is shown that the expressions obtained are most conveniently interpreted in terms of inhomogeneous differential equations. A study of the connection with the first approach reveals that the two methods are essentially equivalent, but also that the use of reduced resolvents and inverse operators may give an alternative insight in the mathematical structure of perturbation theory, particularly with respect to the ``bracketing theorem'' and the use of power series expansions with a remainder. In conclusion, it is emphasized that the combined use of the two methods provides a simpler and more powerful tool than any one of them taken separately.
Background There are two stages in the study of perturbation theory and related techniques (although they are mixed intimately in most derivations in the literature). The first is the formal development , carried out in terms of the total Hamiltonian and total wave function (and total zero-order wave function), without attempt to express anything in terms of one- and two-body quantities (components of Ĥ, orbitals, integrals over orbitals etc.). We can make a considerable amount of progress in this way before considering the detailed form of Ĥ. The second is the many-body development , where all expressions are obtained in terms of orbitals (one-electron states) and oneand two-electron integrals. We shall try to keep these separate for a while and begin with a consideration of formal perturbation theory. Another aspect of the study of many-body techniques is the large variety of approaches, notations and derivations that have been used. Each different approach has contributed to the lore and the language of many-body theory, and each tends to illuminate some aspects better than the other approaches. If we want to be able to read the literature in this field, we should be familiar with several alternative formulations. Therefore, we shall occasionally derive some results in more than one way and, in particular, we shall derive the basic perturbation-theory equations and their many-body representations in several complementary ways. Classical derivation of Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory The perturbation Ansatz We begin with a classical textbook derivation of formal Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory (RSPT).
A formulation of Schr\"odinger perturbation theory is developed that gives a unified treatment of non-degenerate and degenerate cases, is unique, and has a nonzero radius of convergence under very general conditions. Two alternative procedures are given for finding perturbed eigenvectors, one of which is simpler for the nondegenerate case or for small finite degeneracy, the other simpler for infinite or large finite degeneracy. The low-order terms in the perturbation expansions of quantities used in applications are given. The perturbation theory formulated in this paper has the following advantages over the conventional Schr\"odinger and Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theories: (i) When the convergence criterion is satisfied, bounds on the error made in replacing an appropriate infinite perturbation series by its first nnn terms can be obtained. (ii) For the case of degeneracy, the conventional Schr\"odinger perturbation theory can break down under conditions to which the convergence of the perturbation theory developed in this paper are insensitive. (iii) There is no implicit dependence on the eigenvalue, such as appears in the Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory. (iv) For the case of degeneracy, statistical information about the distribution of certain eigenvalues can be obtained without finding the individual eigenvalues. (v) The theory is applicable to a wider class of problems than the conventional Schr\"odinger and Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theories.