THE QUANTUM THEORY OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM began with Bohr’s enunciation of the rules for the quantization of orbital angular momentum in 1913, and the refinement of these rules by Sommerfeld [ 1 ] and Landé [ 2 ] within the framework of the old quantum theory. A basic result for angular momentum in modern quantum theory, which we call The First Fundamental Result, was given in the third foundational paper in 1926 by Born, Heisenberg, and Jordan [ 3 ], who not only gave the basic commutation relations for the components of the total angular momentum J, but all finite-dimensional Hermitian matrix representations of these components. Dirac [ 4 ] simultaneously deduced these basic commutation relations using his algebraic approach to quantum mechanics, and later gave a marvelously brief derivation of their matrix representations in his book [ 5 ]. Further developments, including the famous Pauli matrices and results relating to angular momentum selection rules for transitions in atomic systems, are given in the papers by Heisenberg and Jordan [ 6 ], Pauli [ 7 ], and Güttinger and Pauli [ 8 ]. These works, and the books by Born and Jordan [ 9 ] and Condon and Shortley [ 10 ], fixed the framework for much of the developments in angular momentum theory, which was hardly distinguishable from the general quantum theory in the context of which it was developed for the purpose of giving a consistent description of the spectra of atoms. Little emphasis was given to the universal and distinctive role of symmetry.
THE QUANTUM THEORY OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM began with Bohr’s enunciation of the rules for the quantization of orbital angular momentum in 1913, and the refinement of these rules by Sommerfeld [ 1 ] and Landé [ 2 ] within the framework of the old quantum theory. A basic result for angular momentum in modern quantum theory, which we call The First Fundamental Result, was given in the third foundational paper in 1926 by Born, Heisenberg, and Jordan [ 3 ], who not only gave the basic commutation relations for the components of the total angular momentum J, but all finite-dimensional Hermitian matrix representations of these components. Dirac [ 4 ] simultaneously deduced these basic commutation relations using his algebraic approach to quantum mechanics, and later gave a marvelously brief derivation of their matrix representations in his book [ 5 ]. Further developments, including the famous Pauli matrices and results relating to angular momentum selection rules for transitions in atomic systems, are given in the papers by Heisenberg and Jordan [ 6 ], Pauli [ 7 ], and Güttinger and Pauli [ 8 ]. These works, and the books by Born and Jordan [ 9 ] and Condon and Shortley [ 10 ], fixed the framework for much of the developments in angular momentum theory, which was hardly distinguishable from the general quantum theory in the context of which it was developed for the purpose of giving a consistent description of the spectra of atoms. Little emphasis was given to the universal and distinctive role of symmetry.
Chapter 11 is devoted to the quantum theory of angular momentum. As in classical mechanics, working with angular momentum requires leaving the one-dimensional space, with all the complications that this entails. The importance of angular momentum resides in at least three facts: i) central problems are of particular interest; (ii) many particles have an intrinsic angular momentum (the spin); and iii) the physics of angular momentum involves features such as the so-called space quantization. The first part of the chapter deals with the orbital angular momentum and its eigenfunctions, the spherical harmonics. Its algebraic properties, embodied in the matrix representation, allow for an extension of the theory to half-integer angular momentum in terms of Pauli matrices, as well as the addition of angular momenta.
Anisotropy of angular momenta: ideas and methods The fundamental idea forming the basis of early quantum theory was the quantization of the angular momentum of the atom, which, at a later stage, assumed the form of the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization rule [360], namely ∲ pdq = n ℏ where p and q are the generalized momentum and coordinate. This concept has retained its physical meaning in modern-day quantum mechanics [371, 372]. In the course of the further development of quantum mechanical concepts it became increasingly clear that in the theory of atoms and molecules the angular momentum is a ‘dominant’ notion, the fundamental significance of which is in no small degree connected with its dimension of action, which coincides with that of Planck's constant ℏ. In the interaction between particles and a directed beam of photons the angular momentum of the system is conserved, thus forming the basis for the optical method of producing spatial anisotropy of the distribution of the angular momenta of the ensemble of particles, i.e. its optical polarization . In terms of quantum concepts, spatial anisotropy means that in an ensemble of particles a non-equilibrium population of magnetic sublevels m j of angular momenta is created. We make a distinction between the alignment of momenta, for instance in the absorption of linear polarized light, when there is no difference between the population of ± m j -sublevels, and orientation , when such a difference exists. Anisotropic distribution of angular momenta in an excited state, as produced in absorption, manifests itself directly in the polarization of fluorescence. It is rather likely that understanding of the anisotropic distribution of the angular momenta of atoms was enhanced by Hanle's [184] discovery in 1924.
Spin-s systems Angular momentum is one of the fundamental quantities of Newtonian physics, and in quantum physics its importance is at least as great. In quantum mechanics we often distinguish between two types of angular momentum: orbital angular momentum , which a system of particles possesses due to particle motion through space; and spin angular momentum , which is an intrinsic property of a particle. The distinction will be important later, but for now we will ignore it. We will here refer to angular momentum of any sort as “spin” and develop general-purpose mathematical tools for its description. We have already dealt with spin systems, particularly the example of a spin-½ particle. Our approach began with the empirical observation that a measurement of any spin component of a spin-½ particle could yield only the results +ħ/2 or −ħ/2. We introduced the basis states | z ±〉 for the two-dimensional Hilbert space ℋ. We also gave other basis states such as {| x ±〉} and {| y ±〉} in terms of the | z ±〉 states. From basis states and measurement values we constructed operators for the spin components S x , S y , and S z . With the operators in hand, we could then examine the algebraic relations between them (such as the commutation relation in Exercise 3.56). Our job here is to generalize our analysis to systems of arbitrary spin. To do this, we will reverse our chain of logic.
This chapter covers various aspects of orbital, total, and spin angular momenta and the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients. An approach that is not found in many books, is used to derive eigenvalues of orbital angular momentum. The Pauli theory of spin half systems, addition of angular momenta, eigenfunctions of orbital angular momentum, computation of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients, solved examples, and unsolved exercises are included in the chapter. The basic purpose of the chapter has been to bring out the quantum mechanical importance of the theory of angular momenta with the use of essential mathematical derivations, which are self-consistent, and to adopt an elegant modern approach. Special mention on why orbital angular momentum cannot have non-integer values is made. The concept of spin angular momentum, which is purely a quantum mechanical quantity, is introduced in a simple and most convincing manner.
It has been the purpose of the monograph Angular Momentum in Quantum Physics (AMQP) to develop comprehensively those aspects of angular momentum theory that are required in carrying out research in modern physics and chemistry. The emphasis there was principally on physical concepts and the symmetry principles that underlie the general applicability of angular momentum theory to a broad area of physical phenomena. Mathematical techniques were introduced within the context of the physical concepts themselves. Physical applications of angular momentum theory are to a large extent applications of specific properties of Wigner or Racah functions (more generally of 3 n-j coefficients) or of the representation functions themselves. Such applications tend to emphasize the “numerical” aspects of these functions and thus obscure the relationships to other areas of mathematics. The purpose of the present monograph is to show by specific examples the many interrelations that exist between concepts originating in angular momentum theory and various areas of mathematics. It turns out that this is a substantial task—the diversity of the interrelations is far greater than might be thought. Even a brief acquaintance with the contents of AMQP will show that the concept that recurs again and again in physical applications is that of an irreducible tensor operator with respect to a group [in our case, SU (2), the quantal rotation group]. Indeed, it is this concept that carries the mathematical apparatus of the physical theory beyond the related but much simpler results of the Lie algebraic theory of the angular momentum itself and the implied representation theory of the group SU (2).
This chapter presents key results on angular momentum in quantum mechanics, beginning with a theorem on the simultaneous diagonalization of commuting operators. The eigenvalues and eigenstates of both the total angular momentum operator and its z-component are derived. For a quantum rotator in the p-state with zero magnetic quantum number, it is shown that the most probable trajectory lies in a plane containing the z-axis, and the angular momentum vector is perpendicular to it. The procedure for angular momentum addition is explained in detail, including the use of Clebsch–Gordan coefficients to perform the explicit decomposition of tensor products of irreducible representations. The Bloch sphere representation of qubit spin states is introduced. The chapter then provides an experimental background to the discovery of spin, introduces the Pauli matrices, and demonstrates how they act on spin states. It concludes with the formulation of the Pauli equation, which incorporates spin into the framework of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. Metadata/Keywords: angular momentum, simultaneous diagonalization, magnetic quantum number, Clebsch–Gordan coefficients, spin, Pauli matrices, Bloch sphere, spin states, tensor product, Pauli equation