Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks

Complementarity in biology : quantization of molecular motion

James P. Isaacs, John C. Lamb

Published Jan 1, 1969• 5 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Biological Complementarity of the Molecular and Functional

Arun Bala

Springer eBooks•Dec 3, 2016•0 citations

Physics, Biological Computation and Complementarity

J. J. Hopfield

•Jan 1, 1986•3 citations

Wave Mechanics and Molecular Biology.

Louis de Broglie, R. Bruce Lindsay

•Jan 1, 1966•10 citations

Quantization of molecular motion at the synapse and its consequences as contrasted with the generalized turing machine

John C. Lamb, James P. Isaacs

Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science•Apr 1, 1972•1 citation

Wave Mechanics and Molecular Biology

Louis de Broglie, R. Bruce Lindsay

Physics Today•Jun 1, 1967•2 citations

Complementarity, physics, and biology

Mikhail V. Vol’kenshtein

The views of Niels Bohr on complementarity are examined, both in physics and in other fields. N. Bohr's opinions on the relationship between physics and biology are discussed in detail. It is shown that, over a number of years, Bohr viewed as complementary the study of organisms as atomic-molecular and as integral systems. Subsequently, owing to the development of molecular biology, Bohr rejected the idea of the complementarity in principle of the stated two types of studies. The current status of the physical theory of biological phenomena is examined, and the role of synergetics in this field is noted. The so-called antireductionism is criticized. It is shown that the views of contemporary eminent theoretical biologists reveal them to be unfamiliar with physics. The very important role of physics in the further development of biology and its practical applications is emphasized.

Soviet Physics Uspekhi•Feb 28, 1988•12 citations
The views of Niels Bohr on complementarity are examined, both in physics and in other fields. N. Bohr's opinions on the relationship between physics and biology are discussed in detail. It is shown that, over a number of years, Bohr viewed as complementary the study of organisms as atomic-molecular and as integral systems. Subsequently, owing to the development of molecular biology, Bohr rejected the idea of the complementarity in principle of the stated two types of studies. The current status of the physical theory of biological phenomena is examined, and the role of synergetics in this field is noted. The so-called antireductionism is criticized. It is shown that the views of contemporary eminent theoretical biologists reveal them to be unfamiliar with physics. The very important role of physics in the further development of biology and its practical applications is emphasized.