Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Biological Complementarity of the Molecular and Functional

Arun Bala

Published Dec 3, 2016• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-39784-9_2

Related papers

The complementarity principle in biological and social structures

Howard Hunt Pattee

Journal of Social and Biological Systems•Apr 1, 1978•107 citations

The Complementarity Principle in Biological and Social Structures

Howard Hunt Pattee

Biosemiotics/Biosemiotics. Bookseries•Jan 1, 2012•2 citations

Physics, Biological Computation and Complementarity

J. J. Hopfield

•Jan 1, 1986•3 citations

Complementarity in biology : quantization of molecular motion

James P. Isaacs, John C. Lamb

Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks•Jan 1, 1969•5 citations

The Logic of Nature: Complementarity and the New Biology

Menas C. Kafatos, Robert L. Nadeau

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Complementarity, physics, and biology

Mikhail V. Vol’kenshtein

The views of Niels Bohr on complementarity are examined, both in physics and in other fields. N. Bohr's opinions on the relationship between physics and biology are discussed in detail. It is shown that, over a number of years, Bohr viewed as complementary the study of organisms as atomic-molecular and as integral systems. Subsequently, owing to the development of molecular biology, Bohr rejected the idea of the complementarity in principle of the stated two types of studies. The current status of the physical theory of biological phenomena is examined, and the role of synergetics in this field is noted. The so-called antireductionism is criticized. It is shown that the views of contemporary eminent theoretical biologists reveal them to be unfamiliar with physics. The very important role of physics in the further development of biology and its practical applications is emphasized.

Soviet Physics Uspekhi•Feb 28, 1988•12 citations
The views of Niels Bohr on complementarity are examined, both in physics and in other fields. N. Bohr's opinions on the relationship between physics and biology are discussed in detail. It is shown that, over a number of years, Bohr viewed as complementary the study of organisms as atomic-molecular and as integral systems. Subsequently, owing to the development of molecular biology, Bohr rejected the idea of the complementarity in principle of the stated two types of studies. The current status of the physical theory of biological phenomena is examined, and the role of synergetics in this field is noted. The so-called antireductionism is criticized. It is shown that the views of contemporary eminent theoretical biologists reveal them to be unfamiliar with physics. The very important role of physics in the further development of biology and its practical applications is emphasized.