Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Unified expression for Fermi and Bose distributions

Nan‐Xian Chen

Published Sep 1, 1992• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Some theorems relating the Dirac \ensuremath{\delta} function to both Fermi and Bose distributions are presented in this paper. Several potential applications of these theorems are discussed in detail. In particular, an inverse problem for determining the density of states of Fermi systems is solved with a closed-form expression.
DOI
10.1103/physreva.46.3538

Related papers

Comment on ‘‘Unified expression for Fermi and Bose distributions’’

Xian-Geng Zhao, Jixing Liu

The incorrectness of the recently proposed expressions of the Dirac \ensuremath{\delta} function relating to both Fermi and Bose distributions by Chen [Phys. Rev. A 46, 3538 (1992)] is pointed out. The corresponding correct theorems are provided.

Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics•Oct 1, 1993•0 citations

Solution of Density Profile Function of Trapped Fermi System

Hongyan Liu, Shufeng Ren, Jiaxiao Wang +1 more

Abstract Starting from many-body theory, the density profile function of ideal Fermi systems in harmonic and delta traps are obtained under the quantum mechanics and thermodynamic statistical physics, respectively. The related thermodynamic properties are analyzed based on the Fermi-Dirac distribution and exact solution of the density profile function.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Mar 1, 2023•0 citations

On the Chemical Potential of Ideal Fermi and Bose Gases

Brian P. Cowan

Abstract Knowledge of the chemical potential is essential in application of the Fermi–Dirac and the Bose–Einstein distribution functions for the calculation of properties of quantum gases. We give expressions for the chemical potential of ideal Fermi and Bose gases in 1, 2 and 3 dimensions in terms of inverse polylogarithm functions. We provide Mathematica functions for these chemical potentials together with low- and high-temperature series expansions. In the 3d Bose case we give also expansions about $$T_{{{{\mathrm {B}}}}}$$ T B . The Mathematica routines for the series allow calculation to arbitrary order.

Journal of Low Temperature Physics•Sep 12, 2019•16 citations

Quantum ideal gases: Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics

Mark E. Tuckerman

Abstract Chapter 11 presents a statistical mechanical treatment of the quantum ideal gases, i.e., the ideal Boltzmann, fermion, and boson gases. The discussion begins with the microscopic description and the solution of the eigenvalue problem for a quantum ideal gas. It is argued that calculating the partition function is most readily accomplished in the grand canonical ensemble using a second-quantized formulation. When the particles are distinguishable, the equation of state is identical to that of a classical ideal gas. For fermions and bosons, however, the problem of computing thermodynamic properties is significantly more complex and can only be solved exactly in certain limits. Away from these limits approximations are needed and are discussed in detail. The relevant distributions - the Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions are derived. The local density approximation of density functional theory is derived for the ideal electron gas. For the ideal boson gas, the phenomenon of Bose-Einstein condensation is discussed

•Aug 1, 2023•0 citations

Kinetic Theory Study of Pressure and Equation of State in a Strongly Degenerate Fermi Gas

Vincenzo G. Molinari, D. Mostacci, Francesco Teodori

Starting from the Fermi-Dirac distribution fuunction, Kinetic Theory prescriptions are applied to express number density and pressure as integrals, which are then solved for nonvanishing temperature. The results are then combined to arrive at an equation of state, given in closed form, yielding pressure as a function of number density.

Nuclear Science and Engineering•Apr 19, 2023•0 citations

Distribution Functions in Physics and Mathematics Why Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein Balance Equations are not Distributions from an Axiomatic Perspective

Pascal Moser

The term ‘Verteilungsfunktion’ (distribution function) is used in physics as a semantic container for at least four ontologically distinct mathematical objects: proper probability density functions (PDFs), probability mass functions (PMFs), expectation values of occu-pation numbers, and phase-space measure densities. This conflation arose historically because the statistical mechanics of Boltzmann, Maxwell, Fermi, Dirac and Bose predates Kolmogorov’s axiomatic probability theory (1933) by decades; no systematic back-mapping was ever performed. The central finding concerns the Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein functions specifically: they are not merely mislabeled — they are relative measurements, bounded observable expectation values ⟨nk⟩-normalised against their capacity. Each of the five objects routinely called a ‘distribution function’ is audited against the Kolmogorov taxonomy: the Maxwell–Boltzmann speed distribution is a proper PDF that is merely mislabeled; the Boltzmann canonical distribution is a genuine probability measure; the Boltzmann-transport phase-space density is normalised toNrather than to unity; and the Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein functions are occupation-number expectation values that acquire physical meaning only as convolution kernels against the density of states. A short supporting section shows that this is not an accident of two particular formulas. One elementary theorem establishes that a bounded occupation of capacityMunder Boltz-mann weighting with an additive constraint yields⟨n⟩M= −d ln ZM/dx; atM=1 this is exactly the logistic function, and at M→∞it diverges. Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein are therefore the two branches of a single construction, which is why the first is bounded in [0, 1]and the second admits no bounded normalisation at all. The same unit-capacity form appears outside physics wherever a bounded quantity accumulates additive evidence, which suggests that such objects are best read as relative measurements against a capacity rather than as distributions. The paper reconstructs the historical sequence that produced the terminological divergence and proposes notational conventions to restore conceptual clarity in pedagogy and literature. Keywords: probability density function, distribution function, Fermi–Dirac, Bose–Einstein, Maxwell–Boltzmann, Kolmogorov, Jaynes, ontology, statistical mechanics, probability theory, quantum statistics, foundations of physics,philosophy of science, physics education, information theory, thermodynamics.

•Aug 3, 2026•0 citations
Abstract Knowledge of the chemical potential is essential in application of the Fermi–Dirac and the Bose–Einstein distribution functions for the calculation of properties of quantum gases. We give expressions for the chemical potential of ideal Fermi and Bose gases in 1, 2 and 3 dimensions in terms of inverse polylogarithm functions. We provide Mathematica functions for these chemical potentials together with low- and high-temperature series expansions. In the 3d Bose case we give also expansions about TBT_{{{{\mathrm {B}}}}}TB​ T B . The Mathematica routines for the series allow calculation to arbitrary order.
Abstract Chapter 11 presents a statistical mechanical treatment of the quantum ideal gases, i.e., the ideal Boltzmann, fermion, and boson gases. The discussion begins with the microscopic description and the solution of the eigenvalue problem for a quantum ideal gas. It is argued that calculating the partition function is most readily accomplished in the grand canonical ensemble using a second-quantized formulation. When the particles are distinguishable, the equation of state is identical to that of a classical ideal gas. For fermions and bosons, however, the problem of computing thermodynamic properties is significantly more complex and can only be solved exactly in certain limits. Away from these limits approximations are needed and are discussed in detail. The relevant distributions - the Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions are derived. The local density approximation of density functional theory is derived for the ideal electron gas. For the ideal boson gas, the phenomenon of Bose-Einstein condensation is discussed
The term ‘Verteilungsfunktion’ (distribution function) is used in physics as a semantic container for at least four ontologically distinct mathematical objects: proper probability density functions (PDFs), probability mass functions (PMFs), expectation values of occu-pation numbers, and phase-space measure densities. This conflation arose historically because the statistical mechanics of Boltzmann, Maxwell, Fermi, Dirac and Bose predates Kolmogorov’s axiomatic probability theory (1933) by decades; no systematic back-mapping was ever performed. The central finding concerns the Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein functions specifically: they are not merely mislabeled — they are relative measurements, bounded observable expectation values ⟨nk⟩-normalised against their capacity. Each of the five objects routinely called a ‘distribution function’ is audited against the Kolmogorov taxonomy: the Maxwell–Boltzmann speed distribution is a proper PDF that is merely mislabeled; the Boltzmann canonical distribution is a genuine probability measure; the Boltzmann-transport phase-space density is normalised toNrather than to unity; and the Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein functions are occupation-number expectation values that acquire physical meaning only as convolution kernels against the density of states. A short supporting section shows that this is not an accident of two particular formulas. One elementary theorem establishes that a bounded occupation of capacityMunder Boltz-mann weighting with an additive constraint yields⟨n⟩M= −d ln ZM/dx; atM=1 this is exactly the logistic function, and at M→∞it diverges. Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein are therefore the two branches of a single construction, which is why the first is bounded in [0, 1]and the second admits no bounded normalisation at all. The same unit-capacity form appears outside physics wherever a bounded quantity accumulates additive evidence, which suggests that such objects are best read as relative measurements against a capacity rather than as distributions. The paper reconstructs the historical sequence that produced the terminological divergence and proposes notational conventions to restore conceptual clarity in pedagogy and literature. Keywords: probability density function, distribution function, Fermi–Dirac, Bose–Einstein, Maxwell–Boltzmann, Kolmogorov, Jaynes, ontology, statistical mechanics, probability theory, quantum statistics, foundations of physics,philosophy of science, physics education, information theory, thermodynamics.