Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

University Microfilms International eBooks

The genesis interpretations of quantum physics, 1925-1927

Mara Beller

Published Jan 1, 1983• 3 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The Genesis of Quantum Theory (1899–1913)

Armin Hermann, Arthur E. Ruark

American Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1972•82 citations

The genesis of quantum mechanics (1925–1927)

Christian Joas

•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

The Genesis of Quantum Mechanics

David Favrholdt

Niels Bohr•Jan 1, 1999•3 citations

Genesis of Quantum Mechanics

Alexander Komech

Springer eBooks•Oct 23, 2012•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics: Genesis and Achievements

Alexander Komech

Springer eBooks•Oct 23, 2012•33 citations

The Prescribed Observation Problem: The Empirical Genesis of Quantum Physics

Alexandre Harvey-Tremblay

Quantum mechanics, despite its remarkable empirical success, has been subject to longstanding interpretational challenges. This work introduces the Prescribed Observation Problem (POP) framework, which derives the complete formulation of quantum theory from the empirical basis of measurement outcomes, treated as an optimization constraint. Rather than postulating quantum principles axiomatically, the POP framework formulates quantum mechanics as the solution to an entropy maximization problem subject to this constraint, resulting in quantum theory's axioms emerging as theorems – the optimal, least biased probability measure consistent with the given measurement data. Notably, the POP framework is sufficiently powerful to reduce the foundation of quantum mechanics to a single axiom. Conventionally, interpretations of quantum mechanics need only align with the theory's postulated axioms, allowing for a plurality of viable interpretations that cannot definitively rule each other out. In contrast, the POP framework derives the axioms as theorems directly from empirical first principles, grounding them in observational constraints from the outset. This substantially restricts the allowable theoretical landscape, imposing stringent requirements for the viability of interpretations and invalidating all those that contradict this genesis. By engendering quantum theory from a formal empirical footing, the POP framework offers a compelling resolution to the enduring interpretational puzzles that have long plagued the field, effectively eliminating all but one interpretation consistent with both the axioms and their empirical genesis.

•Apr 16, 2024•0 citations
Quantum mechanics, despite its remarkable empirical success, has been subject to longstanding interpretational challenges. This work introduces the Prescribed Observation Problem (POP) framework, which derives the complete formulation of quantum theory from the empirical basis of measurement outcomes, treated as an optimization constraint. Rather than postulating quantum principles axiomatically, the POP framework formulates quantum mechanics as the solution to an entropy maximization problem subject to this constraint, resulting in quantum theory's axioms emerging as theorems – the optimal, least biased probability measure consistent with the given measurement data. Notably, the POP framework is sufficiently powerful to reduce the foundation of quantum mechanics to a single axiom. Conventionally, interpretations of quantum mechanics need only align with the theory's postulated axioms, allowing for a plurality of viable interpretations that cannot definitively rule each other out. In contrast, the POP framework derives the axioms as theorems directly from empirical first principles, grounding them in observational constraints from the outset. This substantially restricts the allowable theoretical landscape, imposing stringent requirements for the viability of interpretations and invalidating all those that contradict this genesis. By engendering quantum theory from a formal empirical footing, the POP framework offers a compelling resolution to the enduring interpretational puzzles that have long plagued the field, effectively eliminating all but one interpretation consistent with both the axioms and their empirical genesis.