Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Security analysis of the Bennett 1992 quantum key-distribution protocol over a realistic channel

潔 玉木, キヨシ タマキ

Published Mar 24, 2004• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In this thesis, we analyze the security of the Bennett 1992 quantum key-distribution protocol (B92 protocol) over a realistic channel assuming that bit values are encoded in single photon polarization states. First, we study the security of the B92 protocol against individual attack. In the individual attack, eavesdropper (Eve) interacts a qubit emitted by the sender (Alice) with her probe system followed by a measurement on each probe. To make our analysis simple, we propose a modified B92 protocol. Using this protocol, Alice and the receiver (Bob) can estimate Eve's information gain as a function of a few parameters that reflect the imperfections of devices or Eve's disturbance. We find a counter-intuitive behavior of Eve's maximum information gain, i.e., it decreases as the amount of disturbances increases. We also estimate the secret key gain that is the net growth of the secret key per one pulse. We show the region where the modified B92 protocol over a realistic channel is secure against individual attack. Next, we study the unconditional security of the B92 protocol, which is the security against any attack. To prove the security, we first propose a protocol that is unconditionally secure and can be reduced to the B92 protocol. This protocol employs the entanglement distillation protocol (EDP) based on a filtering operation and the Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) quantum error correcting codes. The bit errors and the phase errors, which have to be estimated for the EDP based on the CSS codes, are correlated after the filtering operation, and we can bound the amount of phase errors from the observed bit errors by an estimation method involving nonorthogonal measurements. The angle between the two states shows a trade-off between accuracy of the estimation and robustness to noises. We show a way to run the unconditionally secure B92.

Related papers

Security of the Bennett 1992 quantum-key distribution protocol against individual attack over a realistic channel

Kiyoshi Tamaki, Masato Koashi, Nobuyuki Imoto

The security of two-state quantum-key distribution against individual attack is estimated when the channel has losses and noises. We assume that Alice and Bob use two nonorthogonal single-photon polarization states. To make our analysis simple, we propose a modified $B92$ protocol in which Alice and Bob make use of inconclusive results, and Bob performs a kind of symmetrization of received states. Using this protocol, Alice and Bob can estimate Eve's information gain as a function of a few parameters that reflect the imperfections of devices, or Eve's disturbance. In some parameter regions, Eve's maximum information gain shows counterintuitive behavior, namely, it decreases as the amount of disturbances increases. For a small noise rate, Eve can extract perfect information in the case where the angle between Alice's two states is small or large, while she cannot extract perfect information for intermediate angles. We also estimate the secret key gain, which is the net growth of the secret key per pulse. We show the region where the modified $B92$ protocol over a realistic channel is secure against individual attack.

arXiv:quant-ph/0212161•Physical Review A•Mar 26, 2003•24 citations

Unconditional security of phase-coded quantum key distribution with strong reference pulse [5631-1]

Masato Koashia

We discuss the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse, which is essentially the one proposed by Bennett in 1992 (the B92 scheme). In the BB84 protocol with a perfect single photon source, the key rate decreases linearly with the transmission η of the channel. If we simply replace this source with a weak coherent-state pulse, the key rate drops more rapidly (as O(η)) since the presence of multiple photons favors the eavesdropper, Eve. The B92 protocol, if modified to be encoded on the polarization of a single photon, also shows O(η) dependence. This comes from Eve’s option of sending the vacuum state, which is always registered as an inconclusive result and never causes bit errors. In the original B92 scheme with phase coding, Eve has no such option replacing the weak pulse by the vacuum cannot avoid errors completely, thanks to the strong reference pulse. This should make the scheme stronger against the loss in the channel even coherent-state pulses from conventional lasers are used. We have obtained an unconditional security proof allowing the presence of small bit errors, and confirmed the above observation in a rigorous way. The key rate is found to drop linearly with the transmission η, and it is lower than the BB84 with a perfect single-photon source only by a constant.

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Unconditional security of phase-coded quantum key distribution with strong reference pulse

Masato Koashi

We discuss the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse, which is essentially the one proposed by Bennett in 1992 (the B92 scheme). In the BB84 protocol with a perfect single photon source, the key rate decreases linearly with the transmission T of the channel. If we simply replace this source with a weak coherent-state pulse, the key rate drops more rapidly (as O(η2)) since the presence of multiple photons favors the eavesdropper, Eve. The B92 protocol, if modified to be encoded on the polarization of a single photon, also shows O(η2) dependence. This comes from Eve's option of sending the vacuum state, which is always registered as an inconclusive result and never causes bit errors. In the original B92 scheme with phase coding, Eve has no such option--replacing the weak pulse by the vacuum cannot avoid errors completely, thanks to the strong reference pulse. This should make the scheme stronger against the loss in the channel even coherent-state pulses from conventional lasers are used. We have obtained an unconditional security proof allowing the presence of small bit errors, and confirmed the above observation in a rigorous way. The key rate is found to drop linearly with the transmission η, and it is lower than the BB84 with a perfect single-photon source only by a constant.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Jan 11, 2005•0 citations

Security of B92 quantum cryptography against individual attack over realistic channel

Kiyoshi Tamaki, Masato Koashi, N. Imoto

The security of the B92 protocol using single photon polarization states against an individual attack over a realistic channel is estimated. We calculated an upper bound of Eve's information and clarified the region where B92 over a realistic channel is secure against any individual attack.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim (CLEO-PR)•Nov 13, 2002•0 citations

Security of Bennett–Brassard 1984 Quantum-Key Distribution under a Collective-Rotation Noise Channel

Mhlambululi Mafu, Comfort Sekga, Makhamisa Senekane

The security analysis of the Ekert 1991 (E91), Bennett 1992 (B92), six-state protocol, Scarani–Acín–Ribordy–Gisin 2004 (SARG04) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols, and their variants have been studied in the presence of collective-rotation noise channels. However, besides the Bennett–Brassard 1984 (BB84) being the first proposed, extensively studied, and essential protocol, its security proof under collective-rotation noise is still missing. Thus, we aim to close this gap in the literature. Consequently, we investigate how collective-rotation noise channels affect the security of the BB84 protocol. Mainly, we study scenarios where the eavesdropper, Eve, conducts an intercept-resend attack on the transmitted photons sent via a quantum communication channel shared by Alice and Bob. Notably, we distinguish the impact of collective-rotation noise and that of the eavesdropper. To achieve this, we provide rigorous, yet straightforward numerical calculations. First, we derive a model for the collective-rotation noise for the BB84 protocol and parametrize the mutual information shared between Alice and Eve. This is followed by deriving the quantum bit error rate (QBER) for two intercept-resend attack scenarios. In particular, we demonstrate that, for small rotation angles, one can extract a secure secret key under a collective-rotation noise channel when there is no eavesdropping. We observe that noise induced by rotation of 0.35 radians of the prepared quantum state results in a QBER of 11%, which corresponds to the lower bound on the tolerable error rate for the BB84 QKD protocol against general attacks. Moreover, a rotational angle of 0.53 radians yields a 25% QBER, which corresponds to the error rate bound due to the intercept-resend attack. Finally, we conclude that the BB84 protocol is robust against intercept-resend attacks on collective-rotation noise channels when the rotation angle is varied arbitrarily within particular bounds.

Photonics•Dec 6, 2022•12 citations

Security and performance analyses of quantum-key-distribution systems

Chi‐Hang Fred Fung

Quantum cryptography, or, more precisely, quantum key distribution (QKD) allows two distant parties, Alice and Bob, to expand a previously shared secret key by sending quantum states through a quantum channel. The goal here is for Alice and Bob to communicate securely in the presence of an eavesdropper, Eve. The most well-known QKD protocol is the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol, which has been proved unconditionally secure against any attacks allowed by quantum mechanics. The main advantage of QKD over conventional cryptography is its absolute security. Thus, it is imperative to evaluate the security and performance of QKD protocols and realistic QKD systems. In this thesis, we study the security and performance aspects of QKD in four parts. In the first part, we study the Scarani-Acin-Ribordy-Gisin 2004 (SARG04) protocol. This protocol differs from the BB84 protocol only in the classical post-processing step and uses the same four quantum states as the BB84 protocol. We compared these two protocols and showed that in typical situations, the classical post-processing software for BB84 should be used in order to have a higher performance. In the second part, we prove the security of a three-state protocol. This protocol is similar to the BB84 protocol in that they share the same three qubit states. In the third part, we consider a practical Trojan horse attack on practical QKD systems implementing the BB84 protocol. The attack works by taking advantage of the finite response time of practical phase modulators to remap the states sent out by the legitimate user, Alice. We showed that if Alice and Bob are unaware of our attack, the final key shared between them can be compromised in some situations. In the fourth part, we consider another type of Trojan horse attack, which is based on mismatch between detection efficiencies of detectors. Practical detectors in QKD systems usually do not have identical efficiencies and an eavesdropper Eve may be able to exploit this efficiency mismatch to steal information about the final secret key. We analyze the security of the attack and show that it is possible for Eve to acquire some information on the final secret key if Alice and Bob are unaware of this attack.

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations
In this thesis, we analyze the security of the Bennett 1992 quantum key-distribution protocol (B92 protocol) over a realistic channel assuming that bit values are encoded in single photon polarization states. First, we study the security of the B92 protocol against individual attack. In the individual attack, eavesdropper (Eve) interacts a qubit emitted by the sender (Alice) with her probe system followed by a measurement on each probe. To make our analysis simple, we propose a modified B92 protocol. Using this protocol, Alice and the receiver (Bob) can estimate Eve's information gain as a function of a few parameters that reflect the imperfections of devices or Eve's disturbance. We find a counter-intuitive behavior of Eve's maximum information gain, i.e., it decreases as the amount of disturbances increases. We also estimate the secret key gain that is the net growth of the secret key per one pulse. We show the region where the modified B92 protocol over a realistic channel is secure against individual attack. Next, we study the unconditional security of the B92 protocol, which is the security against any attack. To prove the security, we first propose a protocol that is unconditionally secure and can be reduced to the B92 protocol. This protocol employs the entanglement distillation protocol (EDP) based on a filtering operation and the Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) quantum error correcting codes. The bit errors and the phase errors, which have to be estimated for the EDP based on the CSS codes, are correlated after the filtering operation, and we can bound the amount of phase errors from the observed bit errors by an estimation method involving nonorthogonal measurements. The angle between the two states shows a trade-off between accuracy of the estimation and robustness to noises. We show a way to run the unconditionally secure B92.
The security of two-state quantum-key distribution against individual attack is estimated when the channel has losses and noises. We assume that Alice and Bob use two nonorthogonal single-photon polarization states. To make our analysis simple, we propose a modified B92B92B92 protocol in which Alice and Bob make use of inconclusive results, and Bob performs a kind of symmetrization of received states. Using this protocol, Alice and Bob can estimate Eve's information gain as a function of a few parameters that reflect the imperfections of devices, or Eve's disturbance. In some parameter regions, Eve's maximum information gain shows counterintuitive behavior, namely, it decreases as the amount of disturbances increases. For a small noise rate, Eve can extract perfect information in the case where the angle between Alice's two states is small or large, while she cannot extract perfect information for intermediate angles. We also estimate the secret key gain, which is the net growth of the secret key per pulse. We show the region where the modified B92B92B92 protocol over a realistic channel is secure against individual attack.
We discuss the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse, which is essentially the one proposed by Bennett in 1992 (the B92 scheme). In the BB84 protocol with a perfect single photon source, the key rate decreases linearly with the transmission η of the channel. If we simply replace this source with a weak coherent-state pulse, the key rate drops more rapidly (as O(η)) since the presence of multiple photons favors the eavesdropper, Eve. The B92 protocol, if modified to be encoded on the polarization of a single photon, also shows O(η) dependence. This comes from Eve’s option of sending the vacuum state, which is always registered as an inconclusive result and never causes bit errors. In the original B92 scheme with phase coding, Eve has no such option replacing the weak pulse by the vacuum cannot avoid errors completely, thanks to the strong reference pulse. This should make the scheme stronger against the loss in the channel even coherent-state pulses from conventional lasers are used. We have obtained an unconditional security proof allowing the presence of small bit errors, and confirmed the above observation in a rigorous way. The key rate is found to drop linearly with the transmission η, and it is lower than the BB84 with a perfect single-photon source only by a constant.
We discuss the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse, which is essentially the one proposed by Bennett in 1992 (the B92 scheme). In the BB84 protocol with a perfect single photon source, the key rate decreases linearly with the transmission T of the channel. If we simply replace this source with a weak coherent-state pulse, the key rate drops more rapidly (as O(η2)) since the presence of multiple photons favors the eavesdropper, Eve. The B92 protocol, if modified to be encoded on the polarization of a single photon, also shows O(η2) dependence. This comes from Eve's option of sending the vacuum state, which is always registered as an inconclusive result and never causes bit errors. In the original B92 scheme with phase coding, Eve has no such option--replacing the weak pulse by the vacuum cannot avoid errors completely, thanks to the strong reference pulse. This should make the scheme stronger against the loss in the channel even coherent-state pulses from conventional lasers are used. We have obtained an unconditional security proof allowing the presence of small bit errors, and confirmed the above observation in a rigorous way. The key rate is found to drop linearly with the transmission η, and it is lower than the BB84 with a perfect single-photon source only by a constant.
The security analysis of the Ekert 1991 (E91), Bennett 1992 (B92), six-state protocol, Scarani–Acín–Ribordy–Gisin 2004 (SARG04) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols, and their variants have been studied in the presence of collective-rotation noise channels. However, besides the Bennett–Brassard 1984 (BB84) being the first proposed, extensively studied, and essential protocol, its security proof under collective-rotation noise is still missing. Thus, we aim to close this gap in the literature. Consequently, we investigate how collective-rotation noise channels affect the security of the BB84 protocol. Mainly, we study scenarios where the eavesdropper, Eve, conducts an intercept-resend attack on the transmitted photons sent via a quantum communication channel shared by Alice and Bob. Notably, we distinguish the impact of collective-rotation noise and that of the eavesdropper. To achieve this, we provide rigorous, yet straightforward numerical calculations. First, we derive a model for the collective-rotation noise for the BB84 protocol and parametrize the mutual information shared between Alice and Eve. This is followed by deriving the quantum bit error rate (QBER) for two intercept-resend attack scenarios. In particular, we demonstrate that, for small rotation angles, one can extract a secure secret key under a collective-rotation noise channel when there is no eavesdropping. We observe that noise induced by rotation of 0.35 radians of the prepared quantum state results in a QBER of 11%, which corresponds to the lower bound on the tolerable error rate for the BB84 QKD protocol against general attacks. Moreover, a rotational angle of 0.53 radians yields a 25% QBER, which corresponds to the error rate bound due to the intercept-resend attack. Finally, we conclude that the BB84 protocol is robust against intercept-resend attacks on collective-rotation noise channels when the rotation angle is varied arbitrarily within particular bounds.
Quantum cryptography, or, more precisely, quantum key distribution (QKD) allows two distant parties, Alice and Bob, to expand a previously shared secret key by sending quantum states through a quantum channel. The goal here is for Alice and Bob to communicate securely in the presence of an eavesdropper, Eve. The most well-known QKD protocol is the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol, which has been proved unconditionally secure against any attacks allowed by quantum mechanics. The main advantage of QKD over conventional cryptography is its absolute security. Thus, it is imperative to evaluate the security and performance of QKD protocols and realistic QKD systems. In this thesis, we study the security and performance aspects of QKD in four parts. In the first part, we study the Scarani-Acin-Ribordy-Gisin 2004 (SARG04) protocol. This protocol differs from the BB84 protocol only in the classical post-processing step and uses the same four quantum states as the BB84 protocol. We compared these two protocols and showed that in typical situations, the classical post-processing software for BB84 should be used in order to have a higher performance. In the second part, we prove the security of a three-state protocol. This protocol is similar to the BB84 protocol in that they share the same three qubit states. In the third part, we consider a practical Trojan horse attack on practical QKD systems implementing the BB84 protocol. The attack works by taking advantage of the finite response time of practical phase modulators to remap the states sent out by the legitimate user, Alice. We showed that if Alice and Bob are unaware of our attack, the final key shared between them can be compromised in some situations. In the fourth part, we consider another type of Trojan horse attack, which is based on mismatch between detection efficiencies of detectors. Practical detectors in QKD systems usually do not have identical efficiencies and an eavesdropper Eve may be able to exploit this efficiency mismatch to steal information about the final secret key. We analyze the security of the attack and show that it is possible for Eve to acquire some information on the final secret key if Alice and Bob are unaware of this attack.