Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)

Teleportation: I Want to Teleport Objects

Rumani Dey

Published Dec 16, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Thoughts can teleport without medium or light. Time cannot teleport. Time is sequential. Actually time is an abstract entity, so cannot be deciphered to be teleported. But if pain can teleport which can be felt then why can’t objects be teleported which can be touched?  Now Let's Get into What is Teleportation Mathematically: Teleportation is a lag in motion. It's a missing motion. A motion which has a defect . Our thoughts are like that . In the presence of consciousness, when our eyes concentrate on a new object our thoughts(instead of thinking of the old object) teleport(or forget) to the new object provided the impact of the new object is higher than that of the old object. When motion forgets , it teleports. The entity called quantity also can teleport. We have odd number series or an even number series. So, how is this series linked to teleporting objects? As thoughts can teleport in the same sense of consciousness, so maybe objects need a context/medium to teleport. If I consider the series of even numbers as a medium for teleporting an object , then the complement of that series is the missing entity. So, teleportation has a complement. Forgetfulness / memory loss can be complemented/filled. But we want to teleport an object’s motion. Motion is continuous, not discrete so that it can be teleported. Well a stationary object can be teleported to another place and that is called motion . If a moving object is teleported, it basically would forget its trajectory. Where is the context here? Say a certain light source is the context for teleporting an object which is stationary. If the object is moving , then we have to consider its velocity as part of the context . Isn’t non-uniform speed a kind of teleportation of motion? You are changing the speed / missing the originality of motion. In case of thoughts they teleport towards things they get attracted to. So, you have a magnetic source at the destination. So, can we teleport iron now? But then how would I teleport wood? Well energy/water moves from higher level to low. Teleportation needs to defy this physics and move from Low to higher level.

DOI
10.38124/ijisrt/25nov1530

Related papers

Quantum teleportation

Harry Paul

Transmission of a polarization state The word “teleportation” comes from parapsychology and means transportation of persons or things from one place to another using mental power. It was taken over into science fiction literature, where the transport is imagined to take place instantaneously. However this is still to be invented, and is surely nonsense – relativity theory teaches us that the velocity of light is the upper bound for the motion of an object. Nevertheless, teleportation has occupied a firm place in our fantasies, and when renowned quantum physicists (as has happened) use this word, they can be sure to attract attention. So, what is it all about? The basic idea is that it is not necessary to transport material constituents (ultimately the elementary particles). The same particles already exist at other places; we “simply” need to put them together in the right way. To do this, we need a complete set of building instructions, and this is, according to quantum theory, the quantum mechanical wave function representing the maximum information known about an object. We could imagine the wave function measured on the original system, then transmitted via a conventional (classical) information channel to another place and there used for system reconstruction. Unfortunately, the first step, the determination of the wave function on a single system , is impossible (see Section 10.3). However, quantum mechanics offers us another “magic trick.”

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 20, 2004•4 citations

Quantum teleportation and its experimental realization : Teleporting moving quantum states onto a stationary medium

Alexander Thorén

A quantum mechanical state may be transferred between locations using quantum teleportation.Specically information encoded in the polarized state of a light pulse maybe teleported onto the collecti ...

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Motion Out of Time: Single Speed Hypothesis

Temesgen Degu

This study delves into the concept of velocity within the context of the physical interpretation of acceleration and deceleration for objects in motion through space. A thought experiment involving a marble and a photon is utilized to propose the hypothesis that all objects in space, inherently, do not take time to move from a specific source to a destination. Through a series of methodically structured thought experiments, this hypothesis and the accompanying conclusions are explored and validated. Newton’s first law of motion serves as the basis for these scenarios, enabling logical conclusions to be drawn. Based on the arguments presented, this hypothesis is used to provide a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics. The methodology emphasizes logical reasoning over detailed mathematical formulations, offering a more accessible presentation.

•Apr 23, 2025•0 citations

Can We Teleport Ourselves? The Fundamental Impossibility of Macroscopic Quantum Teleportation

Peter HF Lau

This work investigates whether macroscopic quantum teleportation — the idea of “teleporting ourselves” — is possible under the laws of physics. While quantum teleportation is exact for single qubits, extending the protocol to biological organisms faces insurmountable barriers. We demonstrate that exponential Hilbert‑space growth, rapid decoherence at biological temperatures, chaotic error amplification, and hard thermodynamic limits (energy‑time uncertainty and the Bekenstein bound) render human‑scale teleportation fundamentally impossible. Corrected quantitative estimates show decoherence times as short as 10−19 seconds and power requirements exceeding 1014 watts, grounding the argument in concrete physics. The paper distinguishes between what quantum mechanics permits in principle and what thermodynamics forbids in practice, offering a rigorous synthesis of quantum information theory and physical law. *Author DisclaimerAll underlying concepts, frameworks, and core research directions are the original work of the author. Generative AI tools were used strictly for assistance in manuscript drafting, code generation, and figure preparation. All theoretical formulations and mathematical proofs included herein are unverified AI-generated drafts shared as preliminary proposals for discussion and community review.

•Sep 18, 2026•0 citations

Motion Out of Time: Single Speed Hypothesis

Temesgen Degu

This study delves into the concept of velocity within the context of the physical interpretation of acceleration and deceleration for objects in motion through space. A thought experiment involving a marble and a photon is utilized to propose the hypothesis that all objects in space, inherently, do not take time to move from a specific source to a destination. Through a series of methodically structured thought experiments, this hypothesis and the accompanying conclusions are explored and validated. Newton’s first law of motion serves as the basis for these scenarios, enabling logical conclusions to be drawn. Based on the arguments presented, this hypothesis is used to provide a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics. The methodology emphasizes logical reasoning over detailed mathematical formulations, offering a more accessible presentation.

•Sep 20, 2024•0 citations

Motion Out of Time: Single Speed Hypothesis

Temesgen Degu

This study delves into the concept of velocity within the context of the physical interpretation of acceleration and deceleration for objects in motion through space.A thought experiment involving a marble and a photon is utilized to propose the hypothesis that all objects in space, inherently, do not take time to move from a specific source to a destination.Through a series of methodically structured thought experiments, this hypothesis and the accompanying conclusions are explored and validated.Newton's first law of motion serves as the basis for these scenarios, enabling logical conclusions to be drawn.Based on the arguments presented, this hypothesis is used to provide a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics.The methodology emphasizes logical reasoning over detailed mathematical formulations, offering a more accessible presentation.Consider two entities: a photon and a marble.Both the photon and the marble are set to travel 100 meters in a straight line within the same dimension and in a vacuum.Since a photon travels at the speed of light, it takes approximately 0.0000003336 seconds for the photon to cover the distance.In contrast, assuming the marble is initially traveling at a speed of 40 meters per second in this thought experiment, it takes 2.5 seconds for the marble to complete the 100 meters.This raises a question: The photon covered the distance in 0.0000003336 seconds, while the marble took 2.5 seconds.In other words, the marble took approximately 2.4999996664 additional seconds to complete the distance compared to the photon.What accounts for this extra time taken by the marble?Consider the following analogy: Mrs. Bob has two sons, Eric and Smith, with Eric being the elder child in the household.Mrs. Bob typically sends Eric to buy groceries from a supermarket located a few blocks away from her house.Eric always takes about 20 minutes to purchase the groceries and return.One day, when Eric was unavailable, Mrs. Bob sent her younger son, Smith, instead.Smith left the house with a list of groceries, just as Eric would.However, unlike Eric, Smith returned after 45 minutes.Mrs. Bob noticed this significant difference in timing between the two and asked Smith the question: "Why did you take so long?Eric would return in 20 minutes."If Smith were to respond, he might say: "I couldn't find some of the items, so I had to go to another supermarket, which is farther away," "There was a long line at the checkout," "It took me a while to locate some items in the supermarket," "The supermarket was closed, so I had to wait for 15 minutes until it opened," "I ran into a friend on the way and we chatted for a while," and so forth.Smith could provide multiple reasons to account for his delay.However, all

•Sep 20, 2024•0 citations
Thoughts can teleport without medium or light. Time cannot teleport. Time is sequential. Actually time is an abstract entity, so cannot be deciphered to be teleported. But if pain can teleport which can be felt then why can’t objects be teleported which can be touched?  Now Let's Get into What is Teleportation Mathematically: Teleportation is a lag in motion. It's a missing motion. A motion which has a defect . Our thoughts are like that . In the presence of consciousness, when our eyes concentrate on a new object our thoughts(instead of thinking of the old object) teleport(or forget) to the new object provided the impact of the new object is higher than that of the old object. When motion forgets , it teleports. The entity called quantity also can teleport. We have odd number series or an even number series. So, how is this series linked to teleporting objects? As thoughts can teleport in the same sense of consciousness, so maybe objects need a context/medium to teleport. If I consider the series of even numbers as a medium for teleporting an object , then the complement of that series is the missing entity. So, teleportation has a complement. Forgetfulness / memory loss can be complemented/filled. But we want to teleport an object’s motion. Motion is continuous, not discrete so that it can be teleported. Well a stationary object can be teleported to another place and that is called motion . If a moving object is teleported, it basically would forget its trajectory. Where is the context here? Say a certain light source is the context for teleporting an object which is stationary. If the object is moving , then we have to consider its velocity as part of the context . Isn’t non-uniform speed a kind of teleportation of motion? You are changing the speed / missing the originality of motion. In case of thoughts they teleport towards things they get attracted to. So, you have a magnetic source at the destination. So, can we teleport iron now? But then how would I teleport wood? Well energy/water moves from higher level to low. Teleportation needs to defy this physics and move from Low to higher level.
Transmission of a polarization state The word “teleportation” comes from parapsychology and means transportation of persons or things from one place to another using mental power. It was taken over into science fiction literature, where the transport is imagined to take place instantaneously. However this is still to be invented, and is surely nonsense – relativity theory teaches us that the velocity of light is the upper bound for the motion of an object. Nevertheless, teleportation has occupied a firm place in our fantasies, and when renowned quantum physicists (as has happened) use this word, they can be sure to attract attention. So, what is it all about? The basic idea is that it is not necessary to transport material constituents (ultimately the elementary particles). The same particles already exist at other places; we “simply” need to put them together in the right way. To do this, we need a complete set of building instructions, and this is, according to quantum theory, the quantum mechanical wave function representing the maximum information known about an object. We could imagine the wave function measured on the original system, then transmitted via a conventional (classical) information channel to another place and there used for system reconstruction. Unfortunately, the first step, the determination of the wave function on a single system , is impossible (see Section 10.3). However, quantum mechanics offers us another “magic trick.”
This study delves into the concept of velocity within the context of the physical interpretation of acceleration and deceleration for objects in motion through space. A thought experiment involving a marble and a photon is utilized to propose the hypothesis that all objects in space, inherently, do not take time to move from a specific source to a destination. Through a series of methodically structured thought experiments, this hypothesis and the accompanying conclusions are explored and validated. Newton’s first law of motion serves as the basis for these scenarios, enabling logical conclusions to be drawn. Based on the arguments presented, this hypothesis is used to provide a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics. The methodology emphasizes logical reasoning over detailed mathematical formulations, offering a more accessible presentation.
This work investigates whether macroscopic quantum teleportation — the idea of “teleporting ourselves” — is possible under the laws of physics. While quantum teleportation is exact for single qubits, extending the protocol to biological organisms faces insurmountable barriers. We demonstrate that exponential Hilbert‑space growth, rapid decoherence at biological temperatures, chaotic error amplification, and hard thermodynamic limits (energy‑time uncertainty and the Bekenstein bound) render human‑scale teleportation fundamentally impossible. Corrected quantitative estimates show decoherence times as short as 10−19 seconds and power requirements exceeding 1014 watts, grounding the argument in concrete physics. The paper distinguishes between what quantum mechanics permits in principle and what thermodynamics forbids in practice, offering a rigorous synthesis of quantum information theory and physical law. *Author DisclaimerAll underlying concepts, frameworks, and core research directions are the original work of the author. Generative AI tools were used strictly for assistance in manuscript drafting, code generation, and figure preparation. All theoretical formulations and mathematical proofs included herein are unverified AI-generated drafts shared as preliminary proposals for discussion and community review.
This study delves into the concept of velocity within the context of the physical interpretation of acceleration and deceleration for objects in motion through space. A thought experiment involving a marble and a photon is utilized to propose the hypothesis that all objects in space, inherently, do not take time to move from a specific source to a destination. Through a series of methodically structured thought experiments, this hypothesis and the accompanying conclusions are explored and validated. Newton’s first law of motion serves as the basis for these scenarios, enabling logical conclusions to be drawn. Based on the arguments presented, this hypothesis is used to provide a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics. The methodology emphasizes logical reasoning over detailed mathematical formulations, offering a more accessible presentation.
This study delves into the concept of velocity within the context of the physical interpretation of acceleration and deceleration for objects in motion through space.A thought experiment involving a marble and a photon is utilized to propose the hypothesis that all objects in space, inherently, do not take time to move from a specific source to a destination.Through a series of methodically structured thought experiments, this hypothesis and the accompanying conclusions are explored and validated.Newton's first law of motion serves as the basis for these scenarios, enabling logical conclusions to be drawn.Based on the arguments presented, this hypothesis is used to provide a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics.The methodology emphasizes logical reasoning over detailed mathematical formulations, offering a more accessible presentation.Consider two entities: a photon and a marble.Both the photon and the marble are set to travel 100 meters in a straight line within the same dimension and in a vacuum.Since a photon travels at the speed of light, it takes approximately 0.0000003336 seconds for the photon to cover the distance.In contrast, assuming the marble is initially traveling at a speed of 40 meters per second in this thought experiment, it takes 2.5 seconds for the marble to complete the 100 meters.This raises a question: The photon covered the distance in 0.0000003336 seconds, while the marble took 2.5 seconds.In other words, the marble took approximately 2.4999996664 additional seconds to complete the distance compared to the photon.What accounts for this extra time taken by the marble?Consider the following analogy: Mrs. Bob has two sons, Eric and Smith, with Eric being the elder child in the household.Mrs. Bob typically sends Eric to buy groceries from a supermarket located a few blocks away from her house.Eric always takes about 20 minutes to purchase the groceries and return.One day, when Eric was unavailable, Mrs. Bob sent her younger son, Smith, instead.Smith left the house with a list of groceries, just as Eric would.However, unlike Eric, Smith returned after 45 minutes.Mrs. Bob noticed this significant difference in timing between the two and asked Smith the question: "Why did you take so long?Eric would return in 20 minutes."If Smith were to respond, he might say: "I couldn't find some of the items, so I had to go to another supermarket, which is farther away," "There was a long line at the checkout," "It took me a while to locate some items in the supermarket," "The supermarket was closed, so I had to wait for 15 minutes until it opened," "I ran into a friend on the way and we chatted for a while," and so forth.Smith could provide multiple reasons to account for his delay.However, all