This study investigates hybrid quantum neural networks for fruit quality assessment, with a focus on the impact of the entangling gate choice. Two architectures were developed: NNQEv1, utilizing controlled-NOT (CNOT) gates, and NNQEv2, employing controlled-phase (CZ) gates. A theoretical justification is provided, based on gate decomposition and hardware-aware noise considerations, suggesting the CZ-based architecture is likely to be more stable. The performance of the models was evaluated through the computational execution of their quantum circuits on classical hardware and compared against classical and state-of-the-art deep learning models. The proposed models demonstrated competitive performance, achieving test accuracies of 98.7% on MNIST, 98.6% on the FruitQ dataset, and 96.7% on a custom, data-scarce Apple dataset. The experimental results align with the theoretical analysis: the CZ-based NNQEv2 model, when compared to the CNOT-based NNQEv1, consistently showed more stable training dynamics and yielded tighter confidence intervals in cross-validation. This work presents a foundational, computational study on the role of gate-level design choices, intended to inform the development of future quantum machine learning algorithms.
This study investigates hybrid quantum neural networks for fruit quality assessment, with a focus on the impact of the entangling gate choice. Two architectures were developed: NNQEv1, utilizing controlled-NOT (CNOT) gates, and NNQEv2, employing controlled-phase (CZ) gates. A theoretical justification is provided, based on gate decomposition and hardware-aware noise considerations, suggesting the CZ-based architecture is likely to be more stable. The performance of the models was evaluated through the computational execution of their quantum circuits on classical hardware and compared against classical and state-of-the-art deep learning models. The proposed models demonstrated competitive performance, achieving test accuracies of 98.7% on MNIST, 98.6% on the FruitQ dataset, and 96.7% on a custom, data-scarce Apple dataset. The experimental results align with the theoretical analysis: the CZ-based NNQEv2 model, when compared to the CNOT-based NNQEv1, consistently showed more stable training dynamics and yielded tighter confidence intervals in cross-validation. This work presents a foundational, computational study on the role of gate-level design choices, intended to inform the development of future quantum machine learning algorithms.
This study presents a systematic comparison between hybrid quantum-classical neural networks and purely classical models across three benchmark datasets (MNIST, CIFAR100, and STL10) to evaluate their performance, efficiency, and robustness. The hybrid models integrate parameterized quantum circuits with classical deep learning architectures, while the classical counterparts use conventional convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Experiments were conducted over 50 training epochs for each dataset, with evaluations on validation accuracy, test accuracy, training time, computational resource usage, and adversarial robustness (tested with ε=0.1 perturbations).Key findings demonstrate that hybrid models consistently outperform classical models in final accuracy, achieving {99.38\% (MNIST), 41.69\% (CIFAR100), and 74.05\% (STL10) validation accuracy, compared to classical benchmarks of 98.21\%, 32.25\%, and 63.76\%, respectively. Notably, the hybrid advantage scales with dataset complexity, showing the most significant gains on CIFAR100 (+9.44\%) and STL10 (+10.29\%). Hybrid models also train 5--12× faster (e.g., 21.23s vs. 108.44s per epoch on MNIST) and use 6--32\% fewer parameters} while maintaining superior generalization to unseen test data.Adversarial robustness tests reveal that hybrid models are significantly more resilient on simpler datasets (e.g., 45.27\% robust accuracy on MNIST vs. 10.80\% for classical) but show comparable fragility on complex datasets like CIFAR100 ($\sim$1\% robustness for both). Resource efficiency analyses indicate that hybrid models consume less memory (4--5GB vs. 5--6GB for classical) and lower CPU utilization (9.5\% vs. 23.2\% on average).These results suggest that hybrid quantum-classical architectures offer compelling advantages in accuracy, training efficiency, and parameter scalability, particularly for complex vision tasks.
Quantum machine learning has emerged as a promising application domain for near-term quantum hardware, particularly through hybrid quantum-classical models that leverage both classical and quantum processing. Although numerous hybrid architectures have been proposed and demonstrated successfully on benchmark tasks, a significant open question remains regarding the specific contribution of quantum components to the overall performance of these models. In this work, we aim to shed light on the impact of quantum processing within hybrid quantum-classical neural network architectures through a rigorous statistical study under ideal, noise-free simulation. We systematically assess a selection of commonly used HQNN architectures on three binary medical classification tasks covering medical signal data as well as planar and volumetric images. In doing so, we examine the influence attributable to classical and quantum aspects such as encoding schemes, entanglement, and circuit size. Within this experimental setting, we find that in best-case scenarios, hybrid models show performance comparable to their classical counterparts. However, in most cases, performance metrics deteriorate when the investigated QNN components replace matched classical processing layers. Our multi-modal analysis provides empirical insights into the contributions of the tested quantum components and advocates for cautious claims and design choices for hybrid models in near-term applications.
Abstract In this study, we compare the performance of randomized classical and quantum neural networks (NNs) as well as classical and quantum-classical hybrid convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the task of supervised binary image classification. We keep the employed quantum circuits compatible with near-term quantum devices and use two distinct methodologies: applying randomized NNs on dimensionality-reduced data, and applying CNNs to full image data. We evaluate these approaches on three fully-classical data sets of increasing complexity: an artificial hypercube data set, MNIST handwritten digits and industrial images of practical relevance. Our study’s central goal is to shed more light on how quantum and classical models perform for various binary classification tasks and on what defines a good quantum model. To this end, our study involves a correlation analysis between classification accuracy and quantum model hyperparameters, and an analysis on the role of entanglement in quantum models, as well as on the impact of initial training parameters. We find classical and quantum-classical hybrid models achieve statistically-equivalent classification accuracies across most data sets with no approach consistently outperforming the other. Interestingly, we observe that quantum NNs show lower variance with respect to initial training parameters and that the role of entanglement is nuanced. While incorporating entangling gates seems to be generally advantageous, we also observe that their (optimizable) entangling power is not correlated with model performance. We also observe an inverse proportionality between the number of entangling gates and the average gate entangling power. Our study provides an industry perspective on quantum machine learning for practical binary image classification tasks, highlighting both current limitations and potential avenues for further research in quantum circuit design, entanglement utilization, and model transferability across varied applications.
In current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, hybrid quantum neural networks (HQNNs) offer a promising solution, combining the strengths of classical machine learning with quantum computing capabilities. However, the performance of these networks can be significantly affected by the quantum noise inherent in NISQ devices. In this paper, we conduct an extensive comparative analysis of various HQNN algorithms, namely Quantum Convolution Neural Network (QCNN), Quanvolutional Neural Network (QuanNN), and Quantum Transfer Learning (QTL), for image classification tasks. We evaluate the performance of each algorithm across quantum circuits with different entangling structures, variations in layer count, and optimal placement in the architecture. Subsequently, we select the highest-performing architectures and assess their robustness against noise influence by introducing quantum gate noise through Phase Flip, Bit Flip, Phase Damping, Amplitude Damping, and the Depolarizing Channel. Our results reveal that the top-performing models exhibit varying resilience to different noise gates. However, in most scenarios, the QuanNN demonstrates greater robustness across various quantum noise channels, consistently outperforming other models. This highlights the importance of tailoring model selection to specific noise environments in NISQ devices.
Recent developments in quantum machine learning, there is focus on how the abilities of quantum-based neural architectures, which current purely classical systems cannot achieve, can be utilized to model more complex data connections. To circumvent this issue, this paper suggests an efficient quantum-enhanced neural network model that jointly optimizes model structure, learning dynamics, and hybridization in the process of training. This architecture provides a hybrid of classical feature processing and variational quantum circuits where the performance-based architectural control enables the introduction of quantum elements selectively, as opposed to uniformly. This twin-engine design stresses on stability, awareness of resources and cross-framework deplorability. The classical, hybrid, and quantum-enhanced versions of the device can be evaluated experimentally, showing a consistent improvement of performance.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has recently emerged as a highly promising research frontier. Within this domain, Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs),characterized by Variational Quantum Circuits (VQCs) at their core and featuring layers of quantum gates optimized by classical algorithms, have garnered significant attention. However, a rigorous and exhaustive evaluation of their practical performance remains largely incomplete. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of three prominent hybrid classical-quantum architectures: Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNN), Quantum Recurrent Neural Networks (QRNN), and Quantum Vision Transformers (QViT), focusing on the critical dimensions of generalization, accuracy, and robustness. Our findings provide novel insights that address previous evaluative gaps. Notably, while these models exhibit exceptional performance on low-feature datasets such as MNIST, their learning efficacy degrades significantly when transitioned to high-feature datasets. Furthermore, convolutional-based models like QCNN appear less effective on high-dimensional data than other machine learning architectures. Additionally, while all models are susceptible to adversarial noise, traditional architectures, such as recurrent and convolutional networks, demonstrate superior resilience. Conversely, in the presence of quantum noise, the transformer-based architecture proves its strength by maintaining high robustness against measurement noise, channel noise, and finite-shot effects, whereas other architectures suffer marked performance declines. These results provide a granular perspective on the current state of the field and underscore the critical importance of tailoring model selection to the constraints of contemporary Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) environments.