Systems of linear equations are ubiquitous across science, engineering, machine learning, and even finance. While classical methods can be prohibitively slow for large-scale problems, quantum linear systems algorithms offer the potential for exponential speedup in certain parameter regimes. However, a significant gap persists between this theoretical promise and practical implementation, as the advantages are often obscured by the substantial quantum resources and high sensitivity to noise inherent in current quantum hardware. One way to bridge this gap is through the use of Iterative Refinement, a classical post-processing scheme that can exponentially improve the accuracy to which a linear system of equations can be solved using low-precision arithmetic. In the context of quantum linear systems algorithms, such as the HHL algorithm proposed by Harrow, Hassidim, and Loyd, Iterative Refinement can greatly reduce the quantum resources required to calculate an accurate solution in terms of tomography cost, circuit volume, and fault-tolerant overhead. Here, we compute and benchmark highly precise solutions to linear systems of equations of up to eight variables by running HHL with Iterative Refinement on NISQ quantum computers. We also present our open-source implementation, emphasizing that our circuit is not tailored to specific problem instances, as most available implementations are.
Systems of linear equations are ubiquitous across science, engineering, machine learning, and even finance. While classical methods can be prohibitively slow for large-scale problems, quantum linear systems algorithms offer the potential for exponential speedup in certain parameter regimes. However, a significant gap persists between this theoretical promise and practical implementation, as the advantages are often obscured by the substantial quantum resources and high sensitivity to noise inherent in current quantum hardware. One way to bridge this gap is through the use of Iterative Refinement, a classical post-processing scheme that can exponentially improve the accuracy to which a linear system of equations can be solved using low-precision arithmetic. In the context of quantum linear systems algorithms, such as the HHL algorithm proposed by Harrow, Hassidim, and Loyd, Iterative Refinement can greatly reduce the quantum resources required to calculate an accurate solution in terms of tomography cost, circuit volume, and fault-tolerant overhead. Here, we compute and benchmark highly precise solutions to linear systems of equations of up to eight variables by running HHL with Iterative Refinement on NISQ quantum computers. We also present our open-source implementation, emphasizing that our circuit is not tailored to specific problem instances, as most available implementations are.
One of the most significant developments in quantum computing is the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) method, which can solve linear equation systems at exponential speedup. Because linear systems are essential to many scientific fields, including physics, engineering, and machine learning, this approach has great potential to revolutionize computational paradigms. The HHL algorithm is thoroughly examined in this work, with particular attention paid to its theoretical framework, real-world application utilizing IBM's Qiskit platform, and the difficulties in simulating quantum algorithms on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. Using parameters like fidelity, time complexity, and scalability, the research further evaluates the HHL algorithm's performance in comparison to traditional methods. According to the findings, quantum simulations work well for small-scale matrices like 2x2 and 4x4, but expanding the approach to bigger systems is still difficult because of hardware and software constraints. Finally, the research emphasizes the key directions for advancing quantum hardware and algorithms to overcome current scalability challenges, enabling broader applicability of the HHL algorithm in solving complex linear systems.
We propose an iterative improvement method for the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm to solve a linear system of equations. This is a quantum-classical hybrid algorithm. The accuracy is essential to solve the linear system of equations. However, the accuracy of the HHL algorithm is limited by the number of quantum bits used to express the eigenvalues of the matrix. Our iterative method improves the accuracy of the HHL solutions, and gives higher accuracy which surpasses the accuracy limited by the number of quantum bits. In practical HHL algorithm, a huge number of measurements is required to obtain good accuracy, even if we provide a sufficient number of quantum bits for the eigenvalue expression, since the solution is statistically processed from the measurements. Our improved iterative method can reduce the number of measurements. Moreover, the sign information for each eigenstate of the solution is lost once the measurement is made, although the sign is significant. Therefore, the naïve iterative method of the HHL algorithm may slow down, especially, when the solution includes wrong signs. In this paper, we propose and evaluate an improved iterative method for the HHL algorithm that is robust against the sign information loss, in terms of the number of iterations and the computational accuracy.
The limited capabilities of current quantum hardware significantly constrain the scale of experimental demonstrations of most quantum algorithmic primitives. This makes it challenging to perform benchmarking of the current hardware using useful quantum algorithms, i.e., application-oriented benchmarking. In particular, the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm is a critical quantum linear algebra primitive, but the majority of the components of HHL are far out of the reach of noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, which has led to the proposal of hybrid classical-quantum variants. The goal of this work is to further bridge the gap between proposed near-term friendly implementations of HHL and the kinds of quantum circuits that can be executed on noisy hardware. Our proposal adds to the existing literature of hybrid quantum algorithms for linear algebra that are more compatible with the current scale of quantum devices. Specifically, we propose two modifications to the Hybrid HHL algorithm proposed by Lee et al., leading to our algorithm Hybrid HHL++ : (1) propose a novel algorithm for determining a scaling factor for the linear system matrix that maximizes the utility of the amount of ancillary qubits allocated to the phase estimation component of HHL, and (2) introduce a heuristic for compressing the HHL circuit. We demonstrate the efficacy of our work by running our modified Hybrid HHL on Quantinuum System Model H-series trapped-ion quantum computers to solve different problem instances of small-scale portfolio optimization problems, leading to the largest experimental demonstrations of HHL for an application to date.
Linear systems of equations lie at the heart of numerous scientific and engineering challenges. In cutting-edge arena like artificial intelligence, machine learning and neuro-computation, these systems serve as a fundamental tool for mathematical modeling. Classical algorithms for solving linear systems have been extensively developed and forms the backbone of diverse applications across various scientific disciplines. While classical algorithms exist for solving linear systems, they often encounter limitations termed “NP-completeness” as data complexity increases. The emerging field of quantum computing offers a revolutionary approach to deal with these kinds of problems. The Harrow–Hassidim–Lloyd (HHL) algorithm tackles these challenges and opens new avenues for research. This study delves into the contemporary effectiveness of the HHL algorithm to address systems of linear equations. By examining recent research in quantum machine learning, we aim to assess the HHL algorithm’s potential to revolutionize the process of optimizing hyperparameters for machine learning models, resulting in increased efficiency and cost savings. This paper meticulously analyzes the HHL algorithm and explores its evolution from conception to the latest advancements. A comprehensive examination of the HHL algorithm, including its evolution over time, is thoroughly explored. The investigation delves into the potential challenges and limitations that might hinder the practical deployment of the HHL algorithm. Identifying these roadblocks will pave the way for future research and development efforts.
Quantum computing enables the efficient resolution of complex problems, often outperforming classical methods across various applications. In 2009, Harrow, Hassidim and Lloyd proposed an algorithm for solving linear systems of equations, demonstrating exponential speedup (under ideal conditions) with a complexity of poly(logN), in contrast to classical approaches, which in the general case exhibit a complexity of O(N3), although they can achieve O(N) in specific cases involving sparse matrices. This algorithm holds promise for advancements in machine learning, the solution of differential equations, linear regression, and cryptographic analysis. However, its structure is intricate, and there is a notable lack of detailed instructional materials in the literature. In this context, this paper presents a tutorial addressing the physical and mathematical foundations of the HHL algorithm, aimed at undergraduate students, explaining its theoretical construction and its implementation for solving linear equation systems. After discussing the underlying mathematical and physical concepts, we present numerical examples that illustrate the evolution of the quantum circuit. Finally, the algorithm's complexity, limitations, and future prospects are analyzed. The examples are compared with their classical simulations, allowing for an operational assessment of the algorithm's performance.
Solving systems of linear equations is a key subroutine in many quantum algorithms. In the last 15 years, many quantum linear solvers (QLS) have been developed, competing to achieve the best asymptotic worst-case complexity. Most QLS assume fault-tolerant quantum computers, so they cannot yet be benchmarked on real hardware. Because an algorithm with better asymptotic scaling can underperform on instances of practical interest, the question of which of these algorithms is the most promising remains open. In this work, we implement a method to partially address this question. We consider four well-known QLS algorithms which directly implement an approximate matrix inversion function: the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd algorithm, two algorithms utilizing a linear combination of unitaries, and one utilizing the quantum singular value transformation (QSVT). These methods, known as functional QLS, share nearly identical assumptions about the problem setup and oracle access. Their computational cost is dominated by query calls to a matrix oracle encoding the problem one wants to solve. We provide formulas to count the number of queries needed to solve specific problem instances; these can be used to benchmark the algorithms on real-life instances, under benevolent, idealized assumptions, without requiring access to quantum hardware to implement the procedure. We select three data sets: random generated instances that obey the assumptions of functional QLS, linear systems from simplex iterations on MIPLIB, and Poisson equations. Our methods can be easily extended to other data sets and provide a high-level guide to evaluate the performance of a QLS algorithm. In particular, our work shows that HHL underperforms in comparison to the other methods across all data sets, often by orders of magnitude, while the Chebyshev-approximation based methods typically have the best performance.