Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A Planck-Einstein-Dirac Wave Model of Electron

Zhaoxin Wang

Published Nov 14, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The spherical model of electron cannot explain Bohr magneton, de Broglie wave, etc. To explain these properties physically, we propose that spin, one core concept of quantum theory, is a reality, and introduce this alternative solely based on experimental findings, Planck’s, Einstein’s, and Dirac’s insights, and follows classical laws, that an electron is an electrical wave with a literal $\frac{1}{2}$ spin (Dirac), i.e., spins two circles in one cycle, both angular momentum are ℏ. Its wavelength is determined by $E=h\nu_{m_0}=\frac{hc}{\lambda_{m_0}}=m_0c^2$ (Plank and Einstein), λ m 0 is the Compton wavelength. As E⃗ ⊥ c⃗ for a transverse wave, it has a net electricity due to the first spin, $f(E_q)=\frac{1}{2}E_0\left(1-\cos(2\omega_0t)\right)$, half of its cycle, i.e., the minimal meaningful unit as F = E q , is related with its charge, q = E q ϵ 0 . Moreover, an electron has a ring shape due to the second spin, 2 π R 0 = λ m 0 , λ m 0 is the electron-impact cross section. As $\hbar=\frac{h}{\lambda_{m_0}}\frac{\lambda_{m_0}}{2\pi}=m_0cR_0$, it has a quantized classical angular momentum, with a speed of c . The Bohr magneton, $\vec{\mu_B}=\vec{\frac{q}{2m_0}\hbar}$, g -factor is 2. Critically, the full Dirac’s equation of an electron with a constant velocity is $\vec{mc} = \vec{\hbar_\perp}+\vec{p_\perp } +\vec{\hbar_{//}} +\vec{p_{//}}$, and its electromagnetic properties due to charge are $\vec{f(E_q)} = \vec{f(E_q)\frac{\sqrt{c^2-v^{'2}}}{c}} + \vec{f(E_q) \frac{v\rq}{c}} = \vec{E_{net}^{//}} + \vec{E_q^\perp}$, $\vec{v\rq} // \vec{\hbar_\perp}$ or $\vec{v\rq} // \vec{\hbar_{//}}$, and $\vec{v\rq} // \vec{E_{net}}$. Assuming heavy charged particles have equivalent though shall not identical mechanisms, mathematically this model is equivalent to Special Relativity, and supports ALL its formulas, i.e., v < c , E = m c 2 , direction-insensitive m = γ m 0 and $t=\frac{t_0}{\gamma}$; Moreover, the net electricity $\vec{E_{net}^{//}}$ and Bohr magneton is orientation-quantized, direction-sensitive and follows Lorentz transformation, leading to Lorentz transformation of length contraction; while following Relativity, magnetism can be defined by $\vec{f(B)} =\vec{f(E_q)\frac{v\rq}{c^2}}$, which is not circularly symmetric and self-evidently does not follow Lorentz transformation. The temporospatial averaged magnetic intensity of a current is relativistic, $\bar{\vec{B}} =\sum\vec{{f(E_q)}\frac{\Delta v}{c^2 }}=\frac{\vec{I}}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 c^2}=\frac{\mu_0\vec{I}}{2\pi}$, and μ 0 ϵ 0 c 2 = 1, supporting Maxwell’s equations. Further implications include chirality therefore magnetic spatial quantization, de Broglie wave, etc. The spherical model should be just an observation due to orientation quantization of $\vec{E_{net}}$. We conclude this model of electron may provide one step further to the ultimate Quantum Theory in a nonrelativistic spacetime.

DOI
10.22541/au.176313975.59129238/v1

Related papers

A novel quantum-mechanical interpretation of the Dirac equation

M. K. -h. Kiessling, A. S. Tahvildar-zadeh

A novel interpretation is given of Dirac's "wave equation for the relativistic electron" as a quantum-mechanical one-particle equation. In this interpretation the electron and the positron are merely the two different "topological spin" states of a single more fundamental particle, not distinct particles in their own right. The new interpretation is backed up by the existence of such bi-particle structures in general relativity, in particular the ring singularity present in any spacelike section of the maximal analytically extended, topologically non-trivial, electromagnetic Kerr-Newman spacetime in the zero-gravity limit (here, "zero-gravity" means the limit $G\to 0$, where $G$ is Newton's constant of universal gravitation). This novel interpretation resolves the dilemma that Dirac's wave equation seems to be capable of describing both the electron and the positron in "external" fields in many relevant situations, while the bi-spinorial wave function has only a single position variable in its argument, not two - as it should if it were a two-particle equation! A Dirac equation is formulated for a ring-like bi-particle which interacts with a static point charges located elsewhere in the topologically non-trivial physical space associated with the moving ring bi-particle, the motion being governed by a de-Broglie-Bohm type law extracted from the Dirac equation. As an application, the pertinent general-relativistic zero-gravity Hydrogen problem is studied in the usual Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Its spectral results suggest that the zero-$G$ Kerr-Newman magnetic moment be identified with the so-called "anomalous magnetic moment of the physical electron," not with the Bohr magneton, so that the ring radius is only a tiny fraction of the electron's Compton wave length.

•Jan 1, 2014•8 citations

Early History of Spin

Most students of science and engineering know that every elementary particle, such as electrons, neutrons, photons, neutrinos, etc., has a quantum mechanical property called “spin” which can be measured (perhaps not easily, but at least in principle) and has a quantized value, including zero. The vast majority of these students mentally visualize spin as the angular momentum associated with the elementary particle spinning or rotating about its own axis (like a top or a planetary object). This mental picture, although convenient and comforting, is actually somewhat crude and certainly incomplete. Landau and Lifshitz, in their classic textbook on quantum mechanics [1], wrote “[the spin] property of elementary particles is peculiar to quantum theory. [It] has no classical interpretation... It would be wholly meaningless to imagine the ‘intrinsic’ angular momentum of an elementary particle as being the result of its rotation about its own axis.” The simplistic notion of self-rotation about an axis, shown in Fig. 1.1, can- not explain many features of spin, such as why its magnitude cannot assume continuous values and why it is quantized to certain specific values. It also causes serious problems if taken too literally. As we will see later (Problem 1.2), if we think of an electron as a solid sphere of radius equal to the Lorentz radius e2/(4πǫ0m0c 2) (where e is the electron’s charge, m0 is the mass, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ǫ0 is the dielectric constant of vacuum), then the velocity on the surface of a rotating electron would have to be many times the velocity of light in vacuum if such a rotation were to generate an angular momentum equal to the electron’s spin. Obviously that would not be permitted by the theory of relativity. Indeed, a deep understanding of quantum mechanics is required to understand how the spin property comes about. Its origin is in relativistic quantum mechanics and really was first appreciated by Paul Andrew Maurice Dirac when he derived the Dirac equation which is the cornerstone of relativistic quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman, noted for his distaste for mysticism in physics, wrote about the notion of “spin”: “It appears to be one of the few places in physics where there is a rule which can be stated very simply, but for which no one has found a simple and easy explanation. The explanation is down deep in relativistic quantum mechanics.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 18, 2015•0 citations

Relativistic Mechanics Theory for Electrons that Exhibits Spin, Zitterbewegung, Superposition and Produces Dirac's Wave Equation

James L. Beck

A neo-classical relativistic mechanics theory is presented where the spin of an electron is a natural part of its space-time path as a point particle. The fourth-order equation of motion corresponds to the same Lagrangian function in proper time as in special relativity except for an additional spin energy term. The total motion can be decomposed into a sum of a local spin motion about a point and a global motion of this point, called the spin center. The global motion is sub-luminal and obeys Newton's second law in proper time, the time for a clock fixed at the spin center, while the total motion occurs at the speed of light c, consistent with the eigenvalues of Dirac's velocity operators having magnitude c. The local spin motion corresponds to Schrödinger's zitterbewegung and is a perpetual motion, which for a free electron has a circular path in the spin-center frame. In an electro-magnetic field, this spin motion generates magnetic and electric dipole energies through the Lorentz force on the electron's point charge. The corresponding electric dipole energy is consistent with the spin-orbit coupling term in the corrected Pauli non-relativistic Hamiltonian but the magnetic dipole energy is one half of that in Dirac's theory. By defining a spin tensor as the angular momentum of the electron's total motion about its spin center, the fundamental equations of motion can be re-written in an identical form to those of the Barut-Zanghi electron theory. These equations of motion can then be expressed using operators applied to a state function of proper time satisfying a Dirac-Schrödinger spinor equation. The operators produce dynamic variables without any probability implications. For the free electron, the state function satisfies Dirac's relativistic wave equation when the Lorentz transformation is applied to express proper time in terms of an observer's space-time coordinates.

arXiv:2108.07267•Aug 14, 2021•2 citations

A novel quantum-mechanical interpretation of the Dirac equation

M K-H Kiessling, A S Tahvildar-Zadeh

Abstract A novel interpretation is given of Dirac’s ‘wave equation for the relativistic electron’ as a quantum-mechanical one-particle equation. In this interpretation the electron and the positron are merely the two different ‘topological spin’ states of a single more fundamental particle, not distinct particles in their own right. The new interpretation is backed up by the existence of such ‘bi-particle’ structures in general relativity, in particular the ring singularity present in any spacelike section of the spacetime singularity of the maximal-analytically extended, topologically non-trivial, electromagnetic Kerr–Newman (KN)spacetime in the zero-gravity limit (here, ‘zero-gravity’ means the limit , where G is Newton’s constant of universal gravitation). This novel interpretation resolves the dilemma that Dirac’s wave equation seems to be capable of describing both the electron and the positron in ‘external’ fields in many relevant situations, while the bi-spinorial wave function has only a single position variable in its argument, not two—as it should if it were a quantum-mechanical two-particle wave equation. A Dirac equation is formulated for such a ring-like bi-particle which interacts with a static point charge located elsewhere in the topologically non-trivial physical space associated with the moving ring particle, the motion being governed by a de Broglie–Bohm type law extracted from the Dirac equation. As an application, the pertinent general-relativistic zero-gravity hydrogen problem is studied in the usual Born–Oppenheimer approximation. Its spectral results suggest that the zero- G KN magnetic moment be identified with the so-called ‘anomalous magnetic moment of the physical electron,’ not with the Bohr magneton, so that the ring radius is only a tiny fraction of the electron’s reduced Compton wavelength.

arXiv:1411.2296•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Feb 19, 2016•6 citations

Zitterbewegung and the Electron

Arend Niehaus

Starting from a probabilistic model of the electron, which explains spin and spin measurements in terms of a probability density distribution resulting from a rapidly changing angular momentum during an extended Zitterbewegung EZBW, a “light-like” model of the electron and other spin-1/2 particles is formulated. This model describes individual particles in terms of paths of a moving quantum. It is shown that this description allows one to reproduce observable properties as path-averages over a period of the fast EZBW in elementary calculations. The general topology of the paths may be described as a helical path, with a helix axis forming a circle around a fixed point in space. The radius of the helix and of the circle is equal and given by half the reduced Compton wave length of a photon of energy equal to the rest energy of the particle described. The paths depend on the relative velocity between the described “entity” and the observer, and represent the De Broglie wave. The merits of the proposed model are summarized and its role in relation to the established description by quantum mechanics is discussed. It is concluded that it supports the existence of the proposed EZBW, and offers a description of quantum behavior without quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1701.02998•Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2017•8 citations

A New Theory on Electron Wave-Particle Duality

Nader Butto

A theory employing the vortex shape of the electron was presented to resolve the enigma of the wave-particle duality. Conventions such as “particle” and “wave” were used to describe the behavior of quantum objects such as electrons. A superfluid vacuum formed the base to describe the basic vortex structure and properties of the electron, whereas various formulations derived from hydrodynamic laws described the electron vortex circumference, radius, angular velocity and angular frequency, angular momentum (spin) and magnetic momentum. A vortex electron fully explained the associations between momentum and wave, and hydrodynamic laws were essential in deriving the energy and angular frequency of the electron. In general, an electron traveling in space possesses internal and external motions. To derive the angular frequency of its internal motion, the Compton wavelength was used to represent the length of one cycle of the internal motion that is equal to the circumference of the electron vortex. The angular frequency of the electron vortex was calculated to obtain the same value according to Planck’s theory. A traveling vortex electron has internal and external motions that create a three-dimensional helix trajectory. The magnitude of the instantaneous velocity of the electron is the resultant of its internal and external velocities, being equal to the internal velocity reduced by the Lorentz factor (whose essence is presented in a detailed formulation). The wavelength of the helix trajectory represents the distance traveled by a particle along its axis during one period of revolution around the axis, resulting in the same de Broglie wavelength that corresponds to the helix pitch of the helix. Mathematical formulations were presented to demonstrate the relation between the energy of the vortex and its angular frequency and de Broglie’s wavelength; furthermore, Compton’s and de Broglie’s wavelengths were also differentiated.

Journal of High Energy Physics Gravitation and Cosmology•Jan 1, 2020•15 citations
The spherical model of electron cannot explain Bohr magneton, de Broglie wave, etc. To explain these properties physically, we propose that spin, one core concept of quantum theory, is a reality, and introduce this alternative solely based on experimental findings, Planck’s, Einstein’s, and Dirac’s insights, and follows classical laws, that an electron is an electrical wave with a literal 12\frac{1}{2}21​ spin (Dirac), i.e., spins two circles in one cycle, both angular momentum are ℏ. Its wavelength is determined by E=hνm0=hcλm0=m0c2E=h\nu_{m_0}=\frac{hc}{\lambda_{m_0}}=m_0c^2E=hνm0​​=λm0​​hc​=m0​c2 (Plank and Einstein), λ m 0 is the Compton wavelength. As E⃗ ⊥ c⃗ for a transverse wave, it has a net electricity due to the first spin, f(Eq)=12E0(1−cos⁡(2ω0t))f(E_q)=\frac{1}{2}E_0\left(1-\cos(2\omega_0t)\right)f(Eq​)=21​E0​(1−cos(2ω0​t)), half of its cycle, i.e., the minimal meaningful unit as F = E q , is related with its charge, q = E q ϵ 0 . Moreover, an electron has a ring shape due to the second spin, 2 π R 0 = λ m 0 , λ m 0 is the electron-impact cross section. As ℏ=hλm0λm02π=m0cR0\hbar=\frac{h}{\lambda_{m_0}}\frac{\lambda_{m_0}}{2\pi}=m_0cR_0ℏ=λm0​​h​2πλm0​​​=m0​cR0​, it has a quantized classical angular momentum, with a speed of c . The Bohr magneton, μB⃗=q2m0ℏ⃗\vec{\mu_B}=\vec{\frac{q}{2m_0}\hbar}μB​​=2m0​q​ℏ​, g -factor is 2. Critically, the full Dirac’s equation of an electron with a constant velocity is mc⃗=ℏ⊥⃗+p⊥⃗+ℏ//⃗+p//⃗\vec{mc} = \vec{\hbar_\perp}+\vec{p_\perp } +\vec{\hbar_{//}} +\vec{p_{//}}mc=ℏ⊥​​+p⊥​​+ℏ//​​+p//​​, and its electromagnetic properties due to charge are f(Eq)⃗=f(Eq)c2−v′2c⃗+f(Eq)v′c⃗=Enet//⃗+Eq⊥⃗\vec{f(E_q)} = \vec{f(E_q)\frac{\sqrt{c^2-v^{'2}}}{c}} + \vec{f(E_q) \frac{v\rq}{c}} = \vec{E_{net}^{//}} + \vec{E_q^\perp}f(Eq​)​=f(Eq​)cc2−v′2​​​+f(Eq​)cv′​​=Enet//​​+Eq⊥​​, v′⃗//ℏ⊥⃗\vec{v\rq} // \vec{\hbar_\perp}v′//ℏ⊥​​ or v′⃗//ℏ//⃗\vec{v\rq} // \vec{\hbar_{//}}v′//ℏ//​​, and v′⃗//Enet⃗\vec{v\rq} // \vec{E_{net}}v′//Enet​​. Assuming heavy charged particles have equivalent though shall not identical mechanisms, mathematically this model is equivalent to Special Relativity, and supports ALL its formulas, i.e., v < c , E = m c 2 , direction-insensitive m = γ m 0 and t=t0γt=\frac{t_0}{\gamma}t=γt0​​; Moreover, the net electricity Enet//⃗\vec{E_{net}^{//}}Enet//​​ and Bohr magneton is orientation-quantized, direction-sensitive and follows Lorentz transformation, leading to Lorentz transformation of length contraction; while following Relativity, magnetism can be defined by f(B)⃗=f(Eq)v′c2⃗\vec{f(B)} =\vec{f(E_q)\frac{v\rq}{c^2}}f(B)​=f(Eq​)c2v′​​, which is not circularly symmetric and self-evidently does not follow Lorentz transformation. The temporospatial averaged magnetic intensity of a current is relativistic, B⃗ˉ=∑f(Eq)Δvc2⃗=I⃗2πϵ0c2=μ0I⃗2π\bar{\vec{B}} =\sum\vec{{f(E_q)}\frac{\Delta v}{c^2 }}=\frac{\vec{I}}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 c^2}=\frac{\mu_0\vec{I}}{2\pi}Bˉ=∑f(Eq​)c2Δv​​=2πϵ0​c2I​=2πμ0​I​, and μ 0 ϵ 0 c 2 = 1, supporting Maxwell’s equations. Further implications include chirality therefore magnetic spatial quantization, de Broglie wave, etc. The spherical model should be just an observation due to orientation quantization of Enet⃗\vec{E_{net}}Enet​​. We conclude this model of electron may provide one step further to the ultimate Quantum Theory in a nonrelativistic spacetime.
A novel interpretation is given of Dirac's "wave equation for the relativistic electron" as a quantum-mechanical one-particle equation. In this interpretation the electron and the positron are merely the two different "topological spin" states of a single more fundamental particle, not distinct particles in their own right. The new interpretation is backed up by the existence of such bi-particle structures in general relativity, in particular the ring singularity present in any spacelike section of the maximal analytically extended, topologically non-trivial, electromagnetic Kerr-Newman spacetime in the zero-gravity limit (here, "zero-gravity" means the limit G→0G\to 0G→0, where GGG is Newton's constant of universal gravitation). This novel interpretation resolves the dilemma that Dirac's wave equation seems to be capable of describing both the electron and the positron in "external" fields in many relevant situations, while the bi-spinorial wave function has only a single position variable in its argument, not two - as it should if it were a two-particle equation! A Dirac equation is formulated for a ring-like bi-particle which interacts with a static point charges located elsewhere in the topologically non-trivial physical space associated with the moving ring bi-particle, the motion being governed by a de-Broglie-Bohm type law extracted from the Dirac equation. As an application, the pertinent general-relativistic zero-gravity Hydrogen problem is studied in the usual Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Its spectral results suggest that the zero-GGG Kerr-Newman magnetic moment be identified with the so-called "anomalous magnetic moment of the physical electron," not with the Bohr magneton, so that the ring radius is only a tiny fraction of the electron's Compton wave length.
Most students of science and engineering know that every elementary particle, such as electrons, neutrons, photons, neutrinos, etc., has a quantum mechanical property called “spin” which can be measured (perhaps not easily, but at least in principle) and has a quantized value, including zero. The vast majority of these students mentally visualize spin as the angular momentum associated with the elementary particle spinning or rotating about its own axis (like a top or a planetary object). This mental picture, although convenient and comforting, is actually somewhat crude and certainly incomplete. Landau and Lifshitz, in their classic textbook on quantum mechanics [1], wrote “[the spin] property of elementary particles is peculiar to quantum theory. [It] has no classical interpretation... It would be wholly meaningless to imagine the ‘intrinsic’ angular momentum of an elementary particle as being the result of its rotation about its own axis.” The simplistic notion of self-rotation about an axis, shown in Fig. 1.1, can- not explain many features of spin, such as why its magnitude cannot assume continuous values and why it is quantized to certain specific values. It also causes serious problems if taken too literally. As we will see later (Problem 1.2), if we think of an electron as a solid sphere of radius equal to the Lorentz radius e2/(4πǫ0m0c 2) (where e is the electron’s charge, m0 is the mass, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ǫ0 is the dielectric constant of vacuum), then the velocity on the surface of a rotating electron would have to be many times the velocity of light in vacuum if such a rotation were to generate an angular momentum equal to the electron’s spin. Obviously that would not be permitted by the theory of relativity. Indeed, a deep understanding of quantum mechanics is required to understand how the spin property comes about. Its origin is in relativistic quantum mechanics and really was first appreciated by Paul Andrew Maurice Dirac when he derived the Dirac equation which is the cornerstone of relativistic quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman, noted for his distaste for mysticism in physics, wrote about the notion of “spin”: “It appears to be one of the few places in physics where there is a rule which can be stated very simply, but for which no one has found a simple and easy explanation. The explanation is down deep in relativistic quantum mechanics.
A neo-classical relativistic mechanics theory is presented where the spin of an electron is a natural part of its space-time path as a point particle. The fourth-order equation of motion corresponds to the same Lagrangian function in proper time as in special relativity except for an additional spin energy term. The total motion can be decomposed into a sum of a local spin motion about a point and a global motion of this point, called the spin center. The global motion is sub-luminal and obeys Newton's second law in proper time, the time for a clock fixed at the spin center, while the total motion occurs at the speed of light c, consistent with the eigenvalues of Dirac's velocity operators having magnitude c. The local spin motion corresponds to Schrödinger's zitterbewegung and is a perpetual motion, which for a free electron has a circular path in the spin-center frame. In an electro-magnetic field, this spin motion generates magnetic and electric dipole energies through the Lorentz force on the electron's point charge. The corresponding electric dipole energy is consistent with the spin-orbit coupling term in the corrected Pauli non-relativistic Hamiltonian but the magnetic dipole energy is one half of that in Dirac's theory. By defining a spin tensor as the angular momentum of the electron's total motion about its spin center, the fundamental equations of motion can be re-written in an identical form to those of the Barut-Zanghi electron theory. These equations of motion can then be expressed using operators applied to a state function of proper time satisfying a Dirac-Schrödinger spinor equation. The operators produce dynamic variables without any probability implications. For the free electron, the state function satisfies Dirac's relativistic wave equation when the Lorentz transformation is applied to express proper time in terms of an observer's space-time coordinates.
Abstract A novel interpretation is given of Dirac’s ‘wave equation for the relativistic electron’ as a quantum-mechanical one-particle equation. In this interpretation the electron and the positron are merely the two different ‘topological spin’ states of a single more fundamental particle, not distinct particles in their own right. The new interpretation is backed up by the existence of such ‘bi-particle’ structures in general relativity, in particular the ring singularity present in any spacelike section of the spacetime singularity of the maximal-analytically extended, topologically non-trivial, electromagnetic Kerr–Newman (KN)spacetime in the zero-gravity limit (here, ‘zero-gravity’ means the limit , where G is Newton’s constant of universal gravitation). This novel interpretation resolves the dilemma that Dirac’s wave equation seems to be capable of describing both the electron and the positron in ‘external’ fields in many relevant situations, while the bi-spinorial wave function has only a single position variable in its argument, not two—as it should if it were a quantum-mechanical two-particle wave equation. A Dirac equation is formulated for such a ring-like bi-particle which interacts with a static point charge located elsewhere in the topologically non-trivial physical space associated with the moving ring particle, the motion being governed by a de Broglie–Bohm type law extracted from the Dirac equation. As an application, the pertinent general-relativistic zero-gravity hydrogen problem is studied in the usual Born–Oppenheimer approximation. Its spectral results suggest that the zero- G KN magnetic moment be identified with the so-called ‘anomalous magnetic moment of the physical electron,’ not with the Bohr magneton, so that the ring radius is only a tiny fraction of the electron’s reduced Compton wavelength.
Starting from a probabilistic model of the electron, which explains spin and spin measurements in terms of a probability density distribution resulting from a rapidly changing angular momentum during an extended Zitterbewegung EZBW, a “light-like” model of the electron and other spin-1/2 particles is formulated. This model describes individual particles in terms of paths of a moving quantum. It is shown that this description allows one to reproduce observable properties as path-averages over a period of the fast EZBW in elementary calculations. The general topology of the paths may be described as a helical path, with a helix axis forming a circle around a fixed point in space. The radius of the helix and of the circle is equal and given by half the reduced Compton wave length of a photon of energy equal to the rest energy of the particle described. The paths depend on the relative velocity between the described “entity” and the observer, and represent the De Broglie wave. The merits of the proposed model are summarized and its role in relation to the established description by quantum mechanics is discussed. It is concluded that it supports the existence of the proposed EZBW, and offers a description of quantum behavior without quantum mechanics.
A theory employing the vortex shape of the electron was presented to resolve the enigma of the wave-particle duality. Conventions such as “particle” and “wave” were used to describe the behavior of quantum objects such as electrons. A superfluid vacuum formed the base to describe the basic vortex structure and properties of the electron, whereas various formulations derived from hydrodynamic laws described the electron vortex circumference, radius, angular velocity and angular frequency, angular momentum (spin) and magnetic momentum. A vortex electron fully explained the associations between momentum and wave, and hydrodynamic laws were essential in deriving the energy and angular frequency of the electron. In general, an electron traveling in space possesses internal and external motions. To derive the angular frequency of its internal motion, the Compton wavelength was used to represent the length of one cycle of the internal motion that is equal to the circumference of the electron vortex. The angular frequency of the electron vortex was calculated to obtain the same value according to Planck’s theory. A traveling vortex electron has internal and external motions that create a three-dimensional helix trajectory. The magnitude of the instantaneous velocity of the electron is the resultant of its internal and external velocities, being equal to the internal velocity reduced by the Lorentz factor (whose essence is presented in a detailed formulation). The wavelength of the helix trajectory represents the distance traveled by a particle along its axis during one period of revolution around the axis, resulting in the same de Broglie wavelength that corresponds to the helix pitch of the helix. Mathematical formulations were presented to demonstrate the relation between the energy of the vortex and its angular frequency and de Broglie’s wavelength; furthermore, Compton’s and de Broglie’s wavelengths were also differentiated.