We first give a brief, incomplete overview over historic milestones leading to the emergence of quantum chemistry, starting from John Dalton's earliest attempts to describe the atom in the early 19th century. After the formulation of the Schrödinger equation in 1926 and the first successful description of covalent bonding using the new theory, it became soon clear that the main challenge ahead was to find efficient approximations to the Schrödinger equation, as was famously stated by Paul A. M. Dirac in 1929. Since then, many quantum-chemical approximations have been introduced, with a key problem being the exponential increase of the computational cost with the system size when approaching the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation. In the second part, we will hence focus on selected techniques to overcome the scaling problem. Finally, we close with some insights into the new and challenging field of reaction network exploration, offering a glimpse into potential future directions of quantum chemistry.
We first give a brief, incomplete overview over historic milestones leading to the emergence of quantum chemistry, starting from John Dalton's earliest attempts to describe the atom in the early 19th century. After the formulation of the Schrödinger equation in 1926 and the first successful description of covalent bonding using the new theory, it became soon clear that the main challenge ahead was to find efficient approximations to the Schrödinger equation, as was famously stated by Paul A. M. Dirac in 1929. Since then, many quantum-chemical approximations have been introduced, with a key problem being the exponential increase of the computational cost with the system size when approaching the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation. In the second part, we will hence focus on selected techniques to overcome the scaling problem. Finally, we close with some insights into the new and challenging field of reaction network exploration, offering a glimpse into potential future directions of quantum chemistry.
In ab-initio quantum chemistry, solving the electronic structure problem of a molecular system of interest to obtain an approximation of the ground and, in some cases, the excited state energies is a core and central task in various quantum chemistry processes. These include, but certainly not limited to, the calculation of the activation energy–that is the minimal energy required to launch a given chemical reaction–, the dipole and multipole moments which describe the polarity of the molecule, performing the optimization of the geometry of the molecule and searching for transition states. Furthermore, many quantum chemistry applications are predicated, not merely on the approximation of the ground state energy, but also on the corresponding first order derivatives. The body of literature of classical algorithms approximating the ground state energy and its first order derivative is extensively rich with a plethora of methods such as self-consistent mean-field methods, coupled-cluster methods, density matrix renormalization group and many more, each of which has intrinsic set of properties and characteristics that makes it suitable for specific tasks and cases. However, classical methods face a practically insurmountable challenge: the efficient computation of high accuracy approximation of ground state energies of large system sizes. This is fundamentally because the electronic structure problem provably belongs to the complexity class of QMA-hard problems. Which also means that it is out of reach for quantum algorithms as well in general. However, with certain assumptions that are expected to hold molecules of interest–that so far proved to be classically challenging because the required accuracy set by the standard of chemical accuracy threshold (generally held in quantum chemistry)– quantum algorithms can efficiently treat such cases. While originally theorized by Richard Feynmann as a potentially efficient way of simulating some classically intractable many-body systems, quantum computing has since proven to have a stronger and richer potential paving the way for the inception of new algorithms such as Shor’s algorithm for integer factorization, HHL for solving linear system of equation and Grover’s algorithm for constrained binary search, just to name a few. These algorithms provably exhibit an improvement rate that goes respectively exponentially and quadratically in the time complexity. Quantum chemistry is considered a prominent candidate to benefit from quantum computing given the variety of quantum algorithms put forth to solve the electronic structure problem of particular systems of interest. These quantum algorithm proposals can be broadly categorized in three main categories that span the spectrum: from noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) computers to early and full scale fault tolerant quantum ((E)FTQC) computers. Firstly, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) family of quantum algorithms which variationally search for the ground state energy through the optimization of the energy of a parametrized state prepared in a quantum computer using an ansatz. Secondly, the quantum Krylov subspace diagonalization (QKSD) methods, which generate a subspace of the original Hilbert space and efficiently produce the lowest energy in said subspace as its output. Lastly, we have the quantum phase estimation (QPE) algorithms, which provably produce the ground state energy in Heisenberg scaling presenting hence a provable efficient solution. In this thesis, we firstly set to work on the problem of efficient Hamiltonian linear combination of unitaries (LCU) representation. This is mainly motivated by the wide-range impact an efficient compression of the Hamiltonian can potentially have on several quantum algorithms such as VQE, QPE...etc. We designed a method that efficiently compress the Hamiltonian representation in a way that is beneficially impactful across the set of the aforementioned quantum algorithms. Namely, we motivate and present in Sections 1.3 and 1.4 respectively, the regularized compressed double-factorization (RC-DF) and show how it reduces the energy measurement complexity both in terms of number of distinct observables and number of samples. Moreover, it also reduces the total depth of the quantum phase estimation circuit thanks to its low normalization factor. Secondly, given the importance of the energy derivatives, in Sections 2.1 and 2.2, we introduce and present an efficient quantum algorithm for the calculation of the analytic gradient of VQE energies of double-factorized Hamiltonians. Furthermore, in Section 2.1, we expand on the utility of RC-DF by presenting a quantum algorithm that determines the analytic gradient of energies measured with respect to RC-DF Hamiltonains. Third, in Section 3.1, we summarize the theoretical results of purification error-mitigation techniques, namely echo verification and virtual distillation. In Section 3.2, we report on the results of the experimental bench mark, of said techniques, performed on on Google’s Sycamore device to validate the theoretical scaling of error suppression and extrapolate the resources needed for classically intractable system sizes. Fourth, in Section 4 we establish the challenges of computing energy gradients in a quantum Krylov frame work. To overcome the problem, we provide, in Section 4.3, an efficient quantum algorithm for calculating energy derivative obtained through QKSD procedures. Our approach shows how the QKSD ground state can be prepared using quantum signal processing (QSP) and reduces the number of observables to O(1) per reduced density matrix (RDM). Lastly, in light of the importance of quantum RAMs due to their utility in a variety of quantum algorithms that require efficient initial state preparation, as explained in Section 5.5, we address the problematic exponential depth of the bucket-brigade QRAM (when decomposed). We present in Section 5.6 a very efficient Clifford+T decomposition of the bucket-brigade QRAM, which preserves the linear scaling of the depth of the circuit without introducing any additional ancilla.
This textbook introduces the reader to quantum theory and quantum chemistry. The textbook is meant for 2 nd – 3 rd year bachelor students of chemistry or physics, but also for students of related disciplines like materials science, pharmacy, and bioinformatics. At first, quantum theory is introduced, starting with experimental results that made it inevitable to go beyond classical physics. Subsequently, the Schrödinger equation is discussed in some detail. Some few examples for which the Schrödinger equation can be solved exactly are treated with special emphasis on relating the results to real systems and interpreting the mathematical results in terms of experimental observations. Ultimately, approximate methods are presented that are used when applying quantum theory in the field of quantum chemistry for the study of real systems like atoms, molecules, and crystals. Both the foundations for the different methods and a broader range of examples of their applications are presented. The textbook assumes no prior knowledge in quantum theory. Moreover, special emphasis is put on interpreting the mathematical results and less on an exact mathematical derivations of those. Finally, each chapter closes with a number of questions and exercises that help in focusing on the main results of the chapter. Many of the exercises include answers.
Abstract Chemistry is about the atom and molecule, motion of which follows quantum mechanics established 100 years ago by Werner Heisenberg, inspired by a number of milestone findings including Max Planck’s first quanta concept for black body radiation, Albert Einstein’s photon concept for photoelectric effect and oscillator quanta for heat capacity of solid, and Niels Bohr’s quantum model for atomic structure. Independently, inspired by Louis de Broglie’s particle-wave duality, Erwin Schrödinger established wave mechanics, which is shown to be equivalent to Heisenberg’s mechanics by Paul Dirac. The latter further established the relativistic quantum mechanics, and then claimed that the underlying physical laws necessary for the mathematical theory of a large part of physics and the whole of chemistry are thus completely known, and the difficulty is only that the exact application of these laws lead to equations much too complicated to be soluble. In the occasion of celebrating The International Year of Quantum Science and Technology (IYQ 2025, quantum2025.org), we will present a heuristic review of the development of quantum theory and its application to chemistry, namely, quantum chemistry (QC). Then, we will discuss some of the current challenges and the future developments, especially on the quantum computing for quantum chemistry (QCQC).
Quantum computing offers the promise of revolutionizing quantum chemistry by enabling the solution of chemical problems for substantially less computational cost. While most demonstrations of quantum computation to date have focused on resolving the energies of the electronic ground states of small molecules, the field of quantum chemistry is far broader than ground-state chemistry; equally important to practicing chemists are chemical reaction dynamics and reaction mechanism prediction. Here, we review progress toward and the potential of quantum computation for understanding quantum chemistry beyond the ground state, including for reaction mechanisms, reaction dynamics, and finite-temperature quantum chemistry. We discuss algorithmic and other considerations these applications share, as well as differences that make them unique. We also highlight the potential speedups these applications may realize and challenges they may face. We hope that this discussion stimulates further research into how quantum computation may better inform experimental chemistry in the future.
The field of quantum chemistry has long been defined by the central computational challenge of the quantum many-body fermionic system problem, main the electronic Schrödinger equation. This exponential scaling makes it computationally intractable to solve, the exact governing electronic Schrödinger equation. Approximation methods have been developed, ranging from the widely used Density Functional Theory (DFT) to Coupled Cluster (CC) theory. While powerful, these conventional approaches often involve controlled truncations which caused a trade-off between accuracy, leaving many systems—particularly those with strong electron correlation—beyond the reach of ab initio simulation. Furthermore, the famous fermionic sign oscillation problem is particularly severe in stochastic methods like Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). 1 Traditional Ansätze are also frequently engineered specifically for particular systems, which results in a fragmentation of results and fundamentally limits the transferability. Recent research demonstrates that with carefully designed architectures, ANNs can not only represent ground states of model systems with high precision but also tackle the sign problem, offering a promising path forward for strongly correlated electronic structure calculations.2,3 This review charts the paradigm shift driven by Neural Network Quantum States (NNQS), which leverage the representational power of deep learning to overcome these barriers. We detail the architectural evolution from Restricted Boltzmann Machines to autoregressive models like RNNs and Transformers, which enable exact, uncorrelated sampling and bypass critical bottlenecks.2,4,5Furthermore, we explore the geometric foundation of high-efficiency optimization via the neural networks, which decouples optimization cost from model complexity.6 The frontier of the field is marked by the integration of operator learning and hybrid quantum-classical frameworks, such as Reinforcement Learning for contracted quantum eigen-solvers and Quantum-Enhanced Neural Networks, which leverage quantum processors to enhance expressivity for hardware-efficient Ansätze.7,8 By framing the problem through the lens of computational resource allocation—specifically, trading exponential memory demands for polynomialcomplexity optimization and sampling—this review elucidates how recent advances at the intersection of artificial neural networks and quantum computing have evolved. The emergence of those methods not merely progress into a powerful simulation-tools, but also a hybrid computational interface.9 This convergence offers a versatile and systematically improvable framework for potentially addressing some of the most challenging problems in quantum physics and chemistry.
The field of quantum chemistry has long been defined by the central computational challenge of the quantum many-body fermionic system problem, main the electronic Schrödinger equation. This exponential scaling makes it computationally intractable to solve, the exact governing electronic Schrödinger equation. Approximation methods have been developed, ranging from the widely used Density Functional Theory (DFT) to Coupled Cluster (CC) theory. While powerful, these conventional approaches often involve controlled truncations which caused a trade-off between accuracy, leaving many systems—particularly those with strong electron correlation—beyond the reach of ab initio simulation. Furthermore, the famous fermionic sign oscillation problem is particularly severe in stochastic methods like Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). 1 Traditional Ansätze are also frequently engineered specifically for particular systems, which results in a fragmentation of results and fundamentally limits the transferability. Recent research demonstrates that with carefully designed architectures, ANNs can not only represent ground states of model systems with high precision but also tackle the sign problem, offering a promising path forward for strongly correlated electronic structure calculations.2,3 This review charts the paradigm shift driven by Neural Network Quantum States (NNQS), which leverage the representational power of deep learning to overcome these barriers. We detail the architectural evolution from Restricted Boltzmann Machines to autoregressive models like RNNs and Transformers, which enable exact, uncorrelated sampling and bypass critical bottlenecks.2,4,5Furthermore, we explore the geometric foundation of high-efficiency optimization via the neural networks, which decouples optimization cost from model complexity.6 The frontier of the field is marked by the integration of operator learning and hybrid quantum-classical frameworks, such as Reinforcement Learning for contracted quantum eigen-solvers and Quantum-Enhanced Neural Networks, which leverage quantum processors to enhance expressivity for hardware-efficient Ansätze.7,8 By framing the problem through the lens of computational resource allocation—specifically, trading exponential memory demands for polynomialcomplexity optimization and sampling—this review elucidates how recent advances at the intersection of artificial neural networks and quantum computing have evolved. The emergence of those methods not merely progress into a powerful simulation-tools, but also a hybrid computational interface.9 This convergence offers a versatile and systematically improvable framework for potentially addressing some of the most challenging problems in quantum physics and chemistry.