Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Modern Physics Letters A

Unitary transformation for new diagonalization of Dirac Hamiltonian

Hong-Yi Fan, Ze Wu

Published Oct 31, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation was originally developed to elucidate the nonrelativistic limit of the Dirac equation. In this paper, we introduce a novel unitary transformation for the Hamiltonian of the Dirac equation. The unitary transformation operator is given by [Formula: see text] which results in the diagonal Hamiltonians [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. We also apply this new unitary transformation to wave function calculations, and elaborate on its significance.

DOI
10.1142/s0217732325501998

Related papers

The Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Transformation from Dirac Representation to Foldy-Wouthuysen Representation

В. П. Незнамов

The paper describes conditions for transformation from the Dirac representation to the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation. The necessary condition is the block-diagonal transformation of Hamiltonian relative to the upper and lower components of the wave function. The sufficient condition is the wave function transformation law described by relation (6). It has been demonstrated that the unitary transformations offered by the authors of the papers [14], [15], [16], [17] do not satisfy the sufficiency condition (6) and, hence, they are not the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformations. In applications, the matrix elements of any operator in the FW representation can be calculated, according to (6), using the normalized two-component wave functions in the Dirac representation known for the given problem.

arXiv:0804.0333•Apr 2, 2008•3 citations

Foldy–Wouthuysen wave functions and conditions of transformation between Dirac and Foldy–Wouthuysen representations

V. P. Neznamov, A. J. Silenko

The block diagonalization of the Hamiltonian is not sufficient for the transformation to the Foldy–Wouthuysen (FW) representation. The conditions enabling the transition from the Dirac representation to the FW one are formulated and proven. The connection between wave functions in the two representations is derived. The results obtained allow calculating expectation values of operators corresponding to main classical quantities.

arXiv:0906.2069•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 2009•49 citations

Discussion on non-relativistic approximation of Dirac equation by means of Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation

Yun‐De Li

The non-relativistic approximation of Dirac equation is discussed by means of method of Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation.The recurrence fomiulas of Hamiltonian and wave function are given out.

College Physics•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformation. Exact Solution with Generalization to the Two-Particle Problem

Erik Eriksen

The Dirac Hamiltonian for a particle in a nonexplicitly time-dependent field is converted to an even Dirac matrix by means of a single canonical transformation. When the interaction term is an odd Dirac matrix, the transformed Hamiltonian is expressed in a very simple form. An exact transformation is also found for two-particle wave equations of Breit's type. The transformed Hamiltonian is then a $\mathrm{uU}$-separating matrix, in Chraplyvy's sense.In the nonrelativistic limit expansions in powers of $\frac{1}{m}$ or $\frac{1}{c}$ are made. The approximate wave equations are in agreement with previous transformation results.

Physical Review•Aug 1, 1958•106 citations

Foldy–Wouthuysen-type reduction of the second-order Dirac equation

Levere C. Hostler

A nonrelativistic reduction of the second-order Dirac equation is investigated. An equation K2+[Π0; K−Π̂]=m2+Π̂2 is obtained for a ‘‘kinetic Hamiltonian’’ K such that Φ obeys a nonrelativistic Schrödinger-type equation Π0Φ=KΦ in addition to obeying the second-order Dirac equation. Non-self-adjoint terms in K are removed by a change of representation from Φ to ΦT ≡PΦ, and a closed expression P≡[ 1/2 +(K† −Π̂)(K−Π̂)/2(m)2]1/2 is obtained for P. Similar results are obtained for antiparticle states, and a type of ‘‘factorization theorem’’ for the second-order Dirac equation is obtained in which the second-order Dirac equation is replaced by a pair of uncoupled first-order equations. Since nonperturbative techniques are used throughout, the factorization theorem holds independently of the question of convergence of the Foldy–Wouthuysen series and is valid whenever the equation K2+[Π0; K−Π̂]=m2+Π̂2 admits a solution for K. The connection with the usual linear Dirac equation is investigated, and closed expressions are described for a transformation to a representation of that equation which is ‘‘even’’ in the language of Foldy and Wouthuysen. The transformation described is equivalent to two consecutive ‘‘odd’’ unitary transformations.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 1989•0 citations

Separation of Dirac's Hamiltonian by Van Vleck transformation

Flemming Jørgensen

The now classic Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation (FWT) was introduced as successive unitary transformations. This fundamental idea has become the standard in later developments such as the Douglas–Kroll transformation (DKT) – but it is not the only possibility. FWT can be seen as a simple special case of the general Van Vleck transformation (VVT) which besides the successive version has another, known as the canonical because of a series of nice mathematical properties discovered gradually over time. The aim of the present paper is to compare the two approaches – which give identical results in the lower orders, but not in the higher. After having recapitalised both, we apply them to Dirac's Hamiltonian for the electron in a constant electromagnetic field, written with so few assumptions about the operators that the mathematical techniques stand out separated from the terminology of relativistic quantum mechanics. FWT for a free particle is dealt with by a recent geometric approach to VVT. The original FWT is continued through the next non-zero orders. DKT is considered with special weight on equivalent formulations of the generalised and the optimised forms introduced by Wolf, Reiher and Hess.

Molecular Physics•Oct 12, 2016•2 citations
The Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation was originally developed to elucidate the nonrelativistic limit of the Dirac equation. In this paper, we introduce a novel unitary transformation for the Hamiltonian of the Dirac equation. The unitary transformation operator is given by [Formula: see text] which results in the diagonal Hamiltonians [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. We also apply this new unitary transformation to wave function calculations, and elaborate on its significance.
The paper describes conditions for transformation from the Dirac representation to the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation. The necessary condition is the block-diagonal transformation of Hamiltonian relative to the upper and lower components of the wave function. The sufficient condition is the wave function transformation law described by relation (6). It has been demonstrated that the unitary transformations offered by the authors of the papers [14], [15], [16], [17] do not satisfy the sufficiency condition (6) and, hence, they are not the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformations. In applications, the matrix elements of any operator in the FW representation can be calculated, according to (6), using the normalized two-component wave functions in the Dirac representation known for the given problem.
The Dirac Hamiltonian for a particle in a nonexplicitly time-dependent field is converted to an even Dirac matrix by means of a single canonical transformation. When the interaction term is an odd Dirac matrix, the transformed Hamiltonian is expressed in a very simple form. An exact transformation is also found for two-particle wave equations of Breit's type. The transformed Hamiltonian is then a uU\mathrm{uU}uU-separating matrix, in Chraplyvy's sense.In the nonrelativistic limit expansions in powers of 1m\frac{1}{m}m1​ or 1c\frac{1}{c}c1​ are made. The approximate wave equations are in agreement with previous transformation results.
A nonrelativistic reduction of the second-order Dirac equation is investigated. An equation K2+[Π0; K−Π̂]=m2+Π̂2 is obtained for a ‘‘kinetic Hamiltonian’’ K such that Φ obeys a nonrelativistic Schrödinger-type equation Π0Φ=KΦ in addition to obeying the second-order Dirac equation. Non-self-adjoint terms in K are removed by a change of representation from Φ to ΦT ≡PΦ, and a closed expression P≡[ 1/2 +(K† −Π̂)(K−Π̂)/2(m)2]1/2 is obtained for P. Similar results are obtained for antiparticle states, and a type of ‘‘factorization theorem’’ for the second-order Dirac equation is obtained in which the second-order Dirac equation is replaced by a pair of uncoupled first-order equations. Since nonperturbative techniques are used throughout, the factorization theorem holds independently of the question of convergence of the Foldy–Wouthuysen series and is valid whenever the equation K2+[Π0; K−Π̂]=m2+Π̂2 admits a solution for K. The connection with the usual linear Dirac equation is investigated, and closed expressions are described for a transformation to a representation of that equation which is ‘‘even’’ in the language of Foldy and Wouthuysen. The transformation described is equivalent to two consecutive ‘‘odd’’ unitary transformations.
The now classic Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation (FWT) was introduced as successive unitary transformations. This fundamental idea has become the standard in later developments such as the Douglas–Kroll transformation (DKT) – but it is not the only possibility. FWT can be seen as a simple special case of the general Van Vleck transformation (VVT) which besides the successive version has another, known as the canonical because of a series of nice mathematical properties discovered gradually over time. The aim of the present paper is to compare the two approaches – which give identical results in the lower orders, but not in the higher. After having recapitalised both, we apply them to Dirac's Hamiltonian for the electron in a constant electromagnetic field, written with so few assumptions about the operators that the mathematical techniques stand out separated from the terminology of relativistic quantum mechanics. FWT for a free particle is dealt with by a recent geometric approach to VVT. The original FWT is continued through the next non-zero orders. DKT is considered with special weight on equivalent formulations of the generalised and the optimised forms introduced by Wolf, Reiher and Hess.