Objective: To synthesize the state of the art on how quantum computing (QC) and artificial intelligence (AI) intersect, including algorithmic foundations, software/hardware stacks, empirical evidence of advantage, applications, and open challenges. Methods: We executed a structured search (2019 – 20th August 2025) across major journals (Nature portfolio, APS/PR, Elsevier), arXiv, and official framework documentation (Qiskit, Cirq/TFQ, PennyLane; AWS Braket; NVIDIA CUDA-Q). We included peer‑reviewed studies, comprehensive surveys, and official docs; we excluded opinion pieces and non-reproducible claims. Results: The field converges on hybrid quantum‑classical workflows with two dominant AI families: (i) quantum kernel methods and (ii) variational circuits/QNNs. Trainability remains a core challenge (barren plateaus and noise), with mitigation strategies advancing (local costs, layerwise training, engineered dissipation, learned decoders). Frameworks and cloud orchestrators now support end‑to‑end hybrid training. Empirical “utility” demonstrations in physics‑inspired tasks exist, while domain‑level advantage in mainstream ML is unproven and data‑dependent. Conclusions: QC‑AI integration is maturing into reproducible hybrid stacks. Near‑term value lies in quantum kernels with tailored feature maps, physics‑regularized QNNs, simulator‑accelerated pipelines, and AI‑for‑QC (calibration/decoding). Broad ML advantage awaits lower‑noise hardware and quantum‑friendly data embeddings.
Objective: To synthesize the state of the art on how quantum computing (QC) and artificial intelligence (AI) intersect, including algorithmic foundations, software/hardware stacks, empirical evidence of advantage, applications, and open challenges. Methods: We executed a structured search (2019 – 20th August 2025) across major journals (Nature portfolio, APS/PR, Elsevier), arXiv, and official framework documentation (Qiskit, Cirq/TFQ, PennyLane; AWS Braket; NVIDIA CUDA-Q). We included peer‑reviewed studies, comprehensive surveys, and official docs; we excluded opinion pieces and non-reproducible claims. Results: The field converges on hybrid quantum‑classical workflows with two dominant AI families: (i) quantum kernel methods and (ii) variational circuits/QNNs. Trainability remains a core challenge (barren plateaus and noise), with mitigation strategies advancing (local costs, layerwise training, engineered dissipation, learned decoders). Frameworks and cloud orchestrators now support end‑to‑end hybrid training. Empirical “utility” demonstrations in physics‑inspired tasks exist, while domain‑level advantage in mainstream ML is unproven and data‑dependent. Conclusions: QC‑AI integration is maturing into reproducible hybrid stacks. Near‑term value lies in quantum kernels with tailored feature maps, physics‑regularized QNNs, simulator‑accelerated pipelines, and AI‑for‑QC (calibration/decoding). Broad ML advantage awaits lower‑noise hardware and quantum‑friendly data embeddings.
Quantum Artificial Intelligence (QAI) has emerged at the nexus of quantum computing and AI, promising to redefine computational frontiers. This survey critically synthesizes the state-of-the- art through 2024, elucidating the profound bidirectional synergy between these fields. We analyze how classical machine learning is accelerating quantum hardware control, circuit optimization, and error correction. Conversely, we assess the potential quantum advantage of algorithms, including variational and kernel-based methods, across domains such as drug discovery, financial modeling, and cybersecurity. Our analysis reveals a critical trade-of between the utility of near-term Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices and the long-term promise of fault-tolerant architectures. We identify fundamental obstacles to QAI’s advancement, including hardware decoherence, algorithmic barren plateaus, and data-encoding bottlenecks. While QAI’s potential is transformative, achieving practical quantum advantage requires a concerted effort to overcome these core challenges at the hardware-software interface. This work provides a roadmap for navigating the current landscape and prioritizing future research in this rapidly evolving discipline. • We introduce a bi-directional Quantum-AI framework, AI-for-QC and QC-for-AI, and provide a practical roadmap for integrating both paradigms across the full stack. • We quantify AI-enabled gains: calibration time drops from 8 hours to 2 hours, circuit depth falls by up to 42%, and ML decoders cut logical error rates by about half. • We synthesize comparative guidance on VQAs, quantum kernels, and hybrid/quantum Transformers, clarifying trainability limits and criteria for credible quantum advantage. • We deliver a clinically grounded playbook for radiology, covering small-data use cases, plug-in hybrid modules, OOD validation, fairness assessments, and TRIPOD/CONSORT-AI reporting.
The integration of quantum computing and artificial intelligence (AI) constitutes a bidirectional synergy that is reshaping both disciplines. This review investigates the reciprocal relationship in which AI addresses foundational challenges in quantum computing, while quantum computing offers the potential to advance machine learning beyond classical constraints. Recent advancements exemplify this interaction: Google DeepMind’s AlphaQubit neural network decoder has achieved state-of-the-art quantum error correction, improving performance by 6% over tensor networks and 30% over correlated matching methods. Additionally, quantum neural networks have demonstrated exponential improvements in sample complexity for specific learning tasks. This review systematically examines the current landscape of quantum-AI integration across three primary dimensions. First, it addresses AI-enhanced quantum systems, such as transformer-based error correction, reinforcement learning for circuit optimization, and AI-driven hardware calibration. Second, it explores quantum-accelerated machine learning algorithms, including variational quantum neural networks, quantum generative adversarial networks, and quantum reinforcement learning. Third, it evaluates industry deployments in sectors such as life sciences, financial services, climate modeling, and pharmaceutical development. Notable examples include IonQ’s quantum chemistry simulations, which achieved 40% efficiency improvements in carbon capture material design; St. Jude’s identification of KRAS protein inhibitors using quantum machine learning with experimental validation; and JP Morgan Chase’s implementation of quantum portfolio optimization. The analysis indicates that the field has advanced from preliminary demonstrations to production-grade applications, especially in drug discovery and molecular simulation, where quantum computing offers measurable benefits. Nevertheless, several challenges remain, including barren plateaus in variational algorithms, scalability constraints in current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, requirements for real-time decoding speed, and the necessity for fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) systems. IBM’s 2029 roadmap, which targets 200 logical qubits capable of executing 100 million gates, together with progress in high-rate quantum low-density parity-check codes, outlines a trajectory toward practical fault tolerance. This review makes two principal research contributions: Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Quantum Advantage Assessment: We establish the first systematic, integrated methodology for determining quantum computing feasibility that combines problem characterization, resource estimation, quantum advantage assessment, and quantum algorithm paradigm selection. This framework consolidates criteria scattered across academic literature and industry practice into a unified decision-making tool applicable across chemistry, optimization, machine learning, and simulation domains. The framework addresses a critical industry need: enabling non-expert practitioners (chemists, financial analysts, materials scientists) to objectively assess quantum computing suitability without requiring deep quantum expertise. Novel Quantum Resource Optimization Algorithms: We present three concrete algorithmic contributions advancing quantum-AI integration: • Data Encoding Efficiency Algorithm that automatically selects optimal qubit encoding strategies (amplitude vs. angle encoding) minimizing total quantum resource consumption • Error Budget Optimization Algorithm that iteratively determines optimal quantum error correction code distance balancing logical error rate targets against physical qubit overhead • Real-time Hardware Specification Aggregation from multiple quantum cloud platforms (IBM Quantum, Amazon Braket, Google, IonQ) enabling dynamic feasibility assessment as hardware capabilities evolve Combined, these contributions establish quantum computing advantage assessment as a rigorous, data-driven discipline rather than ad-hoc expert judgment. The framework enables strategic quantum computing investment decisions, accelerates problem identification for early quantum utility, and provides a reference methodology for standardizing quantum advantage evaluation across academia and industry. This review synthesizes insights from recent academic literature, industry implementations, and expert perspectives to deliver a comprehensive assessment of quantum-AI synergies grounded in this evaluation framework. The mathematical foundations, ranging from quantum Fourier transforms to Gaussian processes, are examined. Best practices for researchers and practitioners are also outlined. The findings suggest that, although universal quantum advantage has not yet been realized, domain-specific quantum-AI applications in chemistry, optimization, and sensing are achieving practical utility in 2024-2025. This development marks a significant transition from theoretical potential to commercial realization, informed by rigorous evaluation methodologies.
Quantum Computing (QC) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) have emerged as key technologies in the evolution of Industry 6.0, driving advancements in automation and advanced analytics, and process optimization. Their integration holds the potential to revolutionize sectors such as data science, healthcare, finance, and cybersecurity by enabling faster and more efficient computations through qubits, superposition, and quantum entanglement. However, the lack of structured knowledge regarding specific QC methodologies and applications in AI hinders its optimal implementation and development. Consequently, this study aims to identify the applications and variables associated with QC-AI integration. To this end, a systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 methodology, drawing on studies from Scopus and Web of Science databases. This enabled the analysis of trends, limitations, and opportunities in this technological convergence. This study aims to systematically examine the intersection of quantum computing and artificial intelligence by identifying the key technological features, integration requirements, and sectoral applications that define the current state of the field. The review contributes by mapping existing research, highlighting methodological approaches, and revealing gaps that may guide targeted advancements in hybrid quantum AI systems. The insights generated have the potential to accelerate innovation in high-impact domains such as healthcare, finance, energy, and cybersecurity. The findings indicate that the main advances in QC applied to AI focus on quantum optimization, Quantum Machine Learning (QML), and post-quantum cryptography. Notably, sectors such as energy, healthcare, and finance have shown significant progress in adopting these technologies. For example, in healthcare, QML has been applied to simulate molecular interactions to accelerate drug discovery, and in finance, it enhances predictive models for market behavior. The study concludes that although QC demonstrates substantial potential to enhance AI, its broader adoption remains constrained by reliance on NISQ hardware, the need for effective error correction, and the limited scalability of hybrid quantum classical algorithms. Addressing these challenges will be essential to establishing QML as a cornerstone of technological innovation and digital transformation. Additionally, this review introduces an integrative framework that categorizes key AI QC convergence dimensions and proposes a classification of application areas based on technical requirements and algorithmic capabilities. These contributions aim to guide future experimental validations and hybrid model development.
Quantum computing and artificial intelligence (AI) are converging into a distinct research frontier commonly referred to as quantum-enhanced artificial intelligence, or quantum machine learning (QML). This paper presents a conceptual and integrative review of how principles from quantum physics superposition, entanglement, and interference can be embedded into machine learning pipelines to reshape computational paradigms for classification, optimization, and representation learning. Using a structured narrative-review methodology, the study synthesizes theoretical foundations, algorithmic building blocks (quantum feature maps, variational quantum circuits, quantum kernel methods), and application domains spanning drug discovery, finance, materials science, and natural language processing. The review develops a hybrid quantum-classical architecture model and a complexity-comparison framework contrasting classical algorithms with their quantum counterparts, including Grover's search and Shor's factoring algorithm. Findings indicate that while theoretical speedups are well established, practical quantum advantage on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware remains constrained by decoherence, barren plateaus, and limited qubit connectivity. The paper contributes a synthesized taxonomy of quantum-enhanced AI methods and an evidence-based research agenda emphasizing error mitigation, hardware-aware ansatz design, and hybrid workload partitioning. The discussion further situates these developments within the broader trajectory of next-generation computing, arguing that near-term value will accrue primarily through hybrid quantum-classical systems rather than fully quantum pipelines. Implications for researchers, industry practitioners, and policymakers are discussed, alongside limitations inherent to a literature-synthesis approach.
The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, and cloud infrastructure represents a paradigm shift in how intelligent systems are designed, trained, and deployed. As AI models continue to demand exponential computational resources, classical systems are increasingly reaching their performance limits in domains such as high-dimensional optimization, complex pattern recognition, and probabilistic modeling. Quantum computing, with its foundational principles of superposition, entanglement, and quantum parallelism, offers a theoretical edge in solving problems that are intractable for conventional hardware. However, the practical deployment of quantum algorithms—particularly those relevant to machine learning (ML) has been hindered by the limited scalability and accessibility of quantum hardware. To bridge this gap, cloud-based quantum computing platforms have emerged, providing remote, programmable access to quantum devices and hybrid runtimes. In this context, the present study offers a comprehensive review of cloud-delivered quantum AI systems, examining core architectures, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, platform capabilities, and real-world use cases. The paper synthesizes recent advances and performance insights from systems such as Amazon Braket, IBM Quantum, and Azure Quantum, while critically analyzing algorithmic trends like variational quantum circuits and quantum kernel methods. It further explores challenges including circuit depth limitations, latency in hybrid models, and standardization barriers across toolchains. By consolidating current research and implementation patterns, this review aims to inform the design and future trajectory of scalable, cloud-native quantum AI applications.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum information (QI) are rapidly co-evolving. AI is becoming a practical tool for learning, designing, controlling, and verifying quantum systems, while QI offers new computational models, representational structures, and learning-theoretic questions for AI. This survey reviews the interface from both directions. In the AI for QI direction, we organize recent progress around the central tasks of extracting information from limited measurements, training and discovering quantum algorithms, stabilizing noisy hardware, automating experimental and programming workflows, and extending learning-based methods to sensing and networking. In the QI for AI direction, we examine how quantum computation and quantum-inspired structures affect learning through algorithmic speedups, expressivity, trainability, generalization, neural-network design, and tensor-network representations. We close by identifying cross-cutting challenges in reproducibility, scalability, hardware realism, and co-design, arguing that progress will depend on tighter integration of theory, experiment, and hybrid quantum--classical systems.