Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

SpringerBriefs in physics

Ordinary Global Symmetries, Phases of Matter, and the Landau Paradigm

Nabil Iqbal

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Chapter 2 of Lectures on Generalized Global Symmetries reviews conventional global symmetries — which are essentially associated with the conservation of densities of particles — from the modern point of view of topological operators. It also briefly discusses the Landau paradigm of the phases of matter, one of the cornerstones of our understanding of nature.

DOI
10.1007/978-3-032-00022-4_2

Related papers

Modave lecture notes: Field exploration in phases of matter

A. Pasternak

A new look has been given to symmetries in quantum field theory in the last ten years. Generalized symmetries broadened our vision of their role in constraining the renormalization group flow. Together with the knowledge of their anomalies, they can be used to classify phases of matter that fall outside the scope of Landau’s paradigm with ordinary symmetries. Examples include superfluids on thin layers, deconfined phases of gauge theories, and field theories with topological order. These lectures will introduce these notions and work out examples of quantum field theories that exhibit such phases.

Modave Summer School in Mathematical Physics•Mar 26, 2025•1 citation

Generalized Landau Paradigm for quantum phases and phase transitions

Xie Chen

The Landau paradigm is a central dogma for understanding phase and phase transitions in condensed matter systems, yet for decades it has been known that a variety of quantum phases exist beyond the framework. Is there a more general framework that provides a systematic understanding of phase and phase transitions in quantum many-body systems? Recent developments of the notion of generalized symmetry and generalized gauging seem to point to a way to generalize the Landau Paradigm. In this essay, we discuss how `beyond Landau' phases and phase transitions can be captured by a generalized Landau paradigm in terms of the breaking of generalized symmetries, often induced by the generalized gauging procedure facilitated through the topological holography formalism. We also discuss what needs to be understood to make the generalized Landau paradigm useful in the study of quantum phase and phase transitions.

hep-thCross-listedarXiv:2511.19793•Physical Review Letters•Nov 26, 2025•4 citations

Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter

John McGreevy

Recent advances in our understanding of symmetry in quantum many-body systems offer the possibility of a generalized Landau paradigm that encompasses all equilibrium phases of matter. This is a brief and elementary review of some of these developments.

arXiv:2204.03045•Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics•Oct 20, 2022•338 citations

Topological Quantum Phase Transitions

M. A. Contínentino

The Landau Paradigm The usual paradigm to describe phase transitions is that of Landau. It is based on an expansion of a free energy functional or an action in terms of an order parameter. Close to the phase transition the order parameter is small, and only terms dictated by symmetry are allowed in this expansion. Associated with this paradigm are many important ideas, such as that of broken symmetry and Goldstone modes. The extension of this paradigm to include quantum phase transitions certainly brought new ideas and progress, as we have seen in this book: the inextricability between the dynamics and static properties, the modified hyperscaling relation with the notion of an effective dimensionality, the role of the uncertainty principle linking energy and temporal fluctuations and so on. The underlying principle here is always that of symmetry. However, as we will see in this chapter, this paradigm is not sufficient to describe certain classes of phenomena that do not involve symmetry changes but are nonetheless still associated with diverging lengths, singularities and critical exponents: features that are clearly related to critical phenomena and phase transitions. We have already met similar behaviour when studying density-driven or Lifshitz transitions. We will see in this chapter that these transitions are much more common and interesting that initially thought. The keyword here is topology, which contains principles and constraints that protect quasi-particle excitations and are still more powerful than those of symmetry. Topological Quantum Phase Transitions We will refer to topological quantum phase transitions (TQPT) as those that separate two phases where at least one of them is topologically non-trivial, as characterised by some topological parameter like a winding number or a Berry phase. In some cases these transitions either give rise to singularities in a thermodynamic quantity or are accompanied by a diverging length. However, differently from Landau-type phase transitions they are not necessarily associated with a symmetry change. Also there is no identifiable order parameter to distinguish between the different phases. Topological quantities are not useful to play the role of an order parameter. They are in general discontinuous at topological transitions and this does not necessarily reflect the nature of the transition. On the other hand, we will show that the renormalisation group is a useful tool to describe TQPT.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 1, 2017•1 citation

Topological insulators and related phases with strong interactions

Ashvin Vishwanath

Abstract These lecture notes are mainly concerned with how the concept of topological insulators is generalized when interactions are included. More generally, the interplay of symmetry and topology is discussed. Traditionally, phases of matter were distinguished on the basis of symmetry alone. On the other hand, fractional quantum Hall phases are examples of topological states whose essential character does not require a discussion of symmetry. However, topological insulators are an example of a new phase of matter that combines both symmetry and topology.

•Jan 26, 2017•0 citations

Symmetry protected topological phases of matter

Yoshimasa Hidaka, Ken Shiozaki, Kenji Fukushima

One problem of paramount importance in physics over various fields such as elementary particle physics, condensed matter physics, and statistical mechanics has been to make classification of phases of matter, including nontrivial structures of the vacuum. The triumphant history of theory on the phase classification and the phase transition can be traced back to Landau, which is based on the spontaneous breaking of symmetry. It is known, however, that other kinds of phases exist that cannot be characterized by conventional arguments of symmetry breaking, namely, topological phases. Topological phases are gapped phases at zero temperature without symmetry breaking. Examples of the topological phases include a quantum phase in a fractional quantum Hall system, where the ground state exhibits degeneracy, and an anyon, a quasi-particle with nontrivial statistical nature, neither boson nor fermion, emerges as a low-energy excitation. In contemporary physics of the 21st century, it has been revealed that, among various topological states, there exists a nontrivial ground state that does not have ground state degeneracy and yet can be distinguished from a trivial state. This nontrivial ground state, i.e., a topological insulator, has been recognized first in free electron systems [1–3] and later extended to more general quantum many-body systems with interactions including bosonic (spin) systems. Now, such a generalized situation is called a symmetry protected topological (SPT) phase [4–7]. From the point of a modern view of the SPT phase, nontrivial states, such as the Haldane state proposed in antiferromagnetic quantum spin systems in the 1980’s [8] and the ground state in the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki model [9], belong to the SPT phase. A remarkable feature of the SPT phase is that, if the system has a surface, gapless surface states appear and they are stable against disturbances which do not break the symmetry. One way to understand these surface states is the quantum anomaly on the surface. That is, as long as the surface is concerned, the quantum anomaly arises, but the whole system has no quantum anomaly, and the symmetry is preserved due to cancellation from the bulk contribution. This canceling mechanism of the quantum anomaly has been long known as the anomaly inflow in elementary particle physics [10]. In fact, the classification of the SPT phases can be identified as the classification of the quantum anomaly through the bulk-boundary correspondence. This type of the quantum anomaly closely related to the SPT phase can provide us with a useful theoretical device to constrain phases that can or cannot be realized under the ’t Hooft anomaly matching condition [11–13]. It is quite difficult to scrutinize nonperturbatively interacting systems, but the ’t Hooft anomaly matching condition can be applied to those systems, and possible phases can be constrained. Nowadays, our understanding of the SPT phases has been so developed that applications of the anomaly matching condition can cover systems with finite groups and/or extending objects [14–16]. In this way, the concept of the topological phases has been essential by now in a wide range of physics, particularly in elementary particle physics, condensed matter physics, and statistical mechanics, as mentioned in the beginning. This special section is a collection of papers related to the topological aspects of physics including the topological phases. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the authors who made excellent contributions.

Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics•Mar 16, 2022•1 citation
Abstract Chapter 2 of Lectures on Generalized Global Symmetries reviews conventional global symmetries — which are essentially associated with the conservation of densities of particles — from the modern point of view of topological operators. It also briefly discusses the Landau paradigm of the phases of matter, one of the cornerstones of our understanding of nature.
A new look has been given to symmetries in quantum field theory in the last ten years. Generalized symmetries broadened our vision of their role in constraining the renormalization group flow. Together with the knowledge of their anomalies, they can be used to classify phases of matter that fall outside the scope of Landau’s paradigm with ordinary symmetries. Examples include superfluids on thin layers, deconfined phases of gauge theories, and field theories with topological order. These lectures will introduce these notions and work out examples of quantum field theories that exhibit such phases.
The Landau paradigm is a central dogma for understanding phase and phase transitions in condensed matter systems, yet for decades it has been known that a variety of quantum phases exist beyond the framework. Is there a more general framework that provides a systematic understanding of phase and phase transitions in quantum many-body systems? Recent developments of the notion of generalized symmetry and generalized gauging seem to point to a way to generalize the Landau Paradigm. In this essay, we discuss how `beyond Landau' phases and phase transitions can be captured by a generalized Landau paradigm in terms of the breaking of generalized symmetries, often induced by the generalized gauging procedure facilitated through the topological holography formalism. We also discuss what needs to be understood to make the generalized Landau paradigm useful in the study of quantum phase and phase transitions.
The Landau Paradigm The usual paradigm to describe phase transitions is that of Landau. It is based on an expansion of a free energy functional or an action in terms of an order parameter. Close to the phase transition the order parameter is small, and only terms dictated by symmetry are allowed in this expansion. Associated with this paradigm are many important ideas, such as that of broken symmetry and Goldstone modes. The extension of this paradigm to include quantum phase transitions certainly brought new ideas and progress, as we have seen in this book: the inextricability between the dynamics and static properties, the modified hyperscaling relation with the notion of an effective dimensionality, the role of the uncertainty principle linking energy and temporal fluctuations and so on. The underlying principle here is always that of symmetry. However, as we will see in this chapter, this paradigm is not sufficient to describe certain classes of phenomena that do not involve symmetry changes but are nonetheless still associated with diverging lengths, singularities and critical exponents: features that are clearly related to critical phenomena and phase transitions. We have already met similar behaviour when studying density-driven or Lifshitz transitions. We will see in this chapter that these transitions are much more common and interesting that initially thought. The keyword here is topology, which contains principles and constraints that protect quasi-particle excitations and are still more powerful than those of symmetry. Topological Quantum Phase Transitions We will refer to topological quantum phase transitions (TQPT) as those that separate two phases where at least one of them is topologically non-trivial, as characterised by some topological parameter like a winding number or a Berry phase. In some cases these transitions either give rise to singularities in a thermodynamic quantity or are accompanied by a diverging length. However, differently from Landau-type phase transitions they are not necessarily associated with a symmetry change. Also there is no identifiable order parameter to distinguish between the different phases. Topological quantities are not useful to play the role of an order parameter. They are in general discontinuous at topological transitions and this does not necessarily reflect the nature of the transition. On the other hand, we will show that the renormalisation group is a useful tool to describe TQPT.
Abstract These lecture notes are mainly concerned with how the concept of topological insulators is generalized when interactions are included. More generally, the interplay of symmetry and topology is discussed. Traditionally, phases of matter were distinguished on the basis of symmetry alone. On the other hand, fractional quantum Hall phases are examples of topological states whose essential character does not require a discussion of symmetry. However, topological insulators are an example of a new phase of matter that combines both symmetry and topology.
One problem of paramount importance in physics over various fields such as elementary particle physics, condensed matter physics, and statistical mechanics has been to make classification of phases of matter, including nontrivial structures of the vacuum. The triumphant history of theory on the phase classification and the phase transition can be traced back to Landau, which is based on the spontaneous breaking of symmetry. It is known, however, that other kinds of phases exist that cannot be characterized by conventional arguments of symmetry breaking, namely, topological phases. Topological phases are gapped phases at zero temperature without symmetry breaking. Examples of the topological phases include a quantum phase in a fractional quantum Hall system, where the ground state exhibits degeneracy, and an anyon, a quasi-particle with nontrivial statistical nature, neither boson nor fermion, emerges as a low-energy excitation. In contemporary physics of the 21st century, it has been revealed that, among various topological states, there exists a nontrivial ground state that does not have ground state degeneracy and yet can be distinguished from a trivial state. This nontrivial ground state, i.e., a topological insulator, has been recognized first in free electron systems [1–3] and later extended to more general quantum many-body systems with interactions including bosonic (spin) systems. Now, such a generalized situation is called a symmetry protected topological (SPT) phase [4–7]. From the point of a modern view of the SPT phase, nontrivial states, such as the Haldane state proposed in antiferromagnetic quantum spin systems in the 1980’s [8] and the ground state in the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki model [9], belong to the SPT phase. A remarkable feature of the SPT phase is that, if the system has a surface, gapless surface states appear and they are stable against disturbances which do not break the symmetry. One way to understand these surface states is the quantum anomaly on the surface. That is, as long as the surface is concerned, the quantum anomaly arises, but the whole system has no quantum anomaly, and the symmetry is preserved due to cancellation from the bulk contribution. This canceling mechanism of the quantum anomaly has been long known as the anomaly inflow in elementary particle physics [10]. In fact, the classification of the SPT phases can be identified as the classification of the quantum anomaly through the bulk-boundary correspondence. This type of the quantum anomaly closely related to the SPT phase can provide us with a useful theoretical device to constrain phases that can or cannot be realized under the ’t Hooft anomaly matching condition [11–13]. It is quite difficult to scrutinize nonperturbatively interacting systems, but the ’t Hooft anomaly matching condition can be applied to those systems, and possible phases can be constrained. Nowadays, our understanding of the SPT phases has been so developed that applications of the anomaly matching condition can cover systems with finite groups and/or extending objects [14–16]. In this way, the concept of the topological phases has been essential by now in a wide range of physics, particularly in elementary particle physics, condensed matter physics, and statistical mechanics, as mentioned in the beginning. This special section is a collection of papers related to the topological aspects of physics including the topological phases. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the authors who made excellent contributions.