Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Modern Physics A

Neother’s theorem on quantum hydrodynamics

Andika Kusuma Wijaya, Seramika Ariwahjoedi, Muhammad Farchani Rosyid

Published Jul 5, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This research aims to formulate conserved quantities (classical observables) in Noether’s theorem for quantum hydrodynamics within the framework of symplectic geometry. The symplectic one-form or symplectic potential is identical to the Noether current. 31 The Noether current plays an important role in determining classical observables and conserved quantities, namely, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] associated with the above symmetry in quantum hydrodynamics (nonrelativistic and relativistic) associated with Killing vector field and rotational symmetry group [Formula: see text].

DOI
10.1142/s0217751x25501209

Related papers

The symplectic geometrical formulation of quantum hydrodynamics

Andika Kusuma Wijaya, Arief Hermanto, Muhammad Farchani Rosyid

Quantum hydrodynamics described by Madelung equations is analyzed in the framework of symplectic geometry i.e. in covariant phase space approach to geometric field theory. The pre-symplectic manifolds providing the phase spaces describing the Hamiltonian dynamics of quantum fluid are constructed from the set of all solutions of Madelung equations and their corresponding Lagrangian densities. The Madelung equations under consideration are the Madelung equations associated to Schroedinger equations (in the nonrelativistic case) and Madelung equations associated to Klein–Gordon equations (in the relativistic case). The cases where the coupling with electromagnetic fields is present are also considered here. Our symplectic formulation is different from that of [M. Spera, Moment map and gauge geometric aspects of the Schrodinger and Pauli equations, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 13 (2016) 1–36] in the choice of fundamental fields or variables. Here we regard density function [Formula: see text] and phase function [Formula: see text] not as canonical pair but as the fundamental fields of the theory. The Hamiltonian vector fields corresponding to an observable are obtained from the Hamiltonian equation generated by the observable. The Poisson bracket of two observables then is determined by the Hamiltonian vector fields associated to each observable. In general, the Poisson bracket of two observables is not unique due to the fact that every observable has more than one corresponding Hamiltonian vector field. It is pointed out that the Poisson bracket has a unique value over a certain subset of the set of all observables defined on the pre-symplectic manifold of the Madelung equation under consideration.

International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Jul 1, 2022•3 citations

Symmetries and conservation laws in the Lagrangian picture of quantum hydrodynamics

Peter Holland

Quantum hydrodynamics represents quantum mechanics through two complementary models: the Eulerian picture, a direct transcription of wave mechanics, and the Lagrangian picture, in which the quantum state is represented by the collective motion of a continuum of fluid particles, the latter being obtained by continuously varying the particle label. The Lagrangian picture thus adds variables to the quantum formalism and exhibits a corresponding new quantum symmetry viz. a continuous particle-relabelling covariance group. Using Noether's theorem, the relabelling symmetry is derived as a component of a general investigation of symmetries and conservation laws in the quantum Lagrangian picture. Relations with symmetries and conservation laws in the Eulerian picture are explored in detail. Alongside the infinite relabelling group, the 12-parameter kinematical covariance group of the Schrödinger equation is derived. It is stressed that the role of label transformations extends beyond the class corresponding to Eulerian invariance. As an example, it is shown that the linear superposition of waves, a fundamental symmetry of the quantum Eulerian picture, can be generated by a deformation-dependent label transformation in the Lagrangian picture.

arXiv:1211.0983•Nov 5, 2012•1 citation

Geometry of Nonadiabatic Quantum Hydrodynamics

Michael S. Foskett, Darryl D. Holm, Cesare Tronci

The Hamiltonian action of a Lie group on a symplectic manifold induces a momentum map generalizing Noether’s conserved quantity occurring in the case of a symmetry group. Then, when a Hamiltonian function can be written in terms of this momentum map, the Hamiltonian is called ‘collective’. Here, we derive collective Hamiltonians for a series of models in quantum molecular dynamics for which the Lie group is the composition of smooth invertible maps and unitary transformations. In this process, different fluid descriptions emerge from different factorization schemes for either the wavefunction or the density operator. After deriving this series of quantum fluid models, we regularize their Hamiltonians for finite ħ $\hbar $ by introducing local spatial smoothing. In the case of standard quantum hydrodynamics, the ħ ≠ 0 $\hbar \ne 0$ dynamics of the Lagrangian path can be derived as a finite-dimensional canonical Hamiltonian system for the evolution of singular solutions called ‘Bohmions’, which follow Bohmian trajectories in configuration space. For molecular dynamics models, application of the smoothing process to a new factorization of the density operator leads to a finite-dimensional Hamiltonian system for the interaction of multiple (nuclear) Bohmions and a sequence of electronic quantum states.

arXiv:1807.01031•Acta Applicandae Mathematicae•May 7, 2019•27 citations

Symmetry and Conservation Laws

Tomáš Brauner

This chapter introduces the general concept of symmetry in both classical and quantum physics. The part devoted to classical physics stresses the importance of conservation laws and the role of Noether’s theorem for their understanding. A fairly general discussion of Noether’s theorem is offered, including ambiguities in the definition of the Noether current, possible existence of generalized, tensor conservation laws, and the inverse of Noether’s theorem. The Hamiltonian formalism is then used to motivate the transition from classical to quantum physics, and the definition of symmetry in the latter. In anticipation of the discussion of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the following chapter, the text here emphasizes the difference between implementing symmetry in terms of transformations on the algebra of physical observables, and in terms of unitary mappings on the Hilbert space of states.

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Symmetry and conservation: inverse Noether's theorem and general formalism

Joe Rosen

The previously developed 'continuous temporal development and Noether's theorem' approach to the association of symmetries and conservations of the laws of nature, part of the foundation of any (classical or quantum) Lagrangian theory, is generalised significantly. Within this framework a strong result is obtained for the inverse Noether's theorem, associating symmetries with given conservations. A general symmetry-conservation formalism is proposed, into which both the previously developed 'linear temporal development and conserved eigenheit' approach, part of the foundation of any quantum theory and also applicable to certain classical ones, and the 'continuous temporal...' approach, as different as they are, fit nicely.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 1, 1980•7 citations

Getting to the Bottom of Noether’s Theorem

John C. Baez

This chapter examines the assumptions behind Noether’s theorem connecting symmetries and conservation laws, taking an algebraic approach to compare classical and quantum versions of this theorem. In both classical and quantum mechanics, observables are naturally elements of a Jordan algebra, while generators of one-parameter groups of transformations are naturally elements of a Lie algebra. Noether’s theorem holds whenever we can map observables to generators in such a way that each observable generates a one-parameter group that preserves itself. In ordinary complex quantum mechanics, this mapping is multiplication by the square root of ?1. In the more general framework of unital JB-algebras, Alfsen and Shultz call such a mapping a ‘dynamical correspondence’ and show its presence allows us to identify the unital JB-algebra with the self-adjoint part of a complex C*-algebra. However, to prove their result, they impose a second, more obscure, condition on the dynamical correspondence. This expresses a relation between quantum and statistical mechanics, closely connected to the principle that ‘inverse temperature is imaginary time’.

arXiv:2006.14741•Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 31, 2022•10 citations
This research aims to formulate conserved quantities (classical observables) in Noether’s theorem for quantum hydrodynamics within the framework of symplectic geometry. The symplectic one-form or symplectic potential is identical to the Noether current. 31 The Noether current plays an important role in determining classical observables and conserved quantities, namely, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] associated with the above symmetry in quantum hydrodynamics (nonrelativistic and relativistic) associated with Killing vector field and rotational symmetry group [Formula: see text].
Quantum hydrodynamics described by Madelung equations is analyzed in the framework of symplectic geometry i.e. in covariant phase space approach to geometric field theory. The pre-symplectic manifolds providing the phase spaces describing the Hamiltonian dynamics of quantum fluid are constructed from the set of all solutions of Madelung equations and their corresponding Lagrangian densities. The Madelung equations under consideration are the Madelung equations associated to Schroedinger equations (in the nonrelativistic case) and Madelung equations associated to Klein–Gordon equations (in the relativistic case). The cases where the coupling with electromagnetic fields is present are also considered here. Our symplectic formulation is different from that of [M. Spera, Moment map and gauge geometric aspects of the Schrodinger and Pauli equations, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 13 (2016) 1–36] in the choice of fundamental fields or variables. Here we regard density function [Formula: see text] and phase function [Formula: see text] not as canonical pair but as the fundamental fields of the theory. The Hamiltonian vector fields corresponding to an observable are obtained from the Hamiltonian equation generated by the observable. The Poisson bracket of two observables then is determined by the Hamiltonian vector fields associated to each observable. In general, the Poisson bracket of two observables is not unique due to the fact that every observable has more than one corresponding Hamiltonian vector field. It is pointed out that the Poisson bracket has a unique value over a certain subset of the set of all observables defined on the pre-symplectic manifold of the Madelung equation under consideration.
Quantum hydrodynamics represents quantum mechanics through two complementary models: the Eulerian picture, a direct transcription of wave mechanics, and the Lagrangian picture, in which the quantum state is represented by the collective motion of a continuum of fluid particles, the latter being obtained by continuously varying the particle label. The Lagrangian picture thus adds variables to the quantum formalism and exhibits a corresponding new quantum symmetry viz. a continuous particle-relabelling covariance group. Using Noether's theorem, the relabelling symmetry is derived as a component of a general investigation of symmetries and conservation laws in the quantum Lagrangian picture. Relations with symmetries and conservation laws in the Eulerian picture are explored in detail. Alongside the infinite relabelling group, the 12-parameter kinematical covariance group of the Schrödinger equation is derived. It is stressed that the role of label transformations extends beyond the class corresponding to Eulerian invariance. As an example, it is shown that the linear superposition of waves, a fundamental symmetry of the quantum Eulerian picture, can be generated by a deformation-dependent label transformation in the Lagrangian picture.
The Hamiltonian action of a Lie group on a symplectic manifold induces a momentum map generalizing Noether’s conserved quantity occurring in the case of a symmetry group. Then, when a Hamiltonian function can be written in terms of this momentum map, the Hamiltonian is called ‘collective’. Here, we derive collective Hamiltonians for a series of models in quantum molecular dynamics for which the Lie group is the composition of smooth invertible maps and unitary transformations. In this process, different fluid descriptions emerge from different factorization schemes for either the wavefunction or the density operator. After deriving this series of quantum fluid models, we regularize their Hamiltonians for finite ħ $\hbar $ by introducing local spatial smoothing. In the case of standard quantum hydrodynamics, the ħ ≠ 0 ℏ≠0\hbar \ne 0ℏ=0 dynamics of the Lagrangian path can be derived as a finite-dimensional canonical Hamiltonian system for the evolution of singular solutions called ‘Bohmions’, which follow Bohmian trajectories in configuration space. For molecular dynamics models, application of the smoothing process to a new factorization of the density operator leads to a finite-dimensional Hamiltonian system for the interaction of multiple (nuclear) Bohmions and a sequence of electronic quantum states.
This chapter introduces the general concept of symmetry in both classical and quantum physics. The part devoted to classical physics stresses the importance of conservation laws and the role of Noether’s theorem for their understanding. A fairly general discussion of Noether’s theorem is offered, including ambiguities in the definition of the Noether current, possible existence of generalized, tensor conservation laws, and the inverse of Noether’s theorem. The Hamiltonian formalism is then used to motivate the transition from classical to quantum physics, and the definition of symmetry in the latter. In anticipation of the discussion of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the following chapter, the text here emphasizes the difference between implementing symmetry in terms of transformations on the algebra of physical observables, and in terms of unitary mappings on the Hilbert space of states.
The previously developed 'continuous temporal development and Noether's theorem' approach to the association of symmetries and conservations of the laws of nature, part of the foundation of any (classical or quantum) Lagrangian theory, is generalised significantly. Within this framework a strong result is obtained for the inverse Noether's theorem, associating symmetries with given conservations. A general symmetry-conservation formalism is proposed, into which both the previously developed 'linear temporal development and conserved eigenheit' approach, part of the foundation of any quantum theory and also applicable to certain classical ones, and the 'continuous temporal...' approach, as different as they are, fit nicely.
This chapter examines the assumptions behind Noether’s theorem connecting symmetries and conservation laws, taking an algebraic approach to compare classical and quantum versions of this theorem. In both classical and quantum mechanics, observables are naturally elements of a Jordan algebra, while generators of one-parameter groups of transformations are naturally elements of a Lie algebra. Noether’s theorem holds whenever we can map observables to generators in such a way that each observable generates a one-parameter group that preserves itself. In ordinary complex quantum mechanics, this mapping is multiplication by the square root of ?1. In the more general framework of unital JB-algebras, Alfsen and Shultz call such a mapping a ‘dynamical correspondence’ and show its presence allows us to identify the unital JB-algebra with the self-adjoint part of a complex C*-algebra. However, to prove their result, they impose a second, more obscure, condition on the dynamical correspondence. This expresses a relation between quantum and statistical mechanics, closely connected to the principle that ‘inverse temperature is imaginary time’.