The similarity in form between the two real equations implied by the single-body spin-0 Schrödinger equation in the position representation (wave mechanics) and the equations of fluid mechanics with potential flow in its Eulerian formulation was first pointed out by Madelung in 1926 [1]. In this analogy, the probability density is proportional to the fluid density, and the phase of the wave function is a velocity potential. A novel feature of the quantum fluid is the appearance of quantum stresses, which are usually represented through the quantum potential. To achieve mathematical equivalence of the models, the hydrodynamic variables have to satisfy 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 55 4.2 Deduction of Schrödinger’s Equation from the Lagrangian Picture Trajectory Theory ........................................................................................... 57 4.2.1 Lagrangian Picture ............................................................................. 57 4.2.2 Eulerian Picture .................................................................................. 62 4.2.3 Equivalence of First-Order and Second-Order Trajectory Laws ........64
The similarity in form between the two real equations implied by the single-body spin-0 Schrödinger equation in the position representation (wave mechanics) and the equations of fluid mechanics with potential flow in its Eulerian formulation was first pointed out by Madelung in 1926 [1]. In this analogy, the probability density is proportional to the fluid density, and the phase of the wave function is a velocity potential. A novel feature of the quantum fluid is the appearance of quantum stresses, which are usually represented through the quantum potential. To achieve mathematical equivalence of the models, the hydrodynamic variables have to satisfy 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 55 4.2 Deduction of Schrödinger’s Equation from the Lagrangian Picture Trajectory Theory ........................................................................................... 57 4.2.1 Lagrangian Picture ............................................................................. 57 4.2.2 Eulerian Picture .................................................................................. 62 4.2.3 Equivalence of First-Order and Second-Order Trajectory Laws ........64
Quantum hydrodynamics represents quantum mechanics through two complementary models: the Eulerian picture, a direct transcription of wave mechanics, and the Lagrangian picture, in which the quantum state is represented by the collective motion of a continuum of fluid particles, the latter being obtained by continuously varying the particle label. The Lagrangian picture thus adds variables to the quantum formalism and exhibits a corresponding new quantum symmetry viz. a continuous particle-relabelling covariance group. Using Noether's theorem, the relabelling symmetry is derived as a component of a general investigation of symmetries and conservation laws in the quantum Lagrangian picture. Relations with symmetries and conservation laws in the Eulerian picture are explored in detail. Alongside the infinite relabelling group, the 12-parameter kinematical covariance group of the Schrödinger equation is derived. It is stressed that the role of label transformations extends beyond the class corresponding to Eulerian invariance. As an example, it is shown that the linear superposition of waves, a fundamental symmetry of the quantum Eulerian picture, can be generated by a deformation-dependent label transformation in the Lagrangian picture.
Abstract A formalism of classical mechanics is given for time-dependent many-body states of quantum mechanics, describing both fluid flow and point mass trajectories. The familiar equations of energy, motion, and those of Lagrangian mechanics are obtained. An energy and continuity equation is demonstrated to be equivalent to the real and imaginary parts of the time dependent Schrödinger equation, respectively, where the Schrödinger equation is in density matrix form. For certain stationary states, using Lagrangian mechanics and a Hamiltonian function for quantum mechanics, equations for point-mass trajectories are obtained. For 1-body states and fluid flows, the energy equation and equations of motion are the Bernoulli and Euler equations of fluid mechanics, respectively. Generalizations of the energy and Euler equations are derived to obtain equations that are in the same form as they are in classical mechanics. The fluid flow type is compressible, inviscid, irrotational, with the nonclassical element of local variable mass. Over all space mass is conserved. The variable mass is a necessary condition for the fluid flow to agree with the zero orbital angular momentum for s states of hydrogen. Cross flows are examined, where velocity directions are changed without changing the kinetic energy. For one-electron atoms, the velocity modification gives closed orbits for trajectories, and mass conservation, vortexes, and density stratification for fluid flows. For many body states, under certain conditions, and by hypotheses, Euler equations of orbital-flows are obtained. One-body Schrödinger equations that are a generalization of the Hartree–Fock equations are also obtained. These equations contain a quantum Coulomb’s law, involving the 2-body pair function of reduced density matrix theory that replace the charge densities.
Transcending its origin in the debate on the interpretation of quantum theory, the continuous deterministic trajectory has proved a potent tool in computational quantum mechanics (an excellent introduction to numerical trajectory techniques is provided by Wyatt’s text [1]). It is straightforward to develop a method to derive the timedependent Schrödinger equation from a single-valued continuum of spacetime trajectories, and supply a corresponding exact formula for the wavefunction [2].Anatural language for this theory of evolution is offered by the hydrodynamic analogy, in which wave mechanics corresponds to the Eulerian picture (as shown by Madelung [3]) and the trajectory theory to the Lagrangian picture. The Lagrangian model for the quantum fluid may be developed from a variational principle involving a specific interaction potential (the quantum internal potential energy), and the Euler-Lagrange equations imply a nonlinear partial differential equation to calculate the trajectories of the fluid particles as functions of their initial coordinates and the initial wavefunction. The latter supplies two sets of data to the particle model: the initial density (via the amplitude) and the initial velocity (via the phase). The time-dependent wavefunction is then computed via the standard map between the Lagrangian coordinates and the Eulerian fields.
It is shown that the Schrödinger equation can be cast in the form of two coupled real conservation equations, in Euclidean spacetime in the free case and in a five-dimensional Eisenhart geometry in the presence of an external potential. This implies a novel two-phase quantum-hydrodynamic model whose Lagrangian picture provides an exact scheme to calculate the time-dependent wavefunction from a continuum of deterministic trajectories where two points are linked by at most two trajectories. Properties of the model are examined, including the appearance of 'entangled' trajectories in separable states. Wavefunction constructions employing alternative two-phase models are proposed.
This paper develops a hydrodynamic derivation of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics within the Hydrodynamic Quantum Gravity (HQG) programme. Using the Madelung transformation, the Schrödinger equation is written in amplitude–phase form and shown to be exactly equivalent to (i) a continuity equation for a conserved density and (ii) an Euler-type momentum equation augmented by the “quantum potential” term. In this interpretation, the quantum potential is treated as an effective dispersive stress associated with structured vacuum dynamics, rather than as a purely formal mathematical artefact. The paper reviews how standard quantum features appear naturally in the hydrodynamic variables: interference and diffraction as phase-driven flow, stationary states as time-harmonic solutions, and quantisation as a consequence of single-valued phase (circulation) constraints. It also discusses how pilot-wave style dynamics can be expressed in this language, and surveys laboratory analogues (including walking-droplet experiments) as phenomenological motivation and intuition-building, without claiming identity between the analogue systems and the quantum vacuum. Interpretation note: “Superfluid/condensate” language is used here as an effective mathematical/analogue description of vacuum behaviour; the paper does not assert a material substrate or an operationally accessible preferred rest frame. This paper is part of a series. Companion preprints develop the gravitational and electromagnetic components of the HQG framework and discuss additional open problems and testable predictions. Discussion and feedback: https://github.com/Gptham123456/Hydrodynamic-Quantum-Gravity/discussions
The Madelung equations express the Schrödinger equation as a continuity equation and modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation. These equations are equivalent to the Euler equations for a compressible, potential flow, when classical pressure per unit density is replaced by the quantum potential per unit mass. We extend this hydrodynamic interpretation by quantising a single, spinless, non-relativistic particle constrained to a surface wave with small slope. The wave is distinct from the wave function and, in order to reproduce the Schrödinger equation, it must satisfy the kinematic boundary condition for a free surface advected by twice the Madelung velocity field.