Quantum computing poses significant challenges to the current cryptographic landscape, particularly with the upcoming deployment of 6G networks. Traditional cryptographic algorithms, such as Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), are vulnerable to quantum-based attacks. This vulnerability has led to the development of Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), and Satellite-based QKD solutions. This paper provides a comprehensive review of these quantum-safe technologies, discussing their integration within the context of 6G networks. Key performance indicators (KPIs), scalability issues, and hybrid cryptographic solutions are analyzed, along with the potential of Satellite-based QKD in securing global communications. The paper also explores use cases in healthcare, financial services, defense, and autonomous systems, evaluating future research directions and issues in scaling these quantum-safe technologies across industries.
Quantum computing poses significant challenges to the current cryptographic landscape, particularly with the upcoming deployment of 6G networks. Traditional cryptographic algorithms, such as Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), are vulnerable to quantum-based attacks. This vulnerability has led to the development of Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), and Satellite-based QKD solutions. This paper provides a comprehensive review of these quantum-safe technologies, discussing their integration within the context of 6G networks. Key performance indicators (KPIs), scalability issues, and hybrid cryptographic solutions are analyzed, along with the potential of Satellite-based QKD in securing global communications. The paper also explores use cases in healthcare, financial services, defense, and autonomous systems, evaluating future research directions and issues in scaling these quantum-safe technologies across industries.
Quantum computing presents significant issues to the current cryptographic landscape, especially with the upcoming deployment of 6G networks. Traditional cryptographic algorithms, such as Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), are vulnerable to quantum-based attacks, leading to the need for Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), and Satellite-based QKD solutions. This paper offers a comprehensive review of these quantum-safe technologies, discussing their integration within the context of 6G networks. Key performance indicators (KPIs), scalability issues, and hybrid cryptographic solutions are analyzed, along with the potential of Satellite-based QKD in securing global communications. The paper also explores use cases in healthcare, financial services, defense, and autonomous systems, evaluating future research directions and issues in scaling these quantum-safe technologies across industries.
The exponential advancement of quantum computing poses an unprecedented threat to blockchain technology and emerging Sixth Generation (6G) networks, necessitating an urgent transition to post-quantum cryptographic solutions. This comprehensive review proposed post-quantum Cryptography (PQC) integration within Blockchain Enabled 6G (BE6G) architectures, highlighting vulnerabilities by Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms according to existing cryptographic standards, including Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA), Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA), and Elliptic-Curve Cryptography (ECC). The paper addresses quantum computing fundamentals and blockchain security implications, exploring quantum-resistant cryptographic schemes including lattice-based, hash-based, code-based, and multivariate approaches. Through systematic examination of post-quantum threats, this review shows vulnerabilities affecting nearly 25% of existing cryptocurrency assets, presenting how quantum computers can break public-key systems in polynomial time. The study proposes solutions for implementing quantum-resistant blockchain architectures throughout 6G components, including Radio Access Network (RAN), edge computing, and core transport networks, while meeting ultra-low latency and scalability requirements. Key findings elaborate that hybrid cryptographic approaches combining classical and quantum-resistant algorithms provide promising directions. Lattice-based algorithms, particularly CRYSTALS-kyber and CRYSTALS-dilithium, are identified as primary deployment candidates. The review concludes that successful Quantum-Resistant Security deployment for BE6G Networks requires unprecedented coordination among telecommunication operators, blockchain developers, equipment manufacturers, and regulatory bodies. The ”harvest now, decrypt later” threat model creates sudden implementation, valuable for long-term digital infrastructure security.
The development of quantum computers poses a new security threat to network infrastructures and services, as they will be powerful enough to break the most common forms of digital encryption. Existing encryption services based on Rivest–Shamir–Adleman (RSA), Diffie-Hellman (DH), Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) and so on are vulnerable to attacks by quantum computers. Although the gap between today’s quantum computers and the threats they pose to current public-key cryptography is large, the telecommunications landscape should begin planning for the transition to the post-quantum era as early as possible. In this paper, we examine recent advances in Post Quantum Cryptography (PQC) algorithms from the perspective of the networking and telecommunications industries. The efforts are categorized at three levels, namely communication, computation (consisting of design, implementation and Public Key System (PKS)), and network. Some of the existing challenges and future recommendations for securing communication networks in the post-quantum era are also listed at the end of the paper.
With the rapid advancement of quantum computing, existing cryptographic schemes in 4G LTE and 5G networks confront serious security threats. Traditional reliance on protocols like IPsec and Transport Layer Security leaves infrastructure vulnerable to future quantum attacks, particularly “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later” attacks, where adversaries store current encrypted traffic for future decryption. To counter these threats, Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) and Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) have become potential solutions. As future 6G networks aim to realize ultra-reliable and ubiquitous secure connectivity, it is essential to incorporate both PQC and QKD solutions to ensure long-term robustness. Therefore, the synergy of these security solutions and 5G draws the attention of researchers and practitioners worldwide. This study systematically reviews the literature in this specific field. We analyzed evidence from reviewed literature to address three research questions, resulting in a novel taxonomy to categorize publications in this area and a vision for a quantum-safe 6G network. Moreover, we discussed several open challenges in 5G, PQC, and QKD, along with future work.
With the advent of 6G communication systems on the horizon, ensuring that they are secure from quantum computing threats, in a post-quantum era, is of paramount importance. Quantum attacks, computational hardness-based classical cryptographic algorithms are becoming more susceptible to quantum attacks. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) has been proposed to address this challenge, which can provide unconditional security based on quantum mechanics for establishing security cryptographic keys. In this work, we review how QKD could fit into the 6G design as part of the general siytematic vision of security exploring its potential implementations, the technical feasibility, and the applications considering both fiber and wireless scenarios. We provide a comparative investigation of performance indicators of QKD systems in simulated 6G scenarios: secret key generation rates, quantum bit error rates (QBER), resistance to noise and user mobility. In addition, hybrid security models between classical post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and QKD to achieve multilayered security protocols are demonstrated. Furthermore, the contribution that could be made by AI/ML to improve QKD performance is analyzed, with particular attention to smart error correction, adaptive key management, anomaly detection, and dynamic routing. Despite significant progress, a number of critical challenges are still open in terms of scale, standardization, interoperability and deployment. In Section VI, we offer a forward-looking research direction, highlighting the importance of the AI empowered QKD, protocols global standardization, and creation of realworld testbeds to drive the QKD from the testbed to the 6G network. It is hoped that the insights provide here will inspire research community and industry partners to build quantum-safe communication infrastructure for the future.
Quantum computing advances pose a serious threat to conventional public-key cryptographic systems such as RSA and elliptic curve cryptography as quantum algorithms may undermine the computational assumptions that guaranty their security. This challenge has driven the development of quantumsafe security approaches among which Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) represents a fundamentally different paradigm based on quantum mechanical principles rather than mathematical complexity. This paper presents a structured review of recent progress in QKD based on a systematic analysis of literature between 2020 and 2025, we examine core protocols including discrete-variable, continuous-variable, measurement-deviceindependent, and twin-field approaches, while also discussing their relationship with post-quantum cryptography as a complementary strategy for future secure communication systems. We provide a unified comparison framework to support practical design and policy decisions by organizing protocols and implementations along deployment dimensions. The study analyze theoretical foundations, implementation technologies across fiber, free-space, satellite, and integrated photonic platforms, and key performance trade-offs involving scalability, security robustness, and deployment feasibility. Findings indicate substantial progress in transitioning QKD from laboratory research toward practical implementations, supported by advances in network architectures, integrated hardware and hybrid cryptographic designs. The comparative analysis will highlight distinct strengths and limitations among protocol families and emphasize the potential of combining QKD with post-quantum cryptographic methods to enhance resilience. Remaining challenges including scalability constraints, implementation-level vulnerabilities, performance limitations over long distances, and integration with existing communication infrastructures are critically discussed. Finally, emerging research directions such as quantum repeaters, hybrid quantum-classical security models, and exploratory directions such as artificial intelligence-assisted optimizations are identified as key factors in enabling the evolution of QKD toward largescale quantum-secure networking.