Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Graduate texts in physics

Classical and Quantum Langevin Equations

Daniel F. Walls, Gerard J Milburn

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-84177-4_6

Related papers

Quantum Langevin equations and quantum stochastic Liouville equations

Toshihico Arimitsu

Physics Letters A•Mar 1, 1991•21 citations

Quantum Noise and Quantum Langevin Equation

Wen Wan

The properties of quantum noise and Langevin equation are discussed. Comparisons between the quantum noise and Langevin eqution and the classic one are presented. A brief derivation for quantum Langevin equation is showed. The quantum noise comes from two ways, namely, the way as same as that of classic noise and the Heisenberg uncertainty.

Yuanzihe wuli pinglun•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Quantum Langevin Equations

Crispin W. Gardiner, P. Zoller

Springer series in synergetics•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Quantum Langevin Equations

Crispin W. Gardiner

Springer series in synergetics•Jan 1, 1991•3 citations

The Valididy of the Langevin Equation

J. Frenkel, Jason Taylor

The validity of the Langevin equation (both classical and quantum) is studied in cases when not all the equations of motion are linear. In particular, a model is studied in which the interaction is bilinear in the environment variables. We conclude that the equation is valid only for frequencies close to the frequency of the system alone. If the equation of motion of the system alone is nonlinear, we are unable to find a condition for the validity of the Langevin equation.

arXiv:1102.2610•Feb 13, 2011•0 citations

On the generalized Langevin equation: Classical and quantum mechanicala)

Emilio Cortés, Bruce J. West, Katja Lindenberg

The generalized Langevin equation and its attendant fluctuation–dissipation relation (FDR) for both classical and quantum systems is explictly derived for a large class of system-bath interaction potentials. We demonstrate for this class of potentials that the classical FDR involving only the temperature of the bath is satisfied, and that in general the decay times of the dissipative processes and of the system are temperature dependent. We also demonstrate that the quantum FDR depends in detail on the nature of the bath and on the specific system-bath interaction. Thus we conclude that while the classical Langevin equation is phenomenologically useful, its quantum counterpart is much more limited.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Mar 15, 1985•215 citations
The generalized Langevin equation and its attendant fluctuation–dissipation relation (FDR) for both classical and quantum systems is explictly derived for a large class of system-bath interaction potentials. We demonstrate for this class of potentials that the classical FDR involving only the temperature of the bath is satisfied, and that in general the decay times of the dissipative processes and of the system are temperature dependent. We also demonstrate that the quantum FDR depends in detail on the nature of the bath and on the specific system-bath interaction. Thus we conclude that while the classical Langevin equation is phenomenologically useful, its quantum counterpart is much more limited.