Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Reply to “Comment on ‘Energy-level shift of quantum systems via the scalar electric Aharonov-Bohm effect' ”

R. Y. Chiao, Harold Hart, Michael Scheibner, Jay E. Sharping, Nader A. Inan, Douglas Singleton, Michael Edmund Tobar

Published May 29, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We respond to the points raised in the preceding Comment [] on our recent work [], which introduced a theoretical framework for the scalar electric Aharonov-Bohm effect. In this Reply, we take the opportunity to address specific criticisms, by referring to foundational aspects of gauge invariance and time-dependent quantum systems. We explain why the gauging procedure used in the Comment leads to inconsistencies and show that, when applied similarly to the well-established magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect, it would yield demonstrably incorrect conclusions. Moreover, we highlight the consistency of our results with canonical treatments of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, and we reaffirm the physicality of energy shifts in field-free regions, an effect observed in the magnetic and predicted in the electric Aharonov-Bohm contexts. We believe that this response contributes to a deeper understanding of the subtleties involved in gauge theory and quantum phase phenomena.

DOI
10.1103/mtfh-m6tr

Related papers

Comment on “Energy-level shift of quantum systems via the scalar electric Aharonov-Bohm effect”

Shan Gao

Recently Chiao and his collaborators proposed a novel scalar electric Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect [Phys. Rev. A 107, 042209 (2023)]. They claimed that a quantum system inside a Faraday cage with a time varying but spatially uniform scalar potential acquires an AB phase, resulting in observable energy level shifts. This comment argues that their analysis is flawed: a spatially uniform scalar potential inside the cage, despite external variations, can be gauged away without altering gauge-invariant observables, such as energy differences, thus invalidating their claim. A possible explanation of this seemingly puzzling result is also given.

Physical Review A•May 29, 2025•1 citation

Energy-level shift of quantum systems via the scalar electric Aharonov-Bohm effect

R. Y. Chiao, Harold Hart, Michael Scheibner +4 more

A version of the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect is proposed where the quantum system which picks up the Aharonov-Bohm phase is confined to a Faraday cage with a time-varying spatially uniform scalar potential. The electric and magnetic fields in this region are effectively zero for the entire period of the experiment. The observable consequence of this version of the electric Aharonov-Bohmn effect is to shift the energy levels of the quantum system rather than shift the fringes of the two-slit interference pattern. We show a strong mathematical connection between this version of the scalar electric $AB$ effect and the ac Stark effect.

arXiv:2212.03437•Physical Review A•Apr 13, 2023•12 citations

The Aharonov–Bohm Effect: Gauge Potentials, Quantum Phase, and Experimental Evidence

Giancarmine Sparso

This technical note gives a self-contained exposition of the Aharonov–Bohm effect, aimed at advanced undergraduate students. Starting from the role of electromagnetic potentials in classical electrodynamics, it introduces gauge freedom, the quantum Hamiltonian with minimal coupling, and the gauge covariance of the Schrödinger equation. It then derives the Aharonov–Bohm phase for both the time-dependent scalar configuration and the magnetic configuration, showing how a charged particle acquires an observable phase shift while travelling only through regions where the electromagnetic field vanishes. The final part reviews the experimental evidence, from the early electron-interference experiments of Chambers and of Möllenstedt and Bayh to the 1986 toroidal-magnet experiment of Tonomura and collaborators. In that experiment, superconducting shielding confined the magnetic flux completely and closed the leakage-field loophole, while flux quantization produced the characteristic half-fringe shift. The note is expository and pedagogical: it does not present original research results and has not been peer reviewed. Originally developed from study notes prepared for the PHYS02 scientific talk at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford, in July 2026; an earlier version of the notes has been publicly available on GitHub since August 2026. Corrections and comments are more than welcome at giancarminesparso@gmail.com.

•Jul 1, 2026•0 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Role of potentials in the Aharonov-Bohm effect’ ”

Lev Vaidman A

The preceding Comment challenged my claim that potentials might be just auxiliary mathematical tools and that they are not necessary for explaining physical phenomena. The Comment did not confront my explanation without the potentials of the Aharonov-Bohm effects that appeared in the original article, but stated that I cannot apply this explanation for seven other examples. In my reply, using my method, I provide explanations of one of the examples, show that two other examples are not relevant, and agree that the remaining examples require further analysis. However, I argue that none of the examples provides robust counterexamples to my claim, similar to the original Aharonov-Bohm setups which were explained in my article, so the Comment does not refute my claim.

arXiv:1508.00743•Physical Review A•Aug 31, 2015•34 citations

Comment on "Aharonov-Bohm Phase is Locally Generated Like All Other Quantum Phases"

Shan Gao

Marletto and Vedral [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040401 (2020)] propose that the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase is locally mediated by entanglement between a charged particle and the quantized electromagnetic field, asserting gauge independence for non-closed paths. In this Comment, we critically analyze their model and demonstrate that the AB phase arises from the interaction with the vector potential \(\mathbf{A}\), not from entanglement, which is a byproduct of the quantum electrodynamics (QED) framework. We show that their field-based energy formulation, intended to reflect local electromagnetic interactions, is mathematically flawed due to an incorrect prefactor and yields \( +q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{s}} \) in the Coulomb gauge, conflicting with QED's \( -q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{s}} \). This equivalence to \( q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{s}} \) holds only approximately in the Coulomb gauge under static conditions, failing for time-dependent fields and other gauges, undermining their claim of a gauge-independent local mechanism. Furthermore, we confirm that the AB phase is gauge-dependent for non-closed paths, contradicting their assertion. Our analysis reaffirms the conventional explanation in the semi-classical picture, where the AB phase is driven by the vector potential \(\mathbf{A}\), with entanglement playing no causal role in its generation.

quant-pharXiv:2601.17665•Physical Review Letters•Jan 27, 2026•3 citations

Gauge invariance of the Aharonov-Bohm effect in a quantum electrodynamics framework

Pablo L. Saldanha

The gauge invariance of the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect with a quantum treatment for the electromagnetic field is demonstrated. We provide an exact solution for the electromagnetic ground energy due to the interaction of the quantum electromagnetic field with the classical charges and currents that act as sources of the potentials in a classical description, in the Lorenz gauge. Then, we use first-order perturbation theory to compute an extra change on the electromagnetic ground energy due to the presence of a quantum charged particle with known wave function in the system. This energy in general depends on the quantum particle path in an interferometer, which results in an AB phase difference between the paths. The gauge invariance of this AB phase difference is then shown for the magnetic, electric, and the recently proposed electrodynamic versions of the AB effect. However, the AB phase difference could depend on the gauge for nonclosed paths, which reinforces the view that it only can be measured in closed paths.

arXiv:2405.08536•Physical Review A•Jun 3, 2024•3 citations
We respond to the points raised in the preceding Comment [] on our recent work [], which introduced a theoretical framework for the scalar electric Aharonov-Bohm effect. In this Reply, we take the opportunity to address specific criticisms, by referring to foundational aspects of gauge invariance and time-dependent quantum systems. We explain why the gauging procedure used in the Comment leads to inconsistencies and show that, when applied similarly to the well-established magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect, it would yield demonstrably incorrect conclusions. Moreover, we highlight the consistency of our results with canonical treatments of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, and we reaffirm the physicality of energy shifts in field-free regions, an effect observed in the magnetic and predicted in the electric Aharonov-Bohm contexts. We believe that this response contributes to a deeper understanding of the subtleties involved in gauge theory and quantum phase phenomena.
Recently Chiao and his collaborators proposed a novel scalar electric Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect [Phys. Rev. A 107, 042209 (2023)]. They claimed that a quantum system inside a Faraday cage with a time varying but spatially uniform scalar potential acquires an AB phase, resulting in observable energy level shifts. This comment argues that their analysis is flawed: a spatially uniform scalar potential inside the cage, despite external variations, can be gauged away without altering gauge-invariant observables, such as energy differences, thus invalidating their claim. A possible explanation of this seemingly puzzling result is also given.
A version of the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect is proposed where the quantum system which picks up the Aharonov-Bohm phase is confined to a Faraday cage with a time-varying spatially uniform scalar potential. The electric and magnetic fields in this region are effectively zero for the entire period of the experiment. The observable consequence of this version of the electric Aharonov-Bohmn effect is to shift the energy levels of the quantum system rather than shift the fringes of the two-slit interference pattern. We show a strong mathematical connection between this version of the scalar electric ABABAB effect and the ac Stark effect.
This technical note gives a self-contained exposition of the Aharonov–Bohm effect, aimed at advanced undergraduate students. Starting from the role of electromagnetic potentials in classical electrodynamics, it introduces gauge freedom, the quantum Hamiltonian with minimal coupling, and the gauge covariance of the Schrödinger equation. It then derives the Aharonov–Bohm phase for both the time-dependent scalar configuration and the magnetic configuration, showing how a charged particle acquires an observable phase shift while travelling only through regions where the electromagnetic field vanishes. The final part reviews the experimental evidence, from the early electron-interference experiments of Chambers and of Möllenstedt and Bayh to the 1986 toroidal-magnet experiment of Tonomura and collaborators. In that experiment, superconducting shielding confined the magnetic flux completely and closed the leakage-field loophole, while flux quantization produced the characteristic half-fringe shift. The note is expository and pedagogical: it does not present original research results and has not been peer reviewed. Originally developed from study notes prepared for the PHYS02 scientific talk at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford, in July 2026; an earlier version of the notes has been publicly available on GitHub since August 2026. Corrections and comments are more than welcome at giancarminesparso@gmail.com.
The preceding Comment challenged my claim that potentials might be just auxiliary mathematical tools and that they are not necessary for explaining physical phenomena. The Comment did not confront my explanation without the potentials of the Aharonov-Bohm effects that appeared in the original article, but stated that I cannot apply this explanation for seven other examples. In my reply, using my method, I provide explanations of one of the examples, show that two other examples are not relevant, and agree that the remaining examples require further analysis. However, I argue that none of the examples provides robust counterexamples to my claim, similar to the original Aharonov-Bohm setups which were explained in my article, so the Comment does not refute my claim.
Marletto and Vedral [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040401 (2020)] propose that the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase is locally mediated by entanglement between a charged particle and the quantized electromagnetic field, asserting gauge independence for non-closed paths. In this Comment, we critically analyze their model and demonstrate that the AB phase arises from the interaction with the vector potential A\mathbf{A}A, not from entanglement, which is a byproduct of the quantum electrodynamics (QED) framework. We show that their field-based energy formulation, intended to reflect local electromagnetic interactions, is mathematically flawed due to an incorrect prefactor and yields +qv⋅As +q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{s}} +qv⋅As​ in the Coulomb gauge, conflicting with QED's −qv⋅As -q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{s}} −qv⋅As​. This equivalence to qv⋅As q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{s}} qv⋅As​ holds only approximately in the Coulomb gauge under static conditions, failing for time-dependent fields and other gauges, undermining their claim of a gauge-independent local mechanism. Furthermore, we confirm that the AB phase is gauge-dependent for non-closed paths, contradicting their assertion. Our analysis reaffirms the conventional explanation in the semi-classical picture, where the AB phase is driven by the vector potential A\mathbf{A}A, with entanglement playing no causal role in its generation.
The gauge invariance of the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect with a quantum treatment for the electromagnetic field is demonstrated. We provide an exact solution for the electromagnetic ground energy due to the interaction of the quantum electromagnetic field with the classical charges and currents that act as sources of the potentials in a classical description, in the Lorenz gauge. Then, we use first-order perturbation theory to compute an extra change on the electromagnetic ground energy due to the presence of a quantum charged particle with known wave function in the system. This energy in general depends on the quantum particle path in an interferometer, which results in an AB phase difference between the paths. The gauge invariance of this AB phase difference is then shown for the magnetic, electric, and the recently proposed electrodynamic versions of the AB effect. However, the AB phase difference could depend on the gauge for nonclosed paths, which reinforces the view that it only can be measured in closed paths.