Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2601.17665 · Physical Review Letters

Comment on "Aharonov-Bohm Phase is Locally Generated Like All Other Quantum Phases"

Shan Gao

quant-phSubmitted Jan 25, 2026• Announced Jan 27, 2026• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Marletto and Vedral [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040401 (2020)] propose that the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase is locally mediated by entanglement between a charged particle and the quantized electromagnetic field, asserting gauge independence for non-closed paths. In this Comment, we critically analyze their model and demonstrate that the AB phase arises from the interaction with the vector potential \(\mathbf{A}\), not from entanglement, which is a byproduct of the quantum electrodynamics (QED) framework. We show that their field-based energy formulation, intended to reflect local electromagnetic interactions, is mathematically flawed due to an incorrect prefactor and yields \( +q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{s}} \) in the Coulomb gauge, conflicting with QED's \( -q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{s}} \). This equivalence to \( q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{s}} \) holds only approximately in the Coulomb gauge under static conditions, failing for time-dependent fields and other gauges, undermining their claim of a gauge-independent local mechanism. Furthermore, we confirm that the AB phase is gauge-dependent for non-closed paths, contradicting their assertion. Our analysis reaffirms the conventional explanation in the semi-classical picture, where the AB phase is driven by the vector potential \(\mathbf{A}\), with entanglement playing no causal role in its generation.

Journal reference
Physical Review Letters 135, 098901 (2025)
DOI
10.1103/v117-v5wn
Comments
Comment on arXiv:1906.03440

Related papers

Gauge dependence of the Aharonov-Bohm phase in a quantum electrodynamics framework

A. Hayashi

The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase is usually associated with a line integral of the electromagnetic vector potential generated by an external current source, such as a solenoid. According to this interpretation, the AB phase of a nonclosed path cannot be observed, as the integral depends on the gauge choice of the vector potential. Recent attempts to explain the AB effect through the interaction between a charged particle and an external current, mediated by the exchange of quantum photons, have assumed that the AB phase shift is proportional to the change in interaction energy between the charged particle and the external current source. As a result, these attempts argue that the AB phase change along a path does not depend on the gauge choice, and that the AB phase shift for a nonclosed path is in principle measurable. In this paper, we critically examine this claim and demonstrate that the phase obtained through this approach is actually gauge dependent and not an observable for a nonclosed path. We also provide a brief critical discussion of the proposed experiment for observing the AB phase shift of a nonclosed path.

arXiv:2305.13995•Physical Review A•Aug 17, 2023•1 citation

Aharonov-Bohm Phase is Locally Generated Like All Other Quantum Phases

Chiara Marletto, Vlatko Vedral

In the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, a superposed charge acquires a detectable phase by enclosing an infinite solenoid, in a region where the solenoid's electric and magnetic fields are zero. Its generation seems therefore explainable only by the local action of gauge-dependent potentials, not of gauge-independent fields. This was recently challenged by Vaidman, who explained the phase by the solenoid's current interacting with the electron's field (at the solenoid). Still, his model has a residual nonlocality: it does not explain how the phase, generated at the solenoid, is detectable on the charge. In this Letter, we solve this nonlocality explicitly by quantizing the field. We show that the AB phase is mediated locally by the entanglement between the charge and the photons, like all electromagnetic phases. We also predict a gauge-invariant value for the phase difference at each point along the charge's path. We propose a realistic experiment to measure this phase difference locally, by partial quantum state tomography on the charge, without closing the interference loop.

arXiv:1906.03440•Physical Review Letters•Jul 22, 2020•55 citations

New expressions for the Aharonov–Bohm phase and consequences for the fundamentals of quantum mechanics

Alexander L. Kholmetskii, Tolga Yarman, O. Missevitch

Abstract We focus on new expressions for the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) phase proposed recently by C. Marletto and V. Vedral (Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040401 (2020)) and by our team (A. L. Kholmetskii et al., Ann. Phys., 434, 168627 (2021)). We emphasize the mismatch between the standard expression for the electric component of the AB phase and the expression by Marletto and Vedral for this component, which, as we show, has fundamental roots and indicates the need to use different expressions for the Hamiltonian of the radiative component and bound component of the electromagnetic (EM) field. We further show that the corrected expression for the AB phase of Marletto and Vedral and our expression for the AB phase do not coincide with its standard representation through the potentials of EM field (Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 485) and contain additional terms, which straightforwardly allow to re-express the AB phase via electric and magnetic fields instead of scalar and vector potentials. The recognition of the field-dependent origin of the AB effect also requires to re-express the Hamiltonian of a charged particle through the EM field, which we show can be done in the only possible way. We discuss the physical meaning of the AB effect with the primary role of the EM field and also discuss some general quantum mechanical implications.

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Jan 8, 2024•1 citation

Gauge invariance of the local phase in the Aharonov-Bohm interference: Quantum electrodynamic approach

Kicheon Kang

Abstract In the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, interference fringes are observed for a charged particle in the absence of the local overlap with the external electromagnetic field. This notion of the apparent “nonlocality” of the interaction or the significant role of the potential have recently been challenged and are under debate. The quantum electrodynamic approach provides a microscopic picture of the characteristics of the interaction between a charge and an external field. We explicitly show the gauge invariance of the local phase shift in the magnetic AB effect, which is in contrast to the results obtained using the usual semiclassical vector potential. Our study can resolve the issue of the locality in the magnetic AB effect. However, the problem is not solved in the same way in the electric counterpart wherein virtual scalar photons play an essential role.

arXiv:2206.08620•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Nov 1, 2022•6 citations

Gauge invariance of the Aharonov-Bohm effect in a quantum electrodynamics framework

Pablo L. Saldanha

The gauge invariance of the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect with a quantum treatment for the electromagnetic field is demonstrated. We provide an exact solution for the electromagnetic ground energy due to the interaction of the quantum electromagnetic field with the classical charges and currents that act as sources of the potentials in a classical description, in the Lorenz gauge. Then, we use first-order perturbation theory to compute an extra change on the electromagnetic ground energy due to the presence of a quantum charged particle with known wave function in the system. This energy in general depends on the quantum particle path in an interferometer, which results in an AB phase difference between the paths. The gauge invariance of this AB phase difference is then shown for the magnetic, electric, and the recently proposed electrodynamic versions of the AB effect. However, the AB phase difference could depend on the gauge for nonclosed paths, which reinforces the view that it only can be measured in closed paths.

arXiv:2405.08536•Physical Review A•Jun 3, 2024•3 citations

Does the Aharonov-Bohm Effect Imply the Reality of Electromagnetic Potentials?

Shan Gao

The Aharonov--Bohm (AB) phase for a closed interferometric loop is widely regarded as gauge invariant. This conclusion is usually obtained by treating the electromagnetic source as a fixed background that is unaffected by the test charge. We investigate whether this conclusion remains valid when backreaction is included within the standard gauge-fixed formulation of quantum electrodynamics (QED). Our analysis indicates that, when the interfering branches become entangled with distinct electromagnetic field configurations, changes of the gauge-fixing condition can induce a non-vanishing shift of the total phase. This result gives rise to an apparent paradox: the total phase predicted by the QED formalism appears gauge dependent, whereas experiments robustly exhibit a definite interference shift. We examine two possible resolutions of this paradox. The standard approach attributes the observed interference only to a gauge-invariant component of the total phase and treats the remaining gauge-dependent contribution as physically irrelevant. We argue, however, that the QED formalism itself predicts the total phase governing the interference outcome and does not provide a dynamical prescription that extracts a gauge-invariant component while discarding the remaining terms. We then explore an alternative perspective in which the electromagnetic potential $A_\mu$ is regarded as a physical field whose configuration is determined by the Lorenz condition together with appropriate causal and boundary conditions. From this viewpoint, the total phase can be interpreted as a well-defined physical quantity within the QED formalism. We conclude by discussing a possible experimental test based on direct measurements of open-path relative phases, which may help clarify the ontological status of electromagnetic potentials.

•Aug 6, 2026•0 citations
Marletto and Vedral [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040401 (2020)] propose that the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase is locally mediated by entanglement between a charged particle and the quantized electromagnetic field, asserting gauge independence for non-closed paths. In this Comment, we critically analyze their model and demonstrate that the AB phase arises from the interaction with the vector potential (\mathbf{A}), not from entanglement, which is a byproduct of the quantum electrodynamics (QED) framework. We show that their field-based energy formulation, intended to reflect local electromagnetic interactions, is mathematically flawed due to an incorrect prefactor and yields ( +q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}{\mathbf{s}} ) in the Coulomb gauge, conflicting with QED's ( -q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}{\mathbf{s}} ). This equivalence to ( q \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{s}} ) holds only approximately in the Coulomb gauge under static conditions, failing for time-dependent fields and other gauges, undermining their claim of a gauge-independent local mechanism. Furthermore, we confirm that the AB phase is gauge-dependent for non-closed paths, contradicting their assertion. Our analysis reaffirms the conventional explanation in the semi-classical picture, where the AB phase is driven by the vector potential (\mathbf{A}), with entanglement playing no causal role in its generation.
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase is usually associated with a line integral of the electromagnetic vector potential generated by an external current source, such as a solenoid. According to this interpretation, the AB phase of a nonclosed path cannot be observed, as the integral depends on the gauge choice of the vector potential. Recent attempts to explain the AB effect through the interaction between a charged particle and an external current, mediated by the exchange of quantum photons, have assumed that the AB phase shift is proportional to the change in interaction energy between the charged particle and the external current source. As a result, these attempts argue that the AB phase change along a path does not depend on the gauge choice, and that the AB phase shift for a nonclosed path is in principle measurable. In this paper, we critically examine this claim and demonstrate that the phase obtained through this approach is actually gauge dependent and not an observable for a nonclosed path. We also provide a brief critical discussion of the proposed experiment for observing the AB phase shift of a nonclosed path.
In the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, a superposed charge acquires a detectable phase by enclosing an infinite solenoid, in a region where the solenoid's electric and magnetic fields are zero. Its generation seems therefore explainable only by the local action of gauge-dependent potentials, not of gauge-independent fields. This was recently challenged by Vaidman, who explained the phase by the solenoid's current interacting with the electron's field (at the solenoid). Still, his model has a residual nonlocality: it does not explain how the phase, generated at the solenoid, is detectable on the charge. In this Letter, we solve this nonlocality explicitly by quantizing the field. We show that the AB phase is mediated locally by the entanglement between the charge and the photons, like all electromagnetic phases. We also predict a gauge-invariant value for the phase difference at each point along the charge's path. We propose a realistic experiment to measure this phase difference locally, by partial quantum state tomography on the charge, without closing the interference loop.
Abstract We focus on new expressions for the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) phase proposed recently by C. Marletto and V. Vedral (Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040401 (2020)) and by our team (A. L. Kholmetskii et al., Ann. Phys., 434, 168627 (2021)). We emphasize the mismatch between the standard expression for the electric component of the AB phase and the expression by Marletto and Vedral for this component, which, as we show, has fundamental roots and indicates the need to use different expressions for the Hamiltonian of the radiative component and bound component of the electromagnetic (EM) field. We further show that the corrected expression for the AB phase of Marletto and Vedral and our expression for the AB phase do not coincide with its standard representation through the potentials of EM field (Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 485) and contain additional terms, which straightforwardly allow to re-express the AB phase via electric and magnetic fields instead of scalar and vector potentials. The recognition of the field-dependent origin of the AB effect also requires to re-express the Hamiltonian of a charged particle through the EM field, which we show can be done in the only possible way. We discuss the physical meaning of the AB effect with the primary role of the EM field and also discuss some general quantum mechanical implications.
Abstract In the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, interference fringes are observed for a charged particle in the absence of the local overlap with the external electromagnetic field. This notion of the apparent “nonlocality” of the interaction or the significant role of the potential have recently been challenged and are under debate. The quantum electrodynamic approach provides a microscopic picture of the characteristics of the interaction between a charge and an external field. We explicitly show the gauge invariance of the local phase shift in the magnetic AB effect, which is in contrast to the results obtained using the usual semiclassical vector potential. Our study can resolve the issue of the locality in the magnetic AB effect. However, the problem is not solved in the same way in the electric counterpart wherein virtual scalar photons play an essential role.
The gauge invariance of the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect with a quantum treatment for the electromagnetic field is demonstrated. We provide an exact solution for the electromagnetic ground energy due to the interaction of the quantum electromagnetic field with the classical charges and currents that act as sources of the potentials in a classical description, in the Lorenz gauge. Then, we use first-order perturbation theory to compute an extra change on the electromagnetic ground energy due to the presence of a quantum charged particle with known wave function in the system. This energy in general depends on the quantum particle path in an interferometer, which results in an AB phase difference between the paths. The gauge invariance of this AB phase difference is then shown for the magnetic, electric, and the recently proposed electrodynamic versions of the AB effect. However, the AB phase difference could depend on the gauge for nonclosed paths, which reinforces the view that it only can be measured in closed paths.
The Aharonov--Bohm (AB) phase for a closed interferometric loop is widely regarded as gauge invariant. This conclusion is usually obtained by treating the electromagnetic source as a fixed background that is unaffected by the test charge. We investigate whether this conclusion remains valid when backreaction is included within the standard gauge-fixed formulation of quantum electrodynamics (QED). Our analysis indicates that, when the interfering branches become entangled with distinct electromagnetic field configurations, changes of the gauge-fixing condition can induce a non-vanishing shift of the total phase. This result gives rise to an apparent paradox: the total phase predicted by the QED formalism appears gauge dependent, whereas experiments robustly exhibit a definite interference shift. We examine two possible resolutions of this paradox. The standard approach attributes the observed interference only to a gauge-invariant component of the total phase and treats the remaining gauge-dependent contribution as physically irrelevant. We argue, however, that the QED formalism itself predicts the total phase governing the interference outcome and does not provide a dynamical prescription that extracts a gauge-invariant component while discarding the remaining terms. We then explore an alternative perspective in which the electromagnetic potential AμA_\muAμ​ is regarded as a physical field whose configuration is determined by the Lorenz condition together with appropriate causal and boundary conditions. From this viewpoint, the total phase can be interpreted as a well-defined physical quantity within the QED formalism. We conclude by discussing a possible experimental test based on direct measurements of open-path relative phases, which may help clarify the ontological status of electromagnetic potentials.