Chapter 4 begins to discuss decoherence, and, thus, to address the overarching question: How does the classical world—classical states that are responsible for the objective reality of our everyday experience—emerge from within the Universe that is, as we know from compelling experimental evidence, made out of quantum stuff. The short answer to this question is that decoherence selects (from the vast number of superpositions that populate Hilbert space in the process of environment-induced superselection (also known as einselection) the few states that are—in contrast to all the other alternatives—stable in spite of their immersion in the environment. Decoherence is illustrated with a detailed discussion of two models. A spin decohered by an environment of spins as well as quantum Brownian motion have become paradigmatic models of decoherence for good reason: They are exactly solvable and yet they capture (albeit in an idealized manner) the emergence of the preferred classical states in settings that are relevant for quantum measurements and for Newtonian dynamics in effectively classical phase space.
Chapter 4 begins to discuss decoherence, and, thus, to address the overarching question: How does the classical world—classical states that are responsible for the objective reality of our everyday experience—emerge from within the Universe that is, as we know from compelling experimental evidence, made out of quantum stuff. The short answer to this question is that decoherence selects (from the vast number of superpositions that populate Hilbert space in the process of environment-induced superselection (also known as einselection) the few states that are—in contrast to all the other alternatives—stable in spite of their immersion in the environment. Decoherence is illustrated with a detailed discussion of two models. A spin decohered by an environment of spins as well as quantum Brownian motion have become paradigmatic models of decoherence for good reason: They are exactly solvable and yet they capture (albeit in an idealized manner) the emergence of the preferred classical states in settings that are relevant for quantum measurements and for Newtonian dynamics in effectively classical phase space.
Chapter 5 explores the consequences of decoherence. We live in a Universe that is fundamentally quantum. Yet, our everyday world appears to be resolutely classical. The aim of Chapter 5 is to discuss how preferred classical states, and, more generally, classical physics, arise, as an excellent approximation, on a macroscopic level of a quantum Universe. We show why quantum theory results in the familiar “classical reality” in open quantum systems, that is, systems interacting with their environments. We shall see how and why, and to what extent, quantum theory accounts for our classical perceptions. We shall not complete this task here—a more detailed analysis of how the information is acquired by observers is needed for that, and this task will be taken up in Part III of the book. Moreover, Chapter 5 shows that not just Newtonian physics but also equilibrium thermodynamics follows from the same symmetries of entanglement that led to Born’s rule (in Chapter 3).
The emergence of the classical world from the quantum substrate of our Universe is a long-standing conundrum. In this paper, I describe three insights into the transition from quantum to classical that are based on the recognition of the role of the environment. I begin with the derivation of preferred sets of states that help to define what exists—our everyday classical reality. They emerge as a result of the breaking of the unitary symmetry of the Hilbert space which happens when the unitarity of quantum evolutions encounters nonlinearities inherent in the process of amplification—of replicating information. This derivation is accomplished without the usual tools of decoherence, and accounts for the appearance of quantum jumps and the emergence of preferred pointer states consistent with those obtained via environment-induced superselection, or einselection . The pointer states obtained in this way determine what can happen—define events—without appealing to Born’s Rule for probabilities. Therefore, p k =| ψ k | 2 can now be deduced from the entanglement-assisted invariance, or envariance —a symmetry of entangled quantum states. With probabilities at hand, one also gains new insights into the foundations of quantum statistical physics. Moreover, one can now analyse the information flows responsible for decoherence. These information flows explain how the perception of objective classical reality arises from the quantum substrate: the effective amplification that they represent accounts for the objective existence of the einselected states of macroscopic quantum systems through the redundancy of pointer state records in their environment—through quantum Darwinism . This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on contemporary society’.
This study offers a comprehensive technical analysis of the mechanisms through which classical behavior emerges from the dynamics of quantum measurement. Beginning with unitary evolution and the principles of measurement, we construct the framework of environment-induced decoherence, the selection of pointer states, and the reduction of interference. Our examination focuses on how effective classicality emerges through reduced density matrices, quantum Darwinism, and consistent histories, highlighting the importance of system-environment interactions in determining stable observables. The review investigates into mathematical constructs such as spectral theory, completely positive maps, and quantum trajectories, linking them to experimental observations in mesoscopic systems, optomechanics, and superconducting circuits. We explore the constraints of decoherence in addressing the outcome problem and review interpretational models that tackle the remaining issues. The discussion emphasizes applications in quantum information, metrology, and tests of macroscopic superpositions. The article favors physical insights and mathematical guidance over exhaustive proofs, making it suitable for researchers in quantum foundations and quantum technologies.
The aim in Chapter 7 is to take into account the role of the means of information transmission on the nature of the states that can be perceived. Our point of departure is the recognition that the information we obtain is acquired by observers who monitor fragments of the same environment that decohered the system, einselecting preferred pointer states in the process. Moreover, we only intercept a fraction of the environment. The only information about the system that can be transmitted by its fraction must have been reproduced in many copies in that environment. This process of amplification limits what can be found out to the states einselected by decoherence. Quantum Darwinism provides a simple and natural explanation of this restriction, and, hence, of the objective existence—the essence of classicality—for the einselected states. This chapter introduces and develops information-theoretic tools and concepts (including, e.g., redundancy) that allow one to explore and characterize correlations and information flows between systems, environments, and observers, and illustrates them on an exactly solvable yet non-trivial model.
Core quantum postulates including the superposition principle and the unitarity of evolutions are natural and strikingly simple. I show that—when supplemented with a limited version of predictability (captured in the textbook accounts by the repeatability postulate)—these core postulates can account for all the symptoms of classicality. In particular, both objective classical reality and elusive information about reality arise, via quantum Darwinism, from the quantum substrate. This approach shares with the Relative State Interpretation of Everett the view that collapse of the wavepacket reflects perception of the state of the rest of the Universe relative to the state of observer’s records. However, our “let quantum be quantum” approach poses questions absent in Bohr’s Copenhagen Interpretation that relied on the preexisting classical domain. Thus, one is now forced to seek preferred, predictable, hence effectively classical but ultimately quantum states that allow observers keep reliable records. Without such (i) preferred basis relative states are simply “too relative”, and the ensuing basis ambiguity makes it difficult to identify events (e.g., measurement outcomes). Moreover, universal validity of quantum theory raises the issue of (ii) the origin of Born’s rule, pk=|ψk|2, relating probabilities and amplitudes (that is simply postulated in textbooks). Last not least, even preferred pointer states (defined by einselection—environment—induced superselection)—are still quantum. Therefore, unlike classical states that exist objectively, quantum states of an individual system cannot be found out by an initially ignorant observer through direct measurement without being disrupted. So, to complete the ‘quantum theory of the classical’ one must identify (iii) quantum origin of objective existence and explain how the information about objectively existing states can appear to be essentially inconsequential for them (as it does for states in Newtonian physics) and yet matter in other settings (e.g., thermodynamics). I show how the mathematical structure of quantum theory supplemented by the only uncontroversial measurement postulate (that demands immediate repeatability—hence, predictability) leads to preferred states. These (i) pointer states correspond to measurement outcomes. Their stability is a prerequisite for objective existence of effectively classical states and for events such as quantum jumps. Events at hand, one can now enquire about their probability—the probability of a pointer state (or of a measurement record). I show that the symmetry of entangled states—(ii) entanglement—assisted invariance or envariance—implies Born’s rule. Envariance also accounts for the loss of phase coherence between pointer states. Thus, decoherence can be traced to symmetries of entanglement and understood without its usual tool—reduced density matrices. A simple and manifestly noncircular derivation of pk=|ψk|2 follows. Monitoring of the system by its environment in course of decoherence typically leaves behind multiple copies of its pointer states in the environment. Only pointer states can survive decoherence and can spawn such plentiful information-theoretic progeny. This (iii) quantum Darwinism allows observers to use environment as a witness—to find out pointer states indirectly, leaving systems of interest untouched. Quantum Darwinism shows how epistemic and ontic (coexisting in epiontic quantum state) separate into robust objective existence of pointer states and detached information about them, giving rise to extantons—composite objects with system of interest in the core and multiple records of its pointer states in the halo comprising of environment subsystems (e.g., photons) which disseminates that information throughout the Universe.
In this article I aim to provide an intuitive and non-technical introduction to decoherence and quantum Darwinism. Together these theories explain how our classical reality emerges from an underlying quantum mechanical description. Here I focus on two aspects of this and explain, firstly, how decoherence can tell us why we never see macroscopic superpositions, such as dead-and-alive cats, in our classical surroundings; and secondly I describe and then provide a resolution to the so-called preferred basis problem. I then introduce recent results demonstrating that certain aspects of classicality are generic phenomena that emerge from the basic mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. This is in stark contrast to previous work in this field that focused on specific models that cannot realistically be scaled up to explicitly answer questions about the macroscopic world. Finally, I demonstrate how decoherence and quantum Darwinism can shed significant light on the measurement problem, and I discuss the implications for how we should interpret quantum mechanics.