The aim in Chapter 7 is to take into account the role of the means of information transmission on the nature of the states that can be perceived. Our point of departure is the recognition that the information we obtain is acquired by observers who monitor fragments of the same environment that decohered the system, einselecting preferred pointer states in the process. Moreover, we only intercept a fraction of the environment. The only information about the system that can be transmitted by its fraction must have been reproduced in many copies in that environment. This process of amplification limits what can be found out to the states einselected by decoherence. Quantum Darwinism provides a simple and natural explanation of this restriction, and, hence, of the objective existence—the essence of classicality—for the einselected states. This chapter introduces and develops information-theoretic tools and concepts (including, e.g., redundancy) that allow one to explore and characterize correlations and information flows between systems, environments, and observers, and illustrates them on an exactly solvable yet non-trivial model.
The aim in Chapter 7 is to take into account the role of the means of information transmission on the nature of the states that can be perceived. Our point of departure is the recognition that the information we obtain is acquired by observers who monitor fragments of the same environment that decohered the system, einselecting preferred pointer states in the process. Moreover, we only intercept a fraction of the environment. The only information about the system that can be transmitted by its fraction must have been reproduced in many copies in that environment. This process of amplification limits what can be found out to the states einselected by decoherence. Quantum Darwinism provides a simple and natural explanation of this restriction, and, hence, of the objective existence—the essence of classicality—for the einselected states. This chapter introduces and develops information-theoretic tools and concepts (including, e.g., redundancy) that allow one to explore and characterize correlations and information flows between systems, environments, and observers, and illustrates them on an exactly solvable yet non-trivial model.
Quantum Darwinism demonstrates not only that preferred states are selected for their stability but also that information about them is broadcast by the same environment that causes decoherence and einselection. That environment acts both as a censor and as an advertising agent that disseminates information about pointer states while suppressing complementary information. Chapter 8 explores the implications and limitations of quantum Darwinism using models inspired by the structure of the Universe we inhabit. We perceive our Universe using light and other means of information transmission. We explore models that have a well-defined relation with our everyday reality, and where one can also selectively relax some of the idealized assumptions and investigate the consequences. Light is the communication channel through which we obtain most of our information. Fortunately, it is an ideal channel in the sense of quantum Darwinism, and simple but realistic cases are exactly solvable. The solution presented herein demonstrates the inevitability of the consensus between observers who rely on scattered photons: The emergence of classical objective reality (classical because pointer states are einselected, and objective because redundancy imposes consensus) is inevitable. This is how the classical world we perceive emerges from within the quantum Universe we inhabit.
Core quantum postulates including the superposition principle and the unitarity of evolutions are natural and strikingly simple. I show that—when supplemented with a limited version of predictability (captured in the textbook accounts by the repeatability postulate)—these core postulates can account for all the symptoms of classicality. In particular, both objective classical reality and elusive information about reality arise, via quantum Darwinism, from the quantum substrate. This approach shares with the Relative State Interpretation of Everett the view that collapse of the wavepacket reflects perception of the state of the rest of the Universe relative to the state of observer’s records. However, our “let quantum be quantum” approach poses questions absent in Bohr’s Copenhagen Interpretation that relied on the preexisting classical domain. Thus, one is now forced to seek preferred, predictable, hence effectively classical but ultimately quantum states that allow observers keep reliable records. Without such (i) preferred basis relative states are simply “too relative”, and the ensuing basis ambiguity makes it difficult to identify events (e.g., measurement outcomes). Moreover, universal validity of quantum theory raises the issue of (ii) the origin of Born’s rule, pk=|ψk|2, relating probabilities and amplitudes (that is simply postulated in textbooks). Last not least, even preferred pointer states (defined by einselection—environment—induced superselection)—are still quantum. Therefore, unlike classical states that exist objectively, quantum states of an individual system cannot be found out by an initially ignorant observer through direct measurement without being disrupted. So, to complete the ‘quantum theory of the classical’ one must identify (iii) quantum origin of objective existence and explain how the information about objectively existing states can appear to be essentially inconsequential for them (as it does for states in Newtonian physics) and yet matter in other settings (e.g., thermodynamics). I show how the mathematical structure of quantum theory supplemented by the only uncontroversial measurement postulate (that demands immediate repeatability—hence, predictability) leads to preferred states. These (i) pointer states correspond to measurement outcomes. Their stability is a prerequisite for objective existence of effectively classical states and for events such as quantum jumps. Events at hand, one can now enquire about their probability—the probability of a pointer state (or of a measurement record). I show that the symmetry of entangled states—(ii) entanglement—assisted invariance or envariance—implies Born’s rule. Envariance also accounts for the loss of phase coherence between pointer states. Thus, decoherence can be traced to symmetries of entanglement and understood without its usual tool—reduced density matrices. A simple and manifestly noncircular derivation of pk=|ψk|2 follows. Monitoring of the system by its environment in course of decoherence typically leaves behind multiple copies of its pointer states in the environment. Only pointer states can survive decoherence and can spawn such plentiful information-theoretic progeny. This (iii) quantum Darwinism allows observers to use environment as a witness—to find out pointer states indirectly, leaving systems of interest untouched. Quantum Darwinism shows how epistemic and ontic (coexisting in epiontic quantum state) separate into robust objective existence of pointer states and detached information about them, giving rise to extantons—composite objects with system of interest in the core and multiple records of its pointer states in the halo comprising of environment subsystems (e.g., photons) which disseminates that information throughout the Universe.
An explanation for the quantum-to-classical transition has long been sought after since the haydays of the field. Decoherence theory and open quantum system dynamics have paved the way, showing how a system can become correlated with, and so lose information into the environment. Quantum Darwinism, and its more stringent cousins Strong Quantum Darwinism and Spectrum Broadcast Structures, seek to explain how this information loss is achieved in such a way as to be objective, classical and redundant. However there remains questions as to how the structure of the environment, states and types of interactions can give rise to this redundant encoding. In this thesis, we collect the work of 3 of our papers, exploring these questions. First, we show how information from one environment can spread to another. Then we show how commutativity can play a role in the emergence of objectivity. Lastly, we move beyond a single, pure system to a more realistic bipartite one, with both classical and quantum correlations between the subsystems. We shall show how interactions between only these subsystems can mediate the redundancy of others, and how these can lower bound and upper bound other forms of interactions between said subsystems and the environment.
Quantum Darwinism recognizes that decoherence imprints redundant records of preferred quasi-classical pointer states on the environment. These redundant records are then accessed by observers. We show how redundancy enables and even implies consensus between observers who use fragments of that decohering environment to acquire information about systems of interest. We quantify consensus using information-theoretic measures that employ mutual information to assess the correlation between the records available to observers from distinct -- hence, independently accessible -- fragments of the environment. We prove that when these fragments have enough information about a system, observers that access them will attribute the same pointer state to that system. Thus, those who know enough about the system agree about what they know. We then test proposed measures of consensus in a solvable model of decoherence as well as in numerical simulations of a many-body system. These results provide detailed understanding of how our classical everyday world arises from within the fundamentally quantum Universe we inhabit.
Quantum Darwinism explains classical objectivity through redundant environmental records of a system's pointer states. We show that these records can be established through an intermediate measurement apparatus without direct system--environment interactions. Using exact analytical solutions of quantum circuit models, we compare system monitoring with apparatus monitoring, where the environment interacts only with the apparatus. During encoding, system--apparatus correlations decrease as system--environment correlations grow. Without noise, both models yield identical accessible pointer information and redundancy, while the discord accounts for their different mutual information. The reliability of these records depends on where noise acts. Apparatus bit flips introduce errors shared by successive records, limiting the information recoverable even from the complete environment. In contrast, larger fragments can mitigate independent noise on environment qubits after encoding. Dephasing in the pointer basis leaves the record information unchanged in the model considered. These results extend the description of quantum Darwinism to indirect measurements and clarify the conditions for reliable environmental records.
The framework of Quantum Darwinism strives at characterizing the quantum-to-classical transition by introducing the concept of redundancy of information-as measured by Mutual Information-that a set of observers would acquire on the state of a physical system of interest. Further development on this concept, in the form of Strong Quantum Darwinism and Spectrum Broadcast Structures, has recently led to a more fine-grained identification of the nature of such information, which should not involve any quantum correlations between observing and observed systems, while the assessment of information proliferation from individual systems has attracted most of the attention so far, the way such mechanism takes place in more complex states is open to exploration. To this end, we shall consider a two-qubit state, sharing initial quantum correlations in the form of Quantum Discord, and different dephasing-like interactions between them and an observing environment. We will focus on the amount of information regarding the subsystem not involved in the interaction that is proliferated to the environment. We shall refer to this as mediated redundancy. We will show that, in some cases, the channel capacity of the subsystems, given these interactions, can exceed that of the fragments.