Jack Raymond, M. H. S. Amin, Andrew D. King, Richard Harris, William Bernoudy, A. J. Berkley, Kelly Boothby, Anatoly Yu. Smirnov, Fabio Altomare, Michael C. Babcock, Catia Baron, Jake Connor, Martin H. Dehn, Colin Enderud, Emile Hoskinson, Shuiyuan Huang, Mark W. Johnson, E. Ladizinsky, Trevor M. Lanting, Allison MacDonald, G. Marsden, Reza Molavi, Travis Oh, Gabriel Poulin-Lamarre, Hugh Ramp, Chris C. Rich, Berta Trullas Clavera, Nicholas Tsai, Mark Volkmann, Jed D. Whittaker, Jason J. Yao, Niclas Heinsdorf, Nitin Kaushal, Alberto Nocera, Marcel Franz, Jacek Dziarmaga
Abstract Quantum error mitigation (QEM) presents a promising near-term approach to reducing errors when estimating expectation values in quantum computing. Here, we introduce QEM techniques tailored for quantum annealing, using zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE). We implement ZNE through zero-temperature and zero-time extrapolations. The practical zero-time extrapolation developed exploits the Kibble-Zurek mechanism so that only problem-Hamiltonian rescaling is required. We conduct experimental investigations into the quantum critical and post-critical dynamics of a transverse-field Ising spin chain by examining statistics with weak and strong post-critical dynamics. We demonstrate successful mitigation of thermal noise and non-thermal errors through both of these extrapolation techniques.
Abstract Quantum error mitigation (QEM) presents a promising near-term approach to reducing errors when estimating expectation values in quantum computing. Here, we introduce QEM techniques tailored for quantum annealing, using zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE). We implement ZNE through zero-temperature and zero-time extrapolations. The practical zero-time extrapolation developed exploits the Kibble-Zurek mechanism so that only problem-Hamiltonian rescaling is required. We conduct experimental investigations into the quantum critical and post-critical dynamics of a transverse-field Ising spin chain by examining statistics with weak and strong post-critical dynamics. We demonstrate successful mitigation of thermal noise and non-thermal errors through both of these extrapolation techniques.
Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) presents a promising near-term approach to reduce error when estimating expectation values in quantum computing. Here, we introduce QEM techniques tailored for quantum annealing, using Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE). We implement ZNE through zero-temperature extrapolation as well as energy-time rescaling. We conduct experimental investigations into the quantum critical dynamics of a transverse-field Ising spin chain, demonstrating the successful mitigation of thermal noise through both of these techniques. Moreover, we show that energy-time rescaling effectively mitigates control errors in the coherent regime where the effect of thermal noise is minimal. Our ZNE results agree with exact calculations of the coherent evolution over a range of annealing times that exceeds the coherent annealing range by almost an order of magnitude.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) and quantum error correction (QEC) are two research areas that are often considered as distinct entities, and the problem of combining the two approaches in a non-trivial way has only recently started to be explored. In this paper, we explore a paradigm at the intersection of the two, based on the error mitigation technique of Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), that uses the distance of an error correcting code as a noise parameter. This is distinct from some alternative approaches, as QEC is here used as a subroutine inside the QEM framework, while other proposals use QEM as a subroutine inside QEC experiments. Intuitively, we exploit the fact that a reduction in the physical noise level is analogous to an increase in the code distance, as both of them result in a decrease in the logical error rate. As such, the extrapolation to zero noise in the case of ZNE becomes comparable to the extrapolation to infinite distance in the case of this method. We describe how to calculate expectation values from a fault-tolerant computation, and we gain some analytical intuition for our ansatz choice. We explore the performance of the considered method to reduce the errors in a range of expectation values for a realistic circuit-level noise model and realistic device imperfections on the rotated surface code, and we particularly show that the performance of the method holds even in the case of non-stabiliser input states.
Quantum noise poses a significant challenge for current near-term quantum computing. Quantum error mitigation (QEM) has therefore emerged as a key strategy, offering a practical and effective solution to reduce error impacts and enhance the performance of near-term variational quantum circuits (VQC). Given the lack of a comprehensive survey on this important topic in the literature, this article provides a dedicated overview of QEM, including both during and after the training of VQC. Specifically, during VQC training, we explore and discuss key QEM techniques such as optimal control and dynamical decoupling. For the post-processing stage of VQC, we will examine and discuss mitigation techniques such as zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) and probabilistic error cancellation (PEC). For each of these QEM techniques, we will investigate the fundamentals, mitigation concepts, and recent advances. Subsequently, we also explore research toolboxes, including Mitiq and Qiskit Aer, as well as provide a case study that demonstrates contextual multi-armed bandit-guided ZNE. Finally, we discuss ongoing problems and future research initiatives, including ML-assisted mitigation and integration with error correction. This survey article aims to synthesize the state-of-the-art in QEM, offer organized insights across approaches, and propose potential paths towards error-resilient quantum computing.
The pursuit of practical quantum utility on near-term quantum processors is critically challenged by their inherent noise. Quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques are leading solutions to improve computation fidelity with relatively low qubit-overhead, while full-scale quantum error correction remains a distant goal. However, QEM techniques incur substantial measurement overheads, especially when applied to families of quantum circuits parameterized by classical inputs. Focusing on zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), a widely adopted QEM technique, here we devise the surrogate-enabled ZNE (S-ZNE), which leverages classical learning surrogates to perform ZNE entirely on the classical side. Unlike conventional ZNE, whose measurement cost scales linearly with the number of circuits, S-ZNE requires only constant measurement overhead for an entire family of quantum circuits, offering superior scalability. Theoretical analysis indicates that S-ZNE achieves accuracy comparable to conventional ZNE in many practical scenarios, and numerical experiments on up to 100-qubit ground-state energy and quantum metrology tasks confirm its effectiveness. Our approach provides a template that can be effectively extended to other quantum error mitigation protocols, opening a promising path toward scalable error mitigation.
As quantum computing advances towards practical applications, reducing errors remains a crucial frontier for developing near-term devices. Errors in the quantum gates and quantum state readout could result in noisy circuits, which would prevent the acquisition of the exact expectation values of the observables. Although ultimate robustness to errors is known to be achievable by quantum error correction-based fault-tolerant quantum computing, its successful implementation demands large-scale quantum processors with low average error rates that are not yet widely available. In contrast, quantum error mitigation (QEM) offers more immediate and practical techniques, which do not require extensive resources and can be readily applied to existing quantum devices to improve the accuracy of the expectation values. Here, we report the implementation of a zero-noise extrapolation-based error mitigation technique on a silicon spin qubit platform. This technique has recently been successfully demonstrated for other platforms such as superconducting qubits, trapped-ion qubits, and photonic processors. We first explore three methods for amplifying noise on a silicon spin qubit: global folding, local folding, and pulse stretching, using a standard randomized benchmarking protocol. We then apply global folding-based zero-noise extrapolation to the state tomography and achieve a state fidelity of 99.96% (98.52%), compared to the unmitigated fidelity of 75.82% (82.16%) for different preparation states. The results show that the zero-noise extrapolation technique is a versatile approach that is generally adaptable to quantum computing platforms with different noise characteristics through appropriate noise amplification methods.
Reliable benchmarking of Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) requires distinguishing genuine improvements from artefacts of the post-processing arithmetic. In this paper, we expose a failure mode in Richardson Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), a widely used technique routinely (and often implicitly) relied upon in benchmarks and experiments. When noise amplification operates beyond usable signals - a regime that is quickly reached on current hardware for non-trivial circuits - we show that the extrapolation no longer reflects the underlying physics, but collapses into a fixed rescaling of a single noisy measurement, producing a bogus apparent improvement that is independent of noise amplification. This poses a rarely considered threat to the validity of many empirical evaluations in quantum computing.
Measurements on real hardware (IQM Euro-Q-Exa) confirm this collapse with ordinary folding alone: as circuit depth erodes the signal, the reported estimate decouples from the truth and overshoots the ideal by up to 21%. We further introduce a matched-cost "garbage-folding" negative control that carries no usable signal yet reports a larger apparent improvement than genuine folding - showing that the magnitude of an improvement is not evidence of its correctness - alongside a zero-cost check flagging the artefact from data a benchmark already holds. We distil both into a short reporting checklist for ZNE benchmarks.