Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Lattice-Based Non-interactive Blind Signature Schemes in the Random Oracle Model

Haoqi Zhang, Xinjian Chen, Qiong Huang

Published Jan 1, 2025• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-981-96-0954-3_15

Related papers

ID-Based Signatures from Lattices in the Random Oracle Model

Chunxiang Gu, Li Chen, Yonghui Zheng

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2012•3 citations

Tightly Secure Lattice Identity-Based Signature in the Quantum Random Oracle Model

Ernest Foo, Qinyi Li

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2023•2 citations

Scalable Two-Round n-Out-of-n and Multi-signatures from Lattices in the Quantum Random Oracle Model

Qiqi Lai, Feng-Hao Liu, Yang Lu +3 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Concurrently-Secure Blind Signatures Without Random Oracles or Setup Assumptions

Carmit Hazay, Jonathan I. Katz, Chiu‐Yuen Koo +1 more

Springer eBooks•May 16, 2007•64 citations

Security Analysis for Arbitrated Quantum Signature Scheme based on Random Oracle Model

Lei Qi, Tao Shang, Jianwei Liu

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Revisiting Lattice-based Non-interactive Blind Signature

Anindya Ganguly, Angshuman Karmakar, Suparna Kundu +2 more

Blind signatures (BS) allow a signer to produce a valid signature on a message without learning the message itself.They have niche applications in privacy-preserving protocols such as digital cash and electronic voting.Non-interactive blind signatures (NIBS) remove the need for interaction between the signer and the user.In the post-quantum era, lattice-based NIBS schemes are studied as candidates for long-term security.In Asiacrypt 2024, Baldimtsi et al. proposed the first lattice-based NIBS construction, whose security relies on the random one-more inhomogeneous short integer solution (rOM-ISIS) assumption.This rOM-ISIS is considered to be a non-standard assumption.Later, Zhang et al. introduced another lattice-based construction in ProvSec 2024, and proved its security under the standard module short integer solution (MSIS) assumption.We analyse the security of the latter scheme.In the random oracle model, we show that it fails to achieve both nonce blindness and receiver blindness.We present explicit attacks where an adversary breaks both properties with probability 1.Our attack is based on a crucial observation that uncovers a flaw in the design.Specifically, this flaw allows an attacker to link a message-signature pair with its presignature-nonce pair.In addition, we also identify a flaw in the unforgeability proof.Finally, we suggest a modification to address the issue, which is similar to Baldimtsi et al. construction, and its security relies again on the non-standard rOM-ISIS assumption.This work again raises the question of the feasibility of achieving NIBS from standard assumptions.

•Oct 8, 2025•0 citations
Blind signatures (BS) allow a signer to produce a valid signature on a message without learning the message itself.They have niche applications in privacy-preserving protocols such as digital cash and electronic voting.Non-interactive blind signatures (NIBS) remove the need for interaction between the signer and the user.In the post-quantum era, lattice-based NIBS schemes are studied as candidates for long-term security.In Asiacrypt 2024, Baldimtsi et al. proposed the first lattice-based NIBS construction, whose security relies on the random one-more inhomogeneous short integer solution (rOM-ISIS) assumption.This rOM-ISIS is considered to be a non-standard assumption.Later, Zhang et al. introduced another lattice-based construction in ProvSec 2024, and proved its security under the standard module short integer solution (MSIS) assumption.We analyse the security of the latter scheme.In the random oracle model, we show that it fails to achieve both nonce blindness and receiver blindness.We present explicit attacks where an adversary breaks both properties with probability 1.Our attack is based on a crucial observation that uncovers a flaw in the design.Specifically, this flaw allows an attacker to link a message-signature pair with its presignature-nonce pair.In addition, we also identify a flaw in the unforgeability proof.Finally, we suggest a modification to address the issue, which is similar to Baldimtsi et al. construction, and its security relies again on the non-standard rOM-ISIS assumption.This work again raises the question of the feasibility of achieving NIBS from standard assumptions.