Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The European Physical Journal D

Controlling atomic wave interference by counter-propagating light pulses of different carrier frequencies

V. I. Romanenko, Nataliya V. Kornilovska, Леонід Петрович Яценко

Published Jan 1, 2025• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1140/epjd/s10053-025-00956-5

Related papers

Interference of light with localized atomic wave functions

Wolfgang Vogel, Sascha Wallentowitz

Optics and Spectroscopy•Nov 1, 1999•0 citations

Scattering of atoms in a bichromatic field of oppositely propagating light pulses

V. I. Romanenko, Леонід Петрович Яценко

The interaction of a two-level atom with two light pulses which have different carrier frequencies and propagate in opposite directions is studied in the adiabatic approximation. It is shown that when there is a delay between the light pulses, the momentum of the atom changes, as a result of the interaction with the laser field, by a definite amount that depends on the amplitude of the light pulses and on the difference of their carrier frequencies. It is predicted that the momentum transfer to the atom is a step function of the amplitude of the light pulses.

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 2000•11 citations

Co- and counter-propagating slow light systems

Toshihiko Baba, Keisuke Kondo

We report what we call co- and counter propagating slow-light systems based on the high nonlinearity in Si lattice-shifted photonic crystal waveguides (LSPCWs). The intense slow-light pulse, as a control pulse, efficiently generates two-photon absorption and carrier plasma effects, which tunes the dispersion characteristics of the LSPCWs and spectrum of copropagating or counter-propagating slow-light pulse, as a signal pulse. Using the control pulse, we succeeded in experimentally demonstrating adiabatic wavelength conversion and its enhancement, delay tuning of up to 10 ps with a response time <10 ps, and temporal pulse compression of factor 9.9 in the signal pulse. Furthermore, we discussed theoretically the collision and reflection of the signal pulse counterpropagating against the control pulse through the photonic-bandgap shift, resulting in a large Doppler shift. Considering the detail of these phenomena, we clarified the relation and difference between the adiabatic wavelength conversion, cross-phase modulation, and Doppler shift, which have been unclear so far.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Controlling atomic states by optical pulses

K. Igeta, Bernd Hüttner, Nobuyuki Imoto

•Aug 24, 2005•0 citations

Light pulse in Λ -type cold-atom gases

Ran Wei, Bo Zhao, Youjin Deng +3 more

We investigate the behavior of the light pulse in $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$-type cold-atom gases with two counter-propagating control lights with equal strength by directly simulating the dynamic equations and exploring the dispersion relation. Our analysis shows that, depending on the length ${L}_{0}$ of the stored wave packet and the decay rate $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ of ground-spin coherence, the recreated light can behave differently. For long ${L}_{0}$ and/or large $\ensuremath{\gamma}$, a stationary light pulse is produced, while two propagating light pulses appear for short ${L}_{0}$ and/or small $\ensuremath{\gamma}$. In the $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ limit, the light always splits into two propagating pulses for a sufficiently long time. This scenario agrees with a recent experiment [Y.-W. Lin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 213601 (2009)] where two propagating light pulses are generated in laser-cooled cold-atom ensembles.

arXiv:1001.2359•Physical Review A•Apr 12, 2010•5 citations

Atomic interference in light fields

B Ya Dubetskiĭ, A. P. Kazantsev, V. P. Chebotaev +1 more

IzSSR•Mar 1, 1985•0 citations
The interaction of a two-level atom with two light pulses which have different carrier frequencies and propagate in opposite directions is studied in the adiabatic approximation. It is shown that when there is a delay between the light pulses, the momentum of the atom changes, as a result of the interaction with the laser field, by a definite amount that depends on the amplitude of the light pulses and on the difference of their carrier frequencies. It is predicted that the momentum transfer to the atom is a step function of the amplitude of the light pulses.
We report what we call co- and counter propagating slow-light systems based on the high nonlinearity in Si lattice-shifted photonic crystal waveguides (LSPCWs). The intense slow-light pulse, as a control pulse, efficiently generates two-photon absorption and carrier plasma effects, which tunes the dispersion characteristics of the LSPCWs and spectrum of copropagating or counter-propagating slow-light pulse, as a signal pulse. Using the control pulse, we succeeded in experimentally demonstrating adiabatic wavelength conversion and its enhancement, delay tuning of up to 10 ps with a response time <10 ps, and temporal pulse compression of factor 9.9 in the signal pulse. Furthermore, we discussed theoretically the collision and reflection of the signal pulse counterpropagating against the control pulse through the photonic-bandgap shift, resulting in a large Doppler shift. Considering the detail of these phenomena, we clarified the relation and difference between the adiabatic wavelength conversion, cross-phase modulation, and Doppler shift, which have been unclear so far.
We investigate the behavior of the light pulse in $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$-type cold-atom gases with two counter-propagating control lights with equal strength by directly simulating the dynamic equations and exploring the dispersion relation. Our analysis shows that, depending on the length L0{L}_{0}L0​ of the stored wave packet and the decay rate $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ of ground-spin coherence, the recreated light can behave differently. For long L0{L}_{0}L0​ and/or large $\ensuremath{\gamma}$, a stationary light pulse is produced, while two propagating light pulses appear for short L0{L}_{0}L0​ and/or small $\ensuremath{\gamma}$. In the $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ limit, the light always splits into two propagating pulses for a sufficiently long time. This scenario agrees with a recent experiment [Y.-W. Lin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 213601 (2009)] where two propagating light pulses are generated in laser-cooled cold-atom ensembles.