Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Fundamental theories of physics

Fundamental Probabilism

CHRISTOF WETTERICH

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-83213-0_3

Related papers

Probabilism for stochastic theories

Jeremy Steeger

arXiv:1809.03053•Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Dec 10, 2018•4 citations

Fundamental Probabilities

Christof Wetterich

Fundamental theories of physics•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Compatible?

Nicholas Maxwell

Are probabilism and special relativity compatible? Dieks argues that they are. But the possible universe he specifies, designed to exemplify both probabilism and special relativity, either incorporates a universal “now” (and is thus incompatible with special relativity), or amounts to a many world universe (which I have discussed, and rejected as too ad hoc to be taken seriously), or fails to have any one definite overall Minkowskian-type space-time structure (and thus differs drastically from special relativity as ordinarily understood). Probabilism and special relativity appear to be incompatible after all. What is at issue is not whether “the flow of time” can be reconciled with special relativity, but rather whether explicitly probabilistic versions of quantum theory should be rejected because of incompatibility with special relativity.

Philosophy of Science•Dec 1, 1988•41 citations

Determinism and Probability

Series on the foundations of natural science and technology•Nov 1, 2025•0 citations

Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Incompatible?

Nicholas Maxwell

In this paper I expound an argument which seems to establish that probabilism and special relativity are incompatible. I examine the argument critically, and consider its implications for interpretative problems of quantum theory, and for theoretical physics as a whole.

Philosophy of Science•Mar 1, 1985•120 citations

Generalized probabilistic theories

Jonathan Steinberg

BesMasters•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations
Are probabilism and special relativity compatible? Dieks argues that they are. But the possible universe he specifies, designed to exemplify both probabilism and special relativity, either incorporates a universal “now” (and is thus incompatible with special relativity), or amounts to a many world universe (which I have discussed, and rejected as too ad hoc to be taken seriously), or fails to have any one definite overall Minkowskian-type space-time structure (and thus differs drastically from special relativity as ordinarily understood). Probabilism and special relativity appear to be incompatible after all. What is at issue is not whether “the flow of time” can be reconciled with special relativity, but rather whether explicitly probabilistic versions of quantum theory should be rejected because of incompatibility with special relativity.