Generalized probabilistic theories

Jonathan Steinberg

Zhaoqi Wu, Chuanxi Zhu, Shunlong Luo +1 more

Serge Massar

Koki Ono, Shun Umekawa, Hiroyasu Tajima

Generalized probabilistic theories (GPTs) provide a unified framework for describing probabilistic physical theories, encompassing classical and quantum theories as well as hypothetical theories beyond quantum mechanics. Since most GPTs are highly unrealistic and far removed from known physical theories, it is important to constrain them by physically reasonable principles. One of the most important such principles is consistency with thermodynamics, which has been extensively studied through toy models involving semipermeable membranes (SPMs) implementing measurements. On the other hand, information thermodynamics, which plays a central role in understanding the relationship between measurement and thermodynamics in classical and quantum theory, has remained largely undeveloped in GPTs. In this work, we construct information thermodynamics in GPTs and provide a unified framework for analyzing the relationship between measurement, feedback, information erasure, and the second law of thermodynamics. We also formulate a general framework for SPM models and analyze the thermodynamic cost of measurements implemented by SPMs. As a result, we show that no work can be extracted in contradiction with the second law as long as the measurement processes are consistent with entropy nondecrease, and derive sufficient conditions for this property for several entropy definitions proposed in GPTs. Moreover, by considering measurement processes violating these conditions, we construct explicit GPT systems realizing isothermal SPM cycles from which positive work can be extracted. These results demonstrate that violations of the second law can arise from the lack of fundamental entropy properties or discrepancies between entropy definitions, and provide a unified and model-independent foundation for understanding the relationship between thermodynamics and measurement in GPTs.

Martin Plávala

John H. Selby, David Schmid, Elie Wolfe +3 more

The formalism of generalized probabilistic theories (GPTs) was originally developed as a way to characterize the landscape of conceivable physical theories. Thus, the GPT describing a given physical theory necessarily includes all physically possible processes. We here consider the question of how to provide a GPT-like characterization of a particular experimental setup within a given physical theory. We show that the resulting characterization is not generally a GPT in and of itself, rather, it is described by a more general mathematical object that we introduce and term an accessible GPT fragment. We then introduce an equivalence relation, termed cone equivalence, between accessible GPT fragments (and, as a special case, between standard GPTs). We give a number of examples of experimental scenarios that are best described using accessible GPT fragments, and where moreover, cone-equivalence arises naturally. We then prove that an accessible GPT fragment admits of a classical explanation if and only if every other fragment that is cone equivalent to it also admits of a classical explanation. Finally, we leverage this result to prove several fundamental results regarding the experimental requirements for witnessing the failure of generalized noncontextuality. In particular, we prove that neither incompatibility among measurements nor the assumption of freedom of choice is necessary for witnessing failures of generalized noncontextuality, and moreover, that such failures can be witnessed even when using arbitrarily inefficient detectors.