Quantum computers, while offering exponential computational advantages, are highly vulnerable to noise-induced errors, particularly during the measurement process. This paper investigates machine learning-based error mitigation strategies with a focus on transfer learning. By initially training a base model on a specific quantum device, we leverage transfer learning to adapt the model for use on different quantum computers. This approach not only achieves superior performance with reduced dataset size and training time but also maintains hardware agnosticism, as demonstrated through tests on various IBM quantum backends. Our method provides a practical solution for enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) algorithms by improving machine learning-based error mitigation.
Quantum computers, while offering exponential computational advantages, are highly vulnerable to noise-induced errors, particularly during the measurement process. This paper investigates machine learning-based error mitigation strategies with a focus on transfer learning. By initially training a base model on a specific quantum device, we leverage transfer learning to adapt the model for use on different quantum computers. This approach not only achieves superior performance with reduced dataset size and training time but also maintains hardware agnosticism, as demonstrated through tests on various IBM quantum backends. Our method provides a practical solution for enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) algorithms by improving machine learning-based error mitigation.
Abstract Quantum computing has recently emerged as a novel paradigm for solving problems otherwise intractable on classical computers, yet the practical progress of quantum computers is severely impacted by noise, decoherence, and imperfect gate operations in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Specific to IBM Quantum hardware, imperfections due to readout error, gate errors, and device drift, which depends on time, resolves limits for the accuracy of outputs from our algorithms. The mitigation strategies currently used, for example, Measurement Error Mitigation (MEM), Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), and Clifford Data Regression (CDR), offer improvement over raw, unmitigated outputs, but they are static and not dynamic; the reduction of noise in within an NISQ device is temporal and can vary in patterns that are non-zero. In addition to this, using the conventional methods provides inconsistent and suboptimal results.This study will provide enhanced reliability with respect to performing quantum computation on IBM Quantum hardware with a unique mitigation framework that is adaptive and computationally efficient for a high-fidelity output. The problem taken on here is the failure of existing error mitigation strategies to provide adaptive noise compensation, as they assume a statically-distributed error, despite the performance-related characteristics already being documented in regards to calibration drift and variation over time.To achieve this, we propose a Hybrid Adaptive Error Mitigation (HAEM) approach that includes baseline measurement error mitigation and an additional correction layer that utilizes realtime calibration information, along with lightweight machine learning models. The approach can be broken down into three steps: (i) perform standard measurement error mitigation to reduce classical readout noise, (ii) execute compact calibration circuits, such as Bell states, GHZ states and Clifford benchmarks to capture then current error profile of the device, and (iii) use a lightweight machine learning model (having been trained on historical and newest calibration data) to dynamically change the mitigation weights applied for the target quantum algorithm. All implementation is done using Qiskit Runtime to ensure low-latency execution, and we completed experiments on both Qiskit Aer noisy simulators and IBM Quantum devices.Initial results suggest HAEM improved the outputs of quantum algorithms' fidelity compared to the unmitigated runs and the baseline measurement error mitigation (MEM) runs. On the noisy simulators, HAEM increased fidelity from a raw performance of 0.65 to 0.87, nearly a 34% improvement. In fairer hardware-like scenarios, fidelity-on-average was persistently 12% better than MEM, with nearly equal time duration for the additional adaptive measurements. The adaptive aspect of HAEM consistently supported subsequent calibration cycles of the device and was effective to continue providing fidelity improvements despite the static mitigation performance degrading.To sum up, the proposed HAEM framework is a modern and viable alternative for error mitigation which brings together the benefits of baseline approaches with corrections that are driven by fixed-function error-corrective, adaptive learning. As both learning-based and standard baseline approaches can only achieve fixed levels of performance, HAEM, through its use of noise mitigation both at execution time and through correlating it with standard data, provides a route towards reliable quantum computations on current IBM hardware. HAEM also presents a contribution to the NISQ error-resilient landscape, and however it is intended that it will continue to improve future applications of hybrid workflows of quantum and classical computation where error mitigation and resilience is important.
Quantum computing offers exponential advantages for problems in cryptography, optimization, and quantum simulation, yet the practicality of current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices is severely constrained by decoherence, gate imperfections, and measurement noise. Conventional quantum error correction (QEC) codes such as Steane and surface codes impose large qubit overheads and require high-fidelity logical operations, making them unsuitable for near-term hardware. To address this gap, this work introduces ML-QEM, an adaptive quantum error mitigation framework that employs machine learning to identify and correct dominant Pauli error patterns in real time using only 3–5 ancillary qubits. By integrating Qiskit Aer noise modeling with a lightweight TensorFlow-based classifier, ML-QEM learns device-specific noise characteristics and applies targeted recovery operations with minimal latency. Evaluations across depolarizing, amplitude damping, and thermal relaxation noise models demonstrate a 28.4% average fidelity improvement, 60–84% lower overhead than Steane and surface codes, and a classical processing delay of only 21.7 ms. ML-QEM thus provides an effective and resource-efficient pathway toward enhancing quantum computation fidelity in the NISQ era.
Machine Learning-based quantum error mitigation (ML-QEM) has emerged as a promising approach for improving the performance of noisy quantum algorithms. However, existing ML-QEM methods often have restricted applicability to variational circuits and rely on inaccessible noiseless training data. In this work, we propose a practical ML-QEM protocol tailored to variational quantum algorithms, which generates training data by simulating (near-)Clifford circuits. This data is used for model selection and training, producing a mitigation model that can correct variational circuits with arbitrary parameters and transfer across different target Hamiltonians of similar structure. We benchmark the proposed method on the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) task for the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltonian of up to n=12 qubits under various noise models, analyzing its effect on trainability and comparing its performance against standard Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE). The results demonstrate consistent several-fold error suppression across all tested settings and superior performance over ZNE in the high-noise regime, providing evidence for the applicability of the proposed protocol to present-day NISQ processors.
Hybridizing machine learning (ML) with quantum computing has become an attractive strategy to increase computational power on Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Although these can be potentially quantum advantage devices, their qubit numbers and noise are bounded and there are challenges when it comes to practical quantum circuit realization. This work concentrates on the creation of optimized quantum circuits via ML-based strategies, to enhance the performance of the circuits, to reduce the error rate and to accommodate the particular noise profile of the hardware of NISQ devices. The resulting suboptimal mappings with little or no consideration of noise and hardware topology in traditional quantum compilers can ruin the fidelity of quantum algorithm. Leveraging machine learning, and specifically reinforcement and supervised learning methods, our method learns to optimize compilation strategy for specific quantum hardware architecture. The paper proposes a framework that uses machine learning models to predict qubit mappings, gate decompositions, and transpilation paths that minimize gate depth and error accumulation. We also investigate transfer learning methods for propagating the learned compilation strategies to novel NISQ machines. Such methods are empirically validated on both simulated and real quantum hardware backends, providing evidence of circuit depth, execution time and error reductions. The results show that ML-assisted compilation can achieve better success probabilities for benchmark quantum algorithms like VQE and QAOA than conventional compilers. Furthermore, the work examines the interpretability of ML models providing hardware-aware optimization recommendations and understanding the noise patterns and methods of error correction. Our work highlights the key role of ML for transferring between theoretical quantum algorithms and their practical NISQ implementations. This integration boosts the immediate applicability of existing quantum devices and provides a basis for adaptive and scalable likelihood-based compilation for the era of fault-tolerant quantum computation. Our results motivate further investigation of hybrid classical-quantum workflows, in which ML iteratively improves compilation in accordance with changing hardware noise and capabilities. By improving quantum circuit compilation onNISQ computers, this work is taking steps toward the realization of quantum advantage in application scenarios such as optimization, cryptography, and quantum simulation without needing to wait for fully fault-tolerant large-scale quantum computers.
Abstract Mitigating measurement errors in quantum systems without relying on quantum error correction is of critical importance for the practical development of quantum technology. Deep learning-based quantum measurement error mitigation (QMEM) has exhibited advantages over the linear inversion method due to its capability to correct non-linear noise. However, scalability remains a challenge for both methods. In this study, we propose a scalable QMEM method that leverages the conditional independence (CI) of distant qubits and incorporates transfer learning (TL) techniques. By leveraging the CI assumption, we achieve an exponential reduction in the size of neural networks used for error mitigation. This enhancement also offers the benefit of reducing the number of training data needed for the machine learning model to successfully converge. Additionally, incorporating TL provides a constant speedup. We validate the effectiveness of our approach through experiments conducted on IBM quantum devices with 7 and 13 qubits, demonstrating excellent error mitigation performance and highlighting the efficiency of our method.
In the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) regime, quantum devices contain hardware-specific noise sources which restrict device-invariant error mitigation strategies. We explore transfer learning approaches to apply noise models learned on one quantum device to a different device with the help of a small amount of data. We create a real-hardware dataset from two IBM quantum devices, ibm_fez (source) and ibm_marrakesh (target), comprising 170 noisy and ideal circuit output distributions, with device calibration features added. We train a residual neural network on the source device to map noisy to ideal outcomes. The zero-shot transfer test shows a KL divergence of 1.6706 (up from 0.3014), establishing device specificity. With K = 20 fine-tuning samples, KL drops to 1.1924 (28.6% improvement over zero-shot), recovering 34.9% of the gap between zero-shot and in-domain KL. Ablation studies reveal that the major cause of mismatches across devices is CX gate error, followed by readout error. The results show quantum noise can be learned and fine-tuned with minimal samples, and provide a plausible approach to cross-device quantum error mitigation.