Decoding P vs. NP: A Multidimensional Exploration

Iago Gaspar

Published Jan 10, 2025• 0 citations

Abstract

The P vs. NP problem is a central open question in theoretical computer science, asking whether every problem whose solution can be verified in polynomial time can also be solved in polynomial time. This paper presents an interdisciplinary exploration of this problem by integrating mathematical analysis, quantum computing, and machine learning.We analyze the limitations of polynomial-time reductions among NP-complete problems under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), providing detailed proofs that offer new insights into the structural complexities within NP. Additionally, we develop a novel quantum-classical hybrid algorithm that combines Grover's algorithm with classical heuristics to solve specific instances of NP-complete problems more efficiently. This includes a comprehensive complexity analysis, scalability discussions, and detailed practical implementation aspects such as oracle constructions.Furthermore, we propose a machine learning framework based on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to capture patterns within NP-complete problems. This approach is theoretically justified, enhances heuristic methods, and demonstrates superior performance through extensive experimental comparisons with classical heuristics and exact solvers.By integrating these methods, this work offers fresh perspectives on the P vs. NP problem and contributes to the broader understanding of computational complexity.

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202501.0785.v1

Related papers

The P Vs NP Problem: A Method for Solving NP-Complete Problems by use of Graph Embodiment on a Quantum Computation Paradigm using a Relational Database Query

Shadrack Mwanik, Andrew Mwaura Kahonge, Evans Kirimi Miriti

The relationship between the complexity class P and NP is one of the most fascinating and unresolved question in theoretical Computer Science. The classical computational paradigm, hedged on Turing thesis may be by itself the limiting factor. To investigate this relationship, a method for solving a query problem on a relational database on the classical and the quantum computational paradigm has been developed. The method solves queries or database problems through the use of graphs. The results indicate that the solution to the P vs NP cannot be resolved under the current computation paradigms and may requires a new computation paradigm to resolve it.

Jan 1, 20130 citations

The Subset Sum Problem: Reducing Time Complexity of NP-Completeness with Quantum Search

Bo Moon

The Subset Sum Problem is a member of the NP-complete class, so no known polynomial time algorithm exists for it. Although there are polynomial time approximations and heuristics, these are not always acceptable, yet exact-solution algorithms are unfeasible for large input. Quantum computation offers new insights for not only the Subset Sum Problem but also the entire NP-complete class; most notably, Grover's quantum algorithm for an unstructured database search can be tailored to identify solutions to problems within mathematics and computer science. This paper discusses the physical and conceptual feasibility of quantum computation and demonstrates the utility of quantum search by analyzing the time complexities of the classical dynamic programming algorithm and Grover's algorithm in solving the Subset Sum Problem, evincing the implications this has on the NP-complete class in general.

Undergraduate Journal of Mathematical Modeling One + TwoMay 1, 20133 citations

Quantum Mathematics and the P vs NP Problem （量子数学与P vs NP问题）

Feng Gao

Abstract: The P vs NP problem is the central open question in computational complexity theory, asking whether every problem whose solution can be verified in polynomial time can also be solved in polynomial time. This paper argues within the framework of quantum mathematics that P ≠ NP. Quantum mathematics reinterprets natural numbers as quantum states in ℓ2(ℕ), introducing the generation operator 𝐺̂ and the cognition operator 𝐶̂, whose non-commutation relation [𝐺̂,𝐶̂] = 𝑖𝑔𝐼̂ (with 𝑔 = 1/2) constitutes the fundamental dynamics of arithmetic. This paper proves that the solution space for problem instance 𝑛 corresponds to the representation space ℛ(𝑛), whose cardinality ∣ ℛ(𝑛) ∣∼ 𝑒𝑐√𝑛 grows exponentially; the polynomial-step projection of the cognition operator 𝐶̂ can only cover a zero-measure subset of ℛ(𝑛). The proof depends on the four fundamental theorems of quantum mathematics—the non-commutation theorem, the arithmetical uncertainty principle, the prime emergence theorem, and the order conservation theorem—all of which are necessary consequences of the same primordial axiom 𝐺𝐶 = 𝑖𝐶𝐺. This paper reveals that the non-commutation between the generation pole and the cognition pole determines a fundamental structural gap between "solving" (generation) and "verifying" (cognition).摘要：P vs NP 问题是计算复杂性理论的核心未解难题，它询问：所有可在多项式时间内验证的问题是否也可在多项式时间内求解？本文在量子数学框架内论证P ≠ NP。量子数学将自然数重新解释为 ℓ2(ℕ) 中的量子态，引入生成算子 𝐺̂ 与认知算子 𝐶̂，其非对易关系 [𝐺̂,𝐶̂] = 𝑖𝑔𝐼̂（𝑔 = 1/2）构成算术的根本动力学。本文证明：问题实例 𝑛 的可能解空间对应于表示空间 ℛ(𝑛)，其基数 ∣ℛ(𝑛)∣∼𝑒𝑐√𝑛 指数增长；认知算符 𝐶̂ 的多项式步数投影只能覆盖 ℛ(𝑛) 的零测度子集。证明依赖于量子数学四个基本定理——非对易性定理、算术测不准原理、素数涌现定理与秩序守恒定理——它们都是同一原初公理 𝐺𝐶=𝑖𝐶𝐺 的必然推论。本文揭示：生成极与认知极的非对易性决定了"求解"（生成）与"验证"（认知）之间存在根本性的结构性鸿沟。

Sep 5, 20260 citations

P Vs NP as a Physical Problem: From Topological Invariants to Hardware Implementation

Овчинников С. В.

The relevance of the research is determined by the fundamental nature of the P vs NP problem, which has been considered a central unsolved problem in theoretical computer science for more than half a century. In this article, for the first time, it is proved that the problem of solving the P vs NP problem is not a mathematical problem, but a physical problem, the solution of which depends on the physical implementation of the computing system. The aim of this paper is to prove that the solution of the P vs NP problem depends on the type of physical system used for calculations. The leading approach to research is to synthesize three independent paradigms: 1. Algebraic topology that provides invariants for complexity classification. 2. Quantum physics, which provides parallel information processing. 3. Apparat implementation on the GPU that demonstrates the physical limitations of classical computing. Author's results include: A formal proof that P ≠ NP holds in classical physics (Newtonian mechanics, deterministic computations) and a simultaneous proof that P = NP holds in quantum physics (superposition, entanglement). Experimental confirmation of the physical implementation through a series of computational experiments. Development of hybrid system that allows you to switch between modes depending on the available resources. The theoretical significance lies in rethinking the fundamental problem of complexity theory as a physical law. Practical significance is the creation of an adaptive computing system, the efficiency of which is determined by the available physical platform.

Jan 22, 20260 citations

Exploring Quantum Machine Learning in Solving Complex Optimization Problems: Algorithms and Insights

Uzma Nawaz, Zubair Saeed, Kamran Atif

Optimization problems across domains such as logistics, finance, and artificial intelligence often involve complex and NP-hard formulations that are computationally challenging for classical algorithms due to scalability and efficiency limitations. The study aims to systematically investigate the role of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) in addressing complex optimization problems and to analyze its advantages over traditional optimization techniques. A comprehensive survey and comparative analysis of key QML algorithms, including Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs), and Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVMs), is conducted by examining their working principles, optimization capabilities, and real-world applications. The findings indicate that QML algorithms demonstrate significant potential in exploring large solutions spaces efficiently, achieving faster convergence, and providing improved optimization performance compared to classical approaches, although challenges such as quantum noise, scalability, and hardware limitations remain. The novelty of this study lies in providing a unified and critical comparative framework that integrates multiple QML optimization algorithms, highlights their practical feasibility, and identifies key research gaps hindering their real-world deployment. The implications of this research provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in selecting appropriate QML techniques and emphasize the need for advancements in hybrid quantum -classical systems, algorithms design, and quantum hardware to enable practical large-scale optimization.

Scientific Journal of Computer ScienceFeb 19, 20260 citations

P_vs_NP

Jinsong Liu

The P versus NP problem is one of the most celebrated open questions in theoretical computer science and mathematics. This paper attempts to provide an alternative formulation of the problem based on the LFD (Logic–Field–Distribution) real‑domain quantum computing framework. We do not claim a rigorous mathematical proof; instead, we present a conditional perspective: if the postulates of the LFD framework—concerning the real‑number representation of quantum states, the evolution of historical distributions, and the compression operator—are accepted, then the separation of P and NP can be viewed as a natural consequence of a geometric entropy compression speed‑limit theorem. Specifically, we model the solution process of a computational problem as an evolutionary path of an LFD configuration in the geometric tower, and define the computational geometric entropy as the information content of the accumulated historical distribution. We argue that problems in P correspond to those whose computational geometric entropy can be efficiently compressed to a logarithmic scale within polynomial time, whereas NP‑complete problems, due to the inherent branching structure of their solution spaces, possess an incompressible entropy barrier. All background derivations are based on the formal system established in the companion volume Geometric Tower I: Event‑Importance Formulation of Spacetime. The engineering exploration of an LFD‑based meta‑learning system provides qualitative observations consistent with this theoretical picture. This work aims to build a conceptual bridge between computational complexity and the physics of quantum information, and it invites interdisciplinary criticism and discussion.

Apr 24, 20260 citations