Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Causal classification of spatiotemporal quantum correlations in the absence of active interventions

Song, Min Jeong

Published Jan 1, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

``Why'' questions are ubiquitous in our everyday lives. This innate curiosity has led to monumental scientific methodologies to find the ``because'' -- the key to unlocking ``why''. In search of the true causes behind complex phenomena, we typically employ statistical inference along with appropriate interventions, observing how systems react to various types of interventions. For such sophisticated causal inference, it is crucial to distinguish between the direct causal relations and the indirect causal relations, mediated by a common cause. These causal relationships form two primary causal structures: (i) a temporal structure, in which systems are in the relation of a direct cause, and (ii) a spatial structure, in which systems are in the relation of a common cause. In order to infer causal structures, what types of interventions are necessary? Recent research has revealed quantum advantages in this question; when the systems in question exhibit non-classical characteristics, effective causal inference is possible even without performing interventions actively, in a way that would be impossible classically. Motivated by these pioneering studies, this thesis aims to characterize quantum correlations across space-time in the absence of active interventions by causal classification, which is based on their compatible causal structures. The causal classification of quantum correlations involves examining the incompatibility of observed correlations with spatial and temporal structures. While certifying incompatibility with spatial structures is known to be relatively straightforward, establishing an effective approach for certifying incompatibility with temporal structures has remained challenging. Here, we refer to as atemporality this incompatibility with temporal structures, and introduce an efficient means to certify atemporality, contributing to a complete set of tools for inferring underlying causal structures. This also reveals various properties of atemporality: (1) asymmetry under time reversal, and (2) entanglement does not necessarily imply atemporality, although strong entanglement does imply atemporality. Atemporality thus opens a new aspect of quantum correlations across space-time, distinct from other known spatial quantum correlations such as entanglement. This insight has the potential to spur foundational interest, akin to that seen in the study of spatial quantum correlations.

DOI
10.32657/10356/181399

Related papers

Causal Classification of Spatiotemporal Quantum Correlations

Min-Jeong Song, Varun Narasimhachar, Bartosz Regula +2 more

From correlations in measurement outcomes alone, can two otherwise isolated parties establish whether such correlations are atemporal? That is, can they rule out that they have been given the same system at two different times? Classical statistics says no, yet quantum theory disagrees. Here, we introduce the necessary and sufficient conditions by which such quantum correlations can be identified as atemporal. We demonstrate the asymmetry of atemporality under time reversal and reveal it to be a measure of spatial quantum correlation distinct from entanglement. Our results indicate that certain quantum correlations possess an intrinsic arrow of time and enable classification of general quantum correlations across space-time based on their (in)compatibility with various underlying causal structures.

arXiv:2306.09336•Physical Review Letters•Sep 11, 2024•14 citations

Probing Asymmetry in Spatial-temporal Correlations in Quantum Causal Inference

Meng Yu, Zhenghao Liu, Zhikuan Zhao +11 more

Abstract Quantum correlations in space-time encapsulate the most defining aspects of quantum physics. The dual of the spatial and temporal perspectives are bind with a one-to-one correspondence between bipartite quantum states and quantum channels. Consequently, causal relations between quantum events can sometimes be inferred solely from correlation statistics, apparently contradicting the classical \textit{credo}, `correlation does not imply causation'[1-6]. However, since the spatial-temporal duality does not imply a full symmetry of measurement statistics between the two domains[7], the extent to which correlation alone identifies quantum causality ponders inquiry vital for both fundamental and practical interests. Here, demonstrating a unified geometrical representation of spatial-temporal quantum correlation, we show that certain non-unital channels create temporal correlation without spatial analogue and break the spatial-temporal symmetry. By implementing such channels in a photonic architecture, we observe this asymmetry and classify quantum correlations using a distance criterion, thus bringing empirical insight into causal inference in quantum mechanics.

•Mar 15, 2021•0 citations

Gaussian Atemporality: When Gaussian Quantum Correlations Imply Common Cause

Min-Jeong Song, Jayne E. Thompson, Matthew S. Winnel +4 more

Conventionally, covariances do not distinguish between spatial and temporal correlations. The same covariance matrix could equally describe temporal correlations between observations of the same system at two different times or correlations made on two spatially separated systems that arose from some common cause. Here, we demonstrate Gaussian quantum correlations that are `atemporal', such that the covariances governing their quadrature measurements are unphysical without postulating some common cause. We introduce Gaussian atemporality robustness as a measure of atemporality, illustrating its efficient computability and operational meaning as the maximum noise which can be added without removing this uniquely quantum phenomenon. We illustrate that (i) specific spatiotemporal Gaussian correlations possess an intrinsic arrow of time, such that Gaussian atemporality robustness is zero in one temporal direction and not the other and (ii) that it measures quantum correlations beyond entanglement.

arXiv:2508.11804•Aug 15, 2025•0 citations

Quantifying Causal Influences in the Presence of a Quantum Common Cause

Mariami Gachechiladze, Nikolai Miklin, Rafael Chaves

Quantum mechanics challenges our intuition on the cause-effect relations in nature. Some fundamental concepts, including Reichenbach's common cause principle or the notion of local realism, have to be reconsidered. Traditionally, this is witnessed by the violation of a Bell inequality. But are Bell inequalities the only signature of the incompatibility between quantum correlations and causality theory? Motivated by this question, we introduce a general framework able to estimate causal influences between two variables, without the need of interventions and irrespectively of the classical, quantum, or even postquantum nature of a common cause. In particular, by considering the simplest instrumental scenario-for which violation of Bell inequalities is not possible-we show that every pure bipartite entangled state violates the classical bounds on causal influence, thus, answering in negative to the posed question and opening a new venue to explore the role of causality within quantum theory.

arXiv:2007.01221•Physical Review Letters•Dec 2, 2020•29 citations

Quantum superpositions of ‘common-cause’ and ‘direct-cause’ causal structures

Adrien Feix, Časlav Brukner

The constraints arising for a general set of causal relations, both classically and quantumly, are still poorly understood. As a step in exploring this question, we consider a coherently controlled superposition of 'direct-cause' and 'common-cause' relationships between two events. We propose an implementation involving the spatial superposition of a mass and general relativistic time dilation. Finally, we develop a computationally efficient method to distinguish such genuinely quantum causal structures from classical (incoherent) mixtures of causal structures and show how to design experimental verifications of the nonclassicality of a causal structure.

arXiv:1606.09241•New Journal of Physics•Nov 16, 2017•22 citations

Identification of Causal Influences in Quantum Processes

Isaac Friend, Aleks Kissinger

Though the topic of causal inference is typically considered in the context of classical statistical models, recent years have seen great interest in extending causal inference techniques to quantum and generalized theories. Causal identification is a type of causal inference problem concerned with recovering from observational data and qualitative assumptions the causal mechanisms generating the data, and hence the effects of hypothetical interventions. A major obstacle to a theory of causal identification in the quantum setting is the question of what should play the role of "observational data," as any means of extracting data at a certain locus will almost certainly disturb the system. Hence, one might think a priori that quantum measurements are already too much like interventions, so that the problem of causal identification trivializes. This is not the case. Fixing a limited class of quantum instruments (namely the class of all projective measurements) to play the role of "observations," we note that as in the classical setting, there exist scenarios for which causal identification is not possible. We then present sufficient conditions for quantum causal identification, starting with a quantum analogue of the well-known "front-door criterion" and finishing with a broader class of scenarios for which the effect of a single intervention is identifiable. These results emerge from generalizing the process-theoretic account of classical causal inference due to Jacobs, Kissinger, and Zanasi beyond the setting of Markov categories, and thereby treating the classical and quantum problems uniformly.

arXiv:2311.08882•Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science•Nov 14, 2023•0 citations
Why'' questions are ubiquitous in our everyday lives. This innate curiosity has led to monumental scientific methodologies to find the because'' -- the key to unlocking ``why''. In search of the true causes behind complex phenomena, we typically employ statistical inference along with appropriate interventions, observing how systems react to various types of interventions. For such sophisticated causal inference, it is crucial to distinguish between the direct causal relations and the indirect causal relations, mediated by a common cause. These causal relationships form two primary causal structures: (i) a temporal structure, in which systems are in the relation of a direct cause, and (ii) a spatial structure, in which systems are in the relation of a common cause. In order to infer causal structures, what types of interventions are necessary? Recent research has revealed quantum advantages in this question; when the systems in question exhibit non-classical characteristics, effective causal inference is possible even without performing interventions actively, in a way that would be impossible classically. Motivated by these pioneering studies, this thesis aims to characterize quantum correlations across space-time in the absence of active interventions by causal classification, which is based on their compatible causal structures. The causal classification of quantum correlations involves examining the incompatibility of observed correlations with spatial and temporal structures. While certifying incompatibility with spatial structures is known to be relatively straightforward, establishing an effective approach for certifying incompatibility with temporal structures has remained challenging. Here, we refer to as atemporality this incompatibility with temporal structures, and introduce an efficient means to certify atemporality, contributing to a complete set of tools for inferring underlying causal structures. This also reveals various properties of atemporality: (1) asymmetry under time reversal, and (2) entanglement does not necessarily imply atemporality, although strong entanglement does imply atemporality. Atemporality thus opens a new aspect of quantum correlations across space-time, distinct from other known spatial quantum correlations such as entanglement. This insight has the potential to spur foundational interest, akin to that seen in the study of spatial quantum correlations.
From correlations in measurement outcomes alone, can two otherwise isolated parties establish whether such correlations are atemporal? That is, can they rule out that they have been given the same system at two different times? Classical statistics says no, yet quantum theory disagrees. Here, we introduce the necessary and sufficient conditions by which such quantum correlations can be identified as atemporal. We demonstrate the asymmetry of atemporality under time reversal and reveal it to be a measure of spatial quantum correlation distinct from entanglement. Our results indicate that certain quantum correlations possess an intrinsic arrow of time and enable classification of general quantum correlations across space-time based on their (in)compatibility with various underlying causal structures.
Abstract Quantum correlations in space-time encapsulate the most defining aspects of quantum physics. The dual of the spatial and temporal perspectives are bind with a one-to-one correspondence between bipartite quantum states and quantum channels. Consequently, causal relations between quantum events can sometimes be inferred solely from correlation statistics, apparently contradicting the classical \textit{credo}, `correlation does not imply causation'[1-6]. However, since the spatial-temporal duality does not imply a full symmetry of measurement statistics between the two domains[7], the extent to which correlation alone identifies quantum causality ponders inquiry vital for both fundamental and practical interests. Here, demonstrating a unified geometrical representation of spatial-temporal quantum correlation, we show that certain non-unital channels create temporal correlation without spatial analogue and break the spatial-temporal symmetry. By implementing such channels in a photonic architecture, we observe this asymmetry and classify quantum correlations using a distance criterion, thus bringing empirical insight into causal inference in quantum mechanics.
Conventionally, covariances do not distinguish between spatial and temporal correlations. The same covariance matrix could equally describe temporal correlations between observations of the same system at two different times or correlations made on two spatially separated systems that arose from some common cause. Here, we demonstrate Gaussian quantum correlations that are `atemporal', such that the covariances governing their quadrature measurements are unphysical without postulating some common cause. We introduce Gaussian atemporality robustness as a measure of atemporality, illustrating its efficient computability and operational meaning as the maximum noise which can be added without removing this uniquely quantum phenomenon. We illustrate that (i) specific spatiotemporal Gaussian correlations possess an intrinsic arrow of time, such that Gaussian atemporality robustness is zero in one temporal direction and not the other and (ii) that it measures quantum correlations beyond entanglement.
Quantum mechanics challenges our intuition on the cause-effect relations in nature. Some fundamental concepts, including Reichenbach's common cause principle or the notion of local realism, have to be reconsidered. Traditionally, this is witnessed by the violation of a Bell inequality. But are Bell inequalities the only signature of the incompatibility between quantum correlations and causality theory? Motivated by this question, we introduce a general framework able to estimate causal influences between two variables, without the need of interventions and irrespectively of the classical, quantum, or even postquantum nature of a common cause. In particular, by considering the simplest instrumental scenario-for which violation of Bell inequalities is not possible-we show that every pure bipartite entangled state violates the classical bounds on causal influence, thus, answering in negative to the posed question and opening a new venue to explore the role of causality within quantum theory.
The constraints arising for a general set of causal relations, both classically and quantumly, are still poorly understood. As a step in exploring this question, we consider a coherently controlled superposition of 'direct-cause' and 'common-cause' relationships between two events. We propose an implementation involving the spatial superposition of a mass and general relativistic time dilation. Finally, we develop a computationally efficient method to distinguish such genuinely quantum causal structures from classical (incoherent) mixtures of causal structures and show how to design experimental verifications of the nonclassicality of a causal structure.
Though the topic of causal inference is typically considered in the context of classical statistical models, recent years have seen great interest in extending causal inference techniques to quantum and generalized theories. Causal identification is a type of causal inference problem concerned with recovering from observational data and qualitative assumptions the causal mechanisms generating the data, and hence the effects of hypothetical interventions. A major obstacle to a theory of causal identification in the quantum setting is the question of what should play the role of "observational data," as any means of extracting data at a certain locus will almost certainly disturb the system. Hence, one might think a priori that quantum measurements are already too much like interventions, so that the problem of causal identification trivializes. This is not the case. Fixing a limited class of quantum instruments (namely the class of all projective measurements) to play the role of "observations," we note that as in the classical setting, there exist scenarios for which causal identification is not possible. We then present sufficient conditions for quantum causal identification, starting with a quantum analogue of the well-known "front-door criterion" and finishing with a broader class of scenarios for which the effect of a single intervention is identifiable. These results emerge from generalizing the process-theoretic account of classical causal inference due to Jacobs, Kissinger, and Zanasi beyond the setting of Markov categories, and thereby treating the classical and quantum problems uniformly.