The constraints arising for a general set of causal relations, both classically and quantumly, are still poorly understood. As a step in exploring this question, we consider a coherently controlled superposition of 'direct-cause' and 'common-cause' relationships between two events. We propose an implementation involving the spatial superposition of a mass and general relativistic time dilation. Finally, we develop a computationally efficient method to distinguish such genuinely quantum causal structures from classical (incoherent) mixtures of causal structures and show how to design experimental verifications of the nonclassicality of a causal structure.
The constraints arising for a general set of causal relations, both classically and quantumly, are still poorly understood. As a step in exploring this question, we consider a coherently controlled superposition of 'direct-cause' and 'common-cause' relationships between two events. We propose an implementation involving the spatial superposition of a mass and general relativistic time dilation. Finally, we develop a computationally efficient method to distinguish such genuinely quantum causal structures from classical (incoherent) mixtures of causal structures and show how to design experimental verifications of the nonclassicality of a causal structure.
Understanding the causal influences that hold among the parts of a system is critical both to explaining that system’s natural behaviour and to controlling it through targeted interventions. In a quantum world, understanding causal relations is equally important, but the set of possibilities is far richer. The two basic ways in which a pair of time-ordered quantum systems may be causally related are by a cause-effect mechanism or by a common cause acting on both. Here, we show that it is possible to have a coherent mixture of these two possibilities. We realize such a nonclassical causal relation in a quantum optics experiment and derive a set of criteria for witnessing the coherence based on a quantum version of Berkson’s paradox.
Identifying the causal structures between two statistically correlated events has been widely investigated in many fields of science. While some of the well-studied classical methods are carefully generalized to quantum version of causal inference for certain cases, an effective and efficient way to detect the more general quantum causal structures is still lacking. Here, we introduce a quantity named `Causal Determinant' to efficiently identify the quantum causal structures between two quantum systems and experimentally verify the validity of the method. According to the causal determinant, the quantum direct cause imposed by an arbitrary unitary operator can be perfectly discriminated with the quantum common cause, in which the two quantum systems share a joint quantum state. In addition, the causal determinant has the capability to discriminate between more general causal structures and predict the range of their parameters. The ability to detect more general quantum causal structures of our method can shed new light on the field of quantum causal inference.
``Why'' questions are ubiquitous in our everyday lives. This innate curiosity has led to monumental scientific methodologies to find the ``because'' -- the key to unlocking ``why''. In search of the true causes behind complex phenomena, we typically employ statistical inference along with appropriate interventions, observing how systems react to various types of interventions. For such sophisticated causal inference, it is crucial to distinguish between the direct causal relations and the indirect causal relations, mediated by a common cause. These causal relationships form two primary causal structures: (i) a temporal structure, in which systems are in the relation of a direct cause, and (ii) a spatial structure, in which systems are in the relation of a common cause. In order to infer causal structures, what types of interventions are necessary? Recent research has revealed quantum advantages in this question; when the systems in question exhibit non-classical characteristics, effective causal inference is possible even without performing interventions actively, in a way that would be impossible classically. Motivated by these pioneering studies, this thesis aims to characterize quantum correlations across space-time in the absence of active interventions by causal classification, which is based on their compatible causal structures. The causal classification of quantum correlations involves examining the incompatibility of observed correlations with spatial and temporal structures. While certifying incompatibility with spatial structures is known to be relatively straightforward, establishing an effective approach for certifying incompatibility with temporal structures has remained challenging. Here, we refer to as atemporality this incompatibility with temporal structures, and introduce an efficient means to certify atemporality, contributing to a complete set of tools for inferring underlying causal structures. This also reveals various properties of atemporality: (1) asymmetry under time reversal, and (2) entanglement does not necessarily imply atemporality, although strong entanglement does imply atemporality. Atemporality thus opens a new aspect of quantum correlations across space-time, distinct from other known spatial quantum correlations such as entanglement. This insight has the potential to spur foundational interest, akin to that seen in the study of spatial quantum correlations.
The joint expectation values of quantum observables measured by two parties typically depend on the causal structure of the measurement protocol. The two causal structures we investigate here are the direct-cause scenario, in which a single quantum state is measured twice in series with a general quantum channel between measurements, and the common-cause scenario, in which a shared bipartite quantum state is measured in parallel. Through a variety of examples of qubit channels with tunable parameters, we identify the full set of input states where the direct-cause joint expectation values of Pauli observables coincide with those obtained from a common cause, a situation that we call causal confusion. More generally, for arbitrary finite-dimensional quantum systems and light-touch observables, we prove that a channel exhibits causal confusion for some input state if and only if it is a positive-partial-transpose (PPT) channel, thereby endowing PPT channels with a new operational meaning in terms of causal confusion. Using this result, we characterize the set of qubit channels for which there exists an input state leading to causal confusion as the set of entanglement-breaking channels.
Understanding the causal influences that hold among parts of a system is critical both to explaining that system's natural behaviour and to controlling it through targeted interventions. In a quantum world, understanding causal relations is equally important, but the set of possibilities is far richer. The two basic ways in which a pair of time-ordered quantum systems may be causally related are by a cause-effect mechanism or by a common-cause acting on both. Here we show a coherent mixture of these two possibilities. We realize this nonclassical causal relation in a quantum optics experiment and derive a set of criteria for witnessing the coherence based on a quantum version of Berkson's effect, whereby two independent causes can become correlated on observation of their common effect. The interplay of causality and quantum theory lies at the heart of challenging foundational puzzles, including Bell's theorem and the search for quantum gravity.
It has long been recognized as a difficult problem to determine whether the observed statistical correlations between two classical variables arise from causality or from common causes. Recent research has shown that, in a quantum theoretical framework, the mechanisms of entanglement and quantum coherence provide advantages in tackling this problem. In some particular cases, quantum common causes and quantum causality can be effectively distinguished by using observations alone. However, these solutions do not apply to all cases. There still exist a large class of cases in which quantum common causes and quantum causality cannot be distinguished. In this paper, along the line of considering unitary transformation as causality in the quantum world, we formally show that quantum common causes and quantum causality are universally separable. Based on the analysis, we further provide a general method to discriminate the two.