Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Qualitative equivalence between incompatibility and Bell nonlocality

Shiv Akshar Yadavalli, Nikola Andrejić, Ravi Kunjwal

Published Dec 10, 2024• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The authors study the relationship between joint measurability structures and their ability to support Bell inequality violations with quantum measurements. They show that every joint measurability structure with some incompatibility can show Bell nonlocality in quantum theory.
DOI
10.1103/physreva.110.l060201

Related papers

Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality

Flavien Hirsch, Marco Túlio Quintino, Nicolas Brunner

We discuss the connection between the incompatibility of quantum measurements, as captured by the notion of joint measurability, and the violation of Bell inequalities. Specifically, we explicitly present a given set of non-jointly-measurable positive-operator-value measures (POVMs) ${\mathcal{M}}_{A}$ with the following property. Considering a bipartite Bell test where Alice uses ${\mathcal{M}}_{A}$, then for any possible shared entangled state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ and any set of (possibly infinitely many) POVMs ${\mathcal{N}}_{B}$ performed by Bob, the resulting statistics admits a local model and can thus never violate any Bell inequality. This shows that quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality in general.

arXiv:1707.06960•Physical Review A•Jan 25, 2018•79 citations

Qualitative equivalence between incompatibility and Bell nonlocality

Shiv Akshar Yadavalli, Nikola Andrejić, Ravi Kunjwal

Measurements in quantum theory can fail to be jointly measurable. Like entanglement, this incompatibility of measurements is necessary but not sufficient for violating Bell inequalities. The (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements can be represented by a joint measurability structure, i.e., a hypergraph whose vertices denote measurements and hyperedges denote all and only compatible sets of measurements. Since incompatibility is necessary for a Bell violation, the joint measurability structure on each wing of a Bell experiment must necessarily be non-trivial, i.e., it must admit a subset of incompatible vertices. Here we show that for any non-trivial joint measurability structure with a finite set of vertices, there exists a quantum realization with a set of measurements that enables a Bell violation, i.e., given that Alice has access to this incompatible set of measurements, there exists a set of measurements for Bob and an entangled state shared between them such that they can jointly violate a Bell inequality. Hence, a non-trivial joint measurability structure is not only necessary for a Bell violation, but also sufficient.

arXiv:2008.10100•Aug 23, 2020•0 citations

Measurement compatibility in Bell nonlocality tests

Tassius Temistocles, Rafael Rabelo, Marcelo Terra Cunha

Incompatibility of observables, or measurements, is one of the key features of quantum mechanics, related, among other concepts, to Heisenberg's uncertainty relations and Bell nonlocality. In this manuscript we show, however, that even though incompatible measurements are necessary for the violation of any Bell inequality, some relevant Bell-like inequalities may be obtained if compatibility relations are assumed between the local measurements of one (or more) of the parties. Hence, compatibility of measurements is not necessarily a drawback and may, however, be useful for the detection of Bell nonlocality and device-independent certification of entanglement.

arXiv:1806.09232•Physical Review A•Apr 22, 2019•20 citations

Bell violations from arbitrary joint measurability structures

Shiv Akshar Yadavalli, Nikola Andrejić, Ravi Kunjwal

Measurement incompatibility is necessary but not sufficient for violation of a Bell inequality. The structure of (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements can be represented by a joint measurability structure, i.e., a hypergraph with its vertices representing measurements and its hyperedges representing all (and only) compatible sets of measurements. We show that for any joint measurability structure that admits at least a pair of incompatible vertices (i.e., a non-trivial joint measurability structure), there exists a quantum realization with a set of measurements that enables a Bell violation. In other words, we identify, for any joint measurability structure, an incompatible set of measurements that is sufficient for a Bell violation.

•Aug 23, 2020•1 citation

Measurement Incompatibility versus Bell Nonlocality: An Approach via Tensor Norms

Faedi Loulidi, Ion Nechita

Measurement incompatibility and quantum nonlocality are two key features of quantum theory.Violations of Bell inequalities require quantum entanglement and incompatibility of the measurements used by the two parties involved in the protocol.We analyze the converse question: for which Bell inequalities is the incompatibility of measurements enough to ensure a quantum violation?We relate the two questions by comparing two tensor norms on the space of dichotomic quantum measurements, one characterizing measurement compatibility and the other characterizing violations of a given Bell inequality.We provide sufficient conditions for the equivalence of the two notions in terms of the matrix describing the correlation Bell inequality.We show that the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality and its variants are the only ones that satisfy it.

arXiv:2205.12668•PRX Quantum•Dec 2, 2022•3 citations

ARE BELL-TESTS ONLY ABOUT LOCAL INCOMPATIBILITY?

Diederik Aerts, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi

The view exists that Bell-tests would only be about local incompatibility of quantum observables and that quantum non-locality would be an unnecessary concept in physics. In this note, we emphasize that it is not incompatibility at the local level that is important for the violation of Bell-CHSH inequality, but incompatibility at the non-local level of the joint measurements. Hence, non-locality remains a necessary concept to properly interpret the outcomes of certain joint quantum measurements.

arXiv:2006.08607•WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Oct 1, 2023•1 citation
We discuss the connection between the incompatibility of quantum measurements, as captured by the notion of joint measurability, and the violation of Bell inequalities. Specifically, we explicitly present a given set of non-jointly-measurable positive-operator-value measures (POVMs) MA{\mathcal{M}}_{A}MA​ with the following property. Considering a bipartite Bell test where Alice uses MA{\mathcal{M}}_{A}MA​, then for any possible shared entangled state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ and any set of (possibly infinitely many) POVMs NB{\mathcal{N}}_{B}NB​ performed by Bob, the resulting statistics admits a local model and can thus never violate any Bell inequality. This shows that quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality in general.
Measurements in quantum theory can fail to be jointly measurable. Like entanglement, this incompatibility of measurements is necessary but not sufficient for violating Bell inequalities. The (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements can be represented by a joint measurability structure, i.e., a hypergraph whose vertices denote measurements and hyperedges denote all and only compatible sets of measurements. Since incompatibility is necessary for a Bell violation, the joint measurability structure on each wing of a Bell experiment must necessarily be non-trivial, i.e., it must admit a subset of incompatible vertices. Here we show that for any non-trivial joint measurability structure with a finite set of vertices, there exists a quantum realization with a set of measurements that enables a Bell violation, i.e., given that Alice has access to this incompatible set of measurements, there exists a set of measurements for Bob and an entangled state shared between them such that they can jointly violate a Bell inequality. Hence, a non-trivial joint measurability structure is not only necessary for a Bell violation, but also sufficient.
Incompatibility of observables, or measurements, is one of the key features of quantum mechanics, related, among other concepts, to Heisenberg's uncertainty relations and Bell nonlocality. In this manuscript we show, however, that even though incompatible measurements are necessary for the violation of any Bell inequality, some relevant Bell-like inequalities may be obtained if compatibility relations are assumed between the local measurements of one (or more) of the parties. Hence, compatibility of measurements is not necessarily a drawback and may, however, be useful for the detection of Bell nonlocality and device-independent certification of entanglement.
Measurement incompatibility is necessary but not sufficient for violation of a Bell inequality. The structure of (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements can be represented by a joint measurability structure, i.e., a hypergraph with its vertices representing measurements and its hyperedges representing all (and only) compatible sets of measurements. We show that for any joint measurability structure that admits at least a pair of incompatible vertices (i.e., a non-trivial joint measurability structure), there exists a quantum realization with a set of measurements that enables a Bell violation. In other words, we identify, for any joint measurability structure, an incompatible set of measurements that is sufficient for a Bell violation.
Measurement incompatibility and quantum nonlocality are two key features of quantum theory.Violations of Bell inequalities require quantum entanglement and incompatibility of the measurements used by the two parties involved in the protocol.We analyze the converse question: for which Bell inequalities is the incompatibility of measurements enough to ensure a quantum violation?We relate the two questions by comparing two tensor norms on the space of dichotomic quantum measurements, one characterizing measurement compatibility and the other characterizing violations of a given Bell inequality.We provide sufficient conditions for the equivalence of the two notions in terms of the matrix describing the correlation Bell inequality.We show that the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality and its variants are the only ones that satisfy it.