Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2008.10100

Qualitative equivalence between incompatibility and Bell nonlocality

Shiv Akshar Yadavalli, Nikola Andrejić, Ravi Kunjwal

Published Aug 23, 2020• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Measurements in quantum theory can fail to be jointly measurable. Like entanglement, this incompatibility of measurements is necessary but not sufficient for violating Bell inequalities. The (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements can be represented by a joint measurability structure, i.e., a hypergraph whose vertices denote measurements and hyperedges denote all and only compatible sets of measurements. Since incompatibility is necessary for a Bell violation, the joint measurability structure on each wing of a Bell experiment must necessarily be non-trivial, i.e., it must admit a subset of incompatible vertices. Here we show that for any non-trivial joint measurability structure with a finite set of vertices, there exists a quantum realization with a set of measurements that enables a Bell violation, i.e., given that Alice has access to this incompatible set of measurements, there exists a set of measurements for Bob and an entangled state shared between them such that they can jointly violate a Bell inequality. Hence, a non-trivial joint measurability structure is not only necessary for a Bell violation, but also sufficient.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2008.10100

Related papers

Bell violations from arbitrary joint measurability structures

Shiv Akshar Yadavalli, Nikola Andrejić, Ravi Kunjwal

Measurement incompatibility is necessary but not sufficient for violation of a Bell inequality. The structure of (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements can be represented by a joint measurability structure, i.e., a hypergraph with its vertices representing measurements and its hyperedges representing all (and only) compatible sets of measurements. We show that for any joint measurability structure that admits at least a pair of incompatible vertices (i.e., a non-trivial joint measurability structure), there exists a quantum realization with a set of measurements that enables a Bell violation. In other words, we identify, for any joint measurability structure, an incompatible set of measurements that is sufficient for a Bell violation.

•Aug 23, 2020•1 citation

Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality

Flavien Hirsch, Marco Túlio Quintino, Nicolas Brunner

We discuss the connection between the incompatibility of quantum measurements, as captured by the notion of joint measurability, and the violation of Bell inequalities. Specifically, we explicitly present a given set of non-jointly-measurable positive-operator-value measures (POVMs) ${\mathcal{M}}_{A}$ with the following property. Considering a bipartite Bell test where Alice uses ${\mathcal{M}}_{A}$, then for any possible shared entangled state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ and any set of (possibly infinitely many) POVMs ${\mathcal{N}}_{B}$ performed by Bob, the resulting statistics admits a local model and can thus never violate any Bell inequality. This shows that quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality in general.

arXiv:1707.06960•Physical Review A•Jan 25, 2018•79 citations

Qualitative equivalence between incompatibility and Bell nonlocality

Shiv Akshar Yadavalli, Nikola Andrejić, Ravi Kunjwal

The authors study the relationship between joint measurability structures and their ability to support Bell inequality violations with quantum measurements. They show that every joint measurability structure with some incompatibility can show Bell nonlocality in quantum theory.

Physical Review A•Dec 10, 2024•2 citations

Measurement incompatibility does not give rise to Bell violation in general

Erika Bene, Tamás Vértesi

In the case of a pair of two-outcome measurements, incompatibility is equivalent to Bell nonlocality. Indeed, any pair of incompatible two-outcome measurements can violate the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt Bell inequality, which has been proven by Wolf et al (2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 230402). In the case of more than two measurements the equivalence between incompatibility and Bell nonlocality is still an open problem, though partial results have recently been obtained. Here we show that the equivalence breaks for a special choice of three measurements. In particular, we present a set of three incompatible two-outcome measurements, such that if Alice measures this set, independent of the set of measurements chosen by Bob and the state shared by them, the resulting statistics cannot violate any Bell inequality. On the other hand, complementing the above result, we exhibit a set of N measurements for any that is -wise compatible, nevertheless it gives rise to Bell violation.

arXiv:1705.10069•New Journal of Physics•Nov 27, 2017•71 citations

Joint measurability structures realizable with qubit measurements: Incompatibility via marginal surgery

Nikola Andrejić, Ravi Kunjwal

Measurements in quantum theory exhibit incompatibility, i.e., they can fail to be jointly measurable.An intuitive way to represent the (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements is via a hypergraph representing their joint measurability structure: its vertices represent measurements and its hyperedges represent (all and only) subsets of compatible measurements.Projective measurements in quantum theory realize (all and only) joint measurability structures that are graphs.On the other hand, general measurements represented by positive operator-valued measures (POVMs) can realize arbitrary joint measurability structures.Here we explore the scope of joint measurability structures realizable with qubit POVMs.We develop a technique that we term marginal surgery to obtain nontrivial joint measurability structures starting from a set of compatible measurements.We show explicit examples of marginal surgery on a special set of qubit POVMs to construct joint measurability structures such as N-cycle and N-Specker scenarios for any integer N 3.We also show the realizability of various joint measurability structures with N ∈ {4, 5, 6} vertices.In particular, we show that all possible joint measurability structures with N = 4 vertices are realizable.We conjecture that all joint measurability structures are realizable with qubit POVMs.This contrasts with the unbounded dimension required in R. Kunjwal et al. [Phys. Rev. A 89, 052126 (2014)].Our results also render this previous construction maximally efficient in terms of the required Hilbert space dimension.We also obtain a sufficient condition for the joint measurability of any set of binary qubit POVMs which powers many of our results and should be of independent interest.

arXiv:2003.00785•Physical Review Research•Oct 28, 2020•11 citations

Measurement compatibility in Bell nonlocality tests

Tassius Temistocles, Rafael Rabelo, Marcelo Terra Cunha

Incompatibility of observables, or measurements, is one of the key features of quantum mechanics, related, among other concepts, to Heisenberg's uncertainty relations and Bell nonlocality. In this manuscript we show, however, that even though incompatible measurements are necessary for the violation of any Bell inequality, some relevant Bell-like inequalities may be obtained if compatibility relations are assumed between the local measurements of one (or more) of the parties. Hence, compatibility of measurements is not necessarily a drawback and may, however, be useful for the detection of Bell nonlocality and device-independent certification of entanglement.

arXiv:1806.09232•Physical Review A•Apr 22, 2019•20 citations
Measurements in quantum theory can fail to be jointly measurable. Like entanglement, this incompatibility of measurements is necessary but not sufficient for violating Bell inequalities. The (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements can be represented by a joint measurability structure, i.e., a hypergraph whose vertices denote measurements and hyperedges denote all and only compatible sets of measurements. Since incompatibility is necessary for a Bell violation, the joint measurability structure on each wing of a Bell experiment must necessarily be non-trivial, i.e., it must admit a subset of incompatible vertices. Here we show that for any non-trivial joint measurability structure with a finite set of vertices, there exists a quantum realization with a set of measurements that enables a Bell violation, i.e., given that Alice has access to this incompatible set of measurements, there exists a set of measurements for Bob and an entangled state shared between them such that they can jointly violate a Bell inequality. Hence, a non-trivial joint measurability structure is not only necessary for a Bell violation, but also sufficient.
Measurement incompatibility is necessary but not sufficient for violation of a Bell inequality. The structure of (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements can be represented by a joint measurability structure, i.e., a hypergraph with its vertices representing measurements and its hyperedges representing all (and only) compatible sets of measurements. We show that for any joint measurability structure that admits at least a pair of incompatible vertices (i.e., a non-trivial joint measurability structure), there exists a quantum realization with a set of measurements that enables a Bell violation. In other words, we identify, for any joint measurability structure, an incompatible set of measurements that is sufficient for a Bell violation.
We discuss the connection between the incompatibility of quantum measurements, as captured by the notion of joint measurability, and the violation of Bell inequalities. Specifically, we explicitly present a given set of non-jointly-measurable positive-operator-value measures (POVMs) MA{\mathcal{M}}_{A}MA​ with the following property. Considering a bipartite Bell test where Alice uses MA{\mathcal{M}}_{A}MA​, then for any possible shared entangled state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ and any set of (possibly infinitely many) POVMs NB{\mathcal{N}}_{B}NB​ performed by Bob, the resulting statistics admits a local model and can thus never violate any Bell inequality. This shows that quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality in general.
In the case of a pair of two-outcome measurements, incompatibility is equivalent to Bell nonlocality. Indeed, any pair of incompatible two-outcome measurements can violate the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt Bell inequality, which has been proven by Wolf et al (2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 230402). In the case of more than two measurements the equivalence between incompatibility and Bell nonlocality is still an open problem, though partial results have recently been obtained. Here we show that the equivalence breaks for a special choice of three measurements. In particular, we present a set of three incompatible two-outcome measurements, such that if Alice measures this set, independent of the set of measurements chosen by Bob and the state shared by them, the resulting statistics cannot violate any Bell inequality. On the other hand, complementing the above result, we exhibit a set of N measurements for any that is -wise compatible, nevertheless it gives rise to Bell violation.
Measurements in quantum theory exhibit incompatibility, i.e., they can fail to be jointly measurable.An intuitive way to represent the (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements is via a hypergraph representing their joint measurability structure: its vertices represent measurements and its hyperedges represent (all and only) subsets of compatible measurements.Projective measurements in quantum theory realize (all and only) joint measurability structures that are graphs.On the other hand, general measurements represented by positive operator-valued measures (POVMs) can realize arbitrary joint measurability structures.Here we explore the scope of joint measurability structures realizable with qubit POVMs.We develop a technique that we term marginal surgery to obtain nontrivial joint measurability structures starting from a set of compatible measurements.We show explicit examples of marginal surgery on a special set of qubit POVMs to construct joint measurability structures such as N-cycle and N-Specker scenarios for any integer N 3.We also show the realizability of various joint measurability structures with N ∈ {4, 5, 6} vertices.In particular, we show that all possible joint measurability structures with N = 4 vertices are realizable.We conjecture that all joint measurability structures are realizable with qubit POVMs.This contrasts with the unbounded dimension required in R. Kunjwal et al. [Phys. Rev. A 89, 052126 (2014)].Our results also render this previous construction maximally efficient in terms of the required Hilbert space dimension.We also obtain a sufficient condition for the joint measurability of any set of binary qubit POVMs which powers many of our results and should be of independent interest.
Incompatibility of observables, or measurements, is one of the key features of quantum mechanics, related, among other concepts, to Heisenberg's uncertainty relations and Bell nonlocality. In this manuscript we show, however, that even though incompatible measurements are necessary for the violation of any Bell inequality, some relevant Bell-like inequalities may be obtained if compatibility relations are assumed between the local measurements of one (or more) of the parties. Hence, compatibility of measurements is not necessarily a drawback and may, however, be useful for the detection of Bell nonlocality and device-independent certification of entanglement.