Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics

Spatial, Temporal and Coherent Superposition of Quantum States, a Reinterpretation of the Quantum Superposition Principle

Ivan Georgiev Koprinkov

Published Jan 1, 2024• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Spatial, temporal and coherent superposition of quantum states is considered. A consistent interpretation of the simultaneous superposition of stationary quantum states within material wave packets is proposed.
DOI
10.4236/jamp.2024.1211244

Related papers

A Logical Interpretation of Quantum Superposition as a Consequence of Temporal Spreading

Branislav Hláčik

This paper presents a model of quantum superposition as a physical consequence of temporal spreading in quantum systems. Rather than describing superposition abstractly through wave functions, this model proposes a concrete physical mechanism: a microparticle does not exist at a single moment in the observer's time, but across an interval of times — which, from the observer's perspective, produces multiple simultaneous states. Wavefunction collapse is interpreted as temporal synchronization between the particle and its macroscopic environment — a mechanical, physical process requiring no role for consciousness. The model is applied to quantum entanglement, tunneling, and decoherence, with all phenomena explained by the same mechanism. A key property of the model is its bidirectional consistency: superposition implies temporal spreading and vice versa, distinguishing it from purely mathematical interpretations.

•Mar 7, 2026•0 citations

The time dependence of quantum states

A.P. French, Edwin F. Taylor

The quantum mechanics is most easily started from the experimentally observed discrete energy states of bound particles. The free particle may take on any energy whatever, which makes the quantum description of a free particle more awkward conceptually and mathematically than the quantum description of a bound particle. The construction of moving quantum spatial probabilities will require a superposition of stationary state wave functions of different energies. Any coherent superposition of energy eigen states for a particle represents a possible quantum state of that particle. The most important property of the spatial probability function for superposed energy states is that it changes with time. A moving probability that is limited spatially is called a packet and the corresponding quantum-mechanical description is called a packet state. The free-particle packet states examples satisfy the position-momentum uncertainty relation. Probably the most important application of the energy time uncertainty relation concerns the lifetimes of the excited states of atoms and nuclei.

Routledge eBooks•May 11, 2018•0 citations

On coherence and the transverse spatial extent of a neutron wave packet

C. F. Majkrzak, N. F. Berk, Brian B. Maranville +2 more

In the analysis of neutron scattering measurements of condensed matter structure, it normally suffices to treat the incident and scattered neutron beams as if composed of incoherent distributions of plane waves with wavevectors of different magnitudes and directions which are taken to define an instrumental resolution. However, despite the wide-ranging applicability of this conventional treatment, there are cases in which the wave function of an individual neutron in the beam must be described more accurately by a spatially localized packet, in particular with respect to its transverse extent normal to its mean direction of propagation. One such case involves the creation of orbital angular momentum (OAM) states in a neutron via interaction with a material device of a given size. It is shown in the work reported here that there exist two distinct measures of coherence of special significance and utility for describing neutron beams in scattering studies of materials in general. One measure corresponds to the coherent superposition of basis functions and their wavevectors which constitute each individual neutron packet state function whereas the other measure can be associated with an incoherent distribution of mean wavevectors of the individual neutron packets in a beam. Both the distribution of the mean wavevectors of individual packets in the beam as well as the wavevector components of the superposition of basis functions within an individual packet can contribute to the conventional notion of instrumental resolution. However, it is the transverse spatial extent of packet wavefronts alone that determines the area within which a coherent scattering process can occur in the first place. This picture is shown to be consistent with standard quantum theory. It is also demonstrated that these two measures of coherence can be distinguished from one another experimentally.

arXiv:1911.07974•Nov 18, 2019•0 citations

Coherent Superposition of Local States

A. L. Licht

The notion of coherent superposition is generalized so as to apply to local states.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 1968•0 citations

Discussions on the superposition principle of states in quantum mechanics

Guan Hong

The meaning of superposition principle of states in quantum mechanics is discussed.Comments on some expressions and explanations of it,and some statements of it using simple and plain words are given.

College Physics•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

The Double-Slit Experiment Reinterpreted: Matter-Wave Propagation and the Physical Mechanism of Quantum Interference

YOUNG HO GOH

The double-slit experiment has stood for a century as the paradigmatic demonstration of quantum superposition: the standard interpretation holds that a particle passes through both slits simultaneously, existing in a superposition of two spatially separated states. This paper proposes a physically distinct alternative: the particle's matter wave — a real physical wave propagating through space in accordance with de Broglie's relation λ = h/p — passes through both slits, while the particle itself (matter) remains in an undetermined state until a constructive interference maximum is formed at the detection screen. The particle does not simultaneously occupy two locations; the wave does. This distinction eliminates the need for superposition as an ontological commitment while fully reproducing the observed interference pattern. We further show that the disappearance of the interference pattern upon which-path measurement is explained without invoking wavefunction collapse: the measurement interaction redirects the matter wave to a single-slit geometry, eliminating the two-wave interference condition. Three experimentally testable predictions distinguish this framework from the standard interpretation: (1) weak-measurement trajectory reconstruction should reveal single particle paths inconsistent with simultaneous two-slit passage; (2) diffraction fringe spacing should depend on the mass density of the slit material, because denser slit edges generate a steeper refractive-index gradient for the matter wave; (3) the fringe pattern should exhibit a density-dependent phase shift measurable with current matter-wave interferometry technology. This reinterpretation requires no new mathematical formalism — the Schrödinger equation and Born's rule are retained — but replaces the ontological claim of simultaneous multi-location existence with the physically consistent picture of matter-wave propagation through an undetermined-state particle.

•Apr 22, 2026•0 citations
This paper presents a model of quantum superposition as a physical consequence of temporal spreading in quantum systems. Rather than describing superposition abstractly through wave functions, this model proposes a concrete physical mechanism: a microparticle does not exist at a single moment in the observer's time, but across an interval of times — which, from the observer's perspective, produces multiple simultaneous states. Wavefunction collapse is interpreted as temporal synchronization between the particle and its macroscopic environment — a mechanical, physical process requiring no role for consciousness. The model is applied to quantum entanglement, tunneling, and decoherence, with all phenomena explained by the same mechanism. A key property of the model is its bidirectional consistency: superposition implies temporal spreading and vice versa, distinguishing it from purely mathematical interpretations.
The quantum mechanics is most easily started from the experimentally observed discrete energy states of bound particles. The free particle may take on any energy whatever, which makes the quantum description of a free particle more awkward conceptually and mathematically than the quantum description of a bound particle. The construction of moving quantum spatial probabilities will require a superposition of stationary state wave functions of different energies. Any coherent superposition of energy eigen states for a particle represents a possible quantum state of that particle. The most important property of the spatial probability function for superposed energy states is that it changes with time. A moving probability that is limited spatially is called a packet and the corresponding quantum-mechanical description is called a packet state. The free-particle packet states examples satisfy the position-momentum uncertainty relation. Probably the most important application of the energy time uncertainty relation concerns the lifetimes of the excited states of atoms and nuclei.
In the analysis of neutron scattering measurements of condensed matter structure, it normally suffices to treat the incident and scattered neutron beams as if composed of incoherent distributions of plane waves with wavevectors of different magnitudes and directions which are taken to define an instrumental resolution. However, despite the wide-ranging applicability of this conventional treatment, there are cases in which the wave function of an individual neutron in the beam must be described more accurately by a spatially localized packet, in particular with respect to its transverse extent normal to its mean direction of propagation. One such case involves the creation of orbital angular momentum (OAM) states in a neutron via interaction with a material device of a given size. It is shown in the work reported here that there exist two distinct measures of coherence of special significance and utility for describing neutron beams in scattering studies of materials in general. One measure corresponds to the coherent superposition of basis functions and their wavevectors which constitute each individual neutron packet state function whereas the other measure can be associated with an incoherent distribution of mean wavevectors of the individual neutron packets in a beam. Both the distribution of the mean wavevectors of individual packets in the beam as well as the wavevector components of the superposition of basis functions within an individual packet can contribute to the conventional notion of instrumental resolution. However, it is the transverse spatial extent of packet wavefronts alone that determines the area within which a coherent scattering process can occur in the first place. This picture is shown to be consistent with standard quantum theory. It is also demonstrated that these two measures of coherence can be distinguished from one another experimentally.
The double-slit experiment has stood for a century as the paradigmatic demonstration of quantum superposition: the standard interpretation holds that a particle passes through both slits simultaneously, existing in a superposition of two spatially separated states. This paper proposes a physically distinct alternative: the particle's matter wave — a real physical wave propagating through space in accordance with de Broglie's relation λ = h/p — passes through both slits, while the particle itself (matter) remains in an undetermined state until a constructive interference maximum is formed at the detection screen. The particle does not simultaneously occupy two locations; the wave does. This distinction eliminates the need for superposition as an ontological commitment while fully reproducing the observed interference pattern. We further show that the disappearance of the interference pattern upon which-path measurement is explained without invoking wavefunction collapse: the measurement interaction redirects the matter wave to a single-slit geometry, eliminating the two-wave interference condition. Three experimentally testable predictions distinguish this framework from the standard interpretation: (1) weak-measurement trajectory reconstruction should reveal single particle paths inconsistent with simultaneous two-slit passage; (2) diffraction fringe spacing should depend on the mass density of the slit material, because denser slit edges generate a steeper refractive-index gradient for the matter wave; (3) the fringe pattern should exhibit a density-dependent phase shift measurable with current matter-wave interferometry technology. This reinterpretation requires no new mathematical formalism — the Schrödinger equation and Born's rule are retained — but replaces the ontological claim of simultaneous multi-location existence with the physically consistent picture of matter-wave propagation through an undetermined-state particle.