Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Is a Deterministic Completion of Quantum Mechanics Possible?

Guido Bacciagaluppi, Elise Crull

Published Nov 14, 2024• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

This is the first ever English translation of Heisenberg’s unpublished response to the EPR paper. In this chapter, Heisenberg uses his famous cut argument to argue against the possibility of hidden variables.
DOI
10.1017/9781139028493.018

Related papers

Heisenberg on EPR

Guido Bacciagaluppi, Elise Crull

This chapter introduces in more comprehensive fashion than elsewhere in the literature the interesting role of Heisenberg in the EPR debate. Although we have already published an analysis of Heisenberg’s posthumously published draft response to EPR, only now are we able to situate this excellent primary source in its fullest context, by contributing a chapter describing, for example, Heisenberg’s thinking prior to EPR about interacting systems and hidden variables, the crucial role of Grete Hermann for Heisenberg’s thinking about separability, completeness and observational context, and describing the correspondence between Heisenberg and Bohr discussing Heisenberg’s manuscript.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 14, 2024•0 citations

Translation of: W. Heisenberg, 'Ist eine deterministische Ergänzung der Quantenmechanik möglich?'

Guido Bacciagaluppi, Elise M. Crull

The publication of the EPR paper in 1935 prompted Heisenberg to draft a manuscript on the question of the completability of quantum mechanics (which was published only posthumously). We give here the English translation of this manuscript with a brief introduction and bibliography.

•May 2, 2011•8 citations

Schrödinger's unpublished hidden-variable model in the 1944-45 debate over the "Collapse of Determinism"

Flavio Del Santo

In the mid-1940s, the question of whether quantum mechanics could be supplemented by deterministic hidden variables resurfaced in a debate in ^textit{Nature}. I show that Erwin Schrödinger drafted a hitherto unpublished response to this controversy. In it, Schrödinger provided an explicit hidden-variable model, thereby showing that such models could not be ruled out. I reconstruct the historical context of this forgotten manuscript and publish here the first transcription and analysis. Importantly, Schrödinger's proposal should be understood as a proof of principle rather than as evidence of his commitment to determinism.

physics.hist-phCross-listedarXiv:2610.20752•Oct 16, 2026•0 citations

The Heisenberg Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Talk Slides)

Armin Nikkhah Shirazi

An online youtube talk of this presentation can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-JWhIff51w

•Mar 13, 2020•0 citations

A non-completeness argument for quantum mechanics (analysis of the EPR paper)

Yalçin Koç

Physics Letters A•Sep 1, 1980•5 citations

Hardy's Paradox as a No-go Result for Probabilistic Hidden Variables

Katsuaki Higashi

Hardy presented a famous argument that shows that there exist no hidden variables in quantum mechanics. His argument is called Hardy's paradox. The commentaries and discussions on Hardy's paradox have been ordinarily presented for deterministic hidden variables, and it has not been discussed whether a similar paradox will occurs in probabilistic hidden variables. So, first, I will show that Hardy's argument can also be applied to probabilistic hidden variables. After that, I discuss the common cause of a correlation, which has been actively discussed in the philosophy of science in recent years. That is because requiring the common cause of a quantum correlation is mathematically equivalent to introducing a probabilistic hidden variable to explain the correlation. Some researchers argued that in the non-existence proof of hidden variables, the existence of a common common-cause to multiple correlations is tacitly assumed, however that is unreasonably strong. According to their idea, it is sufficient if there exists a respective common-cause of each correlation. However, it will be revealed that at least as far as Hardy's paradox is concerned, merely weakening the common common-cause requirement to the respective common-cause requirement does not help to construct a local model.

Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations
This chapter introduces in more comprehensive fashion than elsewhere in the literature the interesting role of Heisenberg in the EPR debate. Although we have already published an analysis of Heisenberg’s posthumously published draft response to EPR, only now are we able to situate this excellent primary source in its fullest context, by contributing a chapter describing, for example, Heisenberg’s thinking prior to EPR about interacting systems and hidden variables, the crucial role of Grete Hermann for Heisenberg’s thinking about separability, completeness and observational context, and describing the correspondence between Heisenberg and Bohr discussing Heisenberg’s manuscript.
In the mid-1940s, the question of whether quantum mechanics could be supplemented by deterministic hidden variables resurfaced in a debate in ^textit{Nature}. I show that Erwin Schrödinger drafted a hitherto unpublished response to this controversy. In it, Schrödinger provided an explicit hidden-variable model, thereby showing that such models could not be ruled out. I reconstruct the historical context of this forgotten manuscript and publish here the first transcription and analysis. Importantly, Schrödinger's proposal should be understood as a proof of principle rather than as evidence of his commitment to determinism.
Hardy presented a famous argument that shows that there exist no hidden variables in quantum mechanics. His argument is called Hardy's paradox. The commentaries and discussions on Hardy's paradox have been ordinarily presented for deterministic hidden variables, and it has not been discussed whether a similar paradox will occurs in probabilistic hidden variables. So, first, I will show that Hardy's argument can also be applied to probabilistic hidden variables. After that, I discuss the common cause of a correlation, which has been actively discussed in the philosophy of science in recent years. That is because requiring the common cause of a quantum correlation is mathematically equivalent to introducing a probabilistic hidden variable to explain the correlation. Some researchers argued that in the non-existence proof of hidden variables, the existence of a common common-cause to multiple correlations is tacitly assumed, however that is unreasonably strong. According to their idea, it is sufficient if there exists a respective common-cause of each correlation. However, it will be revealed that at least as far as Hardy's paradox is concerned, merely weakening the common common-cause requirement to the respective common-cause requirement does not help to construct a local model.