Scaling, hyperscaling and finite-size scaling were long considered problematic in theories of critical phenomena in high dimensions. The scaling relations themselves form a model-independent structure that any model-specific theory must adhere to, and they are accounted for by the simple principle of homogeneity. Finite-size scaling is similarly founded on the fundamental idea that only two length scales enter the game — namely system length and correlation length. While all scaling relations are quite satisfactory for multitudes of physical systems in low dimensions, one fails in high dimensions. The aberrant scaling relation is called hyperscaling and involves dimensionality itself. Finite-size scaling also appears to fail in high dimensions. Developed in the 1930s, Landau mean-field theory is valid in such high-dimensional systems. However, it too does not accord with hyperscaling and finite-size scaling there. The advent of renormalization-group theory in the 1970s brought deeper fundamental insights into critical phenomena, allowing systems to be viewed at different scales. Above a critical dimensionality, higher-order Renormalization Group (RG) eigenvalues become irrelevant and scaling is governed by the Gaussian fixed point. Although obeying all scaling relations including hyperscaling, and although it appears to successfully explain scaling in the correlation sector, the Gaussian fixed point fails to capture the free energy and derivatives, even in infinite volume. In the 1980s, to fix this for the magnetisation, specific heat and susceptibility, Fisher introduced the notion of dangerous irrelevant variables. Since the correlation sector did not appear to be broken, no attempt was made to repair it and Fisher’s modified RG formalism worked quite well in the thermodynamic limit of infinite volume. However, finite-size scaling fails. Also in the 1980’s, Binder, Nauenberg, Privman and Young extended Fisher’s concept to the free energy itself and to finite-size systems. While putting Fisher’s ideas on a more fundamental footing, the failure of finite-size scaling there still presented a problem. This appeared to be resolved by the introduction of “thermodynamic length” to replace correlation length as the length scale that controls Finite-Size Scaling (FSS). Thus hyperscaling and FSS were both sacrificed in favour of the RG patched together by ad hoc solutions. In the 1990’s, Luijten and Blöte went a long way to resolving the dilemma by adding corrections to scaling to the above considerations. It was clear that both of these played a role. However, as with previous authors, and adhering to the principle of not fixing that appears not to be broken, they did not address correlation length directly. Here we report on developments over the past decade which went a long way to addressing these long-standing problems The key to unlocking these, and extending their validity to the high-dimensional regime, was to relax assumptions that the correlation length has to be bounded by the physical length of bounded systems. This allowed and necessitated the extension of Fisher’s concept of dangerous irrelevant variables to the correlation sector.
Scaling, hyperscaling and finite-size scaling were long considered problematic in theories of critical phenomena in high dimensions. The scaling relations themselves form a model-independent structure that any model-specific theory must adhere to, and they are accounted for by the simple principle of homogeneity. Finite-size scaling is similarly founded on the fundamental idea that only two length scales enter the game -- namely system length and correlation length. While all scaling relations are quite satisfactory for multitudes of physical systems in low dimensions, one fails in high dimensions...
In the 1960's, four famous scaling relations were developed which relate the six standard critical exponents describing continuous phase transitions in the thermodynamic limit of statistical physics models. They are well understood at a fundamental level through the renormalization group. They have been verified in multitudes of theoretical, computational and experimental studies and are firmly established and profoundly important for our understanding of critical phenomena. One of the scaling relations, hyperscaling, fails above the upper critical dimension. There, critical phenomena are governed by Gaussian fixed points in the renormalization-group formalism. Dangerous irrelevant variables are required to deliver the mean-field and Landau values of the critical exponents, which are deemed valid by the Ginzburg criterion. Also above the upper critical dimension, the standard picture is that, unlike for low-dimensional systems, finite-size scaling is non-universal. Here we report on new developments which indicate that the current paradigm is flawed and incomplete. In particular, the introduction of a new exponent characterising the finite-size correlation length allows one to extend hyperscaling beyond the upper critical dimension. Moreover, finite-size scaling is shown to be universal provided the correct scaling window is chosen. These recent developments also lead to the introduction of a new scaling relation analogous to one introduced by Fisher 50 years ago.
These lecture notes provide an overview of the renormalization group (RG) as a successful framework to understand critical phenomena above the upper critical dimension
duc. After an introduction to the scaling picture of continuous phase transitions, we discuss the apparent failure of the Gaussian fixed point to capture scaling for Landau mean-field theory, which should hold in the thermodynamic limit above
duc. We recount how Fisher's dangerous-irrelevant-variable formalism applied to thermodynamic functions partially repairs the situation but at the expense of hyperscaling and finite-size scaling, both of which were, until recently, believed not to apply above
duc. We recall limitations of various attempts to match the RG with analytical and numerical results for Ising systems. We explain how the extension of dangerous irrelevancy to the correlation sector is key to marrying the above concepts into a comprehensive RG scaling picture that renders hyperscaling and finite-size scaling valid in all dimensions. We collect what we believe is the current status of the theory, including some new insights and results. This paper is in grateful memory of Michael Fisher who introduced many of the concepts discussed and who, half a century later, contributed to their advancement.
These lecture notes provide an overview of the renormalization group (RG) as a successful framework to understand critical phenomena above the upper critical dimension d_{uc} d u c . After an introduction to the scaling picture of continuous phase transitions, we discuss the apparent failure of the Gaussian fixed point to capture scaling for Landau mean-field theory, which should hold in the thermodynamic limit above d_{uc} d u c . We recount how Fisher’s dangerous-irrelevant-variable formalism applied to thermodynamic functions partially repairs the situation but at the expense of hyperscaling and finite-size scaling, both of which were, until recently, believed not to apply above d_{uc} d u c . We recall limitations of various attempts to match the RG with analytical and numerical results for Ising systems. We explain how the extension of dangerous irrelevancy to the correlation sector is key to marrying the above concepts into a comprehensive RG scaling picture that renders hyperscaling and finite-size scaling valid in all dimensions. We collect what we believe is the current status of the theory, including some new insights and results. This paper is in grateful memory of Michael Fisher who introduced many of the concepts discussed and who, half a century later, contributed to their advancement.
In this project finite-size size scaling above the upper critical dimension
dc is investigated. Finite-size scaling there has long been poorly understood, especially its dependency on boundary conditions. The violation of the hyperscaling relation above
dc has also been one of the most visible issues. The breakdown in standard scaling is due to the dangerous irrelevant variables presented in the self-interacting term in the
ϕ4 theory, which were considered dangerous to the free energy density and associated thermodynamic functions, but not to the correlation sector. Recently, a modified finite-size scaling scheme has been proposed, which considers that the correlation length actually plays a pivotal role and is affected by dangerous variables too. This new scheme, named QFSS, considers that the correlation length, instead of having standard scaling behaviour
ξ∼L, scales as
ξ∼LϘ. This pseudocritical exponent is connected to the critical dimension and dangerous variables. Below
dc this exponent takes the value
Ϙ=1, but above the upper critical dimension it is
Ϙ=d/dc. QFSS succeeded in reconciling the mean-field exponents and FSS derived from the renormalisation-group for the models with short-range interactions above
dc with periodic boundary conditions. If
Ϙ is an universal exponent, the validity of that theory should also hold for the free boundary conditions. Initial tests for such systems faced new problems. Whereas QFSS is valid at pseudocritical points where quantities such as the magnetic susceptibility experience a peak for finite systems, at critical points the standard FSS seemed to prevail, i.e., mean-field exponents with
ξ∼L. Here, we show that this last picture at critical point is not correct and instead the exponents that applied there actually arise from the Gaussian fixed-point FSS where the dangerous variables are suppressed. To achieve this aim, we study Ising models with long-range interaction, which can be tuned above
dc, with periodic and free boundary conditions. We also include a study of the Fourier modes which can be used as an example of scaling quantities without dangerous variables.
Renormalization-group theory has stood, for over 40 years, as one of the pillars of modern physics. As such, there should be no remaining doubt regarding its validity. However, finite-size scaling, which derives from it, has long been poorly understood above the upper critical dimension d_{c} in models with free boundary conditions. In addition to its fundamental significance for scaling theories, the issue is important at a practical level because finite-size, statistical-physics systems with free boundaries and above d_{c} are experimentally relevant for long-range interactions. Here, we address the roles played by Fourier modes for such systems and show that the current phenomenological picture is not supported for all thermodynamic observables with either free or periodic boundaries. In particular, the expectation that dangerous irrelevant variables cause Gaussian-fixed-point scaling indices to be replaced by Landau mean-field exponents for all Fourier modes is incorrect. Instead, the Gaussian-fixed-point exponents have a direct physical manifestation for some modes above the upper critical dimension.