Quantum computing is tipped to lead the future of global technological progress. However, the obstacles related to quantum software development are an actual challenge to overcome. In this scenario, this work presents an implementation of the quantum search algorithm in Atos Quantum Assembly Language (AQASM) using the quantum software stack my Quantum Learning Machine (myQLM) and the programming development platform Quantum Learning Machine (QLM). We present the creation of a virtual quantum processor whose configurable architecture allows the analysis of induced quantum noise effects on the quantum algorithms. The codes are available throughout the manuscript so that readers can replicate them and apply the methods discussed in this article to solve their own quantum computing projects. The presented results are consistent with theoretical predictions and demonstrate that AQASM and QLM are powerful tools for building, implementing, and simulating quantum hardware.
Quantum computing is tipped to lead the future of global technological progress. However, the obstacles related to quantum software development are an actual challenge to overcome. In this scenario, this work presents an implementation of the quantum search algorithm in Atos Quantum Assembly Language (AQASM) using the quantum software stack my Quantum Learning Machine (myQLM) and the programming development platform Quantum Learning Machine (QLM). We present the creation of a virtual quantum processor whose configurable architecture allows the analysis of induced quantum noise effects on the quantum algorithms. The codes are available throughout the manuscript so that readers can replicate them and apply the methods discussed in this article to solve their own quantum computing projects. The presented results are consistent with theoretical predictions and demonstrate that AQASM and QLM are powerful tools for building, implementing, and simulating quantum hardware.
Quantum computing is tipped to lead the future of global technological progress. However, the obstacles related to quantum software development are an actual challenge to overcome. In particular, there is a discrepant lack of trained and skilled workforce to implement new quantum software on the recent quantum hardware. In this scenario, this work presents a didactic implementation of the quantum search algorithm in Atos Quantum Assembly Language (AQASM). In addition, we present the creation of a virtual quantum processor whose configurable architecture allows the analysis of induced quantum noise effects on the quantum algorithms. The codes are available throughout the manuscript so that readers, even those with little scientific computing experience, can replicate them and apply the methods discussed in this article to solve their own quantum computing projects. The presented results are consistent with theoretical predictions and demonstrate that AQASM and myQLM are powerful tools for teaching quantum computing and building, implementing, and simulating quantum hardware.
Abstract Effectively manipulating quantum computing (QC) hardware in the presence of imperfect devices and control systems is a central challenge in realizing useful quantum computers. Susceptibility to noise critically limits the performance and capabilities of today’s so-called noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, as well as any future QC technologies. Fortunately, quantum control enables efficient execution of quantum logic operations and quantum algorithms with built-in robustness to errors, and without the need for complex logical encoding. In this manuscript we introduce software tools for the application and integration of quantum control in QC research, serving the needs of hardware R&D teams, algorithm developers, and end users. We provide an overview of a set of Python-based classical software tools for creating and deploying optimized quantum control solutions at various layers of the QC software stack. We describe a software architecture leveraging both high-performance distributed cloud computation and local custom integration into hardware systems, and explain how key functionality is integrable with other software packages and quantum programming languages. Our presentation includes a detailed mathematical overview of key features including a flexible optimization toolkit, engineering-inspired filter functions for analyzing noise susceptibility in high-dimensional Hilbert spaces, and new approaches to noise and hardware characterization. Pseudocode is presented in order to elucidate common programming workflows for these tasks, and performance benchmarking is reported for numerically intensive tasks, highlighting the benefits of the selected cloud-compute architecture. Finally, we present a series of case studies demonstrating the application of quantum control solutions derived from these tools in real experimental settings using both trapped-ion and superconducting quantum computer hardware.
This article presents the definition and implementation of a quantum computer architecture to enable creating a new computational device-a quantum computer as an accelerator. A key question addressed is what such a quantum computer is and how it relates to the classical processor that controls the entire execution process. In this article, we present explicitly the idea of a quantum accelerator that contains the full stack of the layers of an accelerator. Such a stack starts at the highest level describing the target application of the accelerator. The next layer abstracts the quantum logic outlining the algorithm that is to be executed on the quantum accelerator. In our case, the logic is expressed in the universal quantum-classical hybrid computation language developed in the group, called OpenQL, which visualized the quantum processor as a computational accelerator. The OpenQL compiler translates the program to a common assembly language, called cQASM, which can be executed on a quantum simulator. The cQASM represents the instruction set that can be executed by the microarchitecture implemented in the quantum accelerator. In a subsequent step, the compiler can convert the cQASM to generate the eQASM, which is executable on a particular experimental device incorporating the platform-specific parameters. This way, we are able to distinguish clearly the experimental research toward better qubits, and the industrial and societal applications that need to be developed and executed on a quantum device. The first case offers experimental physicists with a full-stack experimental platform using realistic qubits with decoherence and error-rates, whereas the second case offers perfect qubits to the quantum application developer, where there is neither decoherence nor error-rates. We conclude the article by explicitly presenting three examples of full-stack quantum accelerators, for an experimental superconducting processor, for quantum accelerated genome sequencing and for near-term generic optimization problems based on quantum heuristic approaches. The two later full-stack models are currently being actively researched in our group.
Quantum microarchitecture is a key component in bridging the gap between quantum software and quantum hardware of a fully programmable quantum computer. Confronting the control problem of superconducting quantum processors, an experimental microarchitecture (QuMA) has been proposed in previous work. As the size of the target quantum chip continues to evolve, the complexity of QuMA scales up accordingly. This increase in complexity has led to a growing challenge in QuMA’s design, development, and verification. To solve these problems, we build a QuMA simulator which can automate the current QuMA verification process and accelerate the design phase of QuMA. We called this simulator QuMAsim. The first version of QuMAsim is based on CC-Light, an instance of QuMA for controlling a surface-7 superconducting qubit chip. Then this simulator is extended to be self-configurable for different quantum chips. Several applications are built based on this simulator. The verification platform consists of the simulator, the VHDL implementation of QuMA and a validator is designed to automate the verification procedure. In addition, we built a quantum virtual machine based on QuMAsim, which includes other quantum software and simulators to simulate the execution of quantum algorithms on each layer of the quantum computer. We demonstrate the potential of QuMAsim by performing some experiments with it and its applications, including the gearbox circuit simulation.
Major obstacles remain to the implementation of macroscopic quantum computing: hardware problems of noise, decoherence, and scaling; software problems of error correction; and, most important, algorithm construction. Finding truly quantum algorithms is quite difficult, and many of these genuine quantum algorithms, like Shor's prime factoring or phase estimation, require extremely long circuit depth for any practical application, which necessitates error correction. In contrast, we show that machine learning can be used as a systematic method to construct algorithms, that is, to non-algorithmically “program” quantum computers. Quantum machine learning enables us to perform computations without breaking down an algorithm into its gate “building blocks”, eliminating that difficult step and potentially increasing efficiency by simplifying and reducing unnecessary complexity. In addition, our non-algorithmic machine learning approach is robust to both noise and to decoherence, which is ideal for running on inherently noisy NISQ devices which are limited in the number of qubits available for error correction. We demonstrate this using a fundamentally nonclassical calculation: experimentally estimating the entanglement of an unknown quantum state. Results from this have been successfully ported to the IBM hardware and trained using a hybrid reinforcement learning method.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is emerging as a promising technology for tackling complex computational challenges, although its practical implementation faces significant obstacles owed to the inherent noise in current quantum devices. This paper presents a hybrid architecture that combines classical and quantum elements for the development and training of QML models under noisy conditions. This research evaluates the impact of noise on superconducting systems through emulation. The study shows that, compared to noise-free configurations, certain noise levels tend to allow for a reduction in the number of qubits, thus simplifying the architecture of the quantum neural network, which has a direct impact on the computational cost and execution times. Experimental validation was performed by applying three biomedical datasets related to breast cancer detection. The experimental findings revealed that the variations in accuracy between noiseless configurations and those subjected to noisy conditions were minimal, with deviations ranging from 0.11% to 1.68%. Additionally, it was observed that the incorporation of noise during training contributed positively to the efficiency of the process for the datasets under test, achieving improvements in training execution times ranging from a factor of 1.61 to 4.39, when the proposed architecture was emulated on Qaptiva 802.