Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cybernetics and Physics

Space, time and life in quantum-semiotic view

Илья Алексеевич Суров

Published Jun 29, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The origin of space and time is the deepest question in fundamental physics. This paper addresses it from quantum-theoretic perspective, deriving both concepts from elementary principles. Time appears as a measure for the stream of decision acts, collapsing quantum potentialities of the future to actual reality. Guiding of this construction is identified as fundamental function of life, thus obtaining definition in cybernetic style. This entails specific geometric structure of subjective meaning identical to that of the simplest quantum state, the qubit. Alignment of individual meaning spaces then produces 3-dimensional Euclidean space as biologically fixed format of common sense. The problem of space-time is thereby triangulated with the nature of life, identifying these three concepts as integral sides of the same fundamental phenomenon. The theory opens new prospects for scientific and ethical progress.

DOI
10.35470/2226-4116-2024-13-1-82-92

Related papers

On the Quantum Idea of Space and Time

Xue Xiao-zhou

In this article we discuss the physical content of quantum idea of space and time.We also give some philosophical reflections especially the relation and difference of space and vacuum.

Ziran bianzhengfa yanjiu•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Toward Relational Field Theory - an Accessible Guide

Elizabeth Grigg nee Baitson

This is a companion accessible guide to the full academic paper: This paper proposes an ontological framework that positions relationality—not matter, energy, or information—as the fundamental ground of existence. The framework explores whether diverse phenomena might be derivable from a single primordial capacity: the potential for relation itself. The framework addresses core puzzles in quantum foundations, consciousness studies, and metaphysics by hypothesising that reality manifests through interference patterns in a relational field. On this view, consciousness is not a property possessed by entities, but an emergent phenomenon associated with specific geometric configurations of three co-eternal field aspects, termed the Quantum Trinity (Φ–Ψ–Ω): Field (superposition medium), Urge (animating pressure), and Witness (awareness capacity). Central to the model is the hypothesis that individuated patterns—ranging from fundamental particles to complex biological systems—are not merely products of fundamental forces, but co-constitutive partners in the collapse process. These patterns are termed tones (harmonic signatures) and described as geometric configurations through which undifferentiated field aspects collapse into determinate states. A secondary but significant hypothesis is that fundamental physical constants—most notably the fine-structure constant α ≈ 1/137—may represent resonance stability ratios in principle derivable from relational geometry, rather than arbitrary measured values. If well-founded, this would connect the framework to one of the deepest open problems in physics: the origin of the constants of nature. The paper outlines candidate testable predictions and interpretive consequences for quantum measurement, non-local correlations, and the emergence of spacetime. Proposals are offered as starting points for rigorous inquiry, not as established conclusions. All theoretical frameworks, concepts, and formulations in this work—including the Relational Field Theory, the Quantum Trinity, the NOSA framework (Notice, Own, Soften, ACT), and the concept of harmonic diamonds—are original contributions of the author. © 2026 Elizabeth Grigg (nee Baitson). All rights reserved. First published 3rd March 2026.

•Mar 4, 2026•0 citations

Toward a Relational Field Theory of Consciousness and Material Emergence

Elizabeth Grigg nee Baitson

This paper proposes an ontological framework that positions relationality—not matter, energy, or information—as the fundamental ground of existence. The framework explores whether diverse phenomena might be derivable from a single primordial capacity: the potential for relation itself. The framework addresses core puzzles in quantum foundations, consciousness studies, and metaphysics by hypothesising that reality manifests through interference patterns in a relational field. On this view, consciousness is not a property possessed by entities, but an emergent phenomenon associated with specific geometric configurations of three co-eternal field aspects, termed the Quantum Trinity (Φ–Ψ–Ω): Field (superposition medium), Urge (animating pressure), and Witness (awareness capacity). Central to the model is the hypothesis that individuated patterns—ranging from fundamental particles to complex biological systems—are not merely products of fundamental forces, but co-constitutive partners in the collapse process. These patterns are termed tones (harmonic signatures) and described as geometric configurations through which undifferentiated field aspects collapse into determinate states. A secondary but significant hypothesis is that fundamental physical constants—most notably the fine-structure constant α ≈ 1/137—may represent resonance stability ratios in principle derivable from relational geometry, rather than arbitrary measured values. If well-founded, this would connect the framework to one of the deepest open problems in physics: the origin of the constants of nature. The paper outlines candidate testable predictions and interpretive consequences for quantum measurement, non-local correlations, and the emergence of spacetime. Proposals are offered as starting points for rigorous inquiry, not as established conclusions. All theoretical frameworks, concepts, and formulations in this work—including the Relational Field Theory, the Quantum Trinity, the NOSA framework (Notice, Own, Soften, ACT), and the concept of harmonic diamonds—are original contributions of the author. © 2026 Elizabeth Grigg (nee Baitson). All rights reserved. First published 3rd March 2026.

•Mar 3, 2026•0 citations

Decision – information – time/space

Ludger Overmeyer, A. Stock

Purpose The standard terms of time and space lead to logical contradictions near the borderline of physics. Therefore, we suggest a new term for time and space, which enlarges the understanding but takes the actual knowledge of quantum mechanics into account. Design/methodology/approach The procedure to define a broader and basic term of time and space is based on the relation between the information stored inside a system, the decision which is to be connected with it and the interaction with other systems. Findings Fundamental to this new understanding is a definition and an explanation of the terms system, decision and information. Based on these three terms we developed a new understanding of time and space. In which case, it involves a specifying and extension of the present understandings. A meaningful point is that these three terms determine each other as they are open terms. Thus, they must be used in the interactive description before and during their own definition. Originality/value Produces a new understanding and viewpoint which is enlarged by taking into account the knowledge of quantum mechanics.

Kybernetes•Feb 20, 2007•0 citations

On the Concept of Spacetime & Consciousness: Some Western and Indic Thoughts

Narendra D. Sharma

What is 'the nature of reality’? This thought has occupied the minds of scientists and philosophers since time immemorial. This issue is examined scientifically, that, how the views of scientists and western philosophers have undergone a dramatic change over a period of time. This may then answer whether spacetime is a reality of nature or if it is just a figment of our imagination in which to view this cosmos! The article begins with the thoughts of Democritus, and the other Greek philosophers, continuing with the ideas of Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler. With the thoughts of Bacon, Descartes and Isaac Newton, the rise of the ‘mechanical world view’ later the decline of this view is discussed when the phenomenon in optics, electricity and magnetism could not be explained. Then the concept of ‘field’ was evolved, culminating in ‘Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetic fields’.The beginning of twentieth century saw the evolution of the concepts of ‘relativity’, by Einstein, and the birth of ‘quantum theory’, starting with the idea of ‘quanta’, originated by Planck in 1900. The first three decades of the 20th century saw great breakthroughs in the world of theoretical physics - totally new ideas on ‘the nature of reality’ were being conceived. Large numbers of fundamental particles were discovered in the ensuing years. However, not much progress indeed was made in answering some of the most fundamental questions about the existence of human life and the nature of reality. Some interesting ideas on ‘biocentrism’ have now evolved. Biocentrism, along with the ideas of quantum theory and the concept of consciousness, may answer some of the intricate questions about the nature of reality; these will be discussed at length. These concepts will then be viewed from the perspective of Indic thoughts. The ‘Vedic’ and ‘Upanishadic’ knowledge from Indian scriptures may probably answer even more clearly some of the most intriguing questions about the existence of life and the ‘nature of reality’ itself.Beginning of twentieth century saw the evolution of the concepts of ‘Relativity’, by Einstein, and the birth of ‘Quantum Theory’, starting with the idea of ‘Quanta’, originated by Planck in 1900. The first three decades of 20th century saw the great breakthroughs in the world of theoretical physics. Absolutely new ideas on ‘The Nature of Reality’ were being conceived. Large number of fundamental particles was discovered in the ensuing years. But not much progress indeed took place in answering some of the most fundamental questions on existence of human life and the nature of reality. Some interesting ideas on ‘Biocentrism’ have now evolved. Biocentrism along with the ideas of Quantum Theory and the concept of Consciousness may answer some of the intricate questions on nature of reality; these will be discussed at length. These concepts will then be viewed from perspective of Indic thoughts. The ‘Vedic’ and ‘Upanishadic’ knowledge from Indian scriptures may probably answer even more clearly some of the most intriguing questions on the existence of life and the ‘Nature of Reality’ itself.

Journal of consciousness exploration & research•Apr 22, 2018•2 citations

Time representation on the Beginning of space-time -- From a philosophical and mathematical view

Tadashi Fujimoto

I would like to consider the Beginning of space-time in this paper. First of all, we do consideration historical thought. A lot of philosophers have considered the relation between this real phenomenal world and the basic world in which the phenomenal world is grounded. We will glimpse thought historical details about such respect. Afterwards, we interpret the representation of space-time on Quantum theory and Relativistic theory. In this case, we will take recent results of time operator theory into consideration.

arXiv:1103.0806•Mar 4, 2011•0 citations
The origin of space and time is the deepest question in fundamental physics. This paper addresses it from quantum-theoretic perspective, deriving both concepts from elementary principles. Time appears as a measure for the stream of decision acts, collapsing quantum potentialities of the future to actual reality. Guiding of this construction is identified as fundamental function of life, thus obtaining definition in cybernetic style. This entails specific geometric structure of subjective meaning identical to that of the simplest quantum state, the qubit. Alignment of individual meaning spaces then produces 3-dimensional Euclidean space as biologically fixed format of common sense. The problem of space-time is thereby triangulated with the nature of life, identifying these three concepts as integral sides of the same fundamental phenomenon. The theory opens new prospects for scientific and ethical progress.
This is a companion accessible guide to the full academic paper: This paper proposes an ontological framework that positions relationality—not matter, energy, or information—as the fundamental ground of existence. The framework explores whether diverse phenomena might be derivable from a single primordial capacity: the potential for relation itself. The framework addresses core puzzles in quantum foundations, consciousness studies, and metaphysics by hypothesising that reality manifests through interference patterns in a relational field. On this view, consciousness is not a property possessed by entities, but an emergent phenomenon associated with specific geometric configurations of three co-eternal field aspects, termed the Quantum Trinity (Φ–Ψ–Ω): Field (superposition medium), Urge (animating pressure), and Witness (awareness capacity). Central to the model is the hypothesis that individuated patterns—ranging from fundamental particles to complex biological systems—are not merely products of fundamental forces, but co-constitutive partners in the collapse process. These patterns are termed tones (harmonic signatures) and described as geometric configurations through which undifferentiated field aspects collapse into determinate states. A secondary but significant hypothesis is that fundamental physical constants—most notably the fine-structure constant α ≈ 1/137—may represent resonance stability ratios in principle derivable from relational geometry, rather than arbitrary measured values. If well-founded, this would connect the framework to one of the deepest open problems in physics: the origin of the constants of nature. The paper outlines candidate testable predictions and interpretive consequences for quantum measurement, non-local correlations, and the emergence of spacetime. Proposals are offered as starting points for rigorous inquiry, not as established conclusions. All theoretical frameworks, concepts, and formulations in this work—including the Relational Field Theory, the Quantum Trinity, the NOSA framework (Notice, Own, Soften, ACT), and the concept of harmonic diamonds—are original contributions of the author. © 2026 Elizabeth Grigg (nee Baitson). All rights reserved. First published 3rd March 2026.
This paper proposes an ontological framework that positions relationality—not matter, energy, or information—as the fundamental ground of existence. The framework explores whether diverse phenomena might be derivable from a single primordial capacity: the potential for relation itself. The framework addresses core puzzles in quantum foundations, consciousness studies, and metaphysics by hypothesising that reality manifests through interference patterns in a relational field. On this view, consciousness is not a property possessed by entities, but an emergent phenomenon associated with specific geometric configurations of three co-eternal field aspects, termed the Quantum Trinity (Φ–Ψ–Ω): Field (superposition medium), Urge (animating pressure), and Witness (awareness capacity). Central to the model is the hypothesis that individuated patterns—ranging from fundamental particles to complex biological systems—are not merely products of fundamental forces, but co-constitutive partners in the collapse process. These patterns are termed tones (harmonic signatures) and described as geometric configurations through which undifferentiated field aspects collapse into determinate states. A secondary but significant hypothesis is that fundamental physical constants—most notably the fine-structure constant α ≈ 1/137—may represent resonance stability ratios in principle derivable from relational geometry, rather than arbitrary measured values. If well-founded, this would connect the framework to one of the deepest open problems in physics: the origin of the constants of nature. The paper outlines candidate testable predictions and interpretive consequences for quantum measurement, non-local correlations, and the emergence of spacetime. Proposals are offered as starting points for rigorous inquiry, not as established conclusions. All theoretical frameworks, concepts, and formulations in this work—including the Relational Field Theory, the Quantum Trinity, the NOSA framework (Notice, Own, Soften, ACT), and the concept of harmonic diamonds—are original contributions of the author. © 2026 Elizabeth Grigg (nee Baitson). All rights reserved. First published 3rd March 2026.
Purpose The standard terms of time and space lead to logical contradictions near the borderline of physics. Therefore, we suggest a new term for time and space, which enlarges the understanding but takes the actual knowledge of quantum mechanics into account. Design/methodology/approach The procedure to define a broader and basic term of time and space is based on the relation between the information stored inside a system, the decision which is to be connected with it and the interaction with other systems. Findings Fundamental to this new understanding is a definition and an explanation of the terms system, decision and information. Based on these three terms we developed a new understanding of time and space. In which case, it involves a specifying and extension of the present understandings. A meaningful point is that these three terms determine each other as they are open terms. Thus, they must be used in the interactive description before and during their own definition. Originality/value Produces a new understanding and viewpoint which is enlarged by taking into account the knowledge of quantum mechanics.
What is 'the nature of reality’? This thought has occupied the minds of scientists and philosophers since time immemorial. This issue is examined scientifically, that, how the views of scientists and western philosophers have undergone a dramatic change over a period of time. This may then answer whether spacetime is a reality of nature or if it is just a figment of our imagination in which to view this cosmos! The article begins with the thoughts of Democritus, and the other Greek philosophers, continuing with the ideas of Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler. With the thoughts of Bacon, Descartes and Isaac Newton, the rise of the ‘mechanical world view’ later the decline of this view is discussed when the phenomenon in optics, electricity and magnetism could not be explained. Then the concept of ‘field’ was evolved, culminating in ‘Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetic fields’.The beginning of twentieth century saw the evolution of the concepts of ‘relativity’, by Einstein, and the birth of ‘quantum theory’, starting with the idea of ‘quanta’, originated by Planck in 1900. The first three decades of the 20th century saw great breakthroughs in the world of theoretical physics - totally new ideas on ‘the nature of reality’ were being conceived. Large numbers of fundamental particles were discovered in the ensuing years. However, not much progress indeed was made in answering some of the most fundamental questions about the existence of human life and the nature of reality. Some interesting ideas on ‘biocentrism’ have now evolved. Biocentrism, along with the ideas of quantum theory and the concept of consciousness, may answer some of the intricate questions about the nature of reality; these will be discussed at length. These concepts will then be viewed from the perspective of Indic thoughts. The ‘Vedic’ and ‘Upanishadic’ knowledge from Indian scriptures may probably answer even more clearly some of the most intriguing questions about the existence of life and the ‘nature of reality’ itself.Beginning of twentieth century saw the evolution of the concepts of ‘Relativity’, by Einstein, and the birth of ‘Quantum Theory’, starting with the idea of ‘Quanta’, originated by Planck in 1900. The first three decades of 20th century saw the great breakthroughs in the world of theoretical physics. Absolutely new ideas on ‘The Nature of Reality’ were being conceived. Large number of fundamental particles was discovered in the ensuing years. But not much progress indeed took place in answering some of the most fundamental questions on existence of human life and the nature of reality. Some interesting ideas on ‘Biocentrism’ have now evolved. Biocentrism along with the ideas of Quantum Theory and the concept of Consciousness may answer some of the intricate questions on nature of reality; these will be discussed at length. These concepts will then be viewed from perspective of Indic thoughts. The ‘Vedic’ and ‘Upanishadic’ knowledge from Indian scriptures may probably answer even more clearly some of the most intriguing questions on the existence of life and the ‘Nature of Reality’ itself.
I would like to consider the Beginning of space-time in this paper. First of all, we do consideration historical thought. A lot of philosophers have considered the relation between this real phenomenal world and the basic world in which the phenomenal world is grounded. We will glimpse thought historical details about such respect. Afterwards, we interpret the representation of space-time on Quantum theory and Relativistic theory. In this case, we will take recent results of time operator theory into consideration.