Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Information systems engineering and management

An Overview of Quantum Key Agreement Protocols

Youssouf Achouri, Rima Djellab, Khaled Hamouid

Published Jan 1, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-59318-5_1

Related papers

A brief review on Quantum Key Distribution Protocols

Mandeep Kumar, Bhaskar Mondal

Multimedia Tools and Applications•Jan 4, 2025•22 citations

Overview of Key Agreement Protocols.

Ratna Dutta, Rana Barua

•Jan 1, 2005•44 citations

Short Review on Quantum Key Distribution Protocols

Dimitris Giampouris

Advances in experimental medicine and biology•Jan 1, 2017•12 citations

Quantum Consensus: an overview

Marco Marcozzi, Leonardo Mostarda

We review the literature about reaching agreement in quantum networks, also called quantum consensus. After a brief introduction to the key feature of quantum computing, allowing the reader with no quantum theory background to have minimal tools to understand, we report a formal definition of quantum consensus and the protocols proposed. Proposals are classified according to the quantum feature used to achieve agreement.

arXiv:2101.04192•Jan 11, 2021•11 citations

Genuine Multipartite Entanglement is Not Necessary for Standard Device-Independent Conference Key Agreement

Lewis Wooltorton, Peter J. Brown, Roger Colbeck

Conference key agreement aims to establish shared, private randomness among many separated parties in a network. Device-independent conference key agreement (DICKA) is a variant in which the source and the measurement devices used by each party need not be trusted. So far, DICKA protocols largely fall into two categories: those that rely on violating a joint Bell inequality using genuinely multipartite entangled states and those that concatenate many bipartite protocols. The question of whether a hybrid protocol exists, where a multipartite Bell inequality can be violated using only bipartite entanglement, was asked by Grasselli et al. [Quantum 7, 980 (2023)2521-327X10.22331/q-2023-04-13-980]. We answer this question affirmatively, by constructing an asymptotically secure DICKA protocol achieving the same rate as the concatenation of bipartite device-independent quantum key distribution, yet relying on a single joint Bell violation. Our results prompt further discussion on the benefits of multipartite entanglement for DICKA over its bipartite alternative, and we give an overview of different arguments for near-term devices.

arXiv:2503.21290•Physical Review Letters•Sep 25, 2025•1 citation

Quantum Key Distribution Protocols

Ramona Wolf

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2021•9 citations
Conference key agreement aims to establish shared, private randomness among many separated parties in a network. Device-independent conference key agreement (DICKA) is a variant in which the source and the measurement devices used by each party need not be trusted. So far, DICKA protocols largely fall into two categories: those that rely on violating a joint Bell inequality using genuinely multipartite entangled states and those that concatenate many bipartite protocols. The question of whether a hybrid protocol exists, where a multipartite Bell inequality can be violated using only bipartite entanglement, was asked by Grasselli et al. [Quantum 7, 980 (2023)2521-327X10.22331/q-2023-04-13-980]. We answer this question affirmatively, by constructing an asymptotically secure DICKA protocol achieving the same rate as the concatenation of bipartite device-independent quantum key distribution, yet relying on a single joint Bell violation. Our results prompt further discussion on the benefits of multipartite entanglement for DICKA over its bipartite alternative, and we give an overview of different arguments for near-term devices.