Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica Scripta

‘The ‘Vector-Model’ wavefunction: spatial description and wavepacket formation of quantum-mechanical angular momenta’

Theodore Peter Rakitzis, Michail E. Koutrakis, George E. Katsoprinakis

Published May 21, 2024• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract We introduce the concept of an asymptotic spatial angular-momentum wavefunction, X m j φ , θ , χ = e im φ δ θ − θ m e i j + 1 2 χ , which treats j in the j m state as a three-dimensional entity; φ, θ, χ are the Euler angles, and θ m is the Vector-Model polar angle, given by cos θ m = m / j . A wealth of geometric information about j can be deduced from the eigenvalues and spatial transformation properties of the X m j φ , θ , χ . Specifically, the X m j φ , θ , χ

DOI
10.1088/1402-4896/ad4ea1

Related papers

The Vector-Model Wavefunction: spatial description and wavepacket formation of quantum-mechanical angular momenta

Theodore Peter Rakitzis, Michail E. Koutrakis, George E. Katsoprinakis

In quantum mechanics, spatial wavefunctions describe distributions of a particle's position or momentum, but not of angular momentum $j$. In contrast, here we show that a spatial wavefunction, $j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)=~e^{i m ϕ} δ(θ- θ_m) ~e^{i(j+1/2)χ}$, which treats $j$ in the $|jm>$ state as a three-dimensional entity, is an asymptotic eigenfunction of angular-momentum operators; $ϕ$, $θ$, $χ$ are the Euler angles, and $cos θ_m=(m/|j|)$ is the Vector-Model polar angle. The $j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)$ gives a computationally simple description of particle and orbital-angular-momentum wavepackets (constructed from Gaussian distributions in $j$ and $m$) which predicts the effective wavepacket angular uncertainty relations for $Δm Δϕ$, $Δj Δχ$, and $ΔϕΔθ$, and the position of the particle-wavepacket angular motion on the orbital plane. The particle-wavepacket rotation can be experimentally probed through continuous and non-destructive $j$-rotation measurements. We also use the $j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)$ to determine well-known asymptotic expressions for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Wigner d-functions, the gyromagnetic ratio of elementary particles, $g=2$, and the m-state-correlation matrix elements, $$. Interestingly, for low j, even down to $j=1/2$, these expressions are either exact (the last two) or excellent approximations (the first two), showing that $j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)$ gives a useful spatial description of quantum-mechanical angular momentum, and provides a smooth connection with classical angular momentum.

arXiv:2305.11456•May 19, 2023•0 citations

Spatial wavefunctions of spin

Theodore Peter Rakitzis

Abstract We present an alternative formulation of quantum mechanical angular momentum, based on spatial wavefunctions that depend on the Euler angles φ , θ , χ , and have an additional internal projection n . The wavefunctions are Wigner D-functions, D nm s ( φ , θ , χ ) , for which the body-fixed projection quantum number n has the unusual value n = s = s s + 1 = s , or n = 0 . We show that the states D s m s ( φ , θ , χ ) of elementary particles with spin s give a gyromagnetic ratio of g = 2 for s > 0 , and we identify these as the spatial angular-momentum wavefunctions of known fundamental charged particles with spin. All known Standard-Model particles can be categorized with either value n = s or n = 0 , and all known particle reactions are consistent with the conservation of its projection in the internal frame, and with internal-frame Clebsch-Gordan coefficients of unity. Therefore, we make the case that the D nm s ( φ , θ , χ ) are useful as spatial wavefunctions for spin. Some implications and new predictions related to the quantum number n for fundamental particles are discussed, such as the proposed Dirac-fermion nature of the neutrino, the explanation of some Standard-Model structure, and some proposed dark-matter candidates.

arXiv:2307.13591•Physica Scripta•Jan 23, 2025•2 citations

Orbital Angular Momentum

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Nicolai Friis

Abstract In this chapter we introduce the concept of orbital angular momentum into the mathematical language of quantum mechanics. We discuss the commutation relations of the corresponding operators and their roles as generators of rotations in the context of the theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras, focusing on the three-dimensional rotation group SO(3). We further examine how scalar and vector-valued operators transform under spatial rotations. We then turn to the derivation of the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the angular-momentum operators, for which we follow a dual approach in analogy to that employed for the harmonic oscillator in Chapter 5. Using both the algebraic ladder-operator method and an analytical method using spherical polar coordinates we discover the relevant azimuthal and magnetic quantum numbers and their relation to the spherical harmonics and the Legendre polynomials

•Sep 7, 2023•1 citation

Spatial distributions of angular momenta in quantum and quasiclassical stereodynamics

Marcelo P. de Miranda, F. Javier Aoiz, Vicente Sáez-Rábanos +1 more

We have recently reported a derivation of the relationship between the quantum and classical descriptions of angular momentum polarization [M. P. de Miranda and F. Javier Aoiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 083201 (2004)]. This paper presents a detailed account of the derivation outlined in that paper, and discusses the implications of the new results. These include (i) a new expression of the role of the uncertainty principle in the broadening of angular momentum distributions, (ii) the attribution of azimuthal fluctuations of angular momentum distributions to spatial quantum beats, (iii) the definition of a new Fourier transform of the density matrix, distinct from those suggested in the past, that provides an alternative view of how the quantum description of angular momentum polarization approaches the classical one in the correspondence principle limit, (iv) a prescription for the determination of a quasiclassical angular momentum distribution function that does not suffer from problems encountered with its purely classical counterpart, and (v) a description of how angular momentum distributions commonly visualized with recourse to the classical vector model can be depicted with exact and well-defined quantum mechanics.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Nov 11, 2004•44 citations

The spatial wavefunction of half-integer spins

Michel van Veenendaal

Abstract Within a nonrelativistic framework, spin is generally included as an intrinsic angular momentum. It is proposed here that consistent results can be obtained with a spatial wavefunction of an oriented complex exponential e ∓ i a ˆ φ , where the bivector i a ˆ is written in terms of the pseudoscalar i = e x e y e z and the axis of rotation given by the unit vector a ˆ , which is generally an (effective) magnetic field direction (this can also be written as e ∓ i σ · a ˆ φ in terms of the Pauli vector σ ). The wavefunction is a multivector and not a complex scalar. The signs in the exponential correspond to the two directions of rotation around the axis. The transformation properties of these wavefunctions are given by the Pauli spinors. Spin can be viewed as a zero-point rotation arising from the noncommutativity of the momentum and the vector potential.

Physica Scripta•Oct 25, 2023•0 citations

ORBITAL ANGULAR MOMENTUM

Mircea S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

The operator is contained in the expression (31.1) of the central field Hamiltonian, and this can be shown using Eq.(31.6), where the component operators are replaced by their forms (29.16) written in Cartesian coordinates, and this gives ⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−= z x x z z x x z y z z y y z z yL 222ˆ == ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂− x y y x x y y x2= It is a straightforward matter to show that this relation may also be written as ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= 2 2 yx z xz y zy xL = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+ z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy 222222 222 2= We now use the expansion ( )2 2ˆ ˆr p x y z x y zx y z x y z⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⋅ = − + + + +⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy z z y y x x so that the addition of the last two relations yields ( ) ( ) 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 22 2 2ˆ ˆLˆ r p x y z x y zx y zx y z⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ ⋅ = − + + + + + + +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = = ( )pripr ˆˆˆ 22 GG=G ⋅+= (31.10) It follows that the momentum can be expressed as ( ) ( ) ( ) rrr r r L r priprL r p ∂ ∂−⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ⋅−⋅+= 2 ˆ1ˆˆˆˆˆ1ˆ ==GG=GGG (31.11) where the radial part results from the substitution of Eq. (I.20), Appendix I, which gives 1 1ˆ sinr p i i e e e r r rθ ϕθ θ ϕ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂= − ∇ = − + +⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ G G G G= = and hence ˆ ˆr p i r r ∂⋅ = − ∂ G G = Therefore the Hamiltonian (31.1) becomes ( )rUL rrrr r rm H + ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ −∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−= 222 2 ˆ111 2 ˆ = = and reduces to the equivalent form ( )rUL rr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ −⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ 2 ˆ11 2 ˆ = = (31.12) used for a particle bound by a central force field. 31.2. EIGENVALUE EQUATIONS IN A CENTRAL FIELD Spherically symmetric systems, where the potential energy ( )rU is independent of the direction of ,rG are usually treated using the spherical coordinates ( )ϕθ ,,r related to the Cartesian coordinates as referred to in Appendix I, Eq.(I.19). As the angle θ is defined by the inclination to the z-axis, it is mathematically convenient to take the direction of the component of ( zyx ,, ) L G that is compatible with (in the sense introduced in Chapter 34) to be the z-axis. Therefore we consider the eigenvalue equations of the operators and given by ˆ ˆ, zH L 2Lˆ ( ) ( )ˆ , , , ,H r rθ ϕ ε θ ϕΨ = Ψ ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ rLrL zz Ψ=Ψ (31.13) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ 22 rLrL Ψ=Ψ The appropriate form of the Hamiltonian Hˆ is conveniently written using the standard expression (I.23) of the Laplace operator in spherical coordinates as 2∇ ( )rU rrr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 11 2 ˆ ϕθθθθθ = (31.14) Using the transformation (I.19) from Cartesian to spherical coordinates and the chain rule for differentiation, we find sin sin sin cosx y z r r x y x y z x y y θ ϕ θ ϕϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂= + + = − + = −∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂x so that the operator takes the form zLˆ ϕ∂ ∂=⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂= ix y y x i Lz ==ˆ (31.15) Furthermore, from Eqs.(31.12) and (31.14) it follows that is in fact expressed by that part of Hamiltonian which operates on the angular variables 2Lˆ ,θ ϕ only, that is, ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 1ˆ ϕθθθθθ=L (31.16) The energy eigenfunctions in central field, which are simultaneously eigenfunctions of and are subjected, in addition to the usual bound state requirement (30.21), to the single-valueness condition zLˆ 2ˆ ,L ( ) ( )πϕθϕθ 2,,,, +Ψ=Ψ rr since the points ϕ and πϕ 2+ are in fact the same physical point. The solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation (31.13) in central field can be found by a process of separation of variables, yielding three ordinary differential equations in the variables ,r θ and ,ϕ respectively, to which a physical significance will be assigned. It is common practice to separate the variables in two stages, first substituting the trial solution ( ) ( ) ( ), , ,r R r Yθ ϕΨ = θ ϕ (31.17) into the energy eigenvalue equation. If the Hamiltonian is expanded in spherical coordinates, as given by Eq.(31.14), Eq.(31.13) becomes ( )2 22 2 2 21 1 1 sin2 2 sin sin 21R Y Yr U r r m R r r m Y ε θθ θ θ θ ϕ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎡ ⎤+ − = − +⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ = = (31.18) One side is independent of θ and ,ϕ and the other side is independent of r, so they must be separately equal to some constant, which is conveniently chosen to be equal to In this way we obtain a radial equation, given by .2/2 mL ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrU dr dr dr d rm ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛− 2 2 1 2 = (31.19) where was replaced by for obvious reasons, and an angular equation, having the so-called spherical harmonics r∂∂ / drd / ( ),Y θ ϕ as solutions, which reads 2 2 ˆor sin 1sin sin 1 ==⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂− ϕθθθθθ= (31.20) The form of the spherical harmonics is obtained as a result of the second stage of the separation process, where we assume that ( ) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ Φ= PY , so that Eq.(31.20) becomes 2 2 1sinsinsin ϕθθθθ θ ∂ Φ∂ Φ−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ +⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ === LP P (31.21) Since one side is independent of ϕ while the other is independent of ,θ they must each be equal to a constant, which we call We thus obtain the differential equations .2zL d L dϕ Φ 2− = Φ= (31.22) where again ϕ∂∂ / has been replaced by ϕdd / , and 0 sin sin sin 1 22 ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ −+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ PLL d dP d d z θθθθθ === (31.23) where θ∂∂ / has been replaced by θdd / . Therefore the energy equation (31.13) completely separates, in central field, into a radial equation (31.19) and two angular equations (31.22) and (31.23). The radial equation, giving the energy levels ε of the system, takes the form ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrUrR dr d rdr d m ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ +− 2 2 2 2 = (31.24) which can be simplified by making the substitution ( ) ( )rrRr =ξ (31.25) and using the identity 2 1r dd d r dr r rdr dr ξ ξ⎛ ⎞+ =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ r Thus Eq.(31.24) reduces to ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rr mr LrU dr rd m εξξξ =⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++− 2 22 = (31.26) which is formally identical to the time-independent Schrödinger equation in one dimension (30.17), provided the central force potential ( )rU is replaced by an effective potential energy of the form ( ) ( ) 2 2 2mr LrUrUeff += The repulsive potential, associated with the angular momentum, modifies the central potential as illustrated before, see Figure 3.3, for ( ) rCrU /−= . Further progress with the solution of the radial equation depends on the particular form of the potential function . We shall consider the significant example of one-electron atoms in the next chapter.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 8, 2014•1 citation
Abstract We introduce the concept of an asymptotic spatial angular-momentum wavefunction, X m j φ , θ , χ = e im φ δ θ − θ m e i j + 1 2 χ , which treats j in the j m state as a three-dimensional entity; φ, θ, χ are the Euler angles, and θ m is the Vector-Model polar angle, given by cos θ m = m / j . A wealth of geometric information about j can be deduced from the eigenvalues and spatial transformation properties of the X m j φ , θ , χ . Specifically, the X m j φ , θ , χ
In quantum mechanics, spatial wavefunctions describe distributions of a particle's position or momentum, but not of angular momentum jjj. In contrast, here we show that a spatial wavefunction, jm(ϕ,θ,χ)= eimϕδ(θ−θm) ei(j+1/2)χj_m (ϕ,θ,χ)=~e^{i m ϕ} δ(θ- θ_m) ~e^{i(j+1/2)χ}jm​(ϕ,θ,χ)= eimϕδ(θ−θm​) ei(j+1/2)χ, which treats jjj in the ∣jm>|jm>∣jm> state as a three-dimensional entity, is an asymptotic eigenfunction of angular-momentum operators; ϕϕϕ, θθθ, χχχ are the Euler angles, and cosθm=(m/∣j∣)cos θ_m=(m/|j|)cosθm​=(m/∣j∣) is the Vector-Model polar angle. The jm(ϕ,θ,χ)j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)jm​(ϕ,θ,χ) gives a computationally simple description of particle and orbital-angular-momentum wavepackets (constructed from Gaussian distributions in jjj and mmm) which predicts the effective wavepacket angular uncertainty relations for ΔmΔϕΔm ΔϕΔmΔϕ, ΔjΔχΔj ΔχΔjΔχ, and ΔϕΔθΔϕΔθΔϕΔθ, and the position of the particle-wavepacket angular motion on the orbital plane. The particle-wavepacket rotation can be experimentally probed through continuous and non-destructive jjj-rotation measurements. We also use the jm(ϕ,θ,χ)j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)jm​(ϕ,θ,χ) to determine well-known asymptotic expressions for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Wigner d-functions, the gyromagnetic ratio of elementary particles, g=2g=2g=2, and the m-state-correlation matrix elements, $$. Interestingly, for low j, even down to j=1/2j=1/2j=1/2, these expressions are either exact (the last two) or excellent approximations (the first two), showing that jm(ϕ,θ,χ)j_m (ϕ,θ,χ)jm​(ϕ,θ,χ) gives a useful spatial description of quantum-mechanical angular momentum, and provides a smooth connection with classical angular momentum.
Abstract We present an alternative formulation of quantum mechanical angular momentum, based on spatial wavefunctions that depend on the Euler angles φ , θ , χ , and have an additional internal projection n . The wavefunctions are Wigner D-functions, D nm s ( φ , θ , χ ) , for which the body-fixed projection quantum number n has the unusual value n = s = s s + 1 = s , or n = 0 . We show that the states D s m s ( φ , θ , χ ) of elementary particles with spin s give a gyromagnetic ratio of g = 2 for s > 0 , and we identify these as the spatial angular-momentum wavefunctions of known fundamental charged particles with spin. All known Standard-Model particles can be categorized with either value n = s or n = 0 , and all known particle reactions are consistent with the conservation of its projection in the internal frame, and with internal-frame Clebsch-Gordan coefficients of unity. Therefore, we make the case that the D nm s ( φ , θ , χ ) are useful as spatial wavefunctions for spin. Some implications and new predictions related to the quantum number n for fundamental particles are discussed, such as the proposed Dirac-fermion nature of the neutrino, the explanation of some Standard-Model structure, and some proposed dark-matter candidates.
Abstract In this chapter we introduce the concept of orbital angular momentum into the mathematical language of quantum mechanics. We discuss the commutation relations of the corresponding operators and their roles as generators of rotations in the context of the theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras, focusing on the three-dimensional rotation group SO(3). We further examine how scalar and vector-valued operators transform under spatial rotations. We then turn to the derivation of the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the angular-momentum operators, for which we follow a dual approach in analogy to that employed for the harmonic oscillator in Chapter 5. Using both the algebraic ladder-operator method and an analytical method using spherical polar coordinates we discover the relevant azimuthal and magnetic quantum numbers and their relation to the spherical harmonics and the Legendre polynomials
We have recently reported a derivation of the relationship between the quantum and classical descriptions of angular momentum polarization [M. P. de Miranda and F. Javier Aoiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 083201 (2004)]. This paper presents a detailed account of the derivation outlined in that paper, and discusses the implications of the new results. These include (i) a new expression of the role of the uncertainty principle in the broadening of angular momentum distributions, (ii) the attribution of azimuthal fluctuations of angular momentum distributions to spatial quantum beats, (iii) the definition of a new Fourier transform of the density matrix, distinct from those suggested in the past, that provides an alternative view of how the quantum description of angular momentum polarization approaches the classical one in the correspondence principle limit, (iv) a prescription for the determination of a quasiclassical angular momentum distribution function that does not suffer from problems encountered with its purely classical counterpart, and (v) a description of how angular momentum distributions commonly visualized with recourse to the classical vector model can be depicted with exact and well-defined quantum mechanics.
Abstract Within a nonrelativistic framework, spin is generally included as an intrinsic angular momentum. It is proposed here that consistent results can be obtained with a spatial wavefunction of an oriented complex exponential e ∓ i a ˆ φ , where the bivector i a ˆ is written in terms of the pseudoscalar i = e x e y e z and the axis of rotation given by the unit vector a ˆ , which is generally an (effective) magnetic field direction (this can also be written as e ∓ i σ · a ˆ φ in terms of the Pauli vector σ ). The wavefunction is a multivector and not a complex scalar. The signs in the exponential correspond to the two directions of rotation around the axis. The transformation properties of these wavefunctions are given by the Pauli spinors. Spin can be viewed as a zero-point rotation arising from the noncommutativity of the momentum and the vector potential.
The operator is contained in the expression (31.1) of the central field Hamiltonian, and this can be shown using Eq.(31.6), where the component operators are replaced by their forms (29.16) written in Cartesian coordinates, and this gives ⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂−= z x x z z x x z y z z y y z z yL 222ˆ == ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂− x y y x x y y x2= It is a straightforward matter to show that this relation may also be written as ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= 2 2 yx z xz y zy xL = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+ z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy 222222 222 2= We now use the expansion ( )2 2ˆ ˆr p x y z x y zx y z x y z⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⋅ = − + + + +⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂+∂ ∂−= z z y y x x xz zx zy yz yx xy z z y y x x so that the addition of the last two relations yields ( ) ( ) 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 22 2 2ˆ ˆLˆ r p x y z x y zx y zx y z⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+ ⋅ = − + + + + + + +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠G G = = ( )pripr ˆˆˆ 22 GG=G ⋅+= (31.10) It follows that the momentum can be expressed as ( ) ( ) ( ) rrr r r L r priprL r p ∂ ∂−⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ⋅−⋅+= 2 ˆ1ˆˆˆˆˆ1ˆ ==GG=GGG (31.11) where the radial part results from the substitution of Eq. (I.20), Appendix I, which gives 1 1ˆ sinr p i i e e e r r rθ ϕθ θ ϕ ⎛ ⎞∂ ∂ ∂= − ∇ = − + +⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ G G G G= = and hence ˆ ˆr p i r r ∂⋅ = − ∂ G G = Therefore the Hamiltonian (31.1) becomes ( )rUL rrrr r rm H + ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ −∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−= 222 2 ˆ111 2 ˆ = = and reduces to the equivalent form ( )rUL rr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ −⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ 2 ˆ11 2 ˆ = = (31.12) used for a particle bound by a central force field. 31.2. EIGENVALUE EQUATIONS IN A CENTRAL FIELD Spherically symmetric systems, where the potential energy ( )rU is independent of the direction of ,rG are usually treated using the spherical coordinates ( )ϕθ ,,r related to the Cartesian coordinates as referred to in Appendix I, Eq.(I.19). As the angle θ is defined by the inclination to the z-axis, it is mathematically convenient to take the direction of the component of ( zyx ,, ) L G that is compatible with (in the sense introduced in Chapter 34) to be the z-axis. Therefore we consider the eigenvalue equations of the operators and given by ˆ ˆ, zH L 2Lˆ ( ) ( )ˆ , , , ,H r rθ ϕ ε θ ϕΨ = Ψ ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ rLrL zz Ψ=Ψ (31.13) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ ,,,,ˆ 22 rLrL Ψ=Ψ The appropriate form of the Hamiltonian Hˆ is conveniently written using the standard expression (I.23) of the Laplace operator in spherical coordinates as 2∇ ( )rU rrr r rrm H +⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 11 2 ˆ ϕθθθθθ = (31.14) Using the transformation (I.19) from Cartesian to spherical coordinates and the chain rule for differentiation, we find sin sin sin cosx y z r r x y x y z x y y θ ϕ θ ϕϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂= + + = − + = −∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂x so that the operator takes the form zLˆ ϕ∂ ∂=⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂−∂ ∂= ix y y x i Lz ==ˆ (31.15) Furthermore, from Eqs.(31.12) and (31.14) it follows that is in fact expressed by that part of Hamiltonian which operates on the angular variables 2Lˆ ,θ ϕ only, that is, ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂−= 2 sin 1sin sin 1ˆ ϕθθθθθ=L (31.16) The energy eigenfunctions in central field, which are simultaneously eigenfunctions of and are subjected, in addition to the usual bound state requirement (30.21), to the single-valueness condition zLˆ 2ˆ ,L ( ) ( )πϕθϕθ 2,,,, +Ψ=Ψ rr since the points ϕ and πϕ 2+ are in fact the same physical point. The solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation (31.13) in central field can be found by a process of separation of variables, yielding three ordinary differential equations in the variables ,r θ and ,ϕ respectively, to which a physical significance will be assigned. It is common practice to separate the variables in two stages, first substituting the trial solution ( ) ( ) ( ), , ,r R r Yθ ϕΨ = θ ϕ (31.17) into the energy eigenvalue equation. If the Hamiltonian is expanded in spherical coordinates, as given by Eq.(31.14), Eq.(31.13) becomes ( )2 22 2 2 21 1 1 sin2 2 sin sin 21R Y Yr U r r m R r r m Y ε θθ θ θ θ ϕ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎡ ⎤+ − = − +⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ = = (31.18) One side is independent of θ and ,ϕ and the other side is independent of r, so they must be separately equal to some constant, which is conveniently chosen to be equal to In this way we obtain a radial equation, given by .2/2 mL ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrU dr dr dr d rm ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛− 2 2 1 2 = (31.19) where was replaced by for obvious reasons, and an angular equation, having the so-called spherical harmonics r∂∂ / drd / ( ),Y θ ϕ as solutions, which reads 2 2 ˆor sin 1sin sin 1 ==⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ∂ ∂+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂− ϕθθθθθ= (31.20) The form of the spherical harmonics is obtained as a result of the second stage of the separation process, where we assume that ( ) ( ) ( )ϕθϕθ Φ= PY , so that Eq.(31.20) becomes 2 2 1sinsinsin ϕθθθθ θ ∂ Φ∂ Φ−=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ +⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ === LP P (31.21) Since one side is independent of ϕ while the other is independent of ,θ they must each be equal to a constant, which we call We thus obtain the differential equations .2zL d L dϕ Φ 2− = Φ= (31.22) where again ϕ∂∂ / has been replaced by ϕdd / , and 0 sin sin sin 1 22 ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ −+⎟⎠ ⎞⎜⎝ ⎛ PLL d dP d d z θθθθθ === (31.23) where θ∂∂ / has been replaced by θdd / . Therefore the energy equation (31.13) completely separates, in central field, into a radial equation (31.19) and two angular equations (31.22) and (31.23). The radial equation, giving the energy levels ε of the system, takes the form ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rRrR mr LrUrR dr d rdr d m ε=⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ +− 2 2 2 2 = (31.24) which can be simplified by making the substitution ( ) ( )rrRr =ξ (31.25) and using the identity 2 1r dd d r dr r rdr dr ξ ξ⎛ ⎞+ =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ r Thus Eq.(31.24) reduces to ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rr mr LrU dr rd m εξξξ =⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ ++− 2 22 = (31.26) which is formally identical to the time-independent Schrödinger equation in one dimension (30.17), provided the central force potential ( )rU is replaced by an effective potential energy of the form ( ) ( ) 2 2 2mr LrUrUeff += The repulsive potential, associated with the angular momentum, modifies the central potential as illustrated before, see Figure 3.3, for ( ) rCrU /−= . Further progress with the solution of the radial equation depends on the particular form of the potential function . We shall consider the significant example of one-electron atoms in the next chapter.