We have recently reported a derivation of the relationship between the quantum and classical descriptions of angular momentum polarization [M. P. de Miranda and F. Javier Aoiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 083201 (2004)]. This paper presents a detailed account of the derivation outlined in that paper, and discusses the implications of the new results. These include (i) a new expression of the role of the uncertainty principle in the broadening of angular momentum distributions, (ii) the attribution of azimuthal fluctuations of angular momentum distributions to spatial quantum beats, (iii) the definition of a new Fourier transform of the density matrix, distinct from those suggested in the past, that provides an alternative view of how the quantum description of angular momentum polarization approaches the classical one in the correspondence principle limit, (iv) a prescription for the determination of a quasiclassical angular momentum distribution function that does not suffer from problems encountered with its purely classical counterpart, and (v) a description of how angular momentum distributions commonly visualized with recourse to the classical vector model can be depicted with exact and well-defined quantum mechanics.
We have recently reported a derivation of the relationship between the quantum and classical descriptions of angular momentum polarization [M. P. de Miranda and F. Javier Aoiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 083201 (2004)]. This paper presents a detailed account of the derivation outlined in that paper, and discusses the implications of the new results. These include (i) a new expression of the role of the uncertainty principle in the broadening of angular momentum distributions, (ii) the attribution of azimuthal fluctuations of angular momentum distributions to spatial quantum beats, (iii) the definition of a new Fourier transform of the density matrix, distinct from those suggested in the past, that provides an alternative view of how the quantum description of angular momentum polarization approaches the classical one in the correspondence principle limit, (iv) a prescription for the determination of a quasiclassical angular momentum distribution function that does not suffer from problems encountered with its purely classical counterpart, and (v) a description of how angular momentum distributions commonly visualized with recourse to the classical vector model can be depicted with exact and well-defined quantum mechanics.
This Letter presents a derivation of the relationship between the quantum and classical descriptions of angular momentum polarization. The results involve an "uncertainty broadening" term that directly expresses the restrictions imposed by the uncertainty principle. It is argued that neglect of this term can lead to error in the interpretation of theoretical or experimental angular momentum polarization data. Functions that take the uncertainty broadening into account, appropriate for use in quantum or quasiclassical descriptions of spatial distributions of angular momenta, are defined.
In quantum mechanics, spatial wavefunctions describe distributions of a particle's position or momentum, but not of angular momentum j. In contrast, here we show that a spatial wavefunction, jm(ϕ,θ,χ)=eimϕδ(θ−θm)ei(j+1/2)χ, which treats j in the ∣jm> state as a three-dimensional entity, is an asymptotic eigenfunction of angular-momentum operators; ϕ, θ, χ are the Euler angles, and cosθm=(m/∣j∣) is the Vector-Model polar angle. The jm(ϕ,θ,χ) gives a computationally simple description of particle and orbital-angular-momentum wavepackets (constructed from Gaussian distributions in j and m) which predicts the effective wavepacket angular uncertainty relations for ΔmΔϕ, ΔjΔχ, and ΔϕΔθ, and the position of the particle-wavepacket angular motion on the orbital plane. The particle-wavepacket rotation can be experimentally probed through continuous and non-destructive j-rotation measurements. We also use the jm(ϕ,θ,χ) to determine well-known asymptotic expressions for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Wigner d-functions, the gyromagnetic ratio of elementary particles, g=2, and the m-state-correlation matrix elements, $$. Interestingly, for low j, even down to j=1/2, these expressions are either exact (the last two) or excellent approximations (the first two), showing that jm(ϕ,θ,χ) gives a useful spatial description of quantum-mechanical angular momentum, and provides a smooth connection with classical angular momentum.
This work demonstrates that the quantum mechanical moments of a state described by the density matrix correspond to discrete spherical harmonic moments of the classical multipole expansion of the spatial distribution of the angular momentum vectors. For the diagonal density matrix elements, this work exploits the fact that the quantum mechanical vector coupling (Clebsch-Gordan) coefficients become increasingly accurate discrete representations of spherical harmonics as j increases. A Schwinger-type basis accounts for nonaxially symmetric angular distributions, which result in nonzero off-diagonal elements of the density matrix. The resulting discrete minimum uncertainty picture of the classical moments has a stringent equivalence with the quantum mechanical one for all j and provides an unambiguous connection for the classical and quantum moments in the large j limit. The equivalence is numerically tested for simple models, and there is a satisfying equivalence even for small j. Applications, implications, and extensions are indicated, and the relevance of this work for the interpretation of classical mechanical simulations of inelastic and reactive molecular collisions will be documented elsewhere.
Coherent angular momentum states are defined for the two-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator. They share many attractive properties with the familiar (Cartesian) coherent states, but are in general distinct from those states. The probabilities of obtaining particular values for the radial and angular momentum quantum numbers follow independent Poisson distributions in the new states, but not in the old. In a quasiclassical description of the oscillator, corresponding to a given classical trajectory, the uncertainty in the angular momentum of the system is smaller if the new states are used rather than the old. The new states are the natural analogs of the coherent angular momentum states introduced for the three-dimensional oscillator by Bracken and Leemon [A. J. Bracken and H. I. Leemon, J. Math. Phys. 22, 719 (1981)].
A standard description of the angular momentum in atomic or molecular physics is based on quantum mechanics. However, especially at large angular-momentum limit in molecules, sometimes a classical approach greatly simplifies problems that are extremely complicated from a quantum-mechanical viewpoint. The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between the classical and quantum descriptions of the angular-momentum distribution in an ensemble of particles. At first glance, quantum and classical approaches appear to be absolutely different and have very little in common. In this paper this relationship is analyzed. It is shown that similarities can be found between the precession of angular momentum in the external field and the influence of this field upon the wave-function phase of a microparticle. The importance of wave function phases is stressed even for stationary conditions, and some examples of coherent superposition of quantum states are presented. The general method of how to pass from the quantum approach to a classical one is formulated. Results are visualized in the form of 3D distribution functions. This approach allows a graphical interpretation and thus results in a better understanding, sometimes at first glance, of counterintuitive quantum results. As an example the phenomenon of alignment- orientation transition is considered. Rather than presenting only formal derivations, the emphasis is on the instructional aspects, and on illustrating the general approach.
The Wigner representation of angular-momentum orientation in the classical limit on $J\ensuremath{\gg}1$ has been used to derive an equation of angular-momentum motion in the case of a closed two-level system interacting with an arbitrary polarized radiation. This equation enables us to carry out a theoretical analysis of angular-momentum motion and consider final states of the quantum system for all types of dipole transitions. We have found that in the case of a zero magnetic field in the final state of the system with $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{J}J$ or $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{J}J+1$ optical transition, the angular momentum is directed along or opposite to the wave vector of the radiation depending on the sign of the polarization ellipsity, while for a linear polarization the angular momentum is isotropically distributed on the plane orthogonal to the polarization vector. For the $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{J}J\ensuremath{-}1$ transition two directions of angular momentum are possible in the final state. These directions are determined by the ellipsity of polarization. The spatial size of the final distribution of the angular momentum has been defined by the quantum uncertainty, 1/J, of the angular-momentum orientation. In the case of the $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{J}J\ensuremath{-}1$ or $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{J}J,$ transition particles come into ``dark'' states while for the $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{J}J+1$ transition they occupy the ``brightest'' state. In the presence of a nonzero magnetic field, particles with $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{J}J$ transition have in the final state only one angular-momentum orientation, i.e., along or opposite to the direction of the magnetic field depending on the polarization ellipsity sign. For the $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{J}J+1$ transition both directions are possible, i.e., along and opposite to the magnetic field. In the case of the $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{J}J\ensuremath{-}1$ transition the directions of the angular momentum form a cone around the magnetic field.