Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Scientific American

Is the Schrödinger Equation True?

John Horgan

Published Feb 1, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/scientificamerican022021-1oyxdkfghhjsljidakcd23

Related papers

The Math Behind the Schrodinger Equation

Doug Jensen

•Feb 1, 2020•0 citations

Derivation of the Schrödinger equation IV: Stochastic and the Langevin Equations for Quantum Mechanics

Olavo Leopoldino da Silva Filho, Marcello Caio Ramon e Barros Ferreira

This is the fourth paper of a series devoted to mathematically derive the Schrödinger equation using stochastic constructs. We then show that Quantum Mechanics has a stochastic support by following two paths: we first present a stochastic derivation already known in the literature and show that it is equivalent to the characteristic function derivation, made by us in the first paper of this series. However, this approach does not furnish the true stochastic dynamics of the quantum mechanical system, but only an averaged one. We then present a new derivation of the Schrödinger equation based on Langevin equations that present all features of a true stochastic system. These two approaches then improve our understanding of Quantum Mechanics to encompass stochastic behavior.

Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física•Jan 1, 2024•1 citation

Semiclassical stochastic representation of the Feynman integral

Zbigniew Haba

We show that for a wide class of analytic potentials the solution of the Schrodinger equation can be expressed by the Wiener integral. We express the Feynman kernel by the Brownian bridge. We prove an asymptotic semiclassical expansion of the solution of the Schrodinger equation as well as of the Feynman kernel. We show that for a small time the van Vleck formula holds true as the limit h(cross) to 0 of the Feynman kernel.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 7, 1994•14 citations

Schrödinger's Equation and Quantum Mechanics

акустика Механика

Betascript Publishing eBooks•Aug 2, 2010•0 citations

Comments on the Basis of Wave Mechanics

Mohamed Ashraf Farouk

Copenhagen physicists said; The electronics that we use today-radio, televisions, computers, lasers, MRI machines GPS-communications- depend on calculations using Schrodinger’s equation plus a lot of other Mathematics and Measurements, our idea of “shut up and calculate” has worked very well for us technologically. My comment’s these technological achievements do not justify that the equation itself as (I will try show) has any true scientific basis. In 1925, Erwin Schrodinger wrote excitingly to Einstein. “I have been intensely concerned these days with Louis de Broglie’s theory [1]. It is extraordinary, exciting, but still has some very grave difficulties”. So regardless of you are consider Schrodinger’s equation is a fundamental equation (has no derivation from simples forms) or derived one, you cannot deny first that Schrodinger’s equation is a wave equation and second it is shows how (de Broglie hypothesis of) matter wave change with time. i.e. Schrodinger equation describe the evaluation of the physical system in which the quantum effects, the “Wave-particle” duality are significant.

Research & Development in Material Science•Nov 10, 2020•0 citations

How Did Schrödinger Get His Equation?

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Aug 1, 2009•0 citations
This is the fourth paper of a series devoted to mathematically derive the Schrödinger equation using stochastic constructs. We then show that Quantum Mechanics has a stochastic support by following two paths: we first present a stochastic derivation already known in the literature and show that it is equivalent to the characteristic function derivation, made by us in the first paper of this series. However, this approach does not furnish the true stochastic dynamics of the quantum mechanical system, but only an averaged one. We then present a new derivation of the Schrödinger equation based on Langevin equations that present all features of a true stochastic system. These two approaches then improve our understanding of Quantum Mechanics to encompass stochastic behavior.
Copenhagen physicists said; The electronics that we use today-radio, televisions, computers, lasers, MRI machines GPS-communications- depend on calculations using Schrodinger’s equation plus a lot of other Mathematics and Measurements, our idea of “shut up and calculate” has worked very well for us technologically. My comment’s these technological achievements do not justify that the equation itself as (I will try show) has any true scientific basis. In 1925, Erwin Schrodinger wrote excitingly to Einstein. “I have been intensely concerned these days with Louis de Broglie’s theory [1]. It is extraordinary, exciting, but still has some very grave difficulties”. So regardless of you are consider Schrodinger’s equation is a fundamental equation (has no derivation from simples forms) or derived one, you cannot deny first that Schrodinger’s equation is a wave equation and second it is shows how (de Broglie hypothesis of) matter wave change with time. i.e. Schrodinger equation describe the evaluation of the physical system in which the quantum effects, the “Wave-particle” duality are significant.