Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics

Double Groups and Their Representations

Jörg Bünemann

Published Jan 1, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-55268-7_11

Related papers

Representations of the Space Groups

Nikolai Borisovich Melnikov, Boris Il'ich Reser

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Representation theory of Gaussian unitary transformations for bosonic and fermionic systems

Tommaso Guaita, Lucas Hackl, Thomas Quella

Gaussian unitary transformations are generated by quadratic Hamiltonians, i.e., Hamiltonians containing quadratic terms in creations and annihilation operators, and are heavily used in many areas of quantum physics, ranging from quantum optics and condensed matter theory to quantum information and quantum field theory in curved spacetime. They are known to form a representation of the metaplectic and spin group for bosons and fermions, respectively. These groups are the double covers of the symplectic and special orthogonal group, respectively, and our goal is to analyze the behavior of the sign ambiguity that one needs to deal with when moving between these groups and their double cover. We relate this sign ambiguity to expectation values of the form $\langle 0|\exp{(-i\hat{H})}|0\rangle$, where $|0\rangle$ is a Gaussian state and $\hat{H}$ an arbitrary quadratic Hamiltonian. We provide closed formulas for $\langle 0|\exp{(-i\hat{H})}|0\rangle$ and show how we can efficiently describe group multiplications in the double cover without the need of going to a faithful representation on an exponentially large or even infinite-dimensional space. Our construction relies on an explicit parametrization of these two groups (metaplectic, spin) in terms of symplectic and orthogonal group elements together with a twisted U(1) group.

arXiv:2409.11628•Annals of Physics•Oct 17, 2026•3 citations

Semidual Kitaev lattice model and tensor network representation

Florian Girelli, Prince K. Osei, Abdulmajid Osumanu

Kitaev's lattice models are usually defined as representations of the Drinfeld quantum double $D(H)=H\bowtie H^{*\text{op}} $, as an example of a double cross product quantum group. We propose a new version based instead on $M(H)=H^{\text{cop}}\blacktriangleright\!\!\!\triangleleft H$ as an example of Majid's bicrossproduct quantum group, related by semidualisation or `quantum Born reciprocity' to $D(H)$. Given a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra $H$, we show that a quadrangulated oriented surface defines a representation of the bicrossproduct quantum group $H^{\text{cop}}\blacktriangleright\!\!\!\triangleleft H$. Even though the bicrossproduct has a more complicated and entangled coproduct, the construction of this new model is relatively natural as it relies on the use of the covariant Hopf algebra actions. Working locally, we obtain an exactly solvable Hamiltonian for the model and provide a definition of the ground state in terms of a tensor network representation.

arXiv:1709.00522•Sep 2, 2017•0 citations

Representation of Groups

Sadri Hassani

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2013•33 citations

Semidual Kitaev lattice model and tensor network representation

Florian Girelli, Prince K. Osei, Abdulmajid Osumanu

Abstract Kitaev’s lattice models are usually defined as representations of the Drinfeld quantum double D(H) = H ⋈ H*op, as an example of a double cross product quantum group. We propose a new version based instead on M(H) = Hcop ⧑ H as an example of Majid’s bicrossproduct quantum group, related by semidualisation or ‘quantum Born reciprocity’ to D(H). Given a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra H, we show that a quadrangulated oriented surface defines a representation of the bicrossproduct quantum group Hcop ⧑ H. Even though the bicrossproduct has a more complicated and entangled coproduct, the construction of this new model is relatively natural as it relies on the use of the covariant Hopf algebra actions. Working locally, we obtain an exactly solvable Hamiltonian for the model and provide a definition of the ground state in terms of a tensor network representation.

Journal of High Energy Physics•Sep 1, 2021•7 citations

GROUP THEORY AND PHASE TRANSITIONS

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Dec 1, 2023•0 citations
Gaussian unitary transformations are generated by quadratic Hamiltonians, i.e., Hamiltonians containing quadratic terms in creations and annihilation operators, and are heavily used in many areas of quantum physics, ranging from quantum optics and condensed matter theory to quantum information and quantum field theory in curved spacetime. They are known to form a representation of the metaplectic and spin group for bosons and fermions, respectively. These groups are the double covers of the symplectic and special orthogonal group, respectively, and our goal is to analyze the behavior of the sign ambiguity that one needs to deal with when moving between these groups and their double cover. We relate this sign ambiguity to expectation values of the form ⟨0∣exp⁡(−iH^)∣0⟩\langle 0|\exp{(-i\hat{H})}|0\rangle⟨0∣exp(−iH^)∣0⟩, where ∣0⟩|0\rangle∣0⟩ is a Gaussian state and H^\hat{H}H^ an arbitrary quadratic Hamiltonian. We provide closed formulas for ⟨0∣exp⁡(−iH^)∣0⟩\langle 0|\exp{(-i\hat{H})}|0\rangle⟨0∣exp(−iH^)∣0⟩ and show how we can efficiently describe group multiplications in the double cover without the need of going to a faithful representation on an exponentially large or even infinite-dimensional space. Our construction relies on an explicit parametrization of these two groups (metaplectic, spin) in terms of symplectic and orthogonal group elements together with a twisted U(1) group.
Kitaev's lattice models are usually defined as representations of the Drinfeld quantum double $D(H)=H\bowtie H^{*\text{op}} $, as an example of a double cross product quantum group. We propose a new version based instead on M(H)=Hcop▶ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣◃HM(H)=H^{\text{cop}}\blacktriangleright\!\!\!\triangleleft HM(H)=Hcop▶◃H as an example of Majid's bicrossproduct quantum group, related by semidualisation or `quantum Born reciprocity' to D(H)D(H)D(H). Given a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra HHH, we show that a quadrangulated oriented surface defines a representation of the bicrossproduct quantum group Hcop▶ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣◃HH^{\text{cop}}\blacktriangleright\!\!\!\triangleleft HHcop▶◃H. Even though the bicrossproduct has a more complicated and entangled coproduct, the construction of this new model is relatively natural as it relies on the use of the covariant Hopf algebra actions. Working locally, we obtain an exactly solvable Hamiltonian for the model and provide a definition of the ground state in terms of a tensor network representation.
Abstract Kitaev’s lattice models are usually defined as representations of the Drinfeld quantum double D(H) = H ⋈ H*op, as an example of a double cross product quantum group. We propose a new version based instead on M(H) = Hcop ⧑ H as an example of Majid’s bicrossproduct quantum group, related by semidualisation or ‘quantum Born reciprocity’ to D(H). Given a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra H, we show that a quadrangulated oriented surface defines a representation of the bicrossproduct quantum group Hcop ⧑ H. Even though the bicrossproduct has a more complicated and entangled coproduct, the construction of this new model is relatively natural as it relies on the use of the covariant Hopf algebra actions. Working locally, we obtain an exactly solvable Hamiltonian for the model and provide a definition of the ground state in terms of a tensor network representation.