Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Representations of the Space Groups

Nikolai Borisovich Melnikov, Boris Il'ich Reser

Published Jan 1, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-13991-8_5

Related papers

Separability criteria via wavelet transform on homogenous spaces and projective representations

Mahdi Karamati, Mohammad Reza Rezapour

Abstract The intimate connection between the Banach space wavelet reconstruction method for each unitary representation of a given group and homogenous space, and the quantum entanglement description using group theory were both studied in our previous articles. Here, we present a universal description of quantum entanglement using group theory and non-commutative characteristic functions for homogenous space and projective representation of compact groups on Banach spaces for some well known examples, such as: Moyal representation for a spin; Dihedral and Permutation groups.

Open Physics•Jul 23, 2009•0 citations

Representation of Groups

Sadri Hassani

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2013•33 citations

Double Groups and Their Representations

Jörg Bünemann

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Particle statistics from induced representations of a local current group

Gerald A. Goldin, Ralph Menikoff, D. H. Sharp

Representations of the nonrelativistic current group 𝒮-𝒦 are studied in the Gel’fand–Vilenkin formalism, where 𝒮 is Schwartz’ space of rapidly decreasing functions, and 𝒦 is a group of diffeomorphisms of Rs. For the case of N identical particles, information about particle statistics is contained in a representation of 𝒦F (the stability group of a point F∈𝒮′) which factors through the permutation group SN. Starting from a quasi-invariant measure μ concentrated on a 𝒦 orbit Δ in 𝒮′, together with a suitable representation of 𝒦F for F∈Δ, sufficient conditions are developed for inducing a representation of 𝒮-𝒦. The Hilbert space for the induced representation consists of square-integrable functions on a covering space of Δ, which transform in accordance with a representation of 𝒦F. The Bose and Fermi N-particle representations (on spaces of symmetric or antisymmetric wave functions) are recovered as induced representations. Under the conditions which are assumed, the following results hold: (1) A representation of 𝒮-𝒦 determines a well-defined representation of 𝒦F; (2) equivalent representations of 𝒮-𝒦 determine equivalent representations of 𝒦F; (3) a representation of 𝒦F induces a representation of 𝒮-𝒦; and (4) equivalent representations of 𝒦F determine equivalent induced representations.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 1980•169 citations

The General Theory of Representations

Pure and applied physics•Jan 1, 1959•0 citations

Quantum symmetries and the Weyl Wigner product of group representations

Anthony J. Bracken, G Cassinelli, J G Wood

In the usual formulation of quantum mechanics, groups of automorphisms of quantum states have ray representations by unitary and antiunitary operators on complex Hilbert space, in accordance with Wigner's theorem. In the phase-space formulation, they have real, true unitary representations in the space of square-integrable functions on phase space. Each such phase-space representation is a Weyl–Wigner product of the corresponding Hilbert space representation with its contragredient, and these can be recovered by 'factorizing' the Weyl–Wigner product. However, not every real, unitary representation on phase space corresponds to a group of automorphisms, so not every such representation is in the form of a Weyl–Wigner product and can be factorized. The conditions under which this is possible are examined. Examples are presented.

arXiv:math-ph/0211001•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jan 15, 2003•13 citations
Abstract The intimate connection between the Banach space wavelet reconstruction method for each unitary representation of a given group and homogenous space, and the quantum entanglement description using group theory were both studied in our previous articles. Here, we present a universal description of quantum entanglement using group theory and non-commutative characteristic functions for homogenous space and projective representation of compact groups on Banach spaces for some well known examples, such as: Moyal representation for a spin; Dihedral and Permutation groups.
Representations of the nonrelativistic current group 𝒮-𝒦 are studied in the Gel’fand–Vilenkin formalism, where 𝒮 is Schwartz’ space of rapidly decreasing functions, and 𝒦 is a group of diffeomorphisms of Rs. For the case of N identical particles, information about particle statistics is contained in a representation of 𝒦F (the stability group of a point F∈𝒮′) which factors through the permutation group SN. Starting from a quasi-invariant measure μ concentrated on a 𝒦 orbit Δ in 𝒮′, together with a suitable representation of 𝒦F for F∈Δ, sufficient conditions are developed for inducing a representation of 𝒮-𝒦. The Hilbert space for the induced representation consists of square-integrable functions on a covering space of Δ, which transform in accordance with a representation of 𝒦F. The Bose and Fermi N-particle representations (on spaces of symmetric or antisymmetric wave functions) are recovered as induced representations. Under the conditions which are assumed, the following results hold: (1) A representation of 𝒮-𝒦 determines a well-defined representation of 𝒦F; (2) equivalent representations of 𝒮-𝒦 determine equivalent representations of 𝒦F; (3) a representation of 𝒦F induces a representation of 𝒮-𝒦; and (4) equivalent representations of 𝒦F determine equivalent induced representations.
In the usual formulation of quantum mechanics, groups of automorphisms of quantum states have ray representations by unitary and antiunitary operators on complex Hilbert space, in accordance with Wigner's theorem. In the phase-space formulation, they have real, true unitary representations in the space of square-integrable functions on phase space. Each such phase-space representation is a Weyl–Wigner product of the corresponding Hilbert space representation with its contragredient, and these can be recovered by 'factorizing' the Weyl–Wigner product. However, not every real, unitary representation on phase space corresponds to a group of automorphisms, so not every such representation is in the form of a Weyl–Wigner product and can be factorized. The conditions under which this is possible are examined. Examples are presented.