In this paper, we present a stochastic approach to relativistic quantum mechanics. We formulate the three fundamental principles of this theory and derive the Dirac equations based on them. This approach enables us to bring more insight into the nature of Dirac's spinors. Furthermore, we provide a physical interpretation of the stochastic optimal control theory of quantum mechanics.
In this paper, we present a stochastic approach to relativistic quantum mechanics. We formulate the three fundamental principles of this theory and derive the Dirac equations based on them. This approach enables us to bring more insight into the nature of Dirac's spinors. Furthermore, we provide a physical interpretation of the stochastic optimal control theory of quantum mechanics.
The main contribution of this paper is to explain where the imaginary structure comes from in quantum mechanics. It is shown how the demand of relativistic invariance is key and how the geometric structure of the spacetime together with the demand of linearity are fundamental in understanding the foundations of quantum mechanics. We derive the Stueckelberg covariant wave equation from first principles via a stochastic control scheme. From the Stueckelberg wave equation a Telegrapher's equation is deduced, from which the classical relativistic and nonrelativistic equations of quantum mechanics can be derived in a straightforward manner. We therefore provide meaningful insight into quantum mechanics by deriving the concepts from a coordinate invariant stochastic optimization problem, instead of just stating postulates.
Abstract The Dirac equation, central to relativistic quantum mechanics, governs spin- 1 2 particles and their antiparticles, with each spinor component satisfying a Klein–Gordon-type equation—the quantum counterpart of the relativistic mass-shell condition. In our prior work (Yordanov 2024 Sci. Rep. 14 6507), we derived the Dirac equation using stochastic optimal control (SOC) theory by linearizing both the Lagrangian’s kinetic term and the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation, but that earlier linearized derivation did not preserve the relativistic mass-shell condition. Here, we formulate the SOC problem starting from a specified covariant Lagrangian for a single relativistic charged particle in an external electromagnetic field, in which the standard relativistic square-root kinetic term and the minimal electromagnetic coupling are retained in their original form. In addition, the Lagrangian is supplemented by a covariant spin-field coupling term describing the interaction of the particle’s intrinsic spin with the electromagnetic field. Because this spin-field term is matrix-valued, it is incorporated through scalarization so that the HJB problem remains scalar. To retain a scalar HJB formulation, the present construction is restricted to electromagnetic backgrounds for which σ μ ν F μ ν admits a spacetime-independent eigenspinor; the Dirac equation is then obtained in the corresponding fixed spin sector. This yields a relativistically consistent SOC derivation in which the ℏ → 0 limit of the HJB equation recovers the proper-time relativistic Hamilton–Jacobi equation, whose stationary form yields the classical mass-shell condition, while the stationary HJB equation yields the quantum-corrected mass-shell relation. We illustrate the theory with stochastic simulations of the Dirac–Landau problem (electron in a uniform magnetic field): at the analytic optimal drift the average stochastic action attains a local minimum, and the average action components are consistent with the Dirac–Landau values within statistical uncertainty.
This paper re-examines the key aspects of Dirac's derivation of his relativistic equation for the electron in order advance our understanding of the nature of quantum field theory. Dirac's derivation, the paper argues, follows the key principles behind Heisenberg's discovery of quantum mechanics, which, the paper also argues, transformed the nature of both theoretical and experimental physics vis-a-vis classical physics and relativity. However, the limit theory (a crucial consideration for both Dirac and Heisenberg) in the case of Dirac's theory was quantum mechanics, specifically, Schrodinger's equation, while in the case of quantum mechanics, in Heisenberg's version, the limit theory was classical mechanics. Dirac had to find a new equation, Dirac's equation, along with a new type of quantum variables, while Heisenberg, to find new theory, was able to use the equations of classical physics, applied to different, quantum-mechanical variables. In this respect, Dirac's task was more similar to that of Schrodinger in his work on his version of quantum mechanics. Dirac's equation reflects a more complex character of quantum electrodynamics or quantum field theory in general and of the corresponding (high-energy) experimental quantum physics vis-a-vis that of quantum mechanics and the (low-energy) experimental quantum physics. The final section examines this greater complexity and its implications for fundamental physics.
Purpose. The Dirac equation is one of the fundamental equations of modern theoretical physics. It is in service more than 90 years (1928–2018). The application today is much wider than the areas of quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, atomic and nuclear physics, solid state physics. The successful derivation of some equation of mathematical physics is the first step to successful application. In such process the essence of the corresponding model of nature, the mathematical principles and the physical foundations are visualized. Here we deal with the different approaches to the problem of the Dirac equation derivation. Methods. The quantum-mechanical, quantum field-theoretical, group-theoretical, algebraic, symmetrical, statistical, stochastical and numerical approaches are used. Results. The 26 different ways of the Dirac equation derivation are presented. The various physical principles and mathematical formalisms are used. Three original approaches of the authors to the problem are given. They are (i) the generalization of H. Sallhofer derivation, (ii) the obtaining of the massless Dirac equation from the Maxwell equations in maximally symmetrical form, (iii) the derivation of the Dirac equation with nonzero mass from the relativistic quantum mechanics of the fermion-antifermion spin s = 1/2 doublet. In some sense the role of the Dirac equation today is demonstrated. Conclusions. The original investigation of the problem of the Dirac equation derivation is presented. The different approaches, which are based on the various mathematical and physical principles, are considered (26 methods). Therole of the scientists from Uzhhorod is shown. The importance of place of the Dirac equation in modern theoretical physics is discussed.
This paper extends the stochastic electrodynamic framework of Papers 1, 2, and 3 [1–3] to relativistic quantum mechanics, deriving the Dirac equation from the relativistic Coulomb field. The non-relativistic Brownian motion of Paper 1 is generalised to a four-dimensional stochastic process in Minkowski spacetime, parameterised by proper time τ . The relativistic diffusion coefficient isD4D = ℏ/m—exactly twice the non-relativistic value ℏ/2m—arising from the additional contribution of the temporal component of the four-dimensional Wiener process. The covariant zero-point field spectral tensor Sμν(ω) = (ℏω^3/6π^2ϵ0c^3)gμν is derived from the relativistic Coulomb field through the Lorentz-covariant Einstein–Hopf detailed balance and the ergodic theorem, whose applicability to the SED electron-vacuum system is proved in Paper 3 [3]. Relativistic stochastic optimal control gives the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation in four-dimensional configuration space, which yields the Klein–Gordon equation for spin-0 particles through the relativistic Itô correction (ℏ/2m)□. Linearisation of the relativistic Lagrangian −mc√uμuμ via Dirac matrices γμ satisfying {γμ, γν} = 2gμν converts the second-order HJB equation into a first-order equation—the Dirac equation: (iℏγμ∂μ−eγμAμ/c−mc)ψ = 0. The central new result is that spin- 1/2 is not introduced by the linearisation: it is already present in the geometry of the four-dimensional stochastic path. The mass-shell constraint uμuμ = −c^2 forces the relativistic Brownian path to be helical, with radius ℏ/mc and angular frequency 2mc^2/ℏ (Zitterbewegung). The angular momentum of this helix is ℏ/2 (spin- 1/2 ) and the magnetic moment gives g = 2—both following from the Coulomb field without additional assumptions. The linearisation then finds the unique first-order wave equation consistent with this pre-existing helical spin structure. The four-component Dirac spinor encodes four degrees of freedom already determined by the stochastic path: two spin states (helix handedness) and two time directions (particle/antiparticle).