Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Symmetry

A Mini-Review of the Kinetic Energy Partition Method in Quantum Mechanics

Yu-Hsin Chen, I-Huan Wu, Sheng Der Chao

Published Mar 1, 2024• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Based on the idea of adiabatic symmetry, we present a novel basis set expansion method—the kinetic energy partition (KEP) method—for solving quantum eigenvalue problems. Broken symmetry is responsible for quantum entanglement in many-body systems via parametric non-adiabatic corrections. Starting from simple one-particle-in-one-dimension problems, we gradually increase the complexity in the number of particles and the interaction patterns. Our goal in the mini-review is to advocate for the utility of the KEP method in front-line research, in particular for research beginners in quantum many-body problems.

DOI
10.3390/sym16030290

Related papers

A split kinetic energy solution scheme applied to various delta potentials in quantum mechanical systems

Yu-Hsin Chen, Sheng Der Chao

In this work, we extend the split previously developed kinetic energy (dubbed as KEP) method Mineo and Chao (2012) by modifying the mass parameter to include the mass. We first show how to separate the total system into the subsystems with 3 attractive delta potentials by using the KEP method. For repulsive delta potentials, we introduce negative mass terms. Two cases are demonstrated using the negative mass terms for repulsive delta potential problems in quantum mechanics. Our work shows that the KEP solution scheme can be used to obtain not only the exact energies but also the exact wavefuctions very precisely.

Multiscale and Multiphysics Mechanics•Jul 25, 2016•2 citations

A split kinetic energy solution scheme applied to various delta potentials in quantum mechanical systems

Yu-Hsin Chen, Sheng Der Chao

In this work, we extend the previously developed split kinetic energy (dubbed KEP) method by Mineo and Chao (2012) by modifying the mass parameter to include the negative mass. We first show how to separate the total system into the subsystems with 3 attractive delta potentials by using the KEP method. For repulsive delta potentials, we introduce "negative" mass terms. Two cases are demonstrated using the "negative" mass terms for repulsive delta potential problems in quantum mechanics. Our work shows that the KEP solution scheme can be used to obtain not only the exact energies but also the exact wavefunctions very precisely.

Coupled systems mechanics an international journal•Mar 25, 2017•4 citations

Method of Correlated Basis Functions

J. W. Clark, Paul A. Westhaus

The method of correlated basis functions provides a means of systematically exploiting our intuitive understanding of real physical systems. Here we seek especially to develop a formalism for describing systems of strongly interacting fermions, for example, nuclei and liquid ${\mathrm{He}}^{3}$, using a complete set of correlated functions ${\ensuremath{\Psi}}_{\mathrm{m}}=\frac{F{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{\mathrm{m}}}{{({\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{\mathrm{m}}, {F}^{2}{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{\mathrm{m}})}^{\frac{1}{2}}}$. $F$ is taken as a product of two-body factors, $\ensuremath{\Pi}{i<j}^{}[f({r}_{\mathrm{ij}})]$, the $f({r}_{\mathrm{ij}})$ embodying at least the correlations arising from strong short-range repulsions; and ${{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{\mathrm{m}}}$, a set of independent-particle-model functions which might serve as a basis in the absence of highly singular interactions. The matrix elements ${\mathfrak{H}}_{\mathrm{mn}}$, ${\mathfrak{N}}_{\mathrm{mn}}$ of the Hamiltonian and identity operators with respect to the correlated basis ${{\ensuremath{\Psi}}_{\mathrm{m}}}$ are evaluated by generalization of cluster-expansion techniques developed originally for the calculation of the partition function of a classical imperfect gas and adapted to the quantum-mechanical many-body problem by Iwamoto and Yamada. Contributions to our expansions for the ${\mathfrak{H}}_{\mathrm{mn}}$ are classified according to order of magnitude in the quantity $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\omega}$, where $\ensuremath{\omega}=\ensuremath{\int}({f}^{2}(r)\ensuremath{-}1)d\mathrm{r}$ is a "correlation parameter" and $\ensuremath{\rho}$ the average particle density. To the extent that $|\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\omega}|$ is small, it provides a true expansion parameter. A detailed technical discussion of the cluster expansions is given, with special emphasis on their symmetry properties upon truncation. Although the many-body problem is soluble by simultaneous diagonalization of the matrices (${\mathfrak{H}}_{\mathrm{mn}}$) and (${\mathfrak{N}}_{\mathrm{mn}}$), it is preferable first to transform to an orthonormal basis of "unperturbed" correlated functions ${{\ensuremath{\Theta}}_{\mathrm{m}}}$ with respect to which the Hamiltonian and identity operators have the matrix representations (${H}_{\mathrm{mn}}$) and $({N}_{\mathrm{mn}})=({\ensuremath{\delta}}_{\mathrm{mn}})$, and then to attempt the separate diagonalization of (${H}_{\mathrm{mn}}$). In general, such a transformation is expedited by the L\"owdin procedure carried out to the desired order in $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\omega}$. However, a Schmidt orthogonalization scheme might prove more advantageous in specific cases. Field-theoretic techniques (of both perturbative and nonperturbative nature) may be brought to bear in the diagonalization of (${H}_{\mathrm{mn}}$). The inverse of the unitary transformation which takes the basis ${{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{\mathrm{m}}}$ into the basis ${{\ensuremath{\Theta}}_{\mathrm{m}}}$, applied to the given singular Hamiltonian, leads---for any $F$ in the class considered---to a non-singular "effective Hamiltonian." Following this formal cue, we set out to construct explicitly a second-quantized effective Hamiltonian which generates the same matrix elements, to prescribed order in $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\omega}$, when operating between independent-particle kets of the model occupation-number representation, as does the given Hamiltonian in the configuration-space representation, between the corresponding correlated functions of the L\"owdin basis. The quasiparticles described by this effective Hamiltonian interact via well-behaved two-body, three-body, \ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}, $Q$-body, \ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{} potentials, in contrast to the highly singular two-body interactions of the real particles. For small $|\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\omega}|$, the effective two-body forces predominate. An avenue to deeper understanding of the applicability of the nuclear-shell model and the dressed-quasiparticle theory of liquid ${\mathrm{He}}^{3}$ has been opened. This article treats only the formalism for a uniform extended medium. Numerical calculations, as well as the extension of the method to finite systems, will follow.

Physical Review•Jan 21, 1966•160 citations

Many-body perturbation theory: expansion in the interaction

Richard M. Martin, Lucia Reining, David M. Ceperley

We especially need imagination in science. aria Mitchell Summary The many-body problem consists of two parts: the first is the non-interacting system in a materials-specific external potential; the second is the Coulomb interaction that makes the problem so hard to solve. The most straightforward idea is to use perturbation theory, with the Coulomb interaction as perturbation. This is conceptually simple, but it turns out to be difficult in practice, since the Coulomb interaction is often not small compared with typical energy differences, it is long-ranged and in the thermodynamic limit there is an infinite number of particles, contributing with an infinite number of mutual interaction processes. The present chapter outlines how one can deal with this problem. It contains an overview of facts that one can also find in many standard textbooks on the many-body problem, but that are useful to keep in mind in order to look at later chapters from a sound and well-established perspective. The many-body problem is a tough one, and it has many facets. Sorting it out is like putting together a huge puzzle. The eight introductory chapters of this book provide pieces of the puzzle, and ideas on what one might do about it. In the present chapter we choose to go in one of the possible directions, in order to arrive at something tangible. The chapter gives the general framework and the main ideas; specific approximations are the topic of Chs. 10–15. The idea is to start from an independent-particle problem and add the Coulomb interaction as a perturbation. This is not easy: first, the interaction is responsible for a rich variety of phenomena that are completely absent otherwise, such as the finite lifetime of quasiparticles, or additional structures in spectra due to the fact that a quasi-particle excitation may transfer its energy to other elementary excitations, for example plasmons. Second, because of the two-body Coulomb interaction, the problem scales badly with the number of electrons, and straightforward perturbation theory for the many-body hamiltonian with the Coulomb interaction as perturbation rapidly becomes intractable or even useless, especially in large systems. To get started, Sec. 9.1 recalls why things are not so easy. The following sections try to solve one problem after the other, starting from Sec. 9.2 where the Green's function is reformulated in a way that is appropriate for a perturbation expansion.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 31, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement and Asymmetric Matrix Calculation

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum entanglement, a fundamental phenomenon in quantum mechanics, holds the potential to revolutionize computation and simulation. This paper explores the development of a novel non-symmetric matrix calculation algorithm leveraging quantum entanglement to overcome limitations in current computational methods, particularly for complex quantum states. We introduce a new approach that circumvents the inherent asymmetries present in traditional matrix calculations, offering a promising path towards enhanced computational efficiency in both quantum computing and quantum simulation.

•Sep 2, 2026•0 citations

A Quantum Kinetic Monte Carlo Method for Quantum Many-Body Spin Dynamics

Zhenning Cai, Jianfeng Lu

We propose a general framework of a quantum kinetic Monte Carlo algorithm, based on a stochastic representation of a series expansion of the quantum evolution. Two approaches have been developed in the context of quantum many-body spin dynamics, using different decomposition of the Hamiltonian. The effectiveness of the methods is tested for many-body spin systems up to 40 spins.

arXiv:1709.00386•SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing•Jan 1, 2018•2 citations
Based on the idea of adiabatic symmetry, we present a novel basis set expansion method—the kinetic energy partition (KEP) method—for solving quantum eigenvalue problems. Broken symmetry is responsible for quantum entanglement in many-body systems via parametric non-adiabatic corrections. Starting from simple one-particle-in-one-dimension problems, we gradually increase the complexity in the number of particles and the interaction patterns. Our goal in the mini-review is to advocate for the utility of the KEP method in front-line research, in particular for research beginners in quantum many-body problems.
In this work, we extend the split previously developed kinetic energy (dubbed as KEP) method Mineo and Chao (2012) by modifying the mass parameter to include the mass. We first show how to separate the total system into the subsystems with 3 attractive delta potentials by using the KEP method. For repulsive delta potentials, we introduce negative mass terms. Two cases are demonstrated using the negative mass terms for repulsive delta potential problems in quantum mechanics. Our work shows that the KEP solution scheme can be used to obtain not only the exact energies but also the exact wavefuctions very precisely.
In this work, we extend the previously developed split kinetic energy (dubbed KEP) method by Mineo and Chao (2012) by modifying the mass parameter to include the negative mass. We first show how to separate the total system into the subsystems with 3 attractive delta potentials by using the KEP method. For repulsive delta potentials, we introduce "negative" mass terms. Two cases are demonstrated using the "negative" mass terms for repulsive delta potential problems in quantum mechanics. Our work shows that the KEP solution scheme can be used to obtain not only the exact energies but also the exact wavefunctions very precisely.
The method of correlated basis functions provides a means of systematically exploiting our intuitive understanding of real physical systems. Here we seek especially to develop a formalism for describing systems of strongly interacting fermions, for example, nuclei and liquid He3{\mathrm{He}}^{3}He3, using a complete set of correlated functions ${\ensuremath{\Psi}}_{\mathrm{m}}=\frac{F{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{\mathrm{m}}}{{({\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{\mathrm{m}}, {F}^{2}{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{\mathrm{m}})}^{\frac{1}{2}}}$. FFF is taken as a product of two-body factors, $\ensuremath{\Pi}{i<j}^{}[f({r}_{\mathrm{ij}})]$, the f(rij)f({r}_{\mathrm{ij}})f(rij​) embodying at least the correlations arising from strong short-range repulsions; and ${{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{\mathrm{m}}}$, a set of independent-particle-model functions which might serve as a basis in the absence of highly singular interactions. The matrix elements Hmn{\mathfrak{H}}_{\mathrm{mn}}Hmn​, Nmn{\mathfrak{N}}_{\mathrm{mn}}Nmn​ of the Hamiltonian and identity operators with respect to the correlated basis ${{\ensuremath{\Psi}}_{\mathrm{m}}}$ are evaluated by generalization of cluster-expansion techniques developed originally for the calculation of the partition function of a classical imperfect gas and adapted to the quantum-mechanical many-body problem by Iwamoto and Yamada. Contributions to our expansions for the Hmn{\mathfrak{H}}_{\mathrm{mn}}Hmn​ are classified according to order of magnitude in the quantity $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\omega}$, where $\ensuremath{\omega}=\ensuremath{\int}({f}^{2}(r)\ensuremath{-}1)d\mathrm{r}$ is a "correlation parameter" and $\ensuremath{\rho}$ the average particle density. To the extent that $|\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\omega}|$ is small, it provides a true expansion parameter. A detailed technical discussion of the cluster expansions is given, with special emphasis on their symmetry properties upon truncation. Although the many-body problem is soluble by simultaneous diagonalization of the matrices (Hmn{\mathfrak{H}}_{\mathrm{mn}}Hmn​) and (Nmn{\mathfrak{N}}_{\mathrm{mn}}Nmn​), it is preferable first to transform to an orthonormal basis of "unperturbed" correlated functions ${{\ensuremath{\Theta}}_{\mathrm{m}}}$ with respect to which the Hamiltonian and identity operators have the matrix representations (Hmn{H}_{\mathrm{mn}}Hmn​) and $({N}_{\mathrm{mn}})=({\ensuremath{\delta}}_{\mathrm{mn}})$, and then to attempt the separate diagonalization of (Hmn{H}_{\mathrm{mn}}Hmn​). In general, such a transformation is expedited by the L\"owdin procedure carried out to the desired order in $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\omega}$. However, a Schmidt orthogonalization scheme might prove more advantageous in specific cases. Field-theoretic techniques (of both perturbative and nonperturbative nature) may be brought to bear in the diagonalization of (Hmn{H}_{\mathrm{mn}}Hmn​). The inverse of the unitary transformation which takes the basis ${{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{\mathrm{m}}}$ into the basis ${{\ensuremath{\Theta}}_{\mathrm{m}}}$, applied to the given singular Hamiltonian, leads---for any FFF in the class considered---to a non-singular "effective Hamiltonian." Following this formal cue, we set out to construct explicitly a second-quantized effective Hamiltonian which generates the same matrix elements, to prescribed order in $\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\omega}$, when operating between independent-particle kets of the model occupation-number representation, as does the given Hamiltonian in the configuration-space representation, between the corresponding correlated functions of the L\"owdin basis. The quasiparticles described by this effective Hamiltonian interact via well-behaved two-body, three-body, \ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}, QQQ-body, \ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{} potentials, in contrast to the highly singular two-body interactions of the real particles. For small $|\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\omega}|$, the effective two-body forces predominate. An avenue to deeper understanding of the applicability of the nuclear-shell model and the dressed-quasiparticle theory of liquid He3{\mathrm{He}}^{3}He3 has been opened. This article treats only the formalism for a uniform extended medium. Numerical calculations, as well as the extension of the method to finite systems, will follow.
We especially need imagination in science. aria Mitchell Summary The many-body problem consists of two parts: the first is the non-interacting system in a materials-specific external potential; the second is the Coulomb interaction that makes the problem so hard to solve. The most straightforward idea is to use perturbation theory, with the Coulomb interaction as perturbation. This is conceptually simple, but it turns out to be difficult in practice, since the Coulomb interaction is often not small compared with typical energy differences, it is long-ranged and in the thermodynamic limit there is an infinite number of particles, contributing with an infinite number of mutual interaction processes. The present chapter outlines how one can deal with this problem. It contains an overview of facts that one can also find in many standard textbooks on the many-body problem, but that are useful to keep in mind in order to look at later chapters from a sound and well-established perspective. The many-body problem is a tough one, and it has many facets. Sorting it out is like putting together a huge puzzle. The eight introductory chapters of this book provide pieces of the puzzle, and ideas on what one might do about it. In the present chapter we choose to go in one of the possible directions, in order to arrive at something tangible. The chapter gives the general framework and the main ideas; specific approximations are the topic of Chs. 10–15. The idea is to start from an independent-particle problem and add the Coulomb interaction as a perturbation. This is not easy: first, the interaction is responsible for a rich variety of phenomena that are completely absent otherwise, such as the finite lifetime of quasiparticles, or additional structures in spectra due to the fact that a quasi-particle excitation may transfer its energy to other elementary excitations, for example plasmons. Second, because of the two-body Coulomb interaction, the problem scales badly with the number of electrons, and straightforward perturbation theory for the many-body hamiltonian with the Coulomb interaction as perturbation rapidly becomes intractable or even useless, especially in large systems. To get started, Sec. 9.1 recalls why things are not so easy. The following sections try to solve one problem after the other, starting from Sec. 9.2 where the Green's function is reformulated in a way that is appropriate for a perturbation expansion.
Quantum entanglement, a fundamental phenomenon in quantum mechanics, holds the potential to revolutionize computation and simulation. This paper explores the development of a novel non-symmetric matrix calculation algorithm leveraging quantum entanglement to overcome limitations in current computational methods, particularly for complex quantum states. We introduce a new approach that circumvents the inherent asymmetries present in traditional matrix calculations, offering a promising path towards enhanced computational efficiency in both quantum computing and quantum simulation.